00:09:01 Lachy has joined #html-wg 00:40:29 DanC_lap has joined #html-wg 01:02:04 gavin has joined #html-wg 01:36:10 anne has joined #html-wg 01:43:18 anne2 has joined #html-wg 02:07:31 timbl has joined #html-wg 02:26:27 timbl has joined #html-wg 02:30:50 marcos has joined #html-wg 02:41:47 marcos has joined #html-wg 02:55:32 myakura has joined #html-wg 02:59:24 mjs has joined #html-wg 03:00:18 mjs has joined #html-wg 03:09:43 jgraham_ has joined #html-wg 03:09:45 gavin has joined #html-wg 03:16:20 tantek has joined #html-wg 03:17:25 tantek_ has joined #html-wg 03:23:52 So I think Timed Text is a no-op 03:24:27 Six namespaces, duplicating tons of functionality in HTML and CSS, etc. 03:24:55 s/no-op/no-go/ 03:47:29 hober has joined #html-wg 04:12:08 marcos has joined #html-wg 04:16:25 Zeros has joined #html-wg 04:23:24 marcospod has joined #html-wg 04:41:15 jgraham_ has joined #html-wg 05:10:37 Zeros_ has joined #html-wg 05:14:25 marcos has joined #html-wg 05:17:04 gavin has joined #html-wg 05:23:25 marcos has joined #html-wg 07:24:23 gavin has joined #html-wg 07:40:43 Zeros has joined #html-wg 07:46:18 Lachy has joined #html-wg 08:41:44 Sander has joined #html-wg 09:32:11 gavin has joined #html-wg 09:48:57 ROBOd has joined #html-wg 09:52:49 Julian has joined #html-wg 10:15:11 kazuhito has joined #html-wg 10:23:48 Lachy_ has joined #html-wg 10:39:33 Sander has joined #html-wg 11:15:11 Sander has joined #html-wg 11:37:57 Ooh, Opera supports -apple-dashboard-region in CSS 11:39:04 timbl has joined #html-wg 11:39:41 gavin has joined #html-wg 11:55:58 karl has joined #html-wg 11:56:20 yeah, but I think it's a bit strange it was added with the -apple- prefix instead of -o- 11:56:53 AFIAK, apple widgets aren't compatible with opera widgets anyway 12:01:23 Does WebKit still support -apple-dashboard-region? The source code only mentions -webkit-dashboard-region, but maybe they do a s/-apple-/-webkit-/ on the input or something 12:03:29 Hmm, Opera doesn't even support some of the dashboard-region syntax from the Apple documentation 12:03:38 The support is very, very minimal 12:05:02 O9.2 reserialises style="-apple-dashboard-region: dashboard-region(control circle 15px 15px 75px 15px);" into STYLE='apple-dashboard-region: circle' 12:05:18 but O9.5 handles that correctly 12:05:39 ... because it doesn't actually reserialise the style attribute at all 12:07:09 ... so actually O9.5 reserialises into style="-apple-dashboard-region: circle 15px 15px 75px 15px" 12:07:33 so O9.2 does look about as minimal as possible, but O9.5 is somewhat better :-) 12:08:22 Well, let me know if you can make it do something useful 12:08:51 I can't see it doing anything in normal web pages, and I don't care about widgets so I have no idea if it does anything there :-p 12:10:00 Julian has joined #html-wg 12:11:29 Sander has joined #html-wg 12:20:10 Lachy_ has joined #html-wg 12:29:29 Sander has joined #html-wg 12:39:58 MikeSmith has joined #html-wg 12:39:58 billyjack has joined #html-wg 12:55:57 jgraham_ has joined #html-wg 13:25:35 timbl has joined #html-wg 13:27:42 kazuhito has joined #html-wg 13:32:34 olivier has joined #html-wg 13:40:07 timbl has joined #html-wg 13:46:05 Kuruma - you around? 13:47:03 tH_ has joined #html-wg 13:47:17 gavin has joined #html-wg 14:01:58 oedipus has joined #html-wg 14:02:52 olivier has joined #html-wg 14:16:26 DanC_lap has joined #html-wg 14:17:17 shepazu has joined #html-wg 14:18:40 dbaron has joined #html-wg 14:20:32 jun has joined #html-wg 14:27:18 Lachy_ has joined #html-wg 14:39:49 Lachy_ has joined #html-wg 14:52:02 Sander has joined #html-wg 15:04:05 Lachy_ has joined #html-wg 15:17:03 hey, will there be an audio stream today? 15:17:28 Lachy_ - nope 15:17:30 hmm... task forces in other languages... great idea for HTML WG 15:18:14 ok, I guess I'll just have to follow on IRC then 15:18:54 hmm... MikeSmith , I don't mind if somebody audiocasts the HTML WG meeting 15:19:20 DanC_lap - so let's get somebody to do that 15:19:26 I'd have to check with Chris W. 15:19:32 any volunteers? 15:19:45 yes, do try to find somebody, MikeSmith 15:20:09 What mechanism were we using to stream the talk yesterday? 15:20:16 something kinda elaborate 15:20:24 Ralph knows about it 15:20:30 and Ted 15:20:43 I will check with Ralph and/or Ted then 15:20:45 maybe not that elaborate; I think it's on/near media.w3.org 15:21:31 k 15:21:37 quick temporary fix? http://www.nch.com.au/streaming/index.html 15:21:57 Probably we don't need to have anything set up for the HTMLWG session tomorrow, right? 15:22:08 just checking: is the f2f starting at 13:30? 15:22:31 hsivonen - aye 15:23:04 can someone please ping me if/when an audio stream is set up and when the meeting starts? 15:23:17 anybody hip to ices2? 15:23:25 that's what they were using yesterday 15:23:31 re NCH BroadWave you can use it for free provided "This software has two modes. A free version which has full features but requires you to have a link to our site on every page with a link to the stream." 15:23:33 we need a machine with ices2 installed 15:23:39 and we need a decent microphone 15:23:50 microphones are in short supply 15:24:06 MikeSmith: thanks 15:24:08 BroadWave runs on linux, mac, and windows and is compatible with IE, FF, Safari 15:24:22 oedipus - OK 15:24:35 I guess the main thing we really need is a mic 15:24:48 hasather has joined #html-wg 15:25:23 How many mics do we rip on the daily? me say many money me say many many man 15:25:25 y 15:28:26 aye, 13:30 Boston time. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07 15:29:02 DanC_lap has changed the topic to: HTML WG meeting starts 13:30 in Charles View (more logs: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/ ) 15:29:13 DanC_lap has changed the topic to: HTML WG meeting starts 13:30 in Charles View http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07 (more logs: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/ ) 15:31:29 Julian_Reschke has joined #html-wg 15:37:27 billmason has joined #html-wg 15:38:58 oedipus, in your response to the survey about publihsing the HTML5 draft, I don't understand your comment about there being competing specs. They aren't competing. The WHATWG spec and the W3C spec are identical (except for the metadata at the top) 15:40:06 ROOM CHANGE... 