IRC log of tsdtf on 2007-12-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:22:04 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf
- 13:22:04 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-tsdtf-irc
- 13:22:09 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #tsdtf
- 13:22:15 [shadi]
- zakim, this will be tsd
- 13:22:15 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
- 13:22:22 [shadi]
- meeting: TSD TF
- 13:22:58 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has joined #tsdtf
- 13:23:09 [shadi]
- chair: CarlosV, Christophe
- 13:23:42 [Christophe]
- Christophe has joined #tsdtf
- 13:25:42 [shadi]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Dec/0011.html
- 13:25:57 [shadi]
- agenda+ Announcements
- 13:26:06 [shadi]
- agenda+ Reviewing test samples for current working draft
- 13:26:17 [shadi]
- agenda+ Test suite ID in metadata
- 13:26:27 [shadi]
- agenda+ Review of action items
- 13:30:46 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started
- 13:30:54 [Zakim]
- +Helen
- 13:31:09 [shadi]
- zakim, helen is actually shadi
- 13:31:09 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'helen is actually shadi', shadi
- 13:31:19 [shadi]
- zakim, helen is really shadi
- 13:31:19 [Zakim]
- +shadi; got it
- 13:31:20 [Zakim]
- +Drew_LaHart
- 13:31:24 [Zakim]
- -shadi
- 13:31:25 [Zakim]
- +shadi
- 13:31:39 [Zakim]
- +Christophe_Strobbe
- 13:32:04 [Zakim]
- +Vangelis_Karkaletsis
- 13:32:51 [Christophe]
- Regrets: CarlosV
- 13:34:10 [carlosI]
- carlosI has joined #tsdtf
- 13:35:33 [Drew]
- Drew has joined #tsdtf
- 13:35:47 [Drew]
- Good morning all
- 13:36:16 [Drew]
- Ahhh yes, good afternoon:)
- 13:37:17 [Christophe]
- scribe: Drew
- 13:37:55 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 13:37:55 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Announcements" taken up [from shadi]
- 13:38:38 [Drew]
- 45 new test samples uploaded
- 13:39:02 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList
- 13:39:12 [Drew]
- should be fewer issues during structure review due to scricter rules.
- 13:39:16 [Drew]
- all new test samples are in the wiki
- 13:39:30 [Zakim]
- + +49.843.9.aaaa
- 13:39:52 [Drew]
- previous 3 comments were from Christophe
- 13:40:05 [Christophe]
- Zakim, +49 is CarlosI
- 13:40:05 [Zakim]
- +CarlosI; got it
- 13:40:53 [CarlosV]
- CarlosV has joined #tsdtf
- 13:41:16 [Drew]
- Shadi forwarded SSH key to systems team (AJL)
- 13:41:48 [Drew]
- WCAG working Group has approved Working Draft. Last Call draft expected very soon (SAZ)
- 13:41:52 [CarlosV]
- Connecting from review meeting ;-)
- 13:42:35 [Drew]
- When Last Call comes out, more focus on techniques and failures (SAZ)
- 13:44:56 [Drew]
- Zakim, take up agendum 2
- 13:44:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Reviewing test samples for current working draft" taken up [from shadi]
- 13:45:28 [Drew]
- CS: No new reviews this week.
- 13:46:24 [Drew]
- CS: Fixed all the issues found by CV last week. Should be ready for another review. Many test samples with CSS and Javascript code inside HTML files. In the newest test files, these issues should not exist.
- 13:51:21 [Drew]
- CS: CV raised issue of primary and complexity attibutes. They are required in TCDL2, may want to make them optional
- 13:53:38 [Drew]
- s/CV/CI
- 13:56:15 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL
- 13:57:09 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.3.1_l1_045.xml
- 13:57:29 [shadi]
- <rule primary="yes" xlink:href="http://bentoweb.org/refs/rulesets.xml#WCAG2_20060427_1.3_content-structure-separation-programmatic">
- 13:58:22 [Drew]
- SAZ: Is the question, is primary always "yes"? ie: is it always redundant?
- 13:58:35 [Drew]
- CI: This is a compatiability issue.
