IRC log of ua on 2007-08-16
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:44:03 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #ua
- 16:44:03 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-ua-irc
- 16:44:11 [JR]
- Zakim, this will be UAWG
- 16:44:11 [Zakim]
- ok, JR; I see WAI_UAWG()1:00PM scheduled to start in 16 minutes
- 16:44:18 [JR]
- Meeting: WAI UA
- 16:44:45 [JR]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007JulSep/0061.html
- 16:44:54 [JR]
- Scribe: JR
- 16:45:04 [JR]
- Chair: Jim Allan
- 16:49:30 [AllanJ]
- AllanJ has joined #ua
- 16:55:37 [Zakim]
- WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has now started
- 16:55:43 [Zakim]
- +Jim_Allan
- 16:56:28 [KFord]
- KFord has joined #ua
- 16:57:17 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 16:57:49 [AllanJ]
- zakim, [Microsoft] is kford
- 16:57:49 [Zakim]
- +kford; got it
- 16:58:43 [Zakim]
- +??P3
- 16:58:56 [JR]
- zakim, ??P3 is really JR
- 16:58:56 [Zakim]
- +JR; got it
- 17:06:01 [JR]
- Topic: 1. review action items
- 17:06:13 [JR]
- Topic: KF to Update Guideline 2 of the wiki
- 17:06:15 [AllanJ]
- http://www.w3.org/2007/08/09-ua-minutes.html
- 17:07:06 [JR]
- KF: Wanted to talk about it before the wiki
- 17:07:25 [JR]
- JA: Talked about some of it last week
- 17:07:36 [JR]
- Regrets: Gregory Rosmaita
- 17:08:09 [JR]
- JA: Was an interesting discussion.
- 17:08:50 [JR]
- KF: Submission: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007JulSep/0054.html
- 17:09:21 [Zakim]
- + +1.919.403.aaaa
- 17:09:54 [JR]
- zakim, +1.919.403.aaaa is really pparente
- 17:09:54 [Zakim]
- +pparente; got it
- 17:10:38 [JR]
- KF: COnditional content refers to "can't show image so I'll show alt"
- 17:10:51 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 17:11:08 [JR]
- KF: But there are other guidelines about making sure keyboard accessibility is always available
- 17:11:32 [cklaws]
- cklaws has joined #ua
- 17:11:58 [JR]
- KF: So at the end of the day if content author has mouse hovering text, what should the UA do?
- 17:11:59 [AllanJ]
- zakim, [IBM] cklaws
- 17:11:59 [Zakim]
- I don't understand '[IBM] cklaws', AllanJ
- 17:12:06 [AllanJ]
- zakim, [IBM] is cklaws
- 17:12:06 [Zakim]
- +cklaws; got it
- 17:12:55 [JR]
- Topic: 2.3 Render COnditional COntent
- 17:13:09 [JR]
- KF: I don't know
- 17:13:19 [JR]
- JA: THis has been a theme...
- 17:13:43 [JR]
- JA: UA's don't give titles from keyboard, etc.
- 17:14:30 [JR]
- KF: So maybe there's nothing we can do - just proposing new way of thinking about cond. content
- 17:14:45 [JR]
- CL: Some of this info can be discovered
- 17:14:56 [JR]
- KF: SO do we want a rewuirment
- 17:15:25 [JR]
- JA: I see this rendering cond. content tied in with Peter's stuff - ability to toggle display of things...
- 17:15:43 [JR]
- JA: What happens when things turned off...
- 17:15:53 [JR]
- JA: So 3.3 is that things can be toggled...
- 17:16:01 [JR]
- JA: 2.3 is what to do if off
- 17:16:18 [JR]
- CL: User should be blae to config what they see and don't see.
- 17:16:37 [JR]
- CL: In HPR there was prefs re: titlle of abbr
- 17:17:15 [JR]
- KF: HPR plus other assistive techs adding more and more of these options
- 17:17:44 [JR]
- JA: But screen readers see things diff
- 17:18:11 [JR]
- CL: OK but if mainstream browsers don't show things, developers less likely to put them in
- 17:19:15 [JR]
- KF: Seems like 2.3 Render Cond needs more...maybe techniques...needs to be strengthened
- 17:19:26 [JR]
- KF: Maybe I have to come back with a proposal
- 17:19:44 [JR]
- JA: Right and it's really confusing
- 17:19:50 [JR]
- JR: Second that
- 17:20:03 [JR]
- CL: ALso title alt discrepancy comes u[
- 17:20:19 [JR]
- CL: Don't think we can be so specific about it in future
- 17:20:38 [JR]
- KF: Maybe a bit more detailed
- 17:20:49 [JR]
- CL: Of course you should get any alternative content
- 17:21:08 [JR]
- KF: Sounds like group agress change is needed
- 17:21:41 [JR]
- Action KF: Bring back a proposal to rework 2.3 Render Cond. Content
- 17:22:10 [JR]
- KF: Other question from email...
- 17:22:29 [JR]
- KF: timing-independent actions guideline...
- 17:22:52 [JR]
- KF: When Charles CHen was here...
- 17:23:15 [JR]
- KF: Seemed like it had to be content author, rather than UA dealing with that.
- 17:24:00 [JR]
- JA: Hard to set live region specific controls
- 17:24:50 [JR]
- JA: e.g. titles not required for live regions (i.e. divs, spans)
- 17:25:41 [JR]
- CL: Really hard to know that title is even on a control
- 17:26:19 [JR]
- JA: Originally time indep interaction more to do with auto refresh and some for security things...
- 17:26:34 [JR]
- JA: But has just gotten much more complicated with AJAX
- 17:26:52 [JR]
- Topic: Find/Search
- 17:27:07 [JR]
- KF: Shouldn't this talk about conditional content
- 17:27:35 [JR]
- KF: If the view you are used to has this text, you should be able to search it.
- 17:27:58 [JR]
- JA: Can JAWS search for alt text?\
- 17:28:12 [JR]
- KF: Yes it can, it has a separate search
- 17:28:33 [JR]
- KF: Searches its own text view
- 17:29:34 [JR]
- KF: Prob comes up when UA search is used
- 17:30:01 [JR]
- KF: Highlighting for searched word would not be detected
- 17:31:06 [JR]
- CL: Right - so text views are quite different than what UA may be showing
- 17:31:39 [JR]
- All: Group agrees that yes cond. content should be searched.
- 17:32:07 [JR]
- JA: Just concerned about user without AT
- 17:32:25 [JR]
- CL: Happens when text is searched but CSS is hiding it
- 17:32:41 [JR]
- CL: But aren't displayed
- 17:33:14 [JR]
- JA: So do we need to define behaviour
- 17:33:38 [JR]
- CL: Well even if hidden it's still found
- 17:33:59 [JR]
- CL: Clarification - meant text is offscreen, not invisible
- 17:34:52 [JR]
- JA: So is there a configuration for this we could ask for...
- 17:35:01 [JR]
- CL: Maybe status line message?
- 17:35:58 [JR]
- JA: Live region implications?
- 17:36:17 [JR]
- JR: Would it find as well if a layer is under a layer?
- 17:36:49 [JR]
- PP: Firefox Find won't find display:none
- 17:38:12 [JR]
- CL: Descibes example of access keys shown off the visible screen
- 17:39:22 [JR]
- CL: This is happening because the base UAs don't put up list of access keys...browser does
- 17:39:36 [JR]
- KF: I could try and come up with some more proposals
- 17:40:13 [JR]
- KF: Cond. Content needs to include how to display, how to interact with and how to find etc.
- 17:40:52 [JR]
- KF: My goal is to get more actionable things to the list or wiki by next meeting
- 17:41:37 [JR]
- JA: Thanks Kelly
- 17:41:57 [JR]
- JA: ANy other groups we could write to...
- 17:44:29 [JR]
- JA: Reminds me about JAWS getting to CSS menu...but showed more than just what was going on
- 17:45:34 [JR]
- KF: Window eyes in some scenarios will show all hiddent content
- 17:46:17 [JR]
- Topic: JR to Reword normative inclusion #4 in Peter's proposal about placeholders
- 17:46:43 [JR]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007JulSep/0060.html
- 17:50:43 [JR]
- KF: lloks ok
- 17:50:51 [JR]
- JA: Need definition of chrome...
- 17:51:10 [JR]
- JR: Got it from Barry at IBM
- 17:51:31 [JR]
- CL: It is is IBM-ese
- 17:51:42 [JR]
- KF: MS uses it
- 17:52:14 [JR]
- Action JR: Make Glossary section in Wiki
- 17:52:38 [JR]
- CL: Put in link to real one, but only changed things in wiki
- 17:54:15 [JR]
- JA: Kelly, this might inform what you do in conditional content
- 17:54:41 [JR]
- JA: Placeholder is a type of conditional content
- 17:55:00 [JR]
- Topic: Tooltips
- 17:55:08 [JR]
- JA: Sent out my proposal
- 17:55:23 [JR]
- JA: Question about configuring...
- 17:55:42 [JR]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007JulSep/0047.html
- 17:56:01 [JR]
- CL,JA: Can only set by OS
- 17:56:29 [JR]
- JA: Would be good if tooltip affected by font size changer in browser
- 17:56:45 [JR]
- JA: What about colour
- 17:57:08 [JR]
- CL: But rendered by OS
- 17:57:22 [JR]
- CL: UAs could make their own tooltips
- 17:57:32 [JR]
- CL: But do we want that
- 17:58:22 [JR]
- JR: I made them larger, but can you change colour?
- 17:59:24 [JR]
- CL: Yes - in WindowsXP - Display Properties...Advanced
- 17:59:42 [JR]
- CL: IN HPR we added that dialog to the app
- 17:59:55 [JR]
- CL: You can call of those from the User Agent
- 18:00:18 [JR]
- JA: OK so don't have to dig for it.
- 18:00:48 [JR]
- JA: So is that a technique?
- 18:00:57 [JR]
- CL: Hard to make normative maybve
- 18:01:03 [JR]
- JA: So tech under?
- 18:01:25 [JR]
- CL: Maybe its a usability issue rather than compliance
- 18:02:35 [Zakim]
- -kford
- 18:02:37 [JR]
- JA: We will pick this up later
- 18:02:37 [Zakim]
- -cklaws
- 18:02:43 [Zakim]
- -pparente
- 18:02:50 [AllanJ]
- JR: if user asks for extra large fonts in the browser, should make a call to OS to also change tooltip setting, but then applies to OS
- 18:03:05 [AllanJ]
- CL: gets confusing for the user
- 18:03:11 [JR]
- CL: And complicated by mult. browser windows etc
- 18:13:06 [Zakim]
- -JR
- 18:13:08 [Zakim]
- -Jim_Allan
- 18:13:09 [Zakim]
- WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has ended
- 18:13:10 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Jim_Allan, kford, JR, pparente, cklaws
- 18:18:44 [JR]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 18:18:44 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-ua-minutes.html JR
- 18:18:52 [JR]
- RRSAgent, set logs public
- 18:19:12 [JR]
- Zakim, bye
- 18:19:12 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #ua
- 18:19:17 [JR]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 18:19:17 [RRSAgent]
- I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-ua-actions.rdf :
- 18:19:17 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: KF to Bring back a proposal to rework 2.3 Render Cond. Content [1]
- 18:19:17 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-ua-irc#T17-21-41
- 18:19:17 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JR to Make Glossary section in Wiki [2]
- 18:19:17 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-ua-irc#T17-52-14