15:43:14 DanC_lap has changed the topic to: HTML WG meeting starts 13:30 in Empress Ballroom on the 14th floor http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07 (more logs: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/ ) 15:43:58 lachy - if that is so, then why not commit to a single draft and single track for HTML5? all feedback is welcome, but the only working draft should be the one housed in W3C space; WHAT WG can continue to develop its own version of HTML5, but the normative draft should be the one based upon the original WHAT WG submission to the W3C 15:45:08 oedipus, the point is we don't want two separate drafts. I don't see the problem in mirroring the same draft in 2 places 15:45:08 oedipus: not everyone can contribute to the W3C draft sadly 15:45:53 indeed. the W3C's rules about member organisations and prevent some people from joining the HTMLWG if they are employees of W3C members 15:46:20 ... and their employers don't nominate them 15:46:24 oedipus - what you describe is what the current draft available on the W3C site already is, it seems to me at least 15:46:38 it is a single draft 15:46:45 just mirrored, as Lachy_ points out 15:46:52 gsnedders: can you explain why not everyone can contribute? 15:47:01 karl: Lachy_ just did so 15:47:02 oedipus, it seems to me that what you're asking us to do, by letting the WHATWG develop it's own version, is exactly what you're saying we shouldn't do 15:47:35 Lachy: W3C doesn't prevent them to join the group. 15:47:53 karl: how can they, then? 15:47:54 why then mark the WHAT WG draft as a "Call For Comments — 27 October 2007". and shouldn't the rest of the introductory text at least mention that this is a mirror of the draft in W3C space, and encourage feedback to both fora? 15:48:03 by going through their employers. 15:48:20 also, some people choose not to join the HTMLWG due to the volume of traffic and nonsense that goes on there sometimes, whereas they can easily subscribe and contribue to WHATWG since it's much easier to follow 15:48:24 karl: but if the W3C didn't have that requirement, we wouldn't be in this situation at the first time 15:48:33 *in the first place 15:48:40 gsnedders: patent policy is a feature not a bug 15:49:17 lachy: i'm not going to deny anyone's right to develop or comment upon a specification, but there needs to be a central repository for feedback and issue tracking 15:49:19 karl: there are people who can't join the WG because their employer won't let them join the WG. it's not a theoretical issue. 15:49:23 oedipus, because it was a snapshot of the spec as it was on that date, and because publishing a spec there doesn't have to go through the same politics that it goes through in the HTMLWG 15:49:36 gsnedders: I would love to know who 15:49:50 lachy, then why submit the spec to the W3C in the first place? 15:50:13 because we needed the patent policy for other groups of people and organisations to participate 15:50:23 oedipus - a central place for issue tracking is doable 15:50:35 right, the W3C issue tracker DanC set up 15:50:37 a central place for feedback doesn't seem doable to me 15:51:06 any editor can possibly get feedback from a lot of different places 15:51:06 oedipus, feedback comes from many places around the web, beyond even the HTMLWG and WHATWG lists. 15:51:09 karl: I know that Sam Ruby couldn't join for quite a while because of it, and I've heard of others 15:51:20 s/politics/community life/ 15:51:25 ... feedback from multiple mailing lists, etc. 15:51:28 MikeSmith: but if the feedback funneled to the WHAT WG isn't funneled to the HTML WG, we have separate conversations occuring over ostensively the same document 15:51:33 gsnedders: yes but he finally joined 15:51:41 nominated by his ac rep 15:51:48 oedipus - we have that anyway, with any spec 15:51:49 karl: I've heard of others, though I can't remember off the top of my head 15:52:10 even within the W3C, discussions may take place on multiple mailing lists 15:52:15 gsnedders: I heard about black helicopters too flying low above cities 15:52:56 yes, mikeS, but we don't have 2 specs that are self-identified as different drafts -- if what wg wants to host a snapshot, it should be of the W3C draft, and the W3C draft should be pointed to from the WHAT WG draft 15:52:56 It seems to me it is the responsibility of HTMLWG members to join those other lists and follow conversations taking place there too 15:52:59 I said politics and meant it, I didn't mean community life. 15:53:05 MikeSmith: ++ 15:53:08 ... if they want to be able to keep up with everything 15:53:54 I think it's so ridiculous that we have to hold a vote just to get a FPWD out the door 15:53:57 Lachy: you will learn it will take times, it took me time too. But I will not try to convince you, it would be useless. :) It's part of life cycle 15:53:59 oedipus: and should the W3C HTML WG draft point to the WHATWG draft, or does this only apply one way? 15:54:06 MikeS: i'm not against outside feedback, i am concerned about 2 competing drafts, one branded with the W3C style and logo and one branded with the WHAT WG style and logo 15:55:08 gavin has joined #html-wg 15:55:12 oedipus, the logo at the top doesn't make any difference. Both specs are identical in every important aspect 15:55:16 oedipus: take it like translations of W3C specs. it is possible to translate W3C specs in other languages. 15:55:39 the HTML 5 spec is under w3c document license. 15:55:43 gsnedders: it applys only one way -- the WHAT WG draft was submitted to the HTML WG and a number of companies asked that it be considered the basis for the HTML WG's work -- if that is the case, then why have 2 different drafts? 15:55:52 and that all matters 15:56:00 the rest is not very interesting 15:56:01 oedipus - we don't have 2 specs, we have one spec ... and I don't think the copies at the the WHATWG and W3C sites are "self identified as different drafts" 15:56:12 oedipus, why does it matter that the spec is mirrored? 15:56:19 karl: it is possible to translate, but is there a need to translate from english to english? 15:56:36 it doesn't matter that the spec is mirrored, as long as it is the same spec, full stop. 15:56:45 then it is 15:56:52 oedipus - and I don't understand how you see them as competing drafts 15:56:53 it is the same spec 15:56:58 different branding doesn't matter at all 15:57:46 there is nothing the W3C team can or would want to do to prevent any editors or anybody else from mirroring a copy of a draft if the editors chooses to do so 15:57:46 oedipus: whatwg feedback is a good source of input for HTML 5 work. 15:58:14 oedipus - It is the same spec. 15:58:35 oedipus: do you want to disregard several years worth of comments? 15:58:53 i'm not denying that whatwg feedback is a good source of input, but it is but one source, and the draft should be developed in one place -- if it is truly a mirror of the draft in W3C space, it should explicitly state that, and should actually mirror, rather than reflect 15:59:48 gsnedders: no, i'm not disregarding "several years of feedback" i'm concerned that it will take many many more years of feedback under current conditions to arrive at a truly stable state 16:00:26 oedipus - The source is developed in one place, and published in two places. 16:00:38 Philip - no, it would not be difficult 16:01:07 i'm still wondering what lachy meant by "both specs are identical in every important aspect" 16:01:26 DanC_lap has joined #html-wg 16:01:43 (Hmm, I was going to try fixing the multipage generator to be less bad, but I think I forgot about that months ago...) 16:01:54 if they are mirrors of each other, they should be identical in EVERY aspect 16:02:20 oedipus, the header of the spec is not really that important. The important aspects include everything from the Abstract down. 16:02:58 if that's the case, then why insist on having 2 versions of ostensively the same spec? it simply doesn't make any sense... 16:03:06 the header of the spec is quite important; it's about endorsement, branding, etc. the HTML 5 spec currently has two publishers. could be worse. 16:03:18 oedipus - who would you suggest should enforce this identical-in-every-aspect constraint? 16:03:20 Lachy_: They have different abstracts 16:03:27 s/Abstract/TOC/ 16:03:33 (and different "status of this document"s) 16:03:33 ... and how would you imagine they'd be able to do it? 16:03:37 2 publishers, 2 fora, 2 streams 16:03:51 it makes sense to me that there's still momentum in the WHATWG, oedipus 16:03:53 Like I said, anybody is free to mirror anything from the W3C site if they choose to. 16:04:07 no, they're not, MikeSmith 16:04:13 DanC_lap - why not? 16:04:28 we have a mirroring policy 16:04:58 MikeSmith, see http://www.w3.org/1999/10/21-mirroring-policy 16:04:58 the W3C editor's draft is lacking a copyright statement 16:05:15 it's not a mirror; it's separately published 16:05:42 DanC: you hit on my concern -- it is separately published -- how and who ensures that they are in sync? 16:06:07 hixie does 16:06:10 by the way, DanC, regrets for not physically attending the f2f - medical problems made it feasible only to participate remotely 16:06:10 oedipus, they are both generated from the same source by the same editor 16:06:17 DanC_lap - so I will qualify my statement by saying that anybody is free to mirror anything as long as they comply with the mirroring policy 16:06:28 yes, sorry to hear that, oedipus ; your regrets were relayed to me by mutual friends 16:07:00 yes, and the mirroring policy is basically: if you want to mirror anything, you need to mirror everything; we'll help you. 16:07:08 i'm not anti-whatwg, i just want to ensure that there is one draft that is the basis for mirroring 16:07:12 ah 16:07:18 it's also important that the WHATWG publish it because it has a much more liberal copyright than the W3C does 16:07:20 DanC_lap - dinnet know that 16:07:37 Would the W3C licences permit publishing of modified versions of the spec, like for http://philip.html5.org/tests/canvas/suite/tests/spec.html ? 16:07:46 don't think so 16:07:52 there are people like myself and anne who have our own specs with parts of text based upon HTML 5 text 16:08:16 Philip, http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231 16:08:17 how does the WHAT WG and W3C copyright differences affect the spec? i raised this as a concern before (also in regards differing copyright statements in WF2) 16:08:30 I'm not an expert in what our licenses might allow. We do have a copyright faq http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-20000620 16:08:40 DanC: thanks for the pointers 16:09:00 welcome 16:09:18 i just think we need to step back, and align all of the ducks in an orderly row... 16:09:42 the ducks seem to be having a pretty good time wandering around 16:09:54 if we put out food, they'll come by 16:10:15 the W3C's document licence does indeed allow copies of the spec to be hosted anywhere, but doesn't allow modifications 16:10:29 they just require the inclusion of the copyright notice 16:10:31 the momentum of the 2 groups should spur one another, not be mutually exclusive (albeit by individuals' individual choices) 16:11:33 oedipus, the barrier between the two groups is mostly artificial as far as work on the spec is concerned. 