IRC log of bpwg on 2007-11-29
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:51:24 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #bpwg
- 14:51:24 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-bpwg-irc
- 14:51:26 [trackbot-ng]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 14:51:27 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #bpwg
- 14:51:29 [trackbot-ng]
- Zakim, this will be BPWG
- 14:51:29 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot-ng; I see MWI_BPWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes
- 14:51:31 [trackbot-ng]
- Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
- 14:51:33 [trackbot-ng]
- Date: 29 November 2007
- 14:52:17 [dom]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2007Nov/0008.html
- 14:52:20 [dom]
- Chair: Jo
- 14:53:16 [dom]
- Regrets: Bruno, PhilA, Adam, DanA
- 14:53:48 [jo]
- regrets+ Bryan
- 14:53:58 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #bpwg
- 14:54:14 [chaals]
- [I will be late joining :( ]
- 14:55:32 [dom]
- -> http://www.bnettv.com/player.php?id=864 Sean Owen on TV :)
- 14:56:19 [kemp]
- kemp has joined #bpwg
- 14:58:03 [Zakim]
- MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has now started
- 14:58:10 [Zakim]
- + +1.519.880.aaaa
- 14:58:46 [kemp]
- i think the conference code on the website is wrong (BPWG != BCTF)
- 14:58:50 [dom]
- zakim, code?
- 14:58:50 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), dom
- 14:59:12 [kemp]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/#teleconferences
- 14:59:19 [Zakim]
- +Dom
- 14:59:27 [kemp]
- Zakim: aaaa is kemp
- 14:59:29 [miguel]
- miguel has joined #bpwg
- 14:59:53 [rob]
- rob has joined #bpwg
- 14:59:53 [dom]
- Zakim, aaaa is kemp
- 14:59:53 [Zakim]
- +kemp; got it
- 15:00:26 [Zakim]
- +[CTIC]
- 15:00:34 [kemp]
- clearly i'm the one that needs to work on the BPWG != BCTF inequality
- 15:00:52 [miguel]
- Zakim, [CTIC] is me
- 15:00:52 [Zakim]
- +miguel; got it
- 15:00:57 [Zakim]
- + +020899aabb
- 15:01:02 [jo]
- zakim, aabb is me
- 15:01:02 [Zakim]
- +jo; got it
- 15:01:22 [Zakim]
- + +1.781.267.aacc
- 15:01:32 [Magnus]
- Magnus has joined #bpwg
- 15:01:45 [Magnus]
- zakim, code?
- 15:01:45 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Magnus
- 15:02:25 [Zakim]
- + +46.3.17.47.aadd
- 15:02:34 [dom]
- zakim, aadd is Magnus
- 15:02:37 [Zakim]
- +Magnus; got it
- 15:03:22 [abel]
- abel has joined #bpwg
- 15:03:34 [miguel]
- Zakim, abel is with me
- 15:03:34 [Zakim]
- +abel; got it
- 15:03:53 [jo]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 15:03:53 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see kemp, Dom, miguel, jo, +1.781.267.aacc, Magnus
- 15:03:54 [Zakim]
- miguel has miguel, abel
- 15:04:06 [dom]
- zakim, aacc is Shahriar
- 15:04:06 [Zakim]
- +Shahriar; got it
- 15:04:16 [drooks]
- drooks has joined #bpwg
- 15:04:22 [Zakim]
- + +079320aaee
- 15:04:35 [dom]
- zakim, aaee is rob
- 15:04:35 [Zakim]
- +rob; got it
- 15:04:39 [SeanP]
- SeanP has joined #bpwg
- 15:04:39 [Zakim]
- +Ed_Mitukiewicz
- 15:05:02 [skarim]
- skarim has joined #bpwg
- 15:05:04 [edm]
- edm has joined #bpwg
- 15:05:16 [dom]
- Regrets+ Nacho
- 15:05:28 [jo]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 15:05:28 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose miguel
- 15:06:10 [Zakim]
- + +1.630.414.aaff
- 15:06:22 [dom]
- zakim, aaff is SeanP
- 15:06:22 [Zakim]
- +SeanP; got it
- 15:06:28 [dom]
- ScribeNick: kemp
- 15:06:36 [dom]
- Scribe: Aaron Kemp
- 15:06:43 [dom]
- Topic: Good standing
- 15:07:13 [kemp]
- jo: first off, good standing... for this charter, we'll be more strict about maintaining records on good standing... wanted to make sure everyone was aware of that...
- 15:07:33 [Zakim]
- +??P22
- 15:07:45 [kemp]
- ... things like, if you are a member of the group, you need to answer to the surveys, come to teleconferences, etc... in the last charter, we ended up with lots of regrets all the time
- 15:07:51 [kemp]
- ... any comments about that?
- 15:07:55 [drooks]
- zakim, ??P22 is drooks
- 15:07:55 [Zakim]
- +drooks; got it
- 15:08:09 [jo]
- zakim, drooks
- 15:08:09 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'drooks', jo
- 15:08:37 [kemp]
- Magnus: i was a bit surprising to see how many were in bad standing in the group... curious about how they got bad standing?
