14:40:08 RRSAgent has joined #rdfa 14:40:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-irc 14:40:13 Zakim has joined #rdfa 14:40:19 zakim, this will be SW_SWD(RDFa) 14:40:19 ok, mhausenblas; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 20 minutes 14:40:29 Meeting: W3C RDF-in-XHTML TF - Telecon 2007-09-06, 15:00 UTC 14:40:37 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Sep/0037.html 14:40:44 -> http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html previous 2007-08-30 14:41:54 Chair: Ben 14:41:59 ScribeNick: mhausenblas 14:42:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:42:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 14:42:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:56:33 msporny has joined #rdfa 14:59:07 RalphS has joined #rdfa 14:59:58 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started 15:00:06 +Michael_Hausenblas 15:00:10 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:00:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:00:37 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:01:18 +[IPcaller] 15:02:34 Zakim, [IPcaller] is msporny 15:02:34 +msporny; got it 15:02:40 markbirbeck has joined #rdfa 15:02:48 +Ralph 15:02:54 zakim, code? 15:02:54 the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 15:03:19 benadida has joined #rdfa 15:03:22 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:03:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:03:33 + +020876aaaa 15:03:42 zakim, i am aaaa 15:03:42 +markbirbeck; got it 15:04:08 Zakim, who is on the call? 15:04:08 On the phone I see Michael_Hausenblas, msporny, Ralph, markbirbeck 15:04:33 zakim, dial steven-617 15:04:40 ok, Steven; the call is being made 15:04:42 +Steven 15:05:07 + +1.617.395.aabb 15:05:17 zakim, aabb is me 15:05:22 +benadida; got it 15:06:18 Topic: Action Items 15:06:27 -> http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary 15:08:17 [NEW] ACTION: Ben add an isbn: resource example to the Primer to illustrate @resource overriding @href [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] 15:08:57 -- continues 15:09:05 [NEW] ACTION: Ben ask Michael to duplicate tests 34-36 omitting @about [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] 15:09:27 -- done 15:09:33 [NEW] ACTION: Ben ask Michael to duplicate tests 34-36 with @rev in place of @rel [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] 15:09:35 -- done 15:09:41 [NEW] ACTION: Ben ask Michael to write versions of tests 34-36 including all of @src, @href, and @resource [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#action10] 15:09:44 -- done 15:09:52 [NEW] ACTION: Ben send mail to the TF list when the Primer editors' draft is ready for the TF to read [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#action14] 15:09:56 -- continues 15:10:04 [NEW] ACTION: Ralph ask Eric Prud'hommeaux if there's a clever way to write a variant of tests 34-36 without @rel [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#action09] 15:10:12 -- done 15:11:12 +McCarron 15:11:58 Ralph: Eric's solution would require us to be able to identify some tests as returning '0' for a Pass result 15:12:12 ... all the current tests expect '1' to be the Pass result 15:12:38 Michael: with 'ASK' we're checking that the triple exists 15:12:45 ... the expected answer is 'Yes' 15:13:00 -> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#ask 15:13:47 Michael: in the test suite document we could define whether 'Yes' means Pass or Fail 15:14:51 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/Overview.html RDF Testsuite 15:15:30 Michael: my proposal is to leave the current test cases as they are and define how we interpret the 'Yes' response 15:15:41 Mark: for some tests we say 'Yes' means Fail 15:15:52 Michael: yes, I have to confirm that this is feasible 15:16:05 ... to date we have assume that 'Yes' means Pass 15:17:35 ACTION: Michael make sure to that the ASK SPARQL queries evaluate (yes/no) 15:18:39 [NEW] ACTION: Shane send email to the TF list when the editor's draft is ready for the TF to read [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/30-rdfa-minutes.html#action13] 15:18:45 -- done 15:18:58 -- really done 15:19:06 [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to look into Science Commons use case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/11-htmltf-minutes.html#action04] 15:19:10 -- continues 15:19:15 s/to that/to confirm a design for checking that/ 15:19:40 [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to recontact implementors Elias, MarkB, triplr [and Fabien] and post their