16:11:43 that's why i didn't object to the issuing of the draft, but expressed concerns i would like to allay before giving a thumbs up -- 16:12:23 lachy: so whatever we can do to break down those artificial barriers, the better the growth and maturity of the HTML5 draft 16:12:34 olivier has joined #html-wg 16:12:57 trackbot-ng, status 16:13:59 oedipus, hurl me an url for "Marghanita da Cruz's comments"? (cf http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results ) 16:14:59 DanC: re the ducks, we should be attempting to get them eating out of the same trough -- or at least to swim in one anothers ponds more often 16:15:10 oh, only to some extent 16:15:17 yes, ponds more often 16:15:40 DanC: the comments by marghanita da cruz are in her reply to the same question 16:15:47 too bad you couldn't make it to the pond here in Boston. :-/ 16:16:21 ah... 16:16:46 thanks, DanC -- i think my water is getting a bit "stale" here and am chomping at the bit (to mix animal metaphors) to actually get to meet and sit down and discuss thing with others 16:16:48 dglazkov has joined #html-wg 16:17:10 ACTION DanC: consider "inconsistency in the document is the use of examples" from da Cruz in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results 16:17:20 ACTION: Dan consider "inconsistency in the document is the use of examples" from da Cruz in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results 16:17:20 Created ACTION-1 - Consider \"inconsistency in the document is the use of examples\" from da Cruz in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results [on Dan Connolly - due 2007-11-15]. 16:17:58 wow, this is cool 16:18:18 DanC_lap, have a sec? 16:20:13 perhaps what is needed is someone (or someones) to commit issues raised and debated in the WHAT WG fora to the HTML WG's Issue Tracker? 16:21:22 timbl_ has joined #html-wg 16:21:22 oedipus, sure, that can be done for future discussions 16:22:17 lachy: what about the backlog of issues raised by whatwg participants which hixie has often cited? 16:22:21 but the existing feedback needs to continue to be processed as it currently is, since it would take too much effort to process and log all 3000+ emails hixie has in his archive 16:24:10 it's like every other human endeavor -- the more we work together, the less antagonism (real or perceived) between the 2 working groups, but there has to be 1 draft off of which we are all working, and i believe that to be the draft submitted to the W3C 16:26:38 robburns has joined #html-wg 16:27:15 jun has joined #html-wg 16:28:24 mjs has joined #html-wg 16:29:11 DanC: did i ever officially (via the list) report back that i completed my first action item from the last HTML WG telecon? at 1:10 PM EDT 11/1/2007 i sent the following: 1) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Nov/0001.html and 2) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2007Nov/0007.html (the same post in both places) 16:29:59 i'm also working on the CSS action item, as well 16:32:35 mjs has joined #html-wg 16:33:16 robburns has joined #html-wg 16:33:23 matt has joined #html-wg 16:34:05 hey everyone 16:35:02 aaronlev has joined #html-wg 16:35:21 DanC_lap: when do you want mike to do the aria demo? 16:35:27 when does the meeting start, etc. 16:35:34 13:30 16:35:38 k 16:35:53 oedipus: i had to throw out what diego built 16:36:06 I haven't picked a time for the aria demo; can we keep it loose? or is somebody coordinating across rooms? 16:36:15 yeah, i noticed that -- i haven't heard back from him yet 16:36:27 DanC_lap: that's fine as long as we have a ballpark 16:36:31 we'll come in after lunch 16:36:49 oedipus: i went back to a prev version of the mozilla.org example and fixed it 16:37:16 aaronlev: good news! hans hillen should also be involved in testing and sample coding 16:37:17 aaronlev, does http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07 give you enough of a ballpark? 16:37:27 oedipus: yes he should 16:37:43 DanC_lap: yes, thanks 16:37:55 oedipus: the new crash in ff3 was actually 2 separate problems, i have fixes pending 16:38:00 aaronlev: i'll ping hans offline and let him know that he posted his query to the right place 16:38:08 oedipus: but for now it's wise to avoid sub-sub aria menus with that example in ff3 16:38:42 oedipus: i want people to put their testing results in the page everyone looks at, can you do that? 16:39:15 aaronlev: i was considering a menu only example to precede the spreadsheet, which introduces 2 concepts -- might be better to demonstrate a menu, before demonstrating a menu in conjunction with another widget 16:39:21 oedipus: scott haeger just updated it to add Orca results, and I've asked Charles Chen to do it with Fire Vox 16:39:36 oedipus: mike is going to do a tree view 16:39:37 aaronlev: yes, i will use the test result matrix at mozilla 16:39:43 i think that's a more valid example anyway 16:39:58 aaronlev: i agree -- plus, the tree views work rather well 16:39:58 because we can show it using shipping dojo widgets 16:40:12 aaronlev: precisely 16:40:13 working in actual released software 16:40:52 oedipus: this is the page that has the compatibility matrix, i really want to keep it up-to-date: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/ARIA:_Accessible_Rich_Internet_Applications 16:41:12 aaronlev: i think things will shake out well, now that there's a central repository for test results and a designated list (wai-xtech) for discussion/coordination 16:41:19 aaronlev: thanks for the pointer 16:43:00 aaronlev: chaals mcn was testing the materials with opera on a mac -- don't know if he has any useful data yet or not 16:45:15 DanC: does oedipus: and oedipus, have a different meaning in RRSAgent? does a colon indicate attribution or an address to another user, or should that be handled with a comma? 16:46:28 the RRSAgent/scribe.perl tools treat : as attribution (a la Juliet: Romeo, Romeo ...). In W3C meetings, we tend to use traditional (chicago manual of style) comma for direct address 16:46:59 thanks for the clarification -- i've just followed others' (apparently bad) practices 16:49:00 whether the evolution in norms is good or bad is hard to say... it's a bit of a pain given current scribe.perl design 16:49:52 I think it's not cost-effective to train people in this channel to reconfigure their IRC clients and such. 16:50:03 agreed 16:50:05 I can just use a text editor to supplement scribe.perl 16:52:04 A new version of scribe.perl is at work with a complete refactoring and test cases. If you need features, it might be good to propose things. Send an email to david booth cc: www-archive 16:53:22 does anybody know Philip TAYLOR well enough to understand his formal objection in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd11spec/results better than I do? 16:53:32 MikeSmith, do you know him? 16:53:50 ah... thanks for the reminder, karl 16:54:11 karl, do you have bandwidth to chat with Philip TAYLOR? 