12:29:56 RRSAgent has joined #xmlsec 12:29:56 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-xmlsec-irc 12:30:00 zakim, this will be xmlsec 12:30:00 ok, tlr; I see T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM scheduled to start in 30 minutes 12:30:07 rrsagent, make this record public 12:30:14 Meeting: XML Security Specifications Maint WG weekly 12:30:18 Date: 10 July 2007 12:30:45 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0006.html 12:31:01 previous: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0000.html 12:38:03 fjh has joined #xmlsec 12:52:42 hal has joined #xmlsec 12:52:51 zakim, this will be xmlsec 12:52:51 ok, fjh; I see T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 12:54:16 Meeting: XML Security Specifications Maintenance WG Conference Call 12:54:25 Chair: Frederick Hirsch 12:54:34 ScribeNick: hal 12:55:19 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0006.html 12:55:30 RRSAgent, make log public 12:55:43 zakim, who is here? 12:55:43 T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM has not yet started, fjh 12:55:43 On IRC I see hal, fjh, RRSAgent, Zakim, tlr, trackbot-ng 12:58:04 zakim, what is the code? 12:58:04 the conference code is 965732 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), fjh 12:58:35 T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM has now started 12:58:42 +Frederick_Hirsch 12:58:53 zakim, mute me 12:58:53 sorry, fjh, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 12:59:03 zakim, who is on the call 12:59:03 I don't understand 'who is on the call', fjh 12:59:08 zakim, call thomas-781 12:59:08 ok, tlr; the call is being made 12:59:09 +Thomas 12:59:10 zakim, who is on the call? 12:59:10 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, Thomas (muted) 12:59:16 + +1.613.726.aaaa 12:59:24 zakim, aaaa is EdSimon 12:59:24 +EdSimon; got it 12:59:34 sean has joined #xmlsec 13:00:05 zakim, I am thomas 13:00:05 ok, tlr, I now associate you with Thomas 13:00:06 zakim, mute me 13:00:06 Thomas should now be muted 13:00:07 zakim, i am Frederick_Hirsch 13:00:08 ok, fjh, I now associate you with Frederick_Hirsch 13:00:15 zakim, mute me 13:00:16 Frederick_Hirsch should now be muted 13:00:20 zakim, unmute me 13:00:22 + +1.617.876.aabb 13:00:26 Frederick_Hirsch should no longer be muted 13:00:28 rmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:00:31 zakim, aabb is sean 13:00:36 +sean; got it 13:01:08 +Hal_Lockhart 13:01:25 + +1.443.695.aacc 13:01:32 zakim, aacc is rmiller 13:01:32 +rmiller; got it 13:01:44 zakim, who is on the call? 13:01:44 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, Thomas (muted), EdSimon, sean, Hal_Lockhart, rmiller 13:02:01 EdS has joined #xmlsec 13:02:07 zakim, nick EdS is EdSimon 13:02:08 ok, tlr, I now associate EdS with EdSimon 13:02:14 Present: Frederick Hirsch, Thomas Roessler, Ed Simon, Sean Mullen, Hal Lockhart, Rob Miller 13:02:30 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0006.html 13:03:02 Topic: administrivia 13:03:05 TOPIC: Administrivia 13:03:20 ok, Hal, I'll leave the topics to you 13:03:30 next meeting 17 July, Thomas to scribe 13:03:45 Resolution: call on July 24 canceled 13:03:58 klanz2 has joined #xmlsec 13:04:00 zakim, am I muted? 13:04:00 I don't understand your question, tlr. 13:04:03 zakim, who is muted? 13:04:03 I see Thomas muted 13:04:54 rdmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:04:57 fjh: wiki technology to change 13:05:10 ... should not affect this WG 13:05:30 .. will inform ok unless hear otherwise 13:05:38 PHB has joined #xmlsec 13:05:57 ... workshop CFP is out, please publicise 13:06:10 topic: Approve Minutes 13:06:12 http://www.w3.org/2007/06/26-xmlsec-minutes 13:06:30 resolution: approved unimously 13:06:32 zakim, who is on the call? 13:06:32 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, Thomas (muted), EdSimon, sean, Hal_Lockhart, rmiller 13:06:38 s/unimously/unanimously/ 13:06:52 +??P12 13:06:52 topic: Action Item Review 13:06:58 +??P13 13:07:03 zakim, ??P12 is klanz2 13:07:03 +klanz2; got it 13:07:12 zakim, ??P13 is JuanCarlosCruellas 13:07:13 +JuanCarlosCruellas; got it 13:07:35 Present+ Juan Carlos Curellas 13:07:42 Present+ Konrad Lanz 13:07:44 jcc has joined #xmlsec 13:07:55 zakim, nick jcc is JuanCarlosCruellas 13:07:55 ok, tlr, I now associate jcc with JuanCarlosCruellas 13:08:01 I am able to update tracker. 