12:19:47 RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf 12:19:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/08/14-tsdtf-irc 12:19:58 zakim, what conferences? 12:19:58 I see ARCH_Team()8:00AM active 12:19:59 also scheduled at this time are WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM, UW_Team()8:00AM 12:20:11 zakim, this will be WAI_TSDTF 12:20:11 ok, Christophe; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes 12:20:22 Meeting: TSD TF 12:20:38 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Aug/0001.html 12:20:55 Chair: CarlosV, Christophe 12:21:21 Agenda+ Updating test samples to new WCAG 2.0 working draft: 12:22:42 Regrets: CarlosI, Shadi, Tim 12:31:34 Vangelis has joined #tsdtf 12:31:43 CarlosV has joined #tsdtf 12:32:47 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started 12:32:53 +CarlosV 12:33:18 +Cooper 12:33:30 +Christophe_Strobbe 12:33:53 MichaelC has joined #tsdtf 12:34:01 +Vangelis_Karkaletsis 12:34:09 Reinhard has joined #tsdtf 12:35:34 + +43.702.4aaaa 12:35:48 zakim, +43 is Reinhard 12:35:48 +Reinhard; got it 12:36:38 scribe: MichaelC 12:37:00 zakim, take up agendum 1 12:37:00 agendum 1. "Updating test samples to new WCAG 2.0 working draft:" taken up [from Christophe] 12:37:07 agenda? 12:37:15 zakim, take up item 1 12:37:15 agendum 1. "Updating test samples to new WCAG 2.0 working draft:" taken up [from Christophe] 12:38:07 cs: a number of test cases have been migrated with scripts 12:38:13 ... so far 57 12:38:20 ... need to start structure review 12:40:10 rr: have begun uploading, still working out the kinks 12:40:46 ... what about tests that are already in wiki? 12:41:08 cs: will need to be updated to new id and test filenames 12:41:22 ... won't be removed from repository 12:42:46 cv: why can't remove tests? 12:43:02 mc: URI persistence policy, need to not break links etc. 12:43:09 cv: have a deprecated status? 12:43:26 cs: have rejected, but for WG rejects 12:43:36 ... could add a status 12:45:10 RESOLUTION: create status "deprecated" and apply to tests that are no longer valid 12:45:27 Test samples for SC 2.5.1: sc2.5.1_l1_002 and sc2.5.1_l1_003 12:45:38 ... and sc2.5.1_l1_004 12:48:55 mc: why using SC number instead of filename instead of ID, leading to this need to change? 12:49:57 cs: inherited from Bentoweb 12:54:24 mc: propose we not worry about the tests whose IDs need to change until can discuss URI persistence with Shadi; continue uploading knowing might change IDs (automatable) 12:56:12 cs: next step is to start structure review process 12:57:31 rr: what about test cases that need jsp? 12:57:38 mc: unsure status of action checking with systeam 12:58:14 cs: need clear idea of where Java server needs to run, maintenance, etc. 12:58:34 action: MichaelC to investigate JSP server with Systeam 13:00:27 mc: may need to hold back on uploading these test cases until we know 13:00:46 cs: roughly 20 / 466 test cases 13:01:46 +Tim_Boland 13:02:00 cs: have found issues with some of the tests, sent message to list 13:02:08 ... would like them fixed, then can start review process 13:03:05 cs: also have a bunch of test samples in the repository that need to be updated 13:03:35 ... question of whether to wait to do review process until those are done, or do in parallel 13:03:39 mc: propose in parallel 13:04:06 Tim has joined #tsdtf 13:04:06 rr: ones that need updating, each submitter should update their own? 13:04:11 cs, cv: yes 13:05:16 RESOLUTION: everyone keep uploading test cases, except JSP and those without a testcase mapping 13:06:24 topic: Review Process 13:06:54 cs: Bentoweb people should check for issues in tests in repository 13:07:14 ... non Bentoweb people start checking tests submitted earlier, against previous WD of WCAG 13:09:29 cv: can we get WCAG WG members to help? 13:09:34 mc: might be able to ask a few people 13:09:45 action: MichaelC to ask selected members of WCAG WG to help with review process 13:11:56 mc: how is review conducted? 13:12:07 cv, cs: update wiki, also should send note to mailing list 13:12:29 cv: document says to notify author only 13:12:34 ... propose also notify list 13:13:44 mc: which tests are the older tests that are ready for review? 13:13:48 cs: can make a list 13:15:11 action: Christophe to create list of tests ready for review 13:15:42 mc: recommend dividing blocks of tests assigned to "reviewer 1, reviewer 2" etc. and plugging reviewers into those slots 13:16:30 action: Christophe to divide list of tests by proposed reviewer 13:17:32 mc: reluctant to commit to doing review because covering for Ben, but will try to find others 13:17:39 ... Tim, can do a batch? 13:17:41 tb: yes 13:19:08 mc: need to chase reviewers to make sure they get their review done for next meeting 13:19:12 cv: can chase once get names 13:19:17 mc: chase me for names if needed 13:20:28 tb: these are structure reviews or content reviews? 13:20:31 cs: structure 13:21:50 -Vangelis_Karkaletsis 13:21:52 -Tim_Boland 13:21:52 -Reinhard 13:21:55 -Cooper 13:21:56 -CarlosV 13:21:57 Vangelis has left #tsdtf 13:22:01 -Christophe_Strobbe 13:22:02 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended 13:22:03 Attendees were CarlosV, Cooper, Christophe_Strobbe, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, +43.702.4aaaa, Reinhard, Tim_Boland 13:22:23 Regrets: CarlosI, Shadi 13:23:38 zakim, bye 13:23:38 Zakim has left #tsdtf 13:23:48 rrsagent, make log world 13:24:10 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:24:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/14-tsdtf-minutes.html Christophe 13:27:13 rrsagent, bye 13:27:13 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/14-tsdtf-actions.rdf : 13:27:13 ACTION: MichaelC to investigate JSP server with Systeam [1] 13:27:13 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/14-tsdtf-irc#T12-58-34 13:27:13 ACTION: MichaelC to ask selected members of WCAG WG to help with review process [2] 13:27:13 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/14-tsdtf-irc#T13-09-45 13:27:13 ACTION: Christophe to create list of tests ready for review [3] 13:27:13 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/14-tsdtf-irc#T13-15-11 13:27:13 ACTION: Christophe to divide list of tests by proposed reviewer [4] 13:27:13 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/14-tsdtf-irc#T13-16-30