IRC log of swd on 2007-07-10
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:52:05 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swd
- 14:52:05 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-swd-irc
- 14:52:28 [TomB]
- rrsagent, bookmark
- 14:52:28 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-swd-irc#T14-52-28
- 14:52:33 [TomB]
- zakim, this will be swd
- 14:52:33 [Zakim]
- ok, TomB, I see SW_SWD()11:00AM already started
- 14:52:48 [TomB]
- zakim, ??p5 is TomB
- 14:52:48 [Zakim]
- +TomB; got it
- 14:52:58 [TomB]
- Meeting: SWD WG
- 14:53:00 [TomB]
- Chair: Tom
- 14:53:44 [TomB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jul/0043.html
- 14:54:22 [TomB]
- Previous: http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html
- 14:54:46 [TomB]
- Regrets: Guus, Daniel, Diego, Ralph, Jon, Simone, Sean, Elisa, Clay
- 14:55:13 [TomB]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 14:58:14 [edsu]
- edsu has joined #swd
- 14:58:45 [Antoine]
- Antoine has joined #swd
- 15:00:24 [Bern]
- Bern has joined #swd
- 15:00:49 [Zakim]
- +??P16
- 15:00:59 [Zakim]
- + +0120682aaaa
- 15:01:10 [Bern]
- zakim, aaaa is Bernard
- 15:01:10 [Zakim]
- +Bernard; got it
- 15:01:10 [Antoine]
- zakim, P16 is Antoine
- 15:01:11 [Zakim]
- sorry, Antoine, I do not recognize a party named 'P16'
- 15:01:28 [vit]
- vit has joined #swd
- 15:01:36 [seanb]
- seanb has joined #swd
- 15:01:56 [Zakim]
- +[LC]
- 15:02:26 [Zakim]
- +[LC]
- 15:02:32 [TomB]
- Scribe: Bernard
- 15:02:38 [TomB]
- Scribenick: Bern
- 15:03:10 [Zakim]
- +??P34
- 15:04:13 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 15:05:37 [Bern]
- Topic: Admin
- 15:05:59 [Bern]
- TomB proposes accept minutes of 3rd July 2007
- 15:06:06 [Bern]
- No objections,
- 15:06:10 [seanb]
- Alistair's regrets: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jul/0056.html
- 15:06:11 [Bern]
- Resolved
- 15:06:21 [Bern]
- Next telecon 17th July
- 15:06:29 [Bern]
- ACTION: Guus to propose dates in Oct for Amsterdam meeting on SKOS [recorded in [43]http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action01]
- 15:06:36 [Bern]
- --continues
- 15:06:40 [Bern]
- Topic: SKOS
- 15:06:49 [Bern]
- ACTION: Antoine to raise issue of adding broader/narrower relations in skos [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action03]
- 15:06:49 [Antoine]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jul/0012.html
- 15:07:10 [Bern]
- --DONE
- 15:07:44 [Bern]
- Antione: proposal is related to former SKOS extension document
- 15:08:05 [Bern]
- ...with broaderGeneric, broaderPartitive etc.
- 15:08:18 [Bern]
- ...eg. one is meant to represent part-whole relationships
- 15:08:30 [Bern]
- ...some users have spotted these ideas and would like to use them
- 15:08:44 [Bern]
- ...so should we represent these ideas as part of SKOS?
- 15:08:50 [Bern]
- TomB: what is your opinion?
- 15:09:10 [Bern]
- Antione: some correspond to commonly-accepted relationships in thesaurus domain
- 15:09:39 [Bern]
- ...but may be some problems because some relationships are handled by multiple SKOS properties, such as broaderPartitive and relatedPart
- 15:09:59 [Bern]
- ...but generally I thin it would be a good idea to recognise that these properties were proposed
- 15:10:20 [Bern]
- ...and some users want to use these properties as part of their models
- 15:10:36 [Bern]
- TomB: anyone know how extensively these proeprties are already beeing used?
- 15:10:55 [Bern]
- ...it has a W3C URI and people are using it yet it's status seems ambiguous
- 15:11:07 [Bern]
- ...anyone checked to see amount of usage?
- 15:11:36 [Bern]
- Antoine: usage now is not important, but as long as they remain public and they correspond to common thesaurus usage then some users
- 15:11:44 [Bern]
- ...may start using them.
- 15:11:51 [Bern]
- Seanb: what is cost to us to include them?
- 15:12:22 [Bern]
- Antoine: not expensive, but I'm not sure they cover all the established needs. Some papers describe these kinds of links, but there are more
- 15:12:43 [Bern]
- ...but if we want to be extensive, or do we want to limit to the current extensions?
- 15:13:02 [Bern]
- TomB: has anyone raised any objections, other than partititive issue?
- 15:13:31 [Bern]
- ...what status they attained in original project and why they weren't moved into rest of spec?
- 15:14:08 [Bern]
- Antoine: I think it was for the readabiity of the standard, and to be clear about what properties can be extended by users.