13:08:55 ACTION-35 closed 13:08:55 Sorry... I don't know how to close ACTION yet 13:09:28 ACTION-35 Close no activity 13:09:52 ACTION-50 Open 13:09:53 zakim, who is on the call? 13:09:53 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, Thomas (muted), EdSimon, sean, Hal_Lockhart, rmiller, klanz2, JuanCarlosCruellas 13:10:22 Phill, we are wondering if you can dial in? 13:10:35 ACTION-53 Open 13:10:45 zakim, unmute me 13:10:45 Thomas should no longer be muted 13:11:23 ACTION-56 Open Need PK from Juan Carlos 13:11:35 zakim, code? 13:11:35 the conference code is 965732 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), PHB 13:11:36 ACTION-57 Close 13:11:48 ACTION-58 Open 13:12:01 ACTION-59 Close 13:12:11 ACTION-60 Close 13:12:12 +PHB 13:13:09 Topic: Interop Questionaire 13:13:50 fjh: please fill out questionaire 13:14:01 questionnaire: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/interop-sched/ 13:14:09 fjh: is there risk to only three impls? 13:14:27 jcc: we have an impl 13:14:47 sean: just started on C14N 13:15:38 ACTION: fjh to contact Aleksey Sanin about interop and attendance 13:15:38 Created ACTION-61 - Contact Aleksey Sanin about interop and attendance [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2007-07-17]. 13:16:00 rdmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:16:04 q+ hal 13:16:07 q- hal 13:16:21 q+ 13:16:54 rdmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:20:20 topic: text cases 13:20:28 /text cases/test cases/ 13:20:30 argh 13:20:36 s/text cases/test cases/ 13:20:44 s/topic: text cases/topic: test cases/ 13:21:04 jcc: developed categories of tests 13:21:11 ... legacy tests 13:21:30 zakim, mute me 13:21:30 Thomas should now be muted 13:21:31 ... c14N 1.1 tests 13:22:04 ... covering changes 13:22:30 ... application of implicit and explicit C14N 13:22:41 c14n11 test for each xml namespace attribute 13:22:50 ... for example with xml:id 13:23:19 ... last group for checking rules for coding Dnames 13:23:45 ... some tests are missing right now 13:24:32 ... use Konrad's examples as basis of tests 13:25:33 ... fjh: C14N 1.1 has both input and output 13:26:05 klanz2: only some tests have input and output 13:26:23 q+ 13:26:29 fjh: will need input and output for every test 13:27:18 jcc: can link from doc to test cases 13:27:24 ack thomas 13:27:31 q- 13:27:33 ack sean 13:28:00 q+ 13:28:18 q+ 13:28:18 sean: will we wait for working impl to create output? 13:28:32 sean: or will we do it by hand 13:28:39 ack klanz 13:29:11 klanz2: review process in parallel with test case development 13:30:21 q+ 13:30:23 ... put test cases in, then review before workshop what is needed 13:30:30 ack JuanCarlosCurellas 13:31:11 jcc: certain examples in C14N document 13:31:26 ... use as way of checking 13:31:36 ack hal 13:32:24 q+ 13:32:46 hal: reiterating sean's question - what is strategy for testing correctness? 13:32:49 q+ 13:32:57 ... need time for hand crafting 13:33:04 ack JuanCarlosCruellas 13:34:29 rdmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:34:37 rdmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:35:30 jcc: proposing using examples from docs as test cases where possible 13:35:47 ... Dname encoding more difficulet 13:35:59 ... might need many certificates 13:36:01 q+ 13:36:19 q+ 13:36:23 ACTION: jcc to send email describing examples to clarify testing issues 13:36:23 Created ACTION-62 - Send email describing examples to clarify testing issues [on Juan Carlos Cruellas - due 2007-07-17]. 13:36:30 ack klanz 13:37:10 klanz: not too formal, just put test cases in CVS 13:37:13 q- 13:37:39 ... if we get different results we can examine 13:38:18 ... for implicit or explicit just create document to sign 13:38:22 q+ 13:38:26 ack sean 13:38:30 ... run against old and new versions 13:38:57 sean: agree C14N test cases can be generated by hand 13:39:00 sean: c14n test cases can be generated by hand, then generate sigs against those 13:39:09 ack JuanCarlosCruellas 13:39:48 s/old and new versions/old and new versions of XML Canonicalization/ 13:39:50 q+ 13:40:02 jcc: agree, everybody should look at test case document 13:41:04 ack Thomas 13:41:06 http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/testcases.html 13:41:15 +1 to fjh 13:41:38 webcvs ? 13:41:45 ACTION: fjh to write up process outline for interop 13:41:45 Created ACTION-63 - Write up process outline for interop [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2007-07-17]. 13:42:52 tlr: clarified CVS machinery 13:43:24 jcc: suggest action to those creating test cases to avoid duplicate effort 13:43:44 q+ 13:44:10 fjh: need to review jcc document 13:44:15 ack hal 13:45:49 q+ 13:46:10 ack klanz 13:46:24 in summary, will be a doc on the process 13:46:52 another doc with all categories of test containing links to actual tests 13:46:54 q+ 13:47:22 klanz: need to determine naming of test cases, first case defines it, subsequent use that name 13:47:25 tests to be in CVS, use CVS to manage conflicts, duplicate work 13:47:28 ... keep it easy 13:47:48 RecommendationRef.SpecificIssue[.SpecificSub-Issue]#TestNumber-(positive | negative | caveat) 13:47:50 rdmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:48:07 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0006.html 13:48:50 ok for me 13:48:51 fjh: need to take this to the list 13:49:18 topic: XML Signature Draft 13:49:49 http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/#sec-X509Data 13:49:58 fjh: are we happy with this document? 13:50:06 ... ed made comment 13:50:29 q+ 13:50:30 EdS: draft is condridictory 13:50:53 ack JuanCarlosCruellas 13:50:54 ... propose 2 changes to clarify Dname encoding 13:51:13 ack Thomas 13:52:07 tlr: current text is more leniant than RFC 4514 13:52:31 ... need seperate section, editorial change 13:52:43 thomas: not contradictory since RFC defines grammar, more lenient than augmentation 13:52:44 EdS: could be less confusing 13:53:09 http://www.w3.org/mid/000001c7c290$863f19f0$6800a8c0@XMLSEC004 13:54:09 tlr: see what Ed is suggesting, disagree 13:54:47 zakim, mute me 13:54:47 Frederick_Hirsch should now be muted 13:55:08 ... two sections reference different things 13:55:12 zakim, unmute me 13:55:12 Frederick_Hirsch should no longer be muted 13:55:26 +1 to tlr 13:55:28 q+ 13:55:30 q+ 13:55:34 ... constraint on string and how to generate string 13:56:06 zakim, mute me 13:56:06 Frederick_Hirsch should now be muted 13:56:18 zakim, unmute me 13:56:18 Frederick_Hirsch should no longer be muted 13:56:34 seems like we need to clarify that we speak of grammar and generation rules 13:57:07 ack klanz 13:58:01 agreed proposal: "DN should be represented as in sec 3, generated as in sec .. 13:58:15 ack Frederick_Hirsch 13:59:07 zakim, who is on the call? 13:59:07 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, Thomas, EdSimon, sean, Hal_Lockhart, rmiller, klanz2, JuanCarlosCruellas, PHB 13:59:25 zakim, who is here? 13:59:25 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, Thomas, EdSimon, sean, Hal_Lockhart, rmiller, klanz2, JuanCarlosCruellas, PHB 13:59:27 On IRC I see jcc, PHB, klanz2, EdS, rmiller, sean, hal, fjh, RRSAgent, Zakim, tlr, trackbot-ng 13:59:45 http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/#sec-X509Data 14:00:27 not there yet 14:00:48 tlr: propose changes to section 4.4.4 14:00:51 . The distinguished name SHOULD be represented as a string that complies with section 3 of 14:00:57 http://nelson.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html 14:01:03 looks ok to me 14:01:16 -rmiller 14:01:18 http://nelson.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-X509Data 14:01:29 looks ok to me 14:01:42 looks good to me 14:02:06 The distinguished name SHOULD be represented as a string that complies with section 3 of that SHOULD be compliant with RFC22534514 [LDAP-DN], 14:03:40 resolution: agree to change 14:04:14 RESOLUTION: WG agrees to E01 resolution in Editor's Draft $Date: 2007/07/10 14:18:36 $ 14:04:16 woo-hoo! 14:05:08 I just want to make a note for the minutes that TLR was highlighting that we want to distinguish between compliance and generation and so we will keep the original text while also adding my suggested additions (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0008.html). 14:06:08 -Hal_Lockhart 14:06:18 -PHB 14:06:32 -sean 14:06:33 -JuanCarlosCruellas 14:06:40 -EdSimon 14:06:49 hal, still on IRC? 14:07:04 RRSAgent, generate minutes 14:07:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-xmlsec-minutes.html fjh 14:07:32 hal, can you do the minutes fix-up? 14:07:40 ok 14:08:01 thanks 14:08:08 thank you Hal. One item is to remove the processing commands at the end, another is to check the edits and attendance 14:08:09 -Thomas 14:08:26 the draft minutes are at http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-xmlsec-minutes.html 14:09:07 ok will do 14:09:26 -Frederick_Hirsch 14:10:50 hal, please send the result directly to the mailing list. I'll get it from there and drop it in datespace as well 14:11:03 zakim, bye 14:11:03 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Frederick_Hirsch, Thomas, +1.613.726.aaaa, EdSimon, +1.617.876.aabb, sean, Hal_Lockhart, +1.443.695.aacc, rmiller, klanz2, 14:11:03 Zakim has left #xmlsec 14:11:04 ok 14:11:06 ... JuanCarlosCruellas, PHB 14:11:21 to public list or member list? 14:12:13 public 14:14:16 I'm using eclipse default editor which is more like using text editor 14:18:23 rrsagent, excuse us 14:18:23 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-xmlsec-actions.rdf : 14:18:23 ACTION: fjh to contact Aleksey Sanin about interop and attendance [1] 14:18:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-xmlsec-irc#T13-15-38 14:18:23 ACTION: jcc to send email describing examples to clarify testing issues [2] 14:18:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-xmlsec-irc#T13-36-23 14:18:23 ACTION: fjh to write up process outline for interop [3] 14:18:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-xmlsec-irc#T13-41-45 14:18:25 zakim, excuse us