16:54:55 DanC: do you mean quote No, we have not yet agreed the Design Principles. Without those, the specification has no formal basis for existence, and premature publication could jeopardise the reputation of the Working Group. unquote? 16:55:16 DanC_lap - don't know him 16:55:18 yes, that one. 16:55:49 is it easy to obtain lunch and coffee somewhere at the hotel? 16:55:54 do you have bandwidth to phone him or something, MikeSmith ? 16:55:56 I'm thinking of heading over soon 16:56:13 it's straightforward though expensive, I think, mjs 16:56:31 DanC_lap - I'd be glad to call him if you think that would help 16:56:31 other option is I could walk the other way from where I'm staying to Central Square 16:56:47 trackbot-ng, status 16:56:59 mjs - there is rumored to be a restaurant about 10 minutes walk 16:57:03 MikeSmith, why doesn't trackbot-ng know the other folks in the issue tracking group? 16:57:14 I want to give you an action 16:57:17 DanC, i'm not quite sure, and don't know PhilipT personally 16:57:19 DanC_lap: I can try to discuss with him. :) not sure that he will agree, but I can try. It might be just misunderstandings 16:57:36 Lachy has joined #html-wg 16:57:36 DanC_lap - dunno. I think I may need to ask systeam to add me 16:57:37 MikeSmith: I know the area pretty well, just not the hotel 16:57:42 right, karl, I'm not asking you to convince him of anything; just listen 16:58:16 mjs - they got candy bars and potato chips in the convenience store in the lobby 16:58:17 MikeSmith, you're already added to http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/ ; somehow trackbot-ng doesn't seem to be consulting that list 16:58:19 and cookies 16:58:47 DanC_lap - will ask on sysreq now 16:58:51 because there is food at the Galleria Cambridge 16:59:22 DanC_lap - hang one 16:59:23 on 16:59:33 try ACTION: Michael(tm) maybe 16:59:40 no... look: 16:59:42 trackbot-ng, status 16:59:46 oh 16:59:50 I see now 17:00:51 trackbot-ng, reload 17:00:51 Reloading Tracker config 17:00:51 Tracking ISSUEs and ACTIONs from http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/ 17:00:58 trackbot-ng, statsu 17:01:00 trackbot-ng, status 17:01:08 DanC_lap - there you go 17:01:45 thanks... now... did it lose the action I gave above? I guess it's easy enough to do again... 17:01:52 DanC: i think PhilipT's position hasn't changed since the first polls -- he'd rather have a statement of design principles released, garner feedback, and hammered into concensus and rereleased before releasing a working draft 17:02:01 ACTION: Dan consider "inconsistency in the document is the use of examples" from da Cruz in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results 17:02:01 Created ACTION-2 - Consider \"inconsistency in the document is the use of examples\" from da Cruz in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results [on Dan Connolly - due 2007-11-15]. 17:02:27 oops; dup. oh well 17:02:58 I'm gonna assign the formal objection action to MikeSmith cuz he's in the tracker, but you're more than welcome to help, karl 17:03:26 karl - ãŠã­ãŒã„ã—ã¾ã™ 17:04:26 ACTION: Michael (tm) contact Philip TAYLOR to help the chairs better understand his formal objection in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd11spec/results 17:04:26 Sorry, couldn't find user - Michael 17:04:41 DanC_lap - gotta do Michael(tm) 17:04:51 ACTION: Michael(tm) contact Philip TAYLOR to help the chairs better understand his formal objection in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd11spec/results 17:04:51 Created ACTION-3 - Contact Philip TAYLOR to help the chairs better understand his formal objection in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd11spec/results [on Michael(tm) Smith - due 2007-11-15]. 17:06:34 that breakfast of Twix bar and tea don't quite keep me going 17:07:15 can of Guiness Extra Stout at 10:30 helped a bit though 17:07:36 MikeSmith: so, until 13:30 local time, the channel is open for outside the face2face discussions? 17:07:51 oedipus - which channel 17:08:18 hmm... I think I'm gonna need IRC watchers in the meeting. maybe that'll take care of itself 17:08:40 Mike(tm) Smith, well, if this channel is reserved for the f2f we can move to another? or is there already an html-f2f channel? 17:08:54 this is the channel for the ftf 17:08:59 ok 17:09:25 people can make side channels for break-outs or whatever, provided they invite RRSAgent along and make logs world-access 17:09:37 will keep the side conversations to a minumum and use the q commands to enter the queue after 13:30 17:10:13 oedipus - for q, I guess we'll need to /invite Zakim 17:10:21 DOH! 17:10:41 we could go ahead and do now I guess 17:10:54 sure 17:10:56 it makes sense to me, but i'm just a schlub 17:11:16 I wonder if zakim can be the keeper of the unconference session titles and places! 17:11:24 Zakim has joined #html-wg 17:11:40 agenda + Welcome/Convene 17:12:14 agenda + Which end of W3C is up? Q&A session 17:12:24 agenda + ARIA demo Al Gilman] 17:12:33 agenda 3 = ARIA demo [Al Gilman] 17:12:46 agenda + Data Tables [Ben Millard] 17:13:06 agenda + Demo: HTML+CSS as Flash Killer [Maciej Stachowiak] 17:13:26 agenda + Unconference pitches 17:13:51 this will work great; zakim can time speakers for the 1/2/3 minute unconference pitches 17:14:24 Thanks for Zakim, ralph! 17:14:51 anne has joined #html-wg 17:14:56 RRSAgent, pointer? 17:14:56 See http://www.w3.org/2007/11/08-html-wg-irc#T17-14-56 17:16:03 is there place so sit and WiFi on the sixteenth floor already? 