implementations to http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#Implementations [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html#action09] 15:19:52 -- continues 15:20:14 [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to work test cases 31 and 32 into primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-rdfa-minutes.html#action14] 15:20:18 -- continues 15:20:40 [PENDING] ACTION: Ben, Mark, Elias, and other implementors to add xml:lang support [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/23-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] 15:21:37 -- continues 15:21:53 [PENDING] ACTION: Michael to create "Microformats done right -- unambiguous taxonomies via RDF" on the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/23-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] 15:21:59 -- continues 15:22:05 Topic: New Test Cases 15:22:12 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Sep/0040.html 15:22:13 scribenick: ralphs 15:22:23 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC 15:23:04 Ralph has joined #rdfa 15:23:22 Michael: I updated the foaf:img property names 15:23:53 Test case 37 15:24:45 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0037 test 37 15:25:48 RESOLVED: test 37 approved 15:26:23 Michael: tests 38-41 all stem from the same action item; they're the same as 34-37 using @rev instead of @rel 15:26:58 -McCarron 15:27:00 +ShaneM 15:27:00 ... uses foaf:depicts as that's the inverse of foaf:depiction 15:28:04 ... I tested this with Ivan Herman's implementation and it produced the proposed result 15:28:18 RESOLVED: test 38 approved 15:29:01 Ben: typo in test 39; still uses @rel 15:29:14 ShaneM has joined #rdfa 15:29:28 ... let's hold approval for this until it's fixed 15:29:54 ... same typo problem in test 40 15:31:14 test case 41 15:31:28 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0041 test 41 15:31:45 RESOLVED: test 41 approved 15:32:05 Michael: tests 42-45 are same ase 34-37 without @about 15:32:26 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0042 test 42 15:33:11 Ralph: syntactically correct, but are these semantically correct? 15:33:44 Michael: foaf:img is a relationship between a person and an image 15:33:53 ... these may be semantically questionable 15:34:14 Mark: could have a screen shot that is an image of the page 15:34:50 ... is foaf:img really restricted to Domain foaf:Person? 15:35:06 -> http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_img 15:36:05 Michael: yes, foaf:img has rdfs:Domain foaf:Person 15:36:26 It contradicts itself 15:36:34 the description says "An image that can be used to represent some thing" 15:36:42 (not some person) 15:36:58 Ralph: we ought to be able to find some semantically reasonable relationship between the page and the image 15:37:27 Ben: let's approve these tests based on syntax and assign Michael an action to look for a better property 15:38:30 ACTION: Michael look for a more semantically correct predicate for tests 42-45 15:38:46 RESOLVED: test 42 approved, modulo predicate 15:39:01 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0043 test 43 15:39:20 Michael: showing @href overriding @src 15:39:50 RESOLVED: test 43 approved, modulo predicate 15:40:02 Mark: how will we confirm the corrected versions of these tests? 15:40:38 Michael: I have an action, and we'll check when I finish that action 15:41:07 Mark: we should put these on hold, then, rather than accept them now 15:41:56 RESOVLED: tests 42-45 put on hold pending identification of a semantically correct predicate 15:42:05 ScribeNick: mhausenblas 15:42:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:42:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:42:19 Topic: Documents - Thoughts, Reviews 15:42:28 Ben: Where to start? 15:42:36 Steven: Everywhere 15:43:08 Mark: Ivan gave great feedback 15:43:37 Ralph: Which section will be subject to greates change? 15:44:16 Mark: The 'Processing Model' (rules) section is new 15:44:48 ... we are now matching all the other sections with this new rules section 15:45:18 ... the blue boxes detailed out 15:45:53 ... eg @xml:lang in rules it just says it is used 15:46:22 ... then in the detailed sections it exaplains how to use it, examples 15:46:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:46:52 Ben: Regarding review 15:47:10 q+ to ask about/suggest a 'latest version' mechanism 15:47:14 ... can we start right now, where to start? 