14:23:59 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 14:23:59 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc 14:24:02 zakim, this will be dawg 14:24:02 ok, LeeF; I see SW_DAWG()10:30AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 14:24:07 Meeting: RDF Data Access Weekly 14:24:11 they sound like some of the NG features that were very hard to impl 14:24:11 Chair: LeeF 14:24:15 Scribe: LeeF 14:24:24 (very hard for a quads store) 14:24:37 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/0000.html 14:24:51 OK, we do it in Anzo+Glitter so I can probably get a green box there even if it's not one already 14:25:18 LeeF has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/0000.html 14:25:26 agenda + convene 14:25:30 agenda + actions 14:25:34 agenda + algebra bugs 14:25:41 agenda + disposition of comments 14:25:48 can you update the Makefile with all the URLs you know about? 14:25:48 agenda + query language implementation report 14:26:01 agenda + protocol implementation report 14:26:11 agenda + xml results format implementation report 14:26:17 agenda + testimonials 14:26:42 oh right, my mailer may be better apt at replying to some reports to store them as attachements 14:27:07 chimezie has joined #dawg 14:27:40 iv_an_ru, if you can give me a URL for some virtuoso earl in the next couple mins, i can run it during the call 14:27:58 SW_DAWG()10:30AM has now started 14:28:05 +LeeF 14:28:59 +??P15 14:29:01 zakim, ??P is me 14:29:01 +AndyS; got it 14:31:22 agenda? 14:31:47 +EricP 14:31:49 +Chimezie_Ogbuji 14:32:28 Scribe: chimezie 14:32:48 agenda + new optional-filter test 14:34:17 zakim, take up first agendum 14:34:17 I don't understand 'take up first agendum', LeeF 14:34:28 zakim, next agendum 14:34:28 agendum 1. "convene" taken up [from LeeF] 14:34:43 +??P22 14:34:55 Zakim, ??p22 is me 14:34:55 +iv_an_ru; got it 14:35:09 LeeF: meeting tommorow for disposition of comments 14:35:17 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0156/18-dawg-minutes.html minutes from Sep 18 14:35:27 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0175/25-dawg-minutes.html 14:35:33 minutes from sep 25 14:36:28 approve both sets of minutes 14:37:19 LeeF: if you can't make next weeks call, make your feelings known about transition to PR 14:37:29 zakim, close this agendum 14:37:29 agendum 1 closed 14:37:31 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:37:31 zakim, next agendum 14:37:32 2. actions [from LeeF] 14:37:33 agendum 2. "actions" taken up [from LeeF] 14:37:47 ACTION: LeeF to check and annotate open-eq-07 and -10 with mf:LangTagAwareness 14:37:50 action -1 14:37:56 ACTION: LeeF to check and annotate open-eq-07 and -10 with mf:LangTagAwareness [DONE] 14:38:09 ACTION: LeeF: open and postpone an issue on unescapes XML in result set format [DONE] 14:38:29 ACTION: LeeF to investigate PR mechanics, put together draft transition request [CONTINUES] 14:38:40 ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types (esp. application/sparql-query) [CONTINUES] 14:39:22 zakim, close this agendum 14:39:22 agendum 2 closed 14:39:23 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:39:24 3. algebra bugs [from LeeF] 14:39:26 zakim, next agendum 14:39:26 agendum 3. "algebra bugs" taken up [from LeeF] 14:40:25 LeeF: tests were correct, details in the specification were wrong 14:40:33 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0179.html link to both bugs with details 14:40:45 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0177.html SPARQL Algebra Translation Bug 14:41:46 AndyS: there should only be 1 way to get filters into OPTIONALs 14:42:01 AndyS: there are tests that back this behavior up 14:43:45 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/0003.html Chime's reading of Andy's overview 14:44:18 LeeF: we can make the case that implementors were not mislead and don't need to go back to LC 14:44:39 proposed new text is: 14:44:39 [[ 14:44:39 If F is not empty: 14:44:39 G := Filter(F, G) 14:44:39 ]] 14:45:11 PROPOSED: To fix the bug in attaching filters to patterns as per AndyS's suggestion in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0177.html 14:45:28 ericP seconds 14:45:34 resolved 14:46:03 ACTION: AndyS to put replacement text for filter attachment into rq25 14:46:31 ACTION: LeeF to examine 7 tests affected by change in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0177.html in view of implementors' experiences 14:46:58 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0178.html AndyS on simplifying {{ ... }} 14:48:22 AndyS: if you apply the simplification early, you end up with a different Algebra 14:49:16 ericP: ask implementors to run a distinguishing query 14:51:18 AndyS: it is not exactly clear in the process document if we can escape another LC cycle 14:55:03 ACTION: LeeF to mail out a complete test case to determine implementation behavior in the OPTIONAL+FILTER+{{...