14:01:12 RRSAgent has joined #xhtml 14:01:12 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-xhtml-irc 14:01:28 rrsagent, make log public 14:01:32 zakim, this is xhtml 14:01:32 ok, Steven; that matches IA_XHTML2()10:00AM 14:01:42 zakim, dial steven-617 14:01:42 ok, Steven; the call is being made 14:01:43 - +0138687aaaa 14:01:44 + +0138687aaaa 14:01:45 +Steven 14:01:46 zakim, who is here? 14:01:46 On the phone I see +0138687aaaa, Steven (muted) 14:01:47 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, yamx, Roland_, Steven, Charl, krijnh 14:01:49 +??P2 14:02:15 ShaneM has joined #xhtml 14:02:24 zakim, ??p2 is Roland_ 14:02:24 +Roland_; got it 14:02:36 zakim, aaaa is Yamx 14:02:36 +Yamx; got it 14:02:49 Meeting: Weekly XHTML2 WG Teleconference 14:03:02 Chair: Roland, Steven 14:03:24 +ShaneM 14:03:25 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Jul/0002 14:03:35 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Jul/0002 14:05:24 markbirbeck has joined #xhtml 14:05:57 rrsagent, make minutes 14:05:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 14:06:28 zakim, numbers 14:06:28 I don't understand 'numbers', markbirbeck 14:06:37 zakim, code? 14:06:37 the conference code is 94865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Steven 14:06:42 ah :) 14:06:53 Trying to find the UK one. 14:06:54 ta 14:07:24 Regrets: Rich, Alessio 14:07:53 + +1.208.761.aabb 14:08:08 zakim, i am aa 14:08:09 sorry, markbirbeck, I do not see a party named 'aa' 14:08:25 zakim, i am aabb 14:08:25 +markbirbeck; got it 14:08:37 Topic: Welcome Roland 14:09:12 Scribe: Steven 14:09:24 Roland: I work for IBM UK 14:09:30 ... in the past worked on XForms 14:09:35 ... and device independence 14:09:50 ... now back to W3C to co-chair this group, and more interesting work 14:10:54 Topic: New member 14:11:06 Steven: A new company is joining 14:11:35 ... a Japanese company 14:12:19 (machine running slowly, sorry) 14:12:58 ... Mitsue-links Co Ltd 14:13:23 Topics: Announcements 14:13:39 Steven: Tweo new questionnaires 14:13:45 ... one for forthcoming calls 14:13:49 ... one for FtF 14:14:26 Topic: GRDDL 14:14:42 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Jun/0027.html 14:15:32 Shane: I thought it was due a week from today 14:15:45 ... I will do it this week 14:15:53 Lachy has joined #xhtml 14:16:07 Steven: I will send an apology that we are running late 14:16:36 Topic: Wiki/blog 14:19:24 Steven: There are a few possibilities. I've been talking to vcarious people round W3C 14:19:40 ... b2evolution, moinmoin. Mediawiki may be installed sometime soon 14:19:57 Roland: Moinmoin is OK 14:20:07 Shane: We could restyle it, if we don't like the style 14:20:45 Roland: There might be a danger in being the first to use a new system 14:21:29 ACTION: Steven request a moinmoin instance 14:21:52 Topic: Role and access 14:22:36 Steven: Rich sent this message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Jul/0001.html 14:23:57 Shane: The small issue is what we want to say about an access element that doesn't specify a key attribute 14:25:59 Steven: The UA is allowed to override the key anyway, so binding a key when it is not specified should be fine 14:26:21 Roland: Some UAs will bind to softkeys 14:26:54 Steven: And UAs will likely bind well-knoiw roles to standard keys 14:27:18 Steven: So I think we agree with Rich's comment 14:27:36 Shane: There are two optional attributes as well, targetrole and targetid. 14:27:45 ... If neither is specified, what does it mean? 14:28:03 ... It could mean that the current element is the place where the event is raised 14:28:14 s/element/focus point/ 14:28:29 ... (no use case for that though) 14:28:46 ... or say "undefined" or "nothing happens". 14:28:53 ... Any opinions? 14:29:04 Roland: I wouldn't like it to be undefined. 14:29:08 Steven: Me neither 14:29:25 Shane: Or we could require one to be specified 14:29:40 ... but we couldn't validate that 14:29:48 Roland: Relax NG could 14:29:57 Shane: But not he W3C validator 14:30:03 s/ he / the / 14:30:28 Steven: True, but that shouldn't drive our design 14:30:48 Shane: So what do we think? 14:32:58 ... It could be useful to be able to raise an event without specifying target 14:33:31 Steven: But it would be just as easy by saying what the target is 14:33:38 Shane: Well, there is the focus issue 14:34:44 ... does raising a DOMActivate also change the focus? 14:35:18 Mark: I think it should get focus as well 14:35:21 Shane: So do I 14:37:06 Steven: Why do you care? 14:37:17 Shane: Well, if the link goes to another window 14:42:09 Mark: It depends on how you interpret DOMActivate 14:42:26 ... I think DOM2 Events is too vague to be sure whether the control has focus already 14:42:42 ... Is DOMACtivate a notification or an action? 14:43:59 Steven: But you can cancel a DOMActivate 14:44:05 ... which stops default processing 14:45:18 Roland: DOMFocusIn is not cancellable on the other hand 14:45:29 Roland: DOMFocusIn is not cancellable on the other hand 14:46:07 ... which suggests that you can't use DOMFocusIn to set focus 14:46:16 ... it is only notification that it has happenend 14:46:49 Shane: I noticed that; the only alternative is 'focus', but that is only valid on a small subset of elements 14:47:25 "This event is valid for the following elements: LABEL, INPUT, SELECT, TEXTAREA, and BUTTON" 14:49:34 Mark: The only two use cases we know of are "Give focus" and "Give focus and activate" 14:49:38 Tina has joined #xhtml 14:49:44 Steven: So maybe "raise" is too general 14:49:53 ... maybe we should just say those two things 14:50:27 ... or say that focus is always given, and then 'raise' gives an additional optional event 14:51:29 Mark: Or an attribute that is default giving focus, and allows you to specify activations 14:51:53 ... the default behaviour for role and id is surely different 14:52:04 ... for role it is always focus 14:52:13 ... but for id it doesn't have to 14:52:29 Shane: I don't want to special case it 14:52:47 Shane: Shouldn't targetid be a list? 14:52:50 Mark: Cute 14:54:26 Shane: Would it be the next id in the list, or the next id in the list in document sequence? 14:55:04 Mark: So tab gets you onto a route now (with next focus) and this way any key could put you on a route 14:55:52 SHane: Shall I spec it up? 14:55:56 s/SH/Sh/ 14:56:14 Steven: Send it to the list, I wouldn't want to add it to the spec before Rich has seen it 14:56:49 Shane: I think we agreed that an unsepcified key will then be assigned by the UA, and you must either specify a targetid or a targetrole 14:56:53 Steven: Yes 14:58:37 Steven: Out of time. Let's talk longdes next week (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2007Jul/thread.html#msg0) 14:58:47 s/longdes/longdesc/ 14:58:55 ... since we have a rather good solution already 15:00:11 Roland: 3.1.1 says something about id attribute; does that include xml:id 15:00:54 -ShaneM 15:00:55 -Steven 15:00:56 Roland_ has left #xhtml 15:00:57 -markbirbeck 15:00:58 -Yamx 15:01:02 IA_XHTML2()10:00AM has ended 15:01:04 Attendees were +0138687aaaa, Steven, Roland_, Yamx, ShaneM, +1.208.761.aabb, markbirbeck 15:01:11 Steven: We ought to accomodate xml:id; use whatever XML uses to describe the id-ness of an element, and not restrict it to id attributes 15:01:19 rrsagent, make minutes 15:01:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:02:03 s/Topics:/Topic:/ 15:02:29 rrsagent, make minutes 15:02:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:02:48 s/tweo/two/ 15:02:52 rrsagent, make minutes 15:02:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:03:18 s/Tweo/Two/ 15:03:23 rrsagent, make minutes 15:03:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/04-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:17:35 ShaneM has joined #xhtml 16:04:31 Lachy has joined #xhtml 17:29:04 Zakim has left #xhtml