13:57:19 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 13:57:19 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-dawg-irc 13:57:27 Zakim, space for 6? 13:57:29 ok, ericP; conference Team_(dawg)13:57Z scheduled with code 26632 (CONF2) for 60 minutes until 1457Z 13:57:42 Zakim, please dial ericP-office 13:57:42 ok, ericP; the call is being made 13:57:43 Team_(dawg)13:57Z has now started 13:57:44 +EricP 13:57:53 how'zat? 13:58:02 brb, quick bio break 14:01:20 +LeeF 14:01:37 ericP, did you let Ralph and Steve know where we are? 14:03:51 steve has joined #dawg 14:04:07 zakim, what is the code? 14:04:07 the conference code is 26632 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), steve 14:04:24 -EricP 14:04:48 Phone dying - finding a new one 14:05:04 +SteveB 14:05:35 Zakim, SteveB has ericP, SteveB 14:05:35 +ericP, SteveB; got it 14:09:02 general DAWG comments list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 14:10:56 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues 14:12:36 Meeting: SPARQL XML Results Format transition to CR call 14:12:44 Scribe: ericP 14:13:41 Action: EricP to update disposition of comments list with 2 comments 14:13:45 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Aug/0005.html Stu's request to allow arbitrary XML embedded in results 14:14:21 LeeF: dev of XMLRes happened early in WG life 14:15:11 ... apart from removal of @ordered and @distinct, stable since jun,jul 2005 14:15:36 ... this comment got a response saying that this feature request would make parsing much harder 14:16:54 ... expect that WG will have neither energy or desire to take this up now 14:17:36 ... precedent that WG satisfied with XMLRes, as well as concearned about schedule 14:18:22 ... even if they did take discuss it, expect that the feature wouldn't be adopted based on technical complexity 14:18:49 ... exchanged mail with commentor, who said that he "only broght it up to show some users would like it" 14:19:37 ... this feature could be added to a later SPARQL 14:21:03 Action: LeeF to record Tuesdays disposition ... 14:21:27 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Sep/0011.html AlanR's request for metadata 14:22:14 LeeF: evolved to a request for a sparql/head/meta element 14:22:34 ... echoed by 2 or 3 others on the list 14:23:41 ... WG discussed this on last Tue and decided not to take it up 14:24:13 ... ericP asked AlanR if he was content with the "too late" response. verbal response was "yes" 14:25:15 Steve: impl status? report? 14:26:05 LeeF: almost every SPARQL language implentation also implements this XML Results format 14:26:23 ... test suite uses XMLResults so we can prove implementation that way 14:27:15 Steve: what's your CR duration? 14:27:35 LeeF: I proposed 3 weeks 14:27:40 ... can do 4 weeks 14:28:49 Steve: checking process, but since you have at least 10 impls, i'm not concearned with a short CR 14:33:10 "# Each identified SPARQL feature has at least two implementations." 14:38:47 W3C's Current Practices for Presenting Dispositions of Comments 14:38:52 http://www.w3.org/2006/08/Current-DoC-Practices.html 14:40:41 SPARQL XML Results CR will be from 24 Sept to 9 Oct 14:41:03 Steve: any features as risk? 14:41:07 LeeF: no 14:42:05 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ 14:42:31 LeeF, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ should be identical to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ apart from SOTD 14:42:41 LeeF: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ should be identical to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ apart from SOTD 14:42:55 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ editor's draft 14:43:45 Steve: patent policy issues? disclosures? 14:43:48 LeeF: none 14:44:08 Steve: need to: 14:44:12 ... .. update status of these two comments 14:44:24 ... .. director's decision 14:46:50 Steve: on behalf of the director, I approve this transition, contigent on the WG deciding not to take up the arbitrary embedded XML feature request 14:47:05 Steve: do you see much take-up of SPARQL? 14:47:30 LeeF: maybe SPARQL's wierd, but I'm not used to seeing this level of interest in a spec that's not a Rec 14:49:27 -SteveB 14:49:30 -LeeF 14:49:31 Team_(dawg)13:57Z has ended 14:49:33 Attendees were EricP, LeeF, SteveB 14:49:39 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:49:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-dawg-minutes.html ericP 14:50:05 RRSAgent, please make log world-visible 14:51:34 LeeF, which number? 14:52:25 how 'bout this one? 14:52:58 steve has left #dawg 14:55:00 xml results format -- 14:55:42 disposition of comments for the 2 comments, linked to from crq351 (LeeF) 14:55:52 director's decision (EricP) 14:56:08 WG to consider Stu's comment on Tuesday (DAWG) 14:57:41 pubrules compliance, setup with webmaster (EricP) 14:57:54 Tell Webmaster to publish on Tuesday (LeeF) 14:58:07 ........................................ 14:58:26 query language implementation report -- 15:11:44 Email to Malcolm Crowe re: automated results for PyrrhoDb (EricP) 15:13:22 Import data and generate an impl report and document all steps (EricP) 15:17:00 Disposition of QL comments since CR (LeeF) 15:17:30 ........................................................ 15:17:32 protocol to PR -- 15:18:07 Figure out form of implementation report from past examples (LeeF) 15:20:59 Test multiple HTTP endpoints (EliasT) 15:21:06 Test multiple SOAP endpoints (AndyS) 15:21:22 .................................................. 15:21:32 xml results format to PR -- 15:27:22 Figure out form of implementation report from past examples (LeeF) 15:31:26 cripes! my forwarded email didn't attach the file properly 15:39:01 also needs to be done - find unanswered comments (incl. protocol comments) 15:45:18 that kinda sucks. long history to go through 15:47:52 tell me about it 15:48:55 did you get an email i just sent to public-rdf-dawg w/ Ivan M's test results? 15:57:16 waiting for my friggin' mutt to sort 15:57:39 !!! 15:59:01 i see 111k of anzo-glitter-earl-2007-09-21.ttl 16:00:30 Subject: [Moderator Action (size limit exceeded)] [Fwd: Re: DAWG members - please submit EARL by Sept 21] 16:01:04 should i bounce that one? 16:01:15 actually, i don't think i can easily override that one 16:27:40 Zakim has left #dawg 16:38:34 oh you can't? hmm 16:38:53 Ivan M mailed the results directly to you, so you can just put in DAWG CVS / web space