14:57:04 RRSAgent has joined #grddl-wg 14:57:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-irc 14:57:05 agendum 13 added 14:57:07 agenda+ Standard Transformation Library 14:57:08 agendum 14 added 14:57:09 agenda+ #issue-dbooth-3(ambiguity) 14:57:10 agendum 15 added 14:57:11 agenda+ #issue-base-param 14:57:13 agendum 16 added 14:57:15 agenda+ GRDDL vocabulary and misc spec edits 14:57:16 agendum 17 added 14:57:18 agenda+ Implementation Report, toward PR request 14:57:20 agendum 18 added 14:57:22 done reading agenda, HarryH 14:57:24 +??P0 14:57:26 -??P0 14:57:28 +??P0 14:57:56 Zakim, ??P0 is briansuda 14:57:56 +briansuda; got it 14:58:40 john-l has joined #grddl-wg 14:59:53 +john-l 15:00:09 agenda -18 15:00:11 agenda -17 15:00:13 agenda -16 15:00:16 agenda -15 15:00:18 agenda -14 15:00:19 agenda -13 15:00:21 agenda -12 15:00:22 agenda -11 15:00:24 agenda -10 15:00:29 agenda -9 15:00:36 oops 15:00:51 agenda 9 = Implementation Report, toward PR request 15:01:05 +DanC 15:01:25 Zakim, take up item 1 15:01:26 agendum 1. "Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2007-06-20T11:00-0400" taken up 15:01:32 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:01:32 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC 15:01:41 +??P20 15:01:53 Zakim, ??P20 is rreck 15:01:53 +rreck; got it 15:02:19 Scribe: briansuda 15:02:31 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/att-0113/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html minutes 13 Jun 15:02:34 rreck has joined #grddl-wg 15:03:18 iand has joined #grddl-wg 15:03:21 dbooth: note 6 Jun record doesn't say who chaired 15:03:26 +[IPcaller] 15:03:39 I am only available via IRC today I'm afraid 15:03:40 (I see a chair in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/att-0046/SV_MEETING_TITLE_--_6_Jun_2007.htm ) 15:04:00 Zakim, [IPcaller] is danja_ 15:04:01 +danja_; got it 15:04:25 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:04:25 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, danja_ 15:04:34 jjc has joined #grddl-wg 15:04:35 iand, 13 jun minutes good enough for you? 15:04:40 yes 15:04:49 HarryH has joined #grddl-wg 15:04:55 RESOLVED: to approve minutes 13 Jun 15:05:16 PROPOSED: to meet again Wed, 27 June 11:00-0400. scribe volunteer? 15:05:33 HarryH, you're still OK for next week, right? 15:05:49 +Harry_Halpin 15:05:51 RESOLVED: to meet again Wed, 27 June 11:00-0400, danja_ to scribe 15:06:37 +Murray_Maloney 15:06:53 can someone please provide a link to the agenda? 15:06:58 harry, discuss 1 or 2 or dbooths proposals 15:07:07 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda 15:07:13 +??P30 15:07:14 but for archival purposes... 15:07:17 Zakim, next item 15:07:17 agendum 2. "Done without comment" taken up 15:07:24 danja has joined #grddl-wg 15:07:27 Zakim, next item 15:07:27 agendum 2 was just opened, HarryH 15:07:32 Zakim, open item 3 15:07:32 agendum 3. "Primer" taken up 15:07:35 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0177.html 15:08:08 harry, for primer - addressed comments, queries working (some), ... 15:08:43 danny, referencing profile documents, giving bad results? 15:09:09 PROPOSED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html v 1.81 2007/06/20 14:05:38 plus SPARQL query fixes, plus editorial changes that Harry runs by at least one WG member 15:09:15 Embedded RDF? 15:09:15 ^that's what I heard harry propose 15:09:17 danny, resulting RDF was not complete, or maybe the guitar example 15:09:23 FabienG has joined #grddl-wg 15:09:41 (brian, use danny: to attribute something to danny) 15:10:02 The use of a namespace on the root element represents a declaration that the document conforms to the authoritative definition of that namespace as defined by the namespace owner, which may include a transformation from that XML dialect into RDF using GRDDL. 15:10:03 * ACTION: danja to review primer [CONTINUES] 15:10:43 harry: one last grammar check 15:10:48 on the primer 15:11:37 danny: just light editorary thing, and the one error in RDF 15:12:04 Danja, also it would also be useful for you to run queries over sample data. 15:12:14 Dan: keep as much out of the critical path, just Harry and Danny 15:12:14 +FabienG 15:12:39 Danny: david's usecase had the error 15:12:56 that error was fixed yesterday 15:13:04 (jeremy + ian) 15:13:15 Harry: looking for consense on proposal 15:13:24 PROPOSED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html v 1.81 2007/06/20 14:05:38 plus SPARQL query fixes, plus editorial changes that Harry runs by at least one WG member. 15:13:32 danny: seconds 15:13:35 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:13:35 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, danja_, Harry_Halpin, Murray_Maloney, jjc, FabienG 15:13:47 david: yes, 15:13:54 john: yes 15:13:57 yes 15:14:00 fabien : concur 15:14:01 dan: yes 15:14:01 rreck? 