}} case 14:55:18 zakim, close this agendum 14:55:18 agendum 3 closed 14:55:19 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:55:21 4. disposition of comments [from LeeF] 14:55:22 zakim, take up agendum 9 14:55:22 agendum 9. "new optional-filter test" taken up [from LeeF] 14:56:02 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/0003.html contains Chimezie's proposted new test 14:56:39 I wrote that while trying to figure out why: LeftJoin(Ω1, Ω2, expr) = Filter(expr, Join(Ω1, Ω2)) set-union Diff(Ω1, Ω2, expr) 14:56:43 isnt' equivalent to : 14:56:51 LeftJoin(Ω1, Ω2, expr) = Filter(expr, Join(Ω1, Ω2)) set-union Ω1 14:58:20 ARQ passes the test 14:58:42 ericP: does top-down / bottom-up evaluation effect this? 15:00:29 PROPOSED: Approve the test in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/0003.html and ask for implementation results for it 15:00:47 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional-filter/manifest#dawg-optional-filter-004 new tests 15:03:28 ACTION: LeeF to solicit implementors' desired behavior for {{ ... }} case 15:03:42 AndyS: even if we don't approve the tests, we should solicit input about what implementations *want* to do (or what they do currently) 15:04:08 resolved 15:04:19 ACTION: LeeF to mark test in 0003 as approved, update test suite, notify implementors 15:04:35 ericP abstains 15:04:49 s/abstains/mis-runs his software 15:05:03 zakim, close this agendum 15:05:03 agendum 9 closed 15:05:04 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:05:05 4. disposition of comments [from LeeF] 15:05:12 zakim, next agendum 15:05:12 agendum 4. "disposition of comments" taken up [from LeeF] 15:06:10 actually, i do pass it -- just didn't match the name in the manifest 15:06:24 LeeF: main challenge is the protocol document 15:06:37 LeeF: I'll be cleaning up outstanding comments 15:07:14 LeeF: if you are swapped in on the protocol, please contribute to thread if neccessary 15:07:53 cvs.bin history: warning: history line 4811035 invalid 15:07:53 cvs.bin history: warning: history line 4835227 invalid 15:07:53 cvs.bin history: warning: history line 4860295 invalid 15:07:53 cvs.bin history: warning: history line 5247279 invalid 15:07:53 cvs.bin history: warning: history line 5591008 invalid 15:07:54 cvs.bin history: warning: history line 5683713 invalid 15:08:20 zakim, close this agendum 15:08:20 agendum 4 closed 15:08:21 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:08:22 5. query language implementation report [from LeeF] 15:08:38 zakim, next agendum 15:08:38 agendum 5. "query language implementation report" taken up [from LeeF] 15:09:00 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/implementations query language implementation report 15:09:34 ericP: a failure for a test in a facet is a failure for the whole feature set 15:11:33 ericP: the data we have may be sufficient for transition 15:12:31 ACTION: ericP to implement the conservative algorithm (fail a test -> fail the feature) in the implementation report 15:12:44 ACTION: LeeF to weed out basic facets from complex tests 15:13:43 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Sep/0008.html email on pyrrho db results 15:14:10 LeeF: there is no EARL output 15:15:19 ericP: we should not include implementations which do a manual check instead of automated generation of EARL 15:18:18 AndyS: we *should* be doing automated test reporting. perhaps we don't put it in the implementation report matrix 15:18:49 I agree with the caution about manually generated reports (given the nature of BNodes, etc..) 15:19:53 ACTION: LeeF to solicit mechanically generated test results from pyrhho db 15:23:12 ericP: an approach for a first impl report could be to only show those for which we are 'green across the board' 15:24:58 ACTION: ericP to adapt impl report to include syntax tests 15:25:02 zakim, close this agendum 15:25:03 agendum 5 closed 15:25:05 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:25:07 6. protocol implementation report [from LeeF] 15:25:25 zakim, next agendum 15:25:25 agendum 6. "protocol implementation report" taken up [from