14:51:24 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 14:51:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-bpwg-irc 14:51:26 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:51:27 Zakim has joined #bpwg 14:51:29 Zakim, this will be BPWG 14:51:29 ok, trackbot-ng; I see MWI_BPWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 14:51:31 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 14:51:33 Date: 29 November 2007 14:52:17 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2007Nov/0008.html 14:52:20 Chair: Jo 14:53:16 Regrets: Bruno, PhilA, Adam, DanA 14:53:48 regrets+ Bryan 14:53:58 chaals has joined #bpwg 14:54:14 [I will be late joining :( ] 14:55:32 -> http://www.bnettv.com/player.php?id=864 Sean Owen on TV :) 14:56:19 kemp has joined #bpwg 14:58:03 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has now started 14:58:10 + +1.519.880.aaaa 14:58:46 i think the conference code on the website is wrong (BPWG != BCTF) 14:58:50 zakim, code? 14:58:50 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), dom 14:59:12 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/#teleconferences 14:59:19 +Dom 14:59:27 Zakim: aaaa is kemp 14:59:29 miguel has joined #bpwg 14:59:53 rob has joined #bpwg 14:59:53 Zakim, aaaa is kemp 14:59:53 +kemp; got it 15:00:26 +[CTIC] 15:00:34 clearly i'm the one that needs to work on the BPWG != BCTF inequality 15:00:52 Zakim, [CTIC] is me 15:00:52 +miguel; got it 15:00:57 + +020899aabb 15:01:02 zakim, aabb is me 15:01:02 +jo; got it 15:01:22 + +1.781.267.aacc 15:01:32 Magnus has joined #bpwg 15:01:45 zakim, code? 15:01:45 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Magnus 15:02:25 + +46.3.17.47.aadd 15:02:34 zakim, aadd is Magnus 15:02:37 +Magnus; got it 15:03:22 abel has joined #bpwg 15:03:34 Zakim, abel is with me 15:03:34 +abel; got it 15:03:53 zakim, who is on the call? 15:03:53 On the phone I see kemp, Dom, miguel, jo, +1.781.267.aacc, Magnus 15:03:54 miguel has miguel, abel 15:04:06 zakim, aacc is Shahriar 15:04:06 +Shahriar; got it 15:04:16 drooks has joined #bpwg 15:04:22 + +079320aaee 15:04:35 zakim, aaee is rob 15:04:35 +rob; got it 15:04:39 SeanP has joined #bpwg 15:04:39 +Ed_Mitukiewicz 15:05:02 skarim has joined #bpwg 15:05:04 edm has joined #bpwg 15:05:16 Regrets+ Nacho 15:05:28 zakim, pick a victim 15:05:28 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose miguel 15:06:10 + +1.630.414.aaff 15:06:22 zakim, aaff is SeanP 15:06:22 +SeanP; got it 15:06:28 ScribeNick: kemp 15:06:36 Scribe: Aaron Kemp 15:06:43 Topic: Good standing 15:07:13 jo: first off, good standing... for this charter, we'll be more strict about maintaining records on good standing... wanted to make sure everyone was aware of that... 15:07:33 +??P22 15:07:45 ... things like, if you are a member of the group, you need to answer to the surveys, come to teleconferences, etc... in the last charter, we ended up with lots of regrets all the time 15:07:51 ... any comments about that? 15:07:55 zakim, ??P22 is drooks 15:07:55 +drooks; got it 15:08:09 zakim, drooks 15:08:09 I don't understand 'drooks', jo 15:08:37 Magnus: i was a bit surprising to see how many were in bad standing in the group... curious about how they got bad standing? 15:08:52 -> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=37584 Current view of the group 15:08:54 jo: i think it was the crossover from the old charter to the new charter 15:09:19 +??P18 15:09:27 zakim, ??p18 is really me 15:09:27 +chaals; got it 15:09:33 dom: not quite sure where the bad standing stats come from... i think we should reset the flags and wait for us to define rules. i'll clean up the list 15:09:36 zakim, mute me please 15:09:36 chaals should now be muted 15:10:06 jo: anything else on good standing? 