- 15:08:52 [dom]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=37584 Current view of the group
- 15:08:54 [kemp]
- jo: i think it was the crossover from the old charter to the new charter
- 15:09:19 [Zakim]
- +??P18
- 15:09:27 [chaals]
- zakim, ??p18 is really me
- 15:09:27 [Zakim]
- +chaals; got it
- 15:09:33 [kemp]
- dom: not quite sure where the bad standing stats come from... i think we should reset the flags and wait for us to define rules. i'll clean up the list
- 15:09:36 [chaals]
- zakim, mute me please
- 15:09:36 [Zakim]
- chaals should now be muted
- 15:10:06 [kemp]
- jo: anything else on good standing?
- 15:10:43 [dom]
- Topic: CT Task force
- 15:11:02 [dom]
- [everybody is back in good standing for the time being]
- 15:11:04 [kemp]
- jo: reports from taskforces... from the content transformation group: we're still looking for a leader of the group... a new draft of the document should appear shortly (today/tomorrow)
- 15:11:17 [jo]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/latest CT Draft
- 15:11:46 [dom]
- Topic: checker TF
- 15:12:06 [kemp]
- jo: on to checker... sean is not here, so very briefly: a number of bugs have been worked through, work continuing... target of january for beta release
- 15:12:21 [dom]
- Topic: mobileOK Pro poll
- 15:12:33 [jo]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/MobileOK-Pro/ Poll
- 15:12:50 [dom]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/MobileOK-Pro/results results
- 15:14:01 [kemp]
- jo: according to the mobile OK pro poll, the answer is a fairly solid "yes"... since kai and archer are not on the call, there's not much we can say except that assuming we can find someone to act as leader, it looks like it is going ahead
- 15:14:20 [kemp]
- ... let's put it on hold until the next time kai is on the call to see if he wants to lead the TF
- 15:14:59 [chaals]
- ack me
- 15:15:23 [kemp]
- jo: has anyone had a chance to look at the accessibility document?
- 15:15:44 [jo]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/latest Document
- 15:16:06 [kemp]
- chaals: yes, i've sent some more comments...
- 15:16:13 [dom]
- Topic: Accessility doc
- 15:16:50 [dom]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwbp-wcag-20071125 Current latest version, dated Nov 25
- 15:16:53 [kemp]
- jo: my comment is that i'm not quite sure whether the target of the document is clearly focused. it seems to be that it could be about a number of things and right now it's about a mixture of those things
- 15:17:04 [chaals]
- s/comments.../comments, and think that it is moving ahead steadily/
- 15:18:26 [jo]
- regrets+ bindu_rao
- 15:18:28 [kemp]
- chaals: i have a similar concern, i think it needs to be clearer about who it's for. i think there are some things being fixed up that will help, but i think there is work to do.
- 15:19:13 [kemp]
- ... i think it's a big chunk of work, but don't think there is need for concern about the timeline, we raise issues and move forward
- 15:20:08 [kemp]
- jo: ok anything else? not sure where Alan is...
- 15:21:24 [kemp]
- ... ok, any other business?
- 15:22:31 [dom]
- agenda+ republication of mobileOK CR
- 15:23:15 [jo]
- q?
- 15:24:14 [kemp]
- dom: i found a small but annoying bug in the mobile OK spec: useragent string defined by the spec is not the one we had decided on a few months ago.
- 15:24:51 [kemp]
- ... given that websites are likely to fairly strictly match against the string, while the error is minor, it is a fairly serious bug. so we are going to publish a new version tomorrow with a fix
- 15:24:57 [dom]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 15:24:57 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "republication of mobileOK CR" taken up [from dom]
- 15:25:12 [kemp]
- jo: ok thanks dom, so everyone make sure you are using the right string
- 15:25:42 [Zakim]
- -kemp
- 15:25:43 [Zakim]
- -rob
- 15:25:45 [Zakim]
- -Magnus
- 15:25:46 [Zakim]
- -Dom
- 15:25:47 [Zakim]
- -Shahriar
- 15:25:50 [Zakim]
- -drooks
- 15:25:51 [Zakim]
- -miguel
- 15:25:51 [Zakim]
- -jo
- 15:25:53 [Zakim]
- -SeanP
- 15:25:58 [Zakim]
- -Ed_Mitukiewicz
- 15:25:59 [Zakim]
- -chaals
- 15:26:01 [Zakim]
- MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has ended
- 15:26:02 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.519.880.aaaa, Dom, kemp, miguel, +020899aabb, jo, +1.781.267.aacc, +46.3.17.47.aadd, Magnus, abel, Shahriar, +079320aaee, rob, Ed_Mitukiewicz, +1.630.414.aaff,
- 15:26:04 [Zakim]
- ... SeanP, drooks, chaals
- 15:26:09 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-bpwg-minutes.html dom
- 15:26:14 [dom]
- Zakim, bye
- 15:26:14 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #bpwg
- 15:26:18 [jo]
- [sure Alan will be annoyed to have missed this slot to speak about the doc]
- 15:26:26 [jo]
- [thanks Aaron for scribing]
- 15:34:37 [achuter]
- achuter has joined #bpwg
- 15:34:57 [dom]
- hi achuter... we adjourned early :/
- 15:35:05 [dom]
- since we had no news from you
- 15:35:15 [dom]
- I guess the review of the document will have to wait until next week
- 15:35:18 [abel]
- abel has left #bpwg
- 15:35:19 [dom]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 15:35:19 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items