- 15:14:10 [aliman]
- aliman has joined #swd
- 15:14:43 [Bern]
- ...For example, a kind of link that can be thought of is e.g. a painter, and a painting process. This relationship is not currently expressed in the
- 15:15:14 [Bern]
- ...SKOS model, so some users may be confused about how to create their extensions? Should they be a sub property of broader or some more core property?
- 15:15:38 [Bern]
- TomB: suggest we move on today, but discuss when Alistair is here to discover historical context
- 15:15:56 [Bern]
- ACTION: Guus to move Action 26 forward [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action04]
- 15:16:01 [Bern]
- --continues
- 15:16:10 [Bern]
- ACTION: Guus to post user experience reports for ISSUE-26 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action05]
- 15:16:14 [Bern]
- --continues
- 15:16:25 [Bern]
- -- ISSUE-33: Grouping Construct (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33)
- 15:16:42 [Bern]
- Tomb: Alistair has proposed a way forward
- 15:16:49 [Bern]
- -- ISSUE-33: Grouping Construct (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33)
- 15:16:58 [Bern]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0166.html
- 15:17:39 [Bern]
- TomB: Does anyone disagree with this approach?
- 15:17:46 [Bern]
- No response
- 15:18:08 [Bern]
- Antoine: Sean raised some concerns about syntactic constraints
- 15:18:17 [Bern]
- Seanb: haven't had time to consider this yet
- 15:18:50 [Bern]
- Antoine: didn't know if there was redundancy between syntactic and possible future semantic constraints
- 15:19:02 [Bern]
- ...wondering if more experienced people could say something about this
- 15:19:19 [Bern]
- tomB: related to issue 31
- 15:19:21 [Bern]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0166.html
- 15:20:04 [Bern]
- TomB: alistair has added comments about relationship to OWL, specifically OWL-DL
- 15:21:04 [Bern]
- TomB: without alistair's presence we can't make any progress on this today
- 15:21:14 [Bern]
- Topic: RDFa
- 15:21:44 [Bern]
- TomB: last week Ralph suggested a discussion about the difference between class and role
- 15:21:55 [Bern]
- ...is there anyone on the telecon to discuss this?
- 15:22:03 [aliman]
- aliman has joined #swd
- 15:22:05 [Bern]
- ACTION: Ralph to Discuss possibility of meeting for RDFa in Cambridge [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action02]
- 15:22:08 [Bern]
- --continues
- 15:22:12 [Bern]
- TOPIC: Recipes
- 15:22:20 [Bern]
- ACTION: Ralph to Discuss possibility of meeting for RDFa in Cambridge [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action02]
- 15:22:25 [Bern]
- --continues
- 15:22:33 [Bern]
- Topic: Vocabulary Management
- 15:22:41 [Bern]
- TomB: Lisa is not on call
- 15:22:57 [Bern]
- ...so let's continue to next meeting
- 15:23:11 [Bern]
- ...not enough people on the call
- 15:23:24 [Bern]
- [adjourned]
- 15:23:27 [seanb]
- seanb has left #swd
- 15:23:28 [Zakim]
- -Vit
- 15:23:29 [Zakim]
- -Justin
- 15:23:31 [Zakim]
- -Edsu
- 15:23:32 [Zakim]
- -Antoine
- 15:23:36 [Zakim]
- -Seanb
- 15:23:41 [edsu]
- edsu has left #swd
- 15:24:08 [TomB]
- zakim, list attendees
- 15:24:08 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been TomB, +0120682aaaa, Bernard, Antoine, Edsu, Seanb, Justin, Vit
- 15:24:40 [TomB]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 15:24:40 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-swd-minutes.html TomB
- 15:25:06 [aliman]
- hi tom, antoine, bernard, how's it going?
- 15:25:21 [aliman]
- sorry i couldn't make it, stuck in a meeting.
- 15:25:22 [Zakim]
- -Bernard
- 15:25:26 [TomB]
- aliman, hi
- 15:25:44 [TomB]
- we had a short meeting today - lots of regrets (including Guus and Ralph) - it's july...
- 15:26:01 [aliman]
- i saw, a couple of people at the open forum
- 15:26:06 [Zakim]
- -TomB
- 15:26:08 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
- 15:26:09 [Zakim]
- Attendees were TomB, +0120682aaaa, Bernard, Antoine, Edsu, Seanb, Justin, Vit
- 15:26:15 [TomB]
- oops
- 15:26:23 [TomB]
- aliman, are you still there?
- 15:26:28 [aliman]
- yep, here
- 15:26:50 [TomB]
- Jon, Elisa, Clay... anyone else?
- 15:27:18 [aliman]
- think it's just you, me, antoine & bern on IRC
- 15:27:47 [TomB]
- Jon, Elisa, and Clay are at the open forum I think
- 15:28:21 [aliman]
- yep
- 15:29:46 [Antoine]
- hey there were still things happening here :-)
- 15:30:06 [Antoine]
- bye
- 15:30:16 [Antoine]
- Antoine has left #swd
- 15:30:42 [aliman]
- aliman has joined #swd
- 15:30:57 [TomB]
- aliman, talk to you next week?
- 15:31:16 [aliman]
- yep, talk to you then. sorry, dodgy wireless here. hope you're well.