15:14:11 Murry: yes 15:14:21 yes 15:14:21 brian: yes 15:14:44 RESOLVED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html v 1.81 2007/06/20 14:05:38 plus SPARQL query fixes, plus editorial changes that Harry runs by at least one WG member. 15:14:47 version 1.81? 15:15:13 Dan: put the pictures back into the primer 15:15:14 That's to publish that to http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-primer/ as a working draft? 15:15:25 yes, i concur 15:15:43 Dan: all the actions are closed on that item 15:16:08 Dan: working draft or note? 15:16:13 Harry: note 15:16:17 Primer as a Note. 15:16:38 WG Note fine by me 15:17:00 RESOLVED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html v 1.81 2007/06/20 14:05:38 as a WG Note plus SPARQL query fixes, plus editorial changes that Harry runs by at least one WG member. 15:17:31 Zakim, next item 15:17:31 agendum 2. "Done without comment" taken up 15:17:36 Zakim, open item 4 15:17:37 agendum 4. "GRDDL Test Cases" taken up 15:17:41 Zakim, close item 2 15:17:41 agendum 2, Done without comment, closed 15:17:42 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:17:43 4. GRDDL Test Cases 15:18:11 name change from embeded-RDF to inline-RDF 15:18:13 ACTION: john-l to ping Dave Beckett about embeddedRDF [DONE] 15:18:35 Harry: do we have earl results from Dave Beckett? - not yet 15:18:45 On test cases http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0199 15:18:51 John: contacted Dave about this 15:18:52 -jjc 15:18:56 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0135.html 15:19:06 (is "ACTION: chimezie to update test manifest to include statements about features exercised by each test" done?) 15:19:35 DanC, good question; I believe the answer is yes. 15:19:37 +??P24 15:19:38 Harry: any of chimezie open questions need to be answered 15:20:17 john: not sure if this is not finished 15:20:46 still @@'s on XProc stuff 15:22:35 Harry: get the test editor's draft up to speed to publish next week... 15:22:55 Dan: there have been answers to the @@'s that need to be put into the document 15:23:31 ACTION: john-l to ask chime to fix @@s in test-case document 15:23:48 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0140.html Re: Updates to test cases editor's draft. from Dan C 15:24:54 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0199.html and from jjc re test editor's draft 15:25:23 Zakim open item 5 15:25:28 Zakim, open item 5 15:25:29 agendum 5. "Standard Transformation Library" taken up 15:25:32 Zakim, close item 4 15:25:32 agendum 4, GRDDL Test Cases, closed 15:25:33 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:25:34 5. Standard Transformation Library 15:25:54 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/pendinglist 15:26:04 Jeremy: should not suggest more tests, they won't get into the draft - they test the LIB not the implementations 15:26:21 no need to formally approve them 15:26:34 Dan: interested in getting them on the test suite 15:26:40 ACTION: john-l to exercise GRDDL.py on http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/pendinglist 15:26:52 #trix2 does not work yet 15:27:56 Jeremy: will chat with John and seek approval next week 15:28:28 ACTION: jjc to fix glean-profile to work with redirects [DONE] 15:28:41 Zakim, open item 6 15:28:42 agendum 6. "#issue-dbooth-3(ambiguity)" taken up 15:28:46 slides http://dbooth.org/2007/grddl/ambiguity.ppt 15:28:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0142.html 15:29:26 david: slide 2, given an XML document, what RDF was intended 15:30:22 slide 3: not disirable abiguity, not forcing author to be unabigious, ... 15:30:29 Zakim, mute jjc 15:30:29 jjc should now be muted 15:30:48 slide 4, two kinds of ambiguity 15:30:58 1. Wrong results. Results contain different triples than intended. 15:31:04 2. Subsetting. User unknowingly gets a proper subset of the intended results, while believing that he/she got all of them. 15:31:59 leave the door open to future working groups to determine terms 15:32:05 Proposal 1b part 1: Partial solution 15:32:12 Proposal: Change input of GRDDL transformation from XPath node tree to representation 15:32:38 http://dbooth.org/2007/grddl/ambiguity.ppt 15:32:43 danja has joined #grddl-wg 15:32:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0201.html 15:33:39 Permits transformation author to reduce variability in the "transformation application" step 15:33:51 Simple normative change 15:33:54 No changes to test cases 15:34:01 Proposal 2b part 1: Better solution 15:34:06 -danja_ 15:34:15 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0209.html 