17:18:04 anne - dunno. Haven't been up there yet today 17:18:18 k, thanks 17:19:41 jgraham_ has joined #html-wg 17:22:14 aroben has joined #html-wg 17:24:37 DanC_lap has joined #html-wg 17:58:33 robburns has joined #html-wg 18:03:15 gavin has joined #html-wg 18:04:10 timbl has joined #html-wg 18:08:26 hober has joined #html-wg 18:15:25 jgraham_ has joined #html-wg 18:16:31 anne has joined #html-wg 18:18:21 aaronlev has joined #html-wg 18:18:55 kazuhito has joined #html-wg 18:20:22 mjs has joined #html-wg 18:21:43 MikeSmith has joined #html-wg 18:22:28 Lachy - no streaming audio, unfortunately 18:22:45 but we may be able to set up a telephone bridge 18:22:52 if you want to call in 18:23:07 mjs has joined #html-wg 18:26:53 Philip_ has joined #html-wg 18:27:01 in case anyone is on the 16th floor wondering where everyone else is, the meeting is now on the 14th floor 18:27:58 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07 18:28:09 Zakim, agenda? 18:28:09 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 18:28:10 1. Welcome/Convene [from DanC_lap] 18:28:11 2. Which end of W3C is up? Q&A session [from DanC_lap] 18:28:12 3. ARIA demo [Al Gilman] 18:28:14 4. Data Tables [from Ben Millard via DanC_lap] 18:28:16 5. Demo: HTML+CSS as Flash Killer [from Maciej Stachowiak via DanC_lap] 18:28:19 myakura has joined #html-wg 18:28:21 6. Unconference pitches [from DanC_lap] 18:28:21 Nick has joined #html-wg 18:28:32 Chris has joined #html-wg 18:28:35 dbaron has joined #html-wg 18:28:57 not yet, just prepping 18:28:59 lm has joined #html-wg 18:29:00 RRSAgent, please draft inutes 18:29:00 I'm logging. I don't understand 'please draft inutes', MikeSmith. Try /msg RRSAgent help 18:29:03 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 18:29:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/08-html-wg-minutes.html MikeSmith 18:29:04 mauro has joined #html-wg 18:29:08 k 18:29:23 Hixie has changed the topic to: HTML WG meeting in Empress Ballroom on the 14th floor - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07 - http://esw.w3.org/topic/ZakimDemo 18:29:57 MichaelC has joined #html-wg 18:30:08 Marcos has joined #html-wg 18:30:30 Meeting: HTML Working Group November f2f Day One 18:30:48 Chair: DanConnolly, ChrisWilson 18:31:09 Present+ KarlDubost 18:31:12 MikeSmith, unfortunately, I can't call in, since I don't have a phone at home. 18:31:29 Present+ MikkoHonkala 18:31:32 shepazu has joined #html-wg 18:31:37 Present+ MichaelCooper 18:31:54 MikeSmith, it would be good if you could set up skype 18:31:59 Present+ MarcinHanclik 18:32:03 Lachy - no can do 18:32:06 justin has joined #html-wg 18:32:12 Present+ HenriSivonen 18:32:20 Present+ JamesGraham 18:32:33 Present+ AnneVanKesteren 18:32:44 Present+ fromBoeing 18:32:56 Present+ JoshueOConnor 18:33:03 timbl has joined #html-wg 18:33:20 Present+ MarcusMilke 18:33:32 Present+ BobHopgood 18:33:39 Present+ Mauro 18:33:47 Present+ TexTexin 18:33:53 smedero has joined #html-wg 18:34:00 Present+ TravisFromMicrosoft 18:34:10 Present+ MasatakaYakura 18:34:18 Ugh, traffic - just got to the Hyatt. 18:34:26 Present+ KazuhitoKidachi 18:34:30 Is the meeting on the 14th floor still? 18:34:32 Present+ DaveSinger 18:34:45 Present+ MaciejStokowiak 18:34:47 tantek has joined #html-wg 18:34:49 thanks 18:34:57 Present+ DavidBaron 18:35:10 Present+ LesliefromLosAlamos 18:35:25 Present+ NickFromLosAlamos 18:35:36 Present+ AaronLeventhal 18:35:43 Present+ MikeSmith 18:35:57 karl has joined #html-wg 18:36:00 Zakim, close agendum 1 18:36:00 agendum 1, Welcome/Convene, closed 18:36:01 Zakim, close agendum 1 18:36:02 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 18:36:04 2. Which end of W3C is up? Q&A session [from DanC_lap] 18:36:05 agendum 1, Welcome/Convene, closed 18:36:06 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 18:36:07 2. Which end of W3C is up? Q&A session [from DanC_lap] 18:36:10 dsinger has joined #html-wg 18:37:41 mikko_honkala has joined #html-wg 18:37:45 Markus has joined #html-wg 18:38:09 oedipus - DanC says he would rather not right now, but we can play around later at the break 18:38:28 smedero has joined #html-wg 18:38:29 I missed a few people when I did the present list 18:38:41 So if you are on IRC and don't see your name on the following list: 18:38:53 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 18:38:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/08-html-wg-minutes.html MikeSmith 18:39:03 Pion has joined #html-wg 18:39:12 zakim, who is here? 18:39:12 sorry, mauro, I don't know what conference this is 18:39:13 On IRC I see Pion, smedero, Markus, mikko_honkala, dsinger, karl, tantek, timbl, justin, Marcos, MichaelC, mauro, lm, dbaron, ChrisWilson, Nick, myakura, Philip, mjs, MikeSmith, 18:39:17 ... kazuhito, aaronlev, anne, jgraham_, hober, gavin, robburns, aroben, Zakim, Lachy, matt, dglazkov, hasather, oedipus, tH, ROBOd, Lionheart, Hixie, heycam, laplink, bogi, 18:39:21 ... gsnedders, Thezilch, jane, krijnh, deltab, Dashiva, jmb, Kuruma, gavin_, beowulf, jgraham, drry, hsivonen, trackbot-ng, Bob_le_Pointu, RRSAgent 18:39:22 [Danc is explaining the process document with a drawing of Ian Hickson] 18:39:25 ...then please do a "Present+ YourName" to add yourself to the present list 18:39:26 please 18:39:38 Present +ShawnMedero 18:39:53 What if you're in IRC but not at the TP? 18:40:07 heh. 18:40:33 Present+ NoahMendelsohn 18:40:33 anne: snakes go from the head to the tail 18:40:43 http://ln.hixie.ch/media/comics/hixie/w3c-snakes-and-ladders.png 18:41:17 Hixie, oh, so I got them backwards 18:41:20 hober - then please do, e.g., YourName_IRC_only or something like that 18:41:29 is this an internationalization difference? (In the US I think the game is marketed as chutes & ladders) 18:41:32 (the above ln.hixie.ch image is being discussed) 18:42:01 Present+ ShawnHenry 18:42:16 anne, there are steps you can jump over. Basically there are entrance criterias not exit criterias 18:42:24 Present+ OlivierTheroux 18:42:29 Present+ EdwardOConnor_IRC_only 18:42:30 Present+ BertBos 18:42:35 Present +GeoffreySneddon_IRC_only 18:42:57 so the snakes went from each stage backwards 18:43:07 Meeting: HTML WG F2F Meeting 18:43:15 Present+ LachlanHunt_IRC_only 18:43:25 jun has joined #html-wg 18:43:27 Present+ GeoffreySneddon_IRC_only 18:43:29 q? 18:43:29 q? 18:43:34 Present+ ShawnMedero 18:43:45 Present+ GavinSharp_IRC_only 18:44:08 Dennis has joined #html-wg 18:45:32 Present+ DimitriGlazkov_IRC_only 18:46:26 Topic: introduction on aria 18:46:30 ARIA Overview: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria 18:46:47 Ben arrived 18:47:02 Aron Leventhal speaking about ARIA ... ARIA intro 18:47:08 http://www.w3.org/TR/aria-roadmap/ is a useful start too. 18:47:37 32 or more states in a typical accessibility ABI(?) 