15:10:43 Topic: CT Task force 15:11:02 [everybody is back in good standing for the time being] 15:11:04 jo: reports from taskforces... from the content transformation group: we're still looking for a leader of the group... a new draft of the document should appear shortly (today/tomorrow) 15:11:17 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/latest CT Draft 15:11:46 Topic: checker TF 15:12:06 jo: on to checker... sean is not here, so very briefly: a number of bugs have been worked through, work continuing... target of january for beta release 15:12:21 Topic: mobileOK Pro poll 15:12:33 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/MobileOK-Pro/ Poll 15:12:50 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/MobileOK-Pro/results results 15:14:01 jo: according to the mobile OK pro poll, the answer is a fairly solid "yes"... since kai and archer are not on the call, there's not much we can say except that assuming we can find someone to act as leader, it looks like it is going ahead 15:14:20 ... let's put it on hold until the next time kai is on the call to see if he wants to lead the TF 15:14:59 ack me 15:15:23 jo: has anyone had a chance to look at the accessibility document? 15:15:44 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/latest Document 15:16:06 chaals: yes, i've sent some more comments... 15:16:13 Topic: Accessility doc 15:16:50 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwbp-wcag-20071125 Current latest version, dated Nov 25 15:16:53 jo: my comment is that i'm not quite sure whether the target of the document is clearly focused. it seems to be that it could be about a number of things and right now it's about a mixture of those things 15:17:04 s/comments.../comments, and think that it is moving ahead steadily/ 15:18:26 regrets+ bindu_rao 15:18:28 chaals: i have a similar concern, i think it needs to be clearer about who it's for. i think there are some things being fixed up that will help, but i think there is work to do. 15:19:13 ... i think it's a big chunk of work, but don't think there is need for concern about the timeline, we raise issues and move forward 15:20:08 jo: ok anything else? not sure where Alan is... 15:21:24 ... ok, any other business? 15:22:31 agenda+ republication of mobileOK CR 15:23:15 q? 15:24:14 dom: i found a small but annoying bug in the mobile OK spec: useragent string defined by the spec is not the one we had decided on a few months ago. 15:24:51 ... given that websites are likely to fairly strictly match against the string, while the error is minor, it is a fairly serious bug. so we are going to publish a new version tomorrow with a fix 15:24:57 zakim, take up agendum 1 15:24:57 agendum 1. "republication of mobileOK CR" taken up [from dom] 15:25:12 jo: ok thanks dom, so everyone make sure you are using the right string 15:25:42 -kemp 15:25:43 -rob 15:25:45 -Magnus 15:25:46 -Dom 15:25:47 -Shahriar 15:25:50 -drooks 15:25:51 -miguel 15:25:51 -jo 15:25:53 -SeanP 15:25:58 -Ed_Mitukiewicz 15:25:59 -chaals 15:26:01 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has ended 15:26:02 Attendees were +1.519.880.aaaa, Dom, kemp, miguel, +020899aabb, jo, +1.781.267.aacc, +46.3.17.47.aadd, Magnus, abel, Shahriar, +079320aaee, rob, Ed_Mitukiewicz, +1.630.414.aaff, 15:26:04 ... SeanP, drooks, chaals 15:26:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-bpwg-minutes.html dom 15:26:14 Zakim, bye 15:26:14 Zakim has left #bpwg 15:26:18 [sure Alan will be annoyed to have missed this slot to speak about the doc] 15:26:26 [thanks Aaron for scribing] 15:34:37 achuter has joined #bpwg 15:34:57 hi achuter... we adjourned early :/ 15:35:05 since we had no news from you 15:35:15 I guess the review of the document will have to wait until next week 15:35:18 abel has left #bpwg 15:35:19 RRSAgent, bye 15:35:19 I see no action items