15:34:16 Proposal: 15:34:16 Change input of GRDDL transformation from XPath node tree to representation; and 15:34:16 Specify that parsing is minimal, non-validating/me wn/ 15:34:43 [[ 15:34:43 change: "XML document" to "XML document D" 15:34:44 and: "TP applied to R" to "TP applied to D" 15:34:44 ]] 15:34:53 is the part imported from earlier messages 15:35:00 Observations: 15:35:01 Reduces unwanted ambiguity problem 15:35:01 Permits transformation author to reduce variability in the "transformation application" step 15:35:01 Simple normative change 15:35:01 No changes to test cases 15:35:26 (require non-validating parsing? that conflicts with recent real-world experience, i.e. XTech ) 15:36:11 (at this point in the process, post-CR, any substantive changes really should come with test cases.) 15:36:14 (I discovered that I am using a validating parser - I need to find out how to switch it off) 15:36:28 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:36:28 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, Harry_Halpin, Murray_Maloney, FabienG, jjc (muted) 15:36:49 abstain 15:37:12 john: yes, interested 15:37:42 Dan: change from nodeset-document needs some test-cases, no support without test cases 15:37:56 Dan: based on the proposal, no 15:38:00 DanC - no (without test-cases) 15:38:03 yes i am interested. but i think test cases are useful 15:38:10 abstrain 15:38:24 murray - no 15:38:32 and would require re-opening faithful infoset. 15:38:34 Zakim, unmute me 15:38:34 jjc should no longer be muted 15:38:35 concur 15:38:39 jjc? 15:38:40 i abstain 15:39:04 jeremy: opposed, ... 15:39:15 (personally speaking) 15:39:19 Zakim, mute me 15:39:19 jjc should now be muted 15:39:28 3 yes and 3 nos. 15:39:33 dbooth is yes :) 15:39:57 What if jeremy's test case was added: 15:39:58 david: if the test case were added, would there be support? 15:40:00 +[IPcaller] 15:40:09 -Harry_Halpin 15:40:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0149.html 15:40:35 Zakim, unmute me 15:40:35 jjc should no longer be muted 15:40:42 david: implimentor issues, would/could they make the changes 15:41:00 +Harry_Halpin 15:42:44 Murry?: we don't have tests that take a document in, look for transformation, then decide to execute or not? 15:42:48 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/pendinglist#db-3a 15:42:51 and onwards 15:43:04 all the current apps we use are pipelines 15:43:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0209.html 15:43:28 david: 2b part 1 straw poll, same as 1b part 1, with extras 15:43:45 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:43:45 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, Murray_Maloney, FabienG, jjc, [IPcaller] (muted), Harry_Halpin 15:43:57 Zakim, mute me 15:43:57 jjc should now be muted 15:44:00 abstain 15:44:06 john-l: yes 15:44:08 John: yes 15:44:26 Zakim, unmute me 15:44:26 jjc should no longer be muted 15:44:37 Dan: against, but needs thought 15:44:41 yes 15:44:51 murray: no 15:44:52 Murry: no 15:44:52 concur 15:44:57 no 15:45:03 danja? 15:45:13 i abstain 15:45:16 abstain 15:45:30 (Harry, if there's no open issue, the WG doesn't have to make a decision; a proposal that doesn't get consensus can just go by the wayside) 15:45:43 muted ipcaller 15:46:20 david: withdraw proposals at this point 15:46:35 Harry: any portion or changes that the WG could improve and push forward? 15:46:41 Zakim, [IPcaller] is danja 15:46:41 +danja; got it 15:46:59 Zakim, unmute me 15:46:59 jjc should no longer be muted 15:47:10 (I think the "complete GRDDL result" idea is interesting, but I'm not sure how to fit it into the WG schedule. I guess I encourage an HP submission or something.) 15:47:24 David: anyone on the fence, what changes would be simple tweaks that would change your thoughts? 15:47:34 danny: hasn't had a chance to review full, many good points... 15:49:19 danny: how many of these are known-problems? 15:49:48 Harry: xinclude example, to resolve or not resolve it 15:50:06 Danny: different triples, is different than sub-set - wrong results are problems 15:50:06 Zakim, unmute me 15:50:06 jjc should no longer be muted 15:50:30 Murry: if you don't deal with infoset, then you are missing info. 15:50:48 PROPOSED: to respond to issue-dbooth-3 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0078.html by noting that the WG sees some room for further study, but has postponed a nearby issue, issue-faithful-infoset , and encourages the community to experiment in this area 15:50:56 q+ 15:50:59 murry: DTD and other things add parts to a true XML document 15:51:16 q+ to represent someone else in HP 15:51:32 david: permit the author to use things like XProc to control the flow 15:51:51 ack jjc 15:