18:47:51 s/ABI(?)/API 18:48:05 MSAA 18:48:25 aaronlev : MSAA (Microsoft Active Accessibility) ... 18:48:39 Mike Spilachi arrives 18:49:11 s/Spilachi/Squillace 18:49:22 Good overview/start to MSAA is http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms697707.aspx 18:49:23 aaronlev : HTML is missing basic things that we have on the desktop ... 18:49:57 ... ridiculous, for example, that we don't have a tree-view [mechanism] in HTML 18:50:06 shepazu has joined #html-wg 18:50:14 ... widget toolkit takes care of a lot of the work 18:50:36 olivier has joined #html-wg 18:51:03 The number of common widgets that need to be implemented time and time again with JS is maddening 18:51:07 ... because of DOM ability for mutation events, can fire an event for [accessibility needs] 18:51:18 info on ARIA: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/ARIA:_Accessible_Rich_Internet_Applications/Relationship_to_HTML_FAQ 18:51:19 ... the hard work is on the side of the JS author 18:51:25 Scribenick: MikeSmith 18:51:40 In parts you'll never get as good accessibility with JS as you would with native widgets 18:51:59 s/In parts/At times/ 18:51:59 [getting sound from Mike Spilachi's machine plugged in] 18:52:08 Bert has joined #html-wg 18:52:36 s/Spilachi/Squillace/G 18:52:46 gsnedders - that's the semantic problem ARIA tries to address 18:52:52 Marcos is videotaping Mike's demo 18:53:02 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 18:53:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/08-html-wg-minutes.html MikeSmith 18:53:22 ChrisWilson: even with the complete ARIA, I still have my doubts about whether we can recreate everything 18:53:34 [that could be done natively] 18:54:16 by adding all the relevant controls and semantics to HTML, you mean? 18:54:19 Mike slows down his JAWS to 20% and mjs jokes it reminds him of TimBL slowed-down take from yesterday 18:55:05 [Mike is pressing controls in a webapp and getting feedback from jaws] 18:55:25 ChrisWilson: the diversity of AT platforms and how they are implemented makes me wonder whether one thing could really support everything 18:55:51 Demo is "Happy Time Pizza On-line Ordering System" 18:55:57 (ARIA is very low-level) 18:56:07 mjs has joined #html-wg 18:56:28 that's true, but the idea of ARIA (and similar ATs) is to allow mapping application components to a smaller, more high-level semantic set of controls. 18:56:37 no 18:56:48 Mikesmith: I can see the screen, but the URI is a tad long 18:56:57 sorry, not perfect decsription. 18:57:09 aaronlev - can you paste in the URL for the demo please 18:57:15 which widget is it -- i can probably get the uri if you tell me 18:57:26 http://test.cita.uiuc.edu/aria/tabpanel/view_xhtml.php 18:57:32 thanks 18:58:02 the idea is to capture the semantic roles of components; there may be multiple different components that act as a "button" 18:58:03 Most of this demo comes from http://test.cita.uiuc.edu/aria/ 18:58:19 http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/dojotoolkit/dijit/tests/test_Tree.html 18:58:21 [mike is now doing Dijit Tree Test demo] 18:58:22 t.v. raman once mentioned using mobile gmail as the accessible (and quality) equivalent to the full-blown gmail 18:58:33 ChrisWilson, the idea is that the author implements the accessibility on top of a widget he already created 18:58:34 perhaps that's the solution 18:58:57 mike: If you use Dojo toolkit now, a lot of [this] is already built into the library. 18:59:00 instead of taking a complex Web app and attaching AT hooks to it 18:59:23 aaronlev : Mike is using the standard keys for a tree view 18:59:28 build your app with simple blocks, available in HTML 18:59:38 and use JS to enhance the UX 18:59:41 if I create a slider in JS, is there any way it could behave identically to a native one on OS X using ARIA? 18:59:41 mike: just as if I were in Windows Explorer ... just like on a desktop 18:59:42 anne - umm, sort of. the idea is that the author describes the semantic role of their components, so that accessibility tools can make use of it 18:59:45 tlr has joined #html-wg 18:59:49 the dijit tree test works on my FF3 install (last release) with JAWS 8.0.2173 18:59:52 while providing the opportunity to turn off the enhancement 19:00:18 olivier : Is there a specific intonation for indicating [this metadata] 19:00:31 ChrisWilson, is it used for anything else? 19:00:33 (even if we ignore the visible part of the UI for now) 19:01:04 anne, the semantic role? 19:01:19 dglazkov, that's the idea of CSS + XBL basically, if I understand you correctly (but that's more a long term solution :-( 19:01:57 kingryan has joined #html-wg 19:02:16 tex: wouldn't you want to say, give me the list of all elements at this level? ... 19:02:32 yes.. I guess I just don't like the ARIA proposal, because it's ultimately a dead-end. 19:02:40 ... why not just map this to a completely different model? 19:02:51 dglazkov: why do you say it is a dead-end? 19:02:56 MarcinHanclik has joined #html-wg 19:03:28 well, oedipus, I may be to harsh in this characterization 19:03:29 aaronlev : there probably is a more efficient model from presenting the data for this context ... but it would be something completely foreign to the average desktop user 19:03:57 anthony has joined #html-wg 19:03:58 aaronlev : JS widgets will always be a reality ... 19:04:00 but I think that we shouldn't be taking complex UIs and making them accessible 19:04:01 because it's way too complex for average authors to even think about using and you're relying on the distribution and use of pre-written toolkits for this to be even remotely successful 19:04:10 mjs has left #html-wg 19:04:11 mjs has joined #html-wg 19:04:13 it's a dead end only if all control types covered by AX apis end up available in HTML, and we get enough power to fully customize look and feel of all widgets 19:04:31 aaronlev : sometimes the best UI is just one that people [already] know 19:04:37 ARIA is the first step and suffices for generalized markup languages, but the intermediary where specialized knowledge domain markup is used -- consult: http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Accessibility/Handlers 19:04:43 mjs, yeah, CSS is the problem... 19:04:46 Lachy: most authors just use text/links, though, in fairness 19:05:11 anne: I dunno if it's just CSS - HTML doesn't have built-in support for many OS-standard widget types, even in the current HTML5 draft 19:05:12 Lachy: you rely on prewritten toolkits in desktop apps too; to be fair 19:05:21 mjg, by AX do you mean accessibility (a11y)? 19:05:45 oedipus, yes, AX is the abbreviation used by the Mac OS X accessibility APIs 19:05:52 Present+ KevinLawver 19:05:56 thanks, i didn't know 19:06:12 kevin: Think of something like CoverTunes 19:06:28 Hixie : people are still making up their own widgets 19:06:40 q? 19:06:51 mjs: the last time i used a mac, i could still see... it's hard to get agencies for the blind to train on anything other than windows 19:06:55 s/CoverTunes/CoverFlow/ 19:07:11 CoverFlow is just a list view with a bonus magical display 19:07:27 oedipus, that's too bad - VoiceOver is supposedly pretty good 19:07:51 [one more demo from mike now] 19:08:03 http://www.mozilla.org/access/dhtml/spreadsheet 19:08:21 I used VoiceOver briefly to test it out, and it was remarkebly simple even for me 19:08:27 [mike is showing a demo of navigating a table] 19:08:40 mike: I hate navigating spreadsheets 19:08:59 ... the last thing I want to do is go navigating cell-by-cell through a spreadsheet 19:09:11 [mike moving through column headers] 19:09:17 q+ to say ARIA provides the semantics to allow Assistive Technology (AT) to customize presentation - AT could compete on how they optimize the presentation of particular widgets based on these semantics, but we can't expect authors to provide multiple parallel versions 19:09:49 [mike showing how to edit contents of cells] 19:10:11 q+ to say that auditory reflection of the visual UI has a strong advantage - enabling collaboration between sighted and blind users 19:10:27 [mike hitting Ctrl+Alt to pull up menus] 19:10:29 q? 19:11:07 hsivonen - are the table semantics from HTML only or with ARIA markup? 19:11:36 aaronlev - some ARIA to say that the row headers are read-only 19:11:42 q+ to say that auditory reflection of the visual UI is also often necessary in order to get accurate technical assistance 19:12:13 [demo finished ... applause ... DanC stands and stretches] 19:12:50 [next up is demo from Ben] 19:12:54 oedipus, we are collecting questions 19:13:17 q- 19:13:19 Present+ BenMillard 19:13:25 q- 19:13:47 [waiting from Ben to get set up] 19:14:03 Present+ SeanMedero 19:14:20 Present+ PatrickIan 19:14:27 Present+ ChrisRowland 19:14:38 Present+ SteveFaulkner 19:14:50 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 19:14:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/08-html-wg-minutes.html MikeSmith 19:14:52 q- 19:15:16 Regarding customization of presentation: ARIA provides the semantics to allow Assistive Technology (AT) to customize presentation - AT could compete on how they optimize the presentation of particular widgets based on these semantics, but we can't expect authors to provide multiple parallel versions 19:15:17 s/PatrickIan/PatrickIon/ 19:15:58 Marcos_ has joined #html-wg 19:16:14 [we got musical accompaniment from DanC on the guitar] 19:16:38 [Ben Millard introducing topic of data tables] 19:17:10 He explains: http://sitesurgeon.co.uk/tables/ 19:17:10 http://sitesurgeon.co.uk/tables/ 19:17:36 lm has joined #html-wg 19:17:59 ben: found out there are many tables on the Web that weren't in HTML ... some ASCII tables, some Excel, etc. 19:18:08 PIon has joined #html-wg 19:18:38 ... found some instances of tables lacking any header rows at all 19:18:47 oedipus, maybe we should make that requirement for all discussion. 19:19:30 [Ben is walking us through the "How Authors Indicate Headers" part of page at URL above] 19:21:39 q? 19:21:41 q? 19:21:52 ChrisW: sounds good to me -- should i go down into the basement to mix up the medicine? 19:22:20 Present+ HÃ¥kon 19:22:57 [DanC preparing to do some music] 19:24:08 IH: I'm encouraged by these numbers 19:24:26 (they indicate higher quality tables are more common than i expected) 19:24:43 [getting ready for demo from Maciej] 19:25:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2007Nov/0040 19:26:08 [Maciej beginning his demo] 19:26:58 [mjs demoing arbitrary affine transforms thru CSS] 19:27:22 agenda+ song for Hakon [Dan] 19:27:59 so anne can talk 19:28:08 ... showing cross-fading ... menu boxes growing as he mouses overs them ... notes that this can be doing using Javascript but this uses CSS 19:28:18 ... has really good fallback behavior 19:28:45 ... if you view same content in a browser that doesn't support the animation properties 19:28:55 ... no special hardware being used 19:29:13 Lachy : because it's cool, like us 19:30:28 karl, I was hearing the Ginsu knife TV ad... 19:30:38 screenshots! 19:30:54 myakura_ has joined #html-wg 19:30:56 might be a cultural thing 19:31:02 [maciej is showing the markup source and CSS] 19:31:02 mikko_honkala_ has joined #html-wg 19:31:05 MarcinHanclik has joined #html-wg 19:31:07 Marcos_ has joined #html-wg 19:31:18 ... -webkit-transition-duration 19:31:20 aaronlev_ has joined #html-wg 19:31:34 ... -webkit-transform 19:31:47 http://webkit.org/blog/130/css-transforms/ 19:32:19 dglazkov, someone makes a movie, so maybe later 19:33:10 maciej: this demo maybe shows a need for extensions to form controls 19:33:47 ...