15:02:40 RRSAgent has joined #forms 15:02:40 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/09/19-forms-irc 15:02:45 zakim, this will be forms 15:02:45 ok, Steven, I see HTML_Forms()11:00AM already started 15:02:49 zakim, this is forms 15:02:49 Nick, this was already HTML_Forms()11:00AM 15:02:50 ok, Nick; that matches HTML_Forms()11:00AM 15:02:53 rrsagent, make log public 15:02:55 zakim, who is here? 15:02:55 On the phone I see [IBM], +1.919.254.aaaa, Leigh_Klotz, +1.541.753.aabb 15:02:56 zakim, code? 15:02:57 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Nick 15:02:59 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, Nick, Blake, Roger, wellsk, klotz, Charlie, markbirbeck, Steven, trackbot-ng 15:03:01 zakim, [IBM] is Charlie 15:03:01 +Charlie; got it 15:03:05 Meeting: Weekly Forms WG Teleconference 15:03:07 Chair: Erik 15:03:14 zakim, +1541 is me 15:03:14 +Blake; got it 15:03:16 zakim, code? 15:03:16 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 15:03:44 zakim, aaaa is wellsk 15:03:44 +wellsk; got it 15:03:45 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Sep/0055 15:03:52 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Sep/0055 15:03:55 unl has joined #forms 15:04:00 +Nick_van_den_Bleeken 15:04:01 zakim, dial steven-617 15:04:02 ok, Steven; the call is being made 15:04:04 +Steven 15:04:13 zakim, mute me 15:04:13 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:04:14 zakim, who is here? 15:04:14 Roger_ has joined #forms 15:04:15 On the phone I see Charlie, wellsk, Leigh_Klotz, Blake, Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), Steven 15:04:18 On IRC I see unl, RRSAgent, Zakim, Nick, Blake, Roger, wellsk, klotz, Charlie, markbirbeck, Steven, trackbot-ng 15:04:25 zakim, code? 15:04:25 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Roger_ 15:05:22 +Hal_Lockhart 15:05:44 + +49.336.293.aacc 15:05:50 zakim, Hal is Roger_ 15:05:50 +Roger_; got it 15:06:04 zakim, aacc is Uli 15:06:05 +Uli; got it 15:06:15 zakim, 49.336.293.aacc is me 15:06:24 ErikBruchez has joined #forms 15:06:24 Nick has joined #Forms 15:06:25 sorry, unl, I do not recognize a party named '49.336.293.aacc' 15:06:38 zakim, +49.336.293.aacc is me 15:06:39 sorry, unl, I do not recognize a party named '+49.336.293.aacc' 15:06:43 hi guys, I just need 1 minute 15:06:55 +markbirbeck 15:06:58 zakim, mute me 15:07:00 Steven should now be muted 15:07:23 zakim, Uli is me 15:07:23 +unl; got it 15:07:28 -Leigh_Klotz 15:07:31 zakim, mute me 15:07:31 unl should now be muted 15:08:01 i pretty much have to go now, sorry. 15:08:35 anyone here? 15:08:43 or is my phone faulty? 15:08:48 zakim, who is here ? 15:08:48 On the phone I see Charlie, wellsk, Blake, Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), Steven (muted), Roger_, unl (muted), +020876aadd 15:08:52 On IRC I see Nick, ErikBruchez, Roger_, unl, RRSAgent, Zakim, Blake, wellsk, klotz, Charlie, markbirbeck, Steven, trackbot-ng 15:09:13 mmm...would someone mind saying something? :) 15:09:24 ack me 15:09:54 is there talking on the phone? or is it my phone? 15:10:05 +??P14 15:10:18 zakim, ??P14 is ebruchez 15:10:18 +ebruchez; got it 15:10:32 zakim, who is here? 15:10:32 On the phone I see Charlie, wellsk, Blake, Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), Steven, Roger_, unl (muted), +020876aadd, ebruchez 15:10:34 On IRC I see Nick, ErikBruchez, Roger_, unl, RRSAgent, Zakim, Blake, wellsk, klotz, Charlie, markbirbeck, Steven, trackbot-ng 15:10:35 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:10:35 On the phone I see Charlie, wellsk, Blake, Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), Steven, Roger_, unl (muted), +020876aadd, ebruchez 15:11:13 zakim, i am aa 15:11:13 sorry, markbirbeck, I do not see a party named 'aa' 15:11:38 zakim, i am aadd 15:11:40 ok, markbirbeck, I now associate you with +020876aadd 15:12:24 oh no!!! 15:12:33 zakim, unmute me 15:12:33 unl should no longer be muted 15:13:45 ack me 15:15:13 zakim, mute me 15:15:13 unl should now be muted 15:16:36 http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Controls?id=90;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:17:49 blake I need the minutes in the irc or in leigh's format to get the resolutions and actions out of it... 15:18:32 so maybe we can enter the actions and resolutions on irc 15:19:00 We can put the actions here 15:20:29 zakim, mute me 15:20:30 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:21:25 and what with select1? 