LeeF] 15:26:35 -Chimezie_Ogbuji 15:27:32 rssagent, make logs world-visible 15:27:39 EliasT close to having HTTP protocol testing running 15:27:53 LeeF working on creating manually generated implementation report for protocol 15:28:00 ...will work with AndyS to fit in SOAP testing in that 15:28:10 zakim, close this agendum 15:28:10 agendum 6 closed 15:28:11 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:28:12 7. xml results format implementation report [from LeeF] 15:28:12 zakim, next agendum 15:28:12 agendum 7. "xml results format implementation report" taken up [from LeeF] 15:29:26 ...results from testing protocl should demonstrate 2 producers and consumers of SPARQL XML 15:29:36 zakim, close this agendum 15:29:36 agendum 7 closed 15:29:37 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:29:38 8. testimonials [from LeeF] 15:30:33 -> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/sws-testimonial example testimonials 15:32:09 + solicit testimonials from WG members 15:32:17 + ask WG members to solicit testimonials from other W3C members 15:32:32 Q: testimonials from non-W3C people? 15:32:39 + ask SWEO to help provide testimonials 15:32:55 + start soon to help people get testimonials cleared with their organizations 15:33:54 small spam might help :) 15:34:49 adjourned 15:34:56 -EricP 15:34:57 rrsagent, please draft minutes 15:34:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-minutes.html LeeF 15:35:06 rrsagent, make logs world-access 15:35:08 -iv_an_ru 15:35:17 -LeeF 15:35:21 -AndyS 15:35:22 SW_DAWG()10:30AM has ended 15:35:24 Attendees were LeeF, AndyS, EricP, Chimezie_Ogbuji, iv_an_ru 15:35:52 AndyS has left #dawg 15:39:38 rrsagent, make logs world-access 15:39:43 i mean it for real this time, RRSAgent 15:40:01 thanks, RRSAgent 15:40:02 you're the best 16:02:28 ericP - you ended up not abstaining since you passed the test, right? 16:08:08 LeeF, that's right 16:54:23 RRSAgent, please leave 16:54:23 I see 13 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-actions.rdf : 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to check and annotate open-eq-07 and -10 with mf:LangTagAwareness [DONE] [2] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T14-37-56 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF: open and postpone an issue on unescapes XML in result set format [DONE] [3] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T14-38-09 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to investigate PR mechanics, put together draft transition request [CONTINUES] [4] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T14-38-29 16:54:23 ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types (esp. application/sparql-query) [CONTINUES] [5] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T14-38-40 16:54:23 ACTION: AndyS to put replacement text for filter attachment into rq25 [6] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T14-46-03 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to examine 7 tests affected by change in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0177.html in view of implementors' experiences [7] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T14-46-31 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to mail out a complete test case to determine implementation behavior in the OPTIONAL+FILTER+{{...}} case [8] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T14-55-03 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to solicit implementors' desired behavior for {{ ... }} case [9] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T15-03-28 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to mark test in 0003 as approved, update test suite, notify implementors [10] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T15-04-19 16:54:23 ACTION: ericP to implement the conservative algorithm (fail a test -> fail the feature) in the implementation report [11] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T15-12-31 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to weed out basic facets from complex tests [12] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T15-12-44 16:54:23 ACTION: LeeF to solicit mechanically generated test results from pyrhho db [13] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T15-19-53 16:54:23 ACTION: ericP to adapt impl report to include syntax tests [14] 16:54:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-dawg-irc#T15-24-58 16:54:26 zakim, please leave 16:54:26 Zakim has left #dawg