15:47:32 Mark: Final changes on next Monday 15:48:54 ... all sections may be reviewed, but they'll get ready bit by bit 15:49:47 ack RalphS 15:49:47 RalphS, you wanted to ask about/suggest a 'latest version' mechanism 15:51:08 Ben: We agreed are while ago that it will be titled "XHTML 1 + RDFa" 15:51:49 Mark: There used to be more generic things in there, but it is getting more specific 15:51:57 ... sitll not sure how to name it 15:51:58 [I see div.issue rendered as light green] 15:52:47 Mark: I focused on the rules, till now 15:53:07 ... though we need to discuss it, here 15:53:34 ... the idea is that the 'blue boxes' are host language specific 15:54:08 Ralph: Like the approach, but change the subtitle 15:55:05 Ben: RDFa in XHTML 1.1 Syntax as title 15:56:16 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/ 15:56:50 we need a short name for the syntax document. It should be xhtml-syntax-rdfa 15:57:47 note that currently we are using the shorthame rdfa-syntax 15:58:22 but I am sure that is unofficial 15:58:39 [I suggest xhtml-rdfa-syntax ] 15:59:10 Ralph: To get a short name, the WG needs to trigger it 15:59:36 s/trigger it/trigger it by making a First Public Working Draft publication request/ 16:01:40 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/ primer 16:01:40 Ben: I restructured the Primer 16:01:49 currently $Id: 06-rdfa-irc.txt,v 1.47 2007/09/06 17:33:16 swick Exp $ 16:02:35 Ben: the mini-syntax section has been removed 16:03:59 Ben: I am about to change the subtitle 16:05:12 Ben: Manu, I'll take your comments and work them in 16:05:34 regrets for 13 Sep telecon :( 16:06:22 Ben: Mark promised the Syntax is ready for Tuesday morning 16:06:33 Steven has joined #rdfa 16:08:05 Ben: Let's tentatively say next Friday at 15:00 UTC 16:08:12 ... 14 Sep 2007 16:09:05 Topic: Schedule over the next 2 weeks 16:09:15 Ben: Get documents out for review 16:09:28 ... everyone in the TF comments on it 16:09:42 ... will inform SWD, then and propose to review 16:09:55 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:09:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:12:17 Mark: Regarding CURIE [] 16:12:53 Michael: Don't know, but if you find it please add it to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/Resolutions 16:13:36 Mark: It has gone from @href 16:14:11 ... but an extended form is worth having it in there 16:16:21 Ben: [] is just used for disambiguation 16:17:40 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/4 issue 4 (Local) blank node identifiers 16:17:52 [note that issue 4 is marked as resolved] 16:18:04
oy
16:19:13 does this yield: 16:19:19 <#ben> a foaf:Person 16:19:20 or 16:19:28 a foaf:Person 16:19:55 [I've brought this "what is subject of @instanceof?" up previously and was overruled] 16:22:03 note that as this is a question we've revisited several time, whatever our conclusion is we should document it in a section of the Primer 16:22:34 Ralph: Need an action to resolve it 16:22:49 ... Ben to outline it in the Primer 16:23:18 Ben: Too advanced for the Primer 16:23:29 Ralph: In the Syntax, then? 16:23:40 Ben: I'll have a look at it 16:24:20 ACTION: Ben to write up @instanceof referring to other subjects 16:24:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:24:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:25:14 Ben: Mission this week is WRITE or REVIEW 16:25:28 Michael: or both ;) 16:25:46 Ben: Thanks everyone - till Friday next week 16:25:58 -msporny 16:25:59 -Steven 16:26:01 -Michael_Hausenblas 16:26:02 -markbirbeck 16:26:04 -ShaneM 16:26:04 -Ralph 16:26:08 ... and look out for the documents on Tuesday morning! 16:26:11 -benadida 16:26:12 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended 16:26:13 Attendees were Michael_Hausenblas, msporny, Ralph, +020876aaaa, markbirbeck, Steven, +1.617.395.aabb, benadida, McCarron, ShaneM 16:26:15 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:26:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:26:20 Zakim, list attendees 16:26:20 sorry, mhausenblas, I don't know what conference this is 16:27:08 benadida has left #rdfa 16:32:20 quite 17:32:51 zakim, bye 17:32:51 Zakim has left #rdfa 17:33:04 rrsagent, bye 17:33:04 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-actions.rdf : 17:33:04 ACTION: Michael make sure to that the ASK SPARQL queries evaluate (yes/no) [1] 17:33:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-irc#T15-17-35 17:33:04 ACTION: Michael look for a more semantically correct predicate for tests 42-45 [2] 17:33:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-irc#T15-38-30 17:33:04 ACTION: Ben to write up @instanceof referring to other subjects [3] 17:33:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/06-rdfa-irc#T16-24-20