15:23:00 there's no ambiguity with select1 15:23:12 so empty should be allowed, and just work 15:24:39 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2006/xforms-for-html-authors-part2.html#Selecting 15:27:03 Proposed RESOLUTION: Define that it is undefined what empty value elements in a select element mean 15:27:14 s/Define/Say/ 15:41:57 Proposed resolution: Select items with blanks or empty values do not affect the storage value and these items should not be selectable by the user. 15:41:58 blank is not well defined in out spec, does it include required space or other spaces, prob. not but if we don't define it is ambiguous 15:42:45 +1 15:42:53 OK by me 15:42:56 its ok for me 15:43:17 I was only worried for the definition of blank 15:44:07 RESOLUTION: Select items with blanks or empty values do not affect the storage value and these items should not be selectable by the user. 15:44:26 Scribe: Nick 15:44:33 SCribenick: Nick 15:44:35 RESOLUTION: Select items with blanks or empty values do not affect the storage value and these items should not be selectable by the user. 15:45:23 ACTION: Erik to add text for select items with blanks or empty values do not affect the storage value and these items should not be selectable by the user (and have definition or better wording for blank). 15:45:23 Created ACTION-415 - Add text for select items with blanks or empty values do not affect the storage value and these items should not be selectable by the user (and have definition or better wording for blank). [on Erik Bruchez - due 2007-09-26]. 15:46:03 http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Controls?id=88;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:49:09 I read it like this too 15:49:58 unl has joined #forms 15:50:06 but what happens if you select a third value does the invalid value disapear?I guess yes 15:54:25 I think that they should now that they are out of range if there is data in the instance that is not selectable 15:55:15 that is an implmentation detail I think, does the spec defines that you can't remove the invalid value if you change the select? 15:55:43 Our implementation ignores the storaged values not present in the itemset, not throwing any error. 15:56:07 because the value of the control changes and the new value is the space seperated value of all the selected options 15:56:41 ack me 15:58:31 http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Controls?id=89;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:58:49 zakim, mute me 15:58:49 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 16:00:41 ack me 16:01:00 zakim, mute me 16:01:00 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 16:01:12 as additional item 16:02:10 ack me 16:05:24 Proposed resolution for issue 89: We agree that the control present an out-of-range condition in this scenario, and to rewrite the paragraph to clarify that behavior. 16:05:58 s/issue 89/issue 88 16:06:17 +1 16:06:25 I can live with it 16:06:29 -Charlie 16:06:32 Proposed resolution for issue 89: We propose that the behavior be non-destructive and choose option 2a. 16:07:03 RESOLUTION: issue 89 we agree that the control present an out-of-range condition in this scenario, and to rewrite the paragraph to clarify that behavior. 16:07:15 byw 16:07:15 - +020876aadd 16:07:16 -wellsk 16:07:17 -Steven 16:07:21 -Blake 16:07:22 -unl 16:07:23 -Roger_ 16:07:28 wellsk has left #forms 16:07:51 ACTION: Erik Clarify pargraph about out ouf range state on select 16:07:51 Created ACTION-416 - Clarify pargraph about out ouf range state on select [on Erik Bruchez - due 2007-09-26]. 16:07:58 Nick, the first resolution is for issue 88 16:08:10 the second one for issue 89 16:08:10 RESOLUTION: issue 89 we propose that the behavior be non-destructive and choose option 2a. 16:08:28 ACTION: Erik add text for issue 89 we propose that the behavior be non-destructive and choose option 2a. 16:08:28 Created ACTION-417 - Add text for issue 89 we propose that the behavior be non-destructive and choose option 2a. [on Erik Bruchez - due 2007-09-26]. 16:08:39 bye 16:08:40 -Nick_van_den_Bleeken 16:08:50 do we need to do anything to register the action items? 16:08:54 that's done right? 16:09:09 the minutes were taken offline by Blake 16:09:19 I assume this means we don't need to make them 16:09:28 or do we need the IRC minutes? 16:09:33 right 16:09:40 do you know how to do this? 16:10:07 actions? 16:10:18 rrsagent, make minutes 16:10:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/19-forms-minutes.html Nick 16:10:41 great, bye bye 16:10:47 rrsagent, make minutes 16:10:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/19-forms-minutes.html Nick 16:10:55 rssagent, bye 16:13:03 NickVdB has joined #Forms 16:13:41 disconnecting the lone participant, ebruchez, in HTML_Forms()11:00AM 16:13:45 HTML_Forms()11:00AM has ended 16:13:46 Attendees were +1.919.254.aaaa, Leigh_Klotz, +1.541.753.aabb, Charlie, Blake, wellsk, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, Steven, Hal_Lockhart, +49.336.293.aacc, Roger_, markbirbeck, unl, 16:13:48 ... ebruchez 17:46:55 Nick has joined #Forms 18:02:19 Zakim has left #forms