- 13:59:02 [Drew]
- s/compatiability/compatability
- 13:59:54 [Drew]
- CI: In our use case, we should focus on the primary rule. The sample will map to one rule.
- 14:00:12 [Drew]
- CS: That means the test sample needs to pass all of WCAG except the primary rule.
- 14:01:33 [Drew]
- SAZ: Each test sample must link to at least one technique. One test sample could meet more than one technique or use case. A test sample can show more than one thing, so it makes sense to have a primary and a secondary.
- 14:02:23 [Drew]
- CI: We decided some time ago we would focus on one WCAG requirement in each test sample.
- 14:02:24 [CarlosV]
- CarlosV has joined #tsdtf
- 14:02:56 [Drew]
- s/requirement/success criterion
- 14:09:58 [Drew]
- SAZ: If you do not meet 1.4.3 you will not meet 1.4.5. Some of the SC are in direct relationship to each other. In that case, its useful to have this relationship info in the metadata as well.
- 14:10:00 [EtnaRosso]
- EtnaRosso has joined #tsdtf
- 14:11:16 [Drew]
- SAZ: The question that CI raises is what is the criteria for calling something primary vs secondary.
- 14:14:38 [shadi]
- vk: in BenToWeb we use rules to point to different version of the WCAG documents
- 14:14:49 [Drew]
- Christophe V: in BenToWeb, we also use 'primary="no"' to reference versions of the same SC in older WCAG drafts
- 14:15:14 [carlosI]
- Not sure what the "it must not combine several issues in one test" mean if we use several rules
- 14:16:24 [Drew]
- CS: Easiest way to proceed is to make primary attribute optional. Make the default value yes, but this removes the possibility to map to several SC>
- 14:16:32 [Drew]
- s/>/.
- 14:17:51 [EtnaRosso]
- hi Christophe hi all
- 14:18:13 [Drew]
- CI: if we allow the use of several rules, not sure what it means to combine several issues into 1 test. If we do this, we need to change the first step in the content review.
- 14:19:02 [EtnaRosso]
- what is this channel about?
- 14:20:29 [Drew]
- CS: We need to clarify what "issue" means. The terminology is different between the WCAG doc and the review process document.
- 14:21:54 [Drew]
- Action: CI to continue discussion on the mailing list
- 14:22:14 [Drew]
- s/discussion/discussion of primary and secondary attributes
- 14:24:03 [Drew]
- CS: CR has uploaded test cases to the wiki
- 14:24:25 [Drew]
- s/CR/RR
- 14:24:44 [EtnaRosso]
- ah ok it is a "one time" channel
- 14:24:50 [Drew]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 14:24:50 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Test suite ID in metadata" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:25:36 [EtnaRosso]
- see you gui, have a nice meeting
- 14:25:44 [EtnaRosso]
- EtnaRosso has left #tsdtf
- 14:27:43 [Christophe]
- Test Suite ID: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Dec/0000.html
- 14:27:45 [Drew]
- s/Christophe V/VK
- 14:28:46 [Drew]
- Continue this discussion on the mailing list.
- 14:29:28 [Drew]
- Next meeting 8 January 2008
- 14:30:05 [Zakim]
- -Vangelis_Karkaletsis
- 14:30:07 [Zakim]
- -shadi
- 14:30:12 [Zakim]
- -CarlosI
- 14:30:25 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has left #tsdtf
- 14:30:25 [Zakim]
- -Christophe_Strobbe
- 14:31:18 [shadi]
- no thanks, i'll do that
- 14:31:43 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 14:31:43 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Drew_LaHart
- 14:31:47 [Zakim]
- -Drew_LaHart
- 14:31:49 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended
- 14:31:50 [Zakim]
- Attendees were shadi, Drew_LaHart, Christophe_Strobbe, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, +49.843.9.aaaa, CarlosI
- 14:31:54 [shadi]
- zakim, bye
- 14:31:54 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tsdtf
- 14:32:00 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:32:05 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:32:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi
- 14:32:06 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:32:10 [shadi]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:32:10 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-tsdtf-actions.rdf :
- 14:32:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: CI to continue discussion on the mailing list [1]
- 14:32:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-tsdtf-irc#T14-21-54