See also: IRC log
<trackbot-ng> Date: 21 June 2007
<scribe> scribenick: jcantera2
RESOLUTION: Minutes are approved
<Rhys> latest editor's draft is at http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/editors-drafts/DeliveryContextClientInterface/2007-06-30/DCCI.html
keith: review of last call procedures
<steph> 1- define the period
<steph> 2- define the scope of the review
<steph> 3- define the mailing-list for the commentors
keith: all should be transitioned to uwa with
respect to the mailing list isn't it?
... I'm happy to go with any suggestions
<steph> 4- the list of group to ask review
<steph> (specifically)
<steph> 5- the list to spam to announce the LC
Rhys: In DISelect we had an specific mailing list
<steph> 6- who will deal with the the DoC
document
...: we need to discuss a couple of things before going with publication
Rhys: section 2.1 conformance
<steph> 7-provide a diff since the CR
<Rhys> Resolution: Agree to leave the use of the isSupported method in section 7.1 the way it is currently written in the draft
<Rhys> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-uwa/2007Jun/0064.html
Rhys: Sailesh was looking to an older version
of the document and the typos have been already fixed
...: The names of the properties completely separate from DOM Element
names
... that was Sailesh's position
... I think we decided time ago tto use element names
keith: I don't see arguments for separating
Rhys: We need a discussion with him. We cannot go to publication until we talk to Sailesh
steph: Next week call?
dsr: How long should we stay in last call?
Rhys: what's minum?
steph: 4 weeks
Rhys: minimum is reasonable
dsr: +1
steph: should we limit the review of the spec?
keith: keep it focused, the element / node
issue
... require comments directly from DOM IG
steph: We should describe why we are going back in the document
dsr: any other groups interested in review it?
<Rhys> ACTION: Rhys to send Stephane a description of the key change that required moving DCCI back to LC [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/21-uwawg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-27 - Send Stephane a description of the key change that required moving DCCI back to LC [on Rhys Lewis - due 2007-06-28].
dsr: Web API and WAF
keith: One of them
Rhys: the same we asked last time
steph: last time was a wide review
...: DOM IG could be the one to which require specific feedback
<Rotan> You can count on my "Chair's Hat" positive response, when it comes to it.
<Dave> we should invite comments from DOM IG and copy chairs, hcg and public-uwa
steph: specific mailing list ?
<steph> public-DCCI-LC-comments
Rhys: specific
<Rotan> Does "LC" have to be in the mailing list name?
good question Rotan
<Rotan> Yip. That's better: public-dcci-comments
<Rhys> I note that the DISelect list is called public-diselect-editors
<Rotan> Are the comments going to the group, or just to the editors?
Rhys: last call comment tracker should be based
<Rotan> If to the group, then public-dcci-comments sounds better than public-dcci-editors.
<Rotan> +1 to tracker
steph: We need to provide diff sections
...: something that describes what was the previous content
steph: it could be an appendix
dsr: other points?
<Rhys> ACTION: Rhys to add an appendix detailing the changes in the new version of DCCI [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/21-uwawg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-28 - Add an appendix detailing the changes in the new version of DCCI [on Rhys Lewis - due 2007-06-28].
dsr: some comments on CC/PP 2
steph: I will enter all in the tracker
<Dave> (steph is taking over from
Cedric)
...: most of the comments are editorial
<Rhys> +1 to Stephane's suggestion to discuss the items in more detail once they are in the LC tracker and the LC period is complete
<steph> stephane: we will bring cc/pp 2.0 on the agenda
<steph> after july 6 (end of the extended review period)
<steph> and after i enter all teh comments in the cc/pp2.0 lc tracker
dsr: a final call from the REX PAG
<Dave> minutes from final REX PAG call http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-rexp-minutes.html
Rhys: we should close REX PAG with no resolution
<Rotan> Will be able to be in start discussions of layout, just before I go on vacation.
<Rhys> Just to clarify, the REX V1 PAG is likely to close. There may be a need to reopen something when REX V2 work kicks off
<Rotan> +1 to Jose re September.
<Rhys> +1 to Jose re September
<Rhys> Jose suggests starting the layout work in September
<Rotan> Moving DISelect to next stage is a good issue to cover.
<steph> http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/trackbot/actions/20
steph: we need to record group decision
<Rotan> Are we quorate?
<steph> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-uwa/2007Jun/0025.html
dsr: any objections to move into CR?
<Rotan> No objections from me re moving to CR.
<Rhys> Resolution: Move DISelect and XAF to CR
<Dave> ACTION: Rhys to add changes since LCWD to the draft CR for DISelect/XAF [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/21-uwawg-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-29 - Add changes since LCWD to the draft CR for DISelect/XAF [on Rhys Lewis - due 2007-06-28].
<Rhys> ACTION: Rhys to provide a section on the changes since LC [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/21-uwawg-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-30 - Provide a section on the changes since LC [on Rhys Lewis - due 2007-06-28].
steph: what we are going to test?
<Dave> trackbot-agent, drop ACTION-29
steph: We need an implementation of both profiles
Rhys: We need two implementations of each feature
<Dave> Dave notes WAF WG plan to stop its work on declarative formats for apps and UI, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2007Jun/0133.html
<Rotan> +1 to the idea