13:49:00 RRSAgent has joined #er 13:49:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-er-irc 13:49:05 Zakim has joined #er 13:49:11 zakim, this will be ERT 13:49:11 ok, shadi; I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 11 minutes 13:49:17 meeting: ERT WG 13:49:21 chair: Shadi 13:49:26 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0015.html 13:49:47 agenda+ Test mode definitions 13:50:00 agenda+ Review the plan for publishing EARL 1.0 Guide 13:50:09 agemda+ Review the plan for publishing Pointer Methods in RDF 13:50:19 agenda+ Review the plan for publishing Pointer Methods in RDF 13:50:24 agenda+ Revised simplified approach for HTTP-in-RDF 13:54:27 JR has joined #er 13:56:54 drooks has joined #er 13:58:28 WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has now started 13:58:38 +Shadi 13:58:42 +[IPcaller] 13:58:44 + +0175356aaaa 13:59:02 zakim, [IPcaller] is really JR 13:59:02 +JR; got it 13:59:16 zakim, aaaa is really David 13:59:16 +David; got it 14:01:23 CarlosV has joined #er 14:01:56 CarlosI has joined #er 14:02:33 +Klaus/Johannes/Thomas 14:02:52 +Klaus/Johannes/Thomas.a 14:02:54 JohannesK has joined #er 14:03:04 zakim, klaus is really Johannes 14:03:04 sorry, shadi, I do not recognize a party named 'klaus' 14:03:15 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:03:15 On the phone I see Shadi, JR, David, Klaus/Johannes/Thomas, Klaus/Johannes/Thomas.a 14:03:25 zakim, klaus/johannes/thomas is really Johannes 14:03:25 +Johannes; got it 14:03:34 zakim, klaus/johannes/thomas.a is really CarlosV 14:03:34 +CarlosV; got it 14:04:21 agenda? 14:05:46 regrets: Reinhard 14:06:06 +[CTIC] 14:06:17 zakim, ctic is really CarlosI 14:06:17 +CarlosI; got it 14:06:37 scribe: CarlosI 14:06:40 scribenick: CarlosI 14:06:46 zakim, take up agendum 1 14:06:46 agendum 1. "Test mode definitions" taken up [from shadi] 14:06:54 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues#testmode 14:07:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0000 14:07:31 SAZ: Issue #7 Test Mode 14:07:46 http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-er-minutes#item05 14:08:08 SAZ: Discussion before but without conclusions so far 14:08:51 JR: could you summarize? 14:09:30 Where a software tool WAS ABLE TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL PROBLEM INSTANCES, 14:09:30 BUT WHERE HUMAN judgment WAS STILL REQUIRED TO DECIDE OR HELP TO DECIDE 14:09:30 WHETHER AN ACTUAL PROBLEM EXISTS. This should be additionally noted 14:09:30 through the earl:compoundAssertor class of the Assertor. 14:10:48 SAZ: semiautomatic is more about the tool taking the decision but with a little human help 14:11:36 -JR 14:12:05 +Jan_Richards 14:13:34 JR: manual in ATAG means that tool provide info and so but the person makes the decision 14:14:53 JR: in automatic mode the tool makes decision without the need of any human interaction 14:16:46 JR: a tool ask to the person look at the image about description 14:17:07 JR: the person looks at the image and says it's not 14:17:44 JK: other scenario 14:18:02 JK: the tool ask the user: is this a layout table? 14:18:58 JK: if the user says yes and there are structural table elements in the layout table, then the tool takes the decission that this is wrong 14:21:48 SAZ: the difference seems to be that in same cases the tool just go through the document and list things and in other cases it also makes something more "elaborated", a sort of preprocessing 14:22:40 -CarlosI 14:23:19 +CarlosI 14:24:40 CV: try to distinguish who has the main role could add a lot of confussion 14:27:55 CI: The key question is who has the final word, if it's the machine it's automatic, if it's the person is manual 14:29:12 CI: dropping semi-automatic would be the most clear 14:32:44 SAZ: focus on who is doing the hard work instead of the decission 14:33:51 CI: if you need the human intervention it will be manual 14:34:41 JK: so, if there's no human intervention at all it's going to be automatic 14:35:59 SAZ: focus on semi-automatic which is the tricky case 14:39:08 JK: A test tool presents a document to the user with a tree view 14:39:42 JK: The user finds a layout table in the tree and comunicates this to the tool, using a checkbox for example 14:42:01 JR: you need at least have automatic instance location 14:43:21 SAZ: you can look also at "good things", not just problems 14:45:09 JR: will take the rewording to the ATAG WG 14:45:54 JR: are there repair modes in EARL? 14:46:06 SAZ: no, just evaluation 14:47:53 ACTION: SAZ to take the wording back to ATAG and have a final decision next week 14:48:10 -Jan_Richards 14:48:46 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0008 14:49:33 ACTION: everybody to response to the thread on the mailing list 14:49:44 zakim, take up next 14:49:44 agendum 2. "Review the plan for publishing EARL 1.0 Guide" taken up [from shadi] 14:50:03 http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-er-minutes#item01 14:50:40 SAZ: CV, we expected something by yesterday 14:50:52 CV: will be for the next week 14:51:14 s/next week/tonight! 14:51:20 zakim, take up next 14:51:20 agendum 3. "Review the plan for publishing Pointer Methods in RDF" taken up [from shadi] 14:51:35 http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-er-minutes#item02 14:51:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0016.html 14:53:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/att-0016/PointersChangesDraft.htm 14:55:44 CI: it's a summarize of the current state of the art taking into consideration what we have discussed until now, specially at the last F2F 14:56:09 CI: there're some open issues to discuss about 14:56:32 CI: we need to decide what are we going to address before next draft 14:57:40 SAZ: would be good to have issues highlighted to help distinguish them 14:58:26 ACTION: CI to highlight issues in the document 15:00:15 SAZ: is there anything missing or can we freeze this requirements for the next draft? 15:01:00 ACTION: everybody to check the document and look for missing things 15:02:40 zakim, take up next 15:03:02 agendum 4. "Revised simplified approach for HTTP-in-RDF" taken up [from shadi] 15:03:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0009 15:03:28 SAZ: updated with discuss so far 15:03:32 -CarlosV 15:03:42 sorry I must go 15:04:34 -CarlosI 15:04:38 -Shadi 15:04:42 -Johannes 15:06:04 -David 15:06:06 WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has ended 15:06:08 Attendees were Shadi, +0175356aaaa, JR, David, Johannes, CarlosV, CarlosI, Jan_Richards 15:07:00 zakim, bye 15:07:00 Zakim has left #er 15:07:07 rrsagent, make logs world 15:07:12 rrsagent, make minutes 15:07:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-er-minutes.html shadi 15:07:14 rrsagent, make logs world 15:07:18 rrsagent, bye 15:07:18 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-er-actions.rdf : 15:07:18 ACTION: SAZ to take the wording back to ATAG and have a final decision next week [1] 15:07:18 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-er-irc#T14-47-53 15:07:18 ACTION: everybody to response to the thread on the mailing list [2] 15:07:18 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-er-irc#T14-49-33 15:07:18 ACTION: CI to highlight issues in the document [3] 15:07:18 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-er-irc#T14-58-26 15:07:18 ACTION: everybody to check the document and look for missing things [4] 15:07:18 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-er-irc#T15-01-00