14:44:03 RRSAgent has joined #rdfa 14:44:03 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-irc 14:44:09 Zakim has joined #rdfa 14:44:14 zakim, this will be SW_SWD(RDFa) 14:44:14 ok, mhausenblas; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 16 minutes 14:44:21 Meeting: W3C RDF-in-XHTML TF - Telecon 2007-08-02, 15:00 UTC 14:44:28 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Aug/0004.html 14:44:34 Chair: Ben 14:44:39 ScribeNick: mhausenblas 14:44:45 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:44:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 14:44:52 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:45:07 ShaneM has joined #rdfa 14:45:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:45:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 14:55:26 Simone has joined #rdfa 14:57:06 might be a couple of minutes late on the phone 14:57:24 ok - anyway great to have you here! 14:58:18 msporny has joined #rdfa 15:00:36 RalphS has joined #rdfa 15:00:54 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started 15:01:01 +[IPcaller] 15:01:17 +Michael_Hausenblas 15:01:19 -[IPcaller] 15:01:21 +[IPcaller] 15:01:35 +ShaneM 15:01:46 +Ralph 15:02:19 benadida has joined #rdfa 15:02:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:02:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:03:37 -> http://www.w3.org/2007/07/26-rdfa-minutes.html previous 2007-07-26 15:03:41 +benadida 15:03:56 zakim, who is here? 15:03:56 On the phone I see [IPcaller], Michael_Hausenblas, ShaneM, Ralph, benadida 15:03:58 On IRC I see benadida, RalphS, msporny, Simone, ShaneM, Zakim, RRSAgent, mhausenblas 15:04:51 Zakim, IPcaller is msporny 15:04:51 +msporny; got it 15:05:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:05:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:06:07 +??P51 15:06:13 Zakim, ??P51 15:06:13 I don't understand '??P51', Simone 15:06:26 Zakim, ??P51 is me 15:06:26 +Simone; got it 15:07:03 Ben: Did a lot last week - now TC 15:07:07 Topic: Action Item Review 15:07:13 -> http://www.w3.org/2007/07/26-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary 15:07:29 [NEW] ACTION: Ben writeup a summary of this discussion [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] 15:07:35 -- done 15:07:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Jul/0209.html 15:09:00 [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to sum up @href/@resource everywhere proposal [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/12-rdfa-minutes.html#action10] 15:09:06 -- continue 15:09:29 s/continue/continues 15:09:35 [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to look into Science Commons use case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/11-htmltf-minutes.html#action04] 15:09:46 -- continues 15:09:52 [PENDING] ACTION: Elias to send email to list with use case from IBM [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/04-htmltf-minutes.html#action10] 15:09:56 -- continues 15:10:22 [PENDING] ACTION: MarkB to work rdf:label back into RDFa syntax when using @content after October [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/19-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] 15:10:29 -- continues 15:11:09 Topic: Test Cases 15:11:15 scribenick: ralphs 15:11:30 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC TC 15:12:09 Michael: we've already approved 1 through 18 15:12:34 s/approved/reviewed/ 15:13:08 Ben: I can volunteer to look over the cases to see if we have invalidated any with our recent decisions 15:13:39 Michael: any such cases are either 'on hold' or should be removed 15:14:07 test case 0019 15:14:07 15:14:07 @about for subject 15:14:23 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0019 test 19 15:15:03 proposed to accept 19 15:15:26 resolved to accept 19 15:15:42 test case 0020 Inheriting @about for subject 15:15:55 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0020 test 20 15:16:00 Michael: two nested spans 15:16:31 resolved to accept 20 15:16:57 test case 0021 Subject inheritance with no @about 15:17:10 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0021 test 21 15:17:26 Michael: the semantics now look strange to me 15:18:12 Ben: looks good to me; creator is specified in the correct direction 15:18:22 resolved to accept 21 15:18:37 test case 0022 meta with parent @id 15:18:43 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0022 test 22 15:19:00 Ben: given that we're not including META in body in XHTML 1, we should reject this test 15:19:07 resolved to reject 22 15:19:23 test case 0023 Ignore @id in non-parent ancestor 15:19:31 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0023 test 23 15:19:47 Michael: this test now tests another useful feature 15:20:00 ... we could rename it to 'test that @id does not generate subjects' 15:20:57 Ben: yes, this recent decision does require some implementation changes. I have code for those edge cases, though we've not seen those edge cases in practice 15:21:10 resolved to accept 23 with a renaming 15:23:23
this photo was taken by Mark Birbeck
15:24:29 Ben: formerly this test demonstrated that 'photo1' was not inherited. Now the same test shows that @id never triggers a triple 15:25:06 test case 0024 Ignore @id for non-meta and non-link 15:25:22 Michael: this test should be rejected as redundant 15:25:34 Ben: yes, effectively merged with test 23 15:25:49 resolved to merge 24 into 23 15:26:07 Michael: I'd prefer to just reject rather than merge 15:26:40 resolved to drop 24; it does not test anything new 15:26:52 test case 0025 @id for object 15:27:06 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0025 test 25 15:27:07 Ben Adida, ben@adida.net. 15:27:16 15:27:21 Ben: this test is "interestingly" controversial 15:27:49 <> dc:creator <#me> . 15:27:57 ... I interpreted this as creating striping (or 'chaining' as Mark has called it) 15:28:09 ... that's what test 25 was meant to test 15:28:33 ... one of our non-binding resolutions from last week was to not consider @id 15:28:45 ... so with that in mind, we should reject this test 15:28:55 Glossary in -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/ 15:29:08 Michael: I'm trying to put together a glossary in the umbrella document 15:29:13 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/ 15:29:21 ... I found the striping idea very confusing 15:29:48 ... I recommend that the term 'striping' be better-defined or changed to 'chaining' 15:30:21 Ben: I'm happy to change the word to 'chaining' instead 15:31:39 Ben: test 25 was my old idea of how the markup should work, now we're using @href instead 15:31:51 Michael: rather than drop the test, let's rewrite it to use @href 15:32:46 Shane: this is a pretty arcane level of RDF 15:33:12 Ben: last week's discussion was about the use of @id to do chaining. Mark was opposed to that 15:33:21 Shane: I don't much care about this notion of chaining 15:33:58 Ben: the intent is to be able to describe intermediate resources 15:34:21 Shane: that description makes a lot more sense 15:34:59 Ben: the concept of 'chaining' is about defining an intermediate resource 15:35:07 ... e.g. a music album with a musician who has a name 15:35:20 ... the question is what XML attribute triggers this object/subject switch 15:36:36 ... so test 25 should confirm our decision on which attribute (now @resource) triggers the object/subject switch 15:37:15 ... foaf:mbox could be dropped from this test to simplify it as a chaining test 15:37:41 ... the foaf:mbox adds a second level of chaining 15:37:48 This paper was written by 15:37:56 15:38:02 Ben Adida. 15:38:07 15:38:10 s/@resource="me"/resource="#me"/ 15:38:29 Ben: yes, that's the simple example 15:38:53 resolved to accept test 25, rewritten, and renamed to 'simple chaining example' 15:38:59 15:39:39 Ben: add ^ to the test for a slightly bigger example 15:40:15 Michael: I'd rather create a new, separate test -- call it test 33 15:40:26 Ben: 33 should use @rel without @resource 15:40:53 ... and producing the same SPARQL ask as TC25 15:41:13 ... with a bNode instead of #me 15:42:15 Simone: phone is bad :( so TC are ok for me 15:42:32 test case 0026 @content 15:42:39 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0026 test 26 15:42:55 Michael: but the span has no content 15:43:01 Ben: so it's a bnode 15:43:14 15:43:35 s/bnode/empty literal/ 15:44:18 15:45:21 Michael: from an XML viewpoint, 26 and 27 as written are not very different 15:45:59 Ben: right, we're not testing XML here. It would be OK to change 26 to be a self-closed element 15:46:17 Shane: I think they're both interesting test cases; they'd really test the DOM parser 15:47:00 ... but I don't think self-closing SPANs work, say, in Internet Explorer 15:47:35 Ben: 26 is worthwhile as a self-closed element and if IE has trouble, that's good to know 15:47:47 resolved to accept 26, re-written as a self-closed element 15:48:00 ACTION: Michael test how behaves in Internet Explorer 15:48:41 Ben: test 27 is the same as 26 but has content in the span 15:48:43 resolved to accept 27 15:48:56 test case 0028 @xml:lang and @datatype 15:49:04 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0028 test 28 15:49:17 Ben: this test the affect of xml:lang on the triple 15:50:11 s/test/tests/ 15:50:39 Ben: test 28 looks OK to me 15:50:54 ACTION: Ben to work through xml:lang issue with Ivan 15:51:02 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Jul/0198.html 15:51:45 Ben: I need to followup with Ivan on the behavior of xml:lang 15:51:55 Michael: I think Karl's message 0198 may resolve this 15:52:07 Ben: ok, but I want the Task Force to review it 15:52:38 ACTION: Michael to email individual emails to resolve TCs 29-33 (TC 28 to be resolved post xml:lang discussion) 15:53:00 scribenick: mhausenblas 15:53:05 Topic: Documents 15:53:32 Ben: We agreed last time to use XHTML XXX 15:54:15 Shane: Currently no contact to Steven 15:54:22 ... he has the edit token 15:54:29 [Steven is on holiday] 15:55:01 Ben: We have an array of changes (chaining, no @id, etc.) 15:55:56 Ralph: He did no significant changes; should be back on 13 Aug 15:56:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:56:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:56:26 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:56:39 Ralph: Does Steven work offline? 15:57:02 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/ 15:57:30 Shane: Give me a correct version, I'll take care for the conversion 15:57:39 ... may take me some couple of an hour 15:58:08 Ben: Not time-frozen version, but the actual one 15:58:54 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/Overview.xml 15:59:45 Ben: Pls keep me in the loop 16:00:00 ... as Mark and Steven are on holiday 16:00:20 ... we might need a separate chat 16:00:30 Shane: the XHTML2 WG has a separate content management system not on w3.org 16:00:41 Shane: There is a separate access control/system we work on 16:00:45 Ralph: that's too bad, but if the work is getting done then ok 16:01:13 Ben: Have to look at the Primer 16:01:33 ... and update it according to the newest development 16:01:45 Topic: Implementations 16:02:00 Shane: the intention is still to keep the syntax document as a stand-alone document 16:02:15 -> http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#Implementations 16:03:18 ACTION: Ben to recontact implementors Elias, MarkB and post their implementations to http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#Implementations 16:03:24 question: does syntax document become rec-track? I can't remember 16:03:33 s/, MarkB/, MarkB, triplr/ 16:03:58 Ben says yes. 16:04:36 Note that there is already a sepaarate xhtml-rdfa document that does a similar thing, but without all the syntax parsing rules. 16:04:43 s/sepaarate/separate/ 16:04:50 Ralph: TomB had the question regarding reck-track 16:05:09 s/sepaarate/separate 16:05:22 Simone: I'm testing Js implementation and works great, for XSL implementation I've load a parser with Fabien's XSL but my Sablotron has problem, so also Monkey RDFa (a PHP parser with n3 output) works good 16:07:02 Simone: So on W3C XSL servlet is ok, we may ask to get an RDFa extractor service? 16:07:40 Michael: will we ever declare the test cases frozen? 16:08:51 Ralph: as we're not doing conformance test, I suggest we leave ourselves the option to add a test whenever we reach a decision about an open question 16:10:04 Ben: it would be nice to be able to add a test without having to take [the test case] document back to Last Call 16:10:31 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:10:39 ... for now, it's good that our strategy be to act as if the test cases were Rec Track 16:11:26 -ShaneM 16:11:30 Ben: I'll be running in-between meetings next week, may have difficulty making a call 16:11:42 -Michael_Hausenblas 16:11:54 zakim, who is on the call? 16:11:54 On the phone I see msporny, Ralph, benadida, Simone 16:12:02 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:12:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:12:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:13:14 -Simone 16:14:43 zakim, list participants 16:14:43 As of this point the attendees have been Michael_Hausenblas, ShaneM, Ralph, benadida, msporny, Simone 16:15:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:15:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:16:03 bye 16:26:22 -Ralph 16:26:25 -benadida 16:26:27 benadida has left #rdfa 16:26:27 -msporny 16:26:29 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended 16:26:30 Attendees were Michael_Hausenblas, ShaneM, Ralph, benadida, msporny, Simone 16:27:46 zakim, bye 16:27:46 Zakim has left #rdfa 16:27:58 ShaneM has left #rdfa 17:04:41 rrsagent, bye 17:04:41 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-actions.rdf : 17:04:41 ACTION: Michael test how behaves in Internet Explorer [1] 17:04:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-irc#T15-48-00 17:04:41 ACTION: Ben to work through xml:lang issue with Ivan [2] 17:04:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-irc#T15-50-54 17:04:41 ACTION: Michael to email individual emails to resolve TCs 29-33 (TC 28 to be resolved post xml:lang discussion) [3] 17:04:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-irc#T15-52-38 17:04:41 ACTION: Ben to recontact implementors Elias, MarkB and post their implementations to http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#Implementations [4] 17:04:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/02-rdfa-irc#T16-03-18