IRC log of tagmem on 2007-11-06

Timestamps are in UTC.

16:08:24 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #tagmem
16:08:24 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-tagmem-irc
16:24:27 [ht]
q+ suggest that Noah is uncovering the two-layer nature of SGML and XML, which we have I think implicitly agreed to gloss over
16:28:27 [Norm]
q?
16:28:28 [Norm]
q+
16:29:10 [ht]
ack ht
16:30:51 [Stuart]
q?
16:36:04 [dorchard]
tbl: #2. Any extensions in a text of the language should have a well-defined default meaning.
16:37:37 [dorchard]
#2. Any extensions in a text of the language should have a well-defined default meaning (which often is that the extension has no meaning and can be ignored)
16:38:07 [dorchard]
Any extensions in a text of the language should have a well-defined default meaning (which often is that the extension conveys no information and can be ignored)
16:38:14 [raman]
so "text of the language" i.e. it needn't not be well-formed?
16:39:59 [dorchard]
#2. Any extensions in a text of the language should have a well-defined default meaning (which often is that the extension conveys no information and can be ignored)
16:40:19 [timbl]
I can live with that
16:41:42 [Stuart]
Present: DaveO, Henty, Norm, TimBL, Noah, Raman, Stuart
16:42:10 [Stuart]
All present can live with:#2. Any extensions in a text of the language should have a well-defined default meaning (which often is that the extension conveys no information and can be ignored)
16:57:11 [dorchard]
if the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then there is a set of unknown version identifiers that can be treated as if the version identifier was known
16:57:26 [dorchard]
#3: if the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then there is a set of unknown version identifiers that can be treated as if the version identifier was known
16:58:22 [timbl]
If the texts of teh language cont version identifiers, then for any version version there are a set of future versions whose texts can they were of that version.
17:00:41 [timbl]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then for any version there is a set of future versions whose texts can be treated as though they were of that version.
17:03:03 [timbl]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then for a given version there is a set of future versions whose texts can be treated as though they were of that version.
17:06:08 [dorchard]
If the ..., then for a given version there is a set of future version identifiers that can be treated as known version identifiers
17:08:44 [dorchard]
If the ..., then for a given version there is a set of future version identifiers that have well-defined default meaning (which is often to allow)
17:09:37 [dorchard]
if the..., then for a given version there is a set of future version identifiers that are allowed
17:11:16 [dorchard]
if the..., then for a given version there is a set of future version identifiers that are acceptable.
17:12:22 [ht]
I'm happy with either of the last two formulations
17:20:02 [dorchard]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then for a given language version there is a set of future version identifiers that are acceptable.
17:21:59 [dorchard]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then for a given language version there is a set of future version identifiers that are compatible
17:25:15 [raman]
my reaction as I listen to this conversation is: "what problem are we solving, and how will the world benefit from this discussion"?
17:26:56 [ht]
"Version identifiers can signal intended compatibility relationships between versions of an extensible language: "
17:27:10 [raman]
Let's actually ask the following questions: "How can we get this document out to the world for wider review and feedback"? and "How can this document help the W3C's various language design woes, starting with the html vs xhtml issue.
17:28:07 [ht]
"Version identifiers for use in the texts of a language can signal intended compatibility relationships between versions of an extensible language: "
17:37:25 [dorchard]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then for a given language version there is a set of compatible future versions.
17:38:16 [dorchard]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then for a given language version there is a set of compatible future versions identifiers.
17:39:09 [Norm]
Norm has joined #tagmem
17:41:59 [DanC_lap]
DanC_lap has joined #tagmem
17:42:51 [Stuart]
#2. Any extensions in a text of the language should have a well-defined default meaning (which often is that the extension conveys no information and can be ignored)
17:43:35 [Stuart]
"if the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then specify a mechanism such that the intended forward compatibility of (future?) version identifiers can be determined inspection/comparison a text's versions identifier."
17:44:42 [dorchard]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then the language defines a set of compatible future versions identifiers.
17:46:10 [dorchard]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then a given language version defines a set of compatible future versions identifiers.
17:46:49 [dorchard]
#3: If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then a given language version defines a set of compatible future versions identifiers.
17:47:46 [dorchard]
If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then a given language version should define a set of compatible future versions identifiers.
17:48:08 [dorchard]
#3: If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then a given language version should contain a set of compatible future versions identifiers.
17:49:37 [dorchard]
#3: If the texts of the language contain version identifiers, then a given language version should define a set of compatible future version identifiers.
17:50:40 [dorchard]
Present: DaveO, Henry, Norm, TimBL, Noah, Raman, Stuart
17:51:00 [dorchard]
All present can live with the previous text.
18:20:11 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem
18:34:09 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #tagmem
19:12:18 [raman]
raman has left #tagmem
19:16:49 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem
19:24:13 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem
19:33:03 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem
19:52:16 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem
20:13:42 [Stuart]
Stuart has joined #tagmem
20:18:31 [skw]
skw has joined #tagmem
20:21:27 [Stuart]
Stuart has joined #tagmem
20:25:34 [Stuart]
Stuart has joined #tagmem
20:28:54 [ericP]
ericP has joined #tagmem
20:37:33 [Noah]
Noah has joined #tagmem
20:38:51 [dorchard]
dorchard has joined #tagmem
20:39:02 [DanC_lap]
DanC_lap has joined #tagmem
20:42:33 [dorchard]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/passwordsInTheClear-52
21:04:55 [dorchard]
q+
21:06:02 [ht]
ht has joined #tagmem
21:06:22 [ht]
what channel are we on?
21:06:35 [dorchard]
argh
21:06:56 [dorchard]
I was on #tagmem when I should have switched
21:08:32 [tlr]
tlr has joined #tagmem
21:08:40 [ht]
ht has changed the topic to: Meeting with security context WG on channel #wsc
21:08:42 [tlr]
please join #wsc if you are in the passwordsInTheClear session
21:09:02 [Stuart]
Stuart has joined #tagmem
21:24:08 [tlr]
tlr has left #tagmem
21:37:20 [DanC_lap]
DanC_lap has joined #tagmem
22:03:49 [tlr]
tlr has joined #tagmem
22:04:15 [tlr]
ACTION: stuart to ask Norm to be point person for passwordsInTheClear-52
22:04:15 [trackbot-ng]
Created ACTION-75 - Ask Norm to be point person for passwordsInTheClear-52 [on Stuart Williams - due 2007-11-13].
23:10:14 [ericP]
ericP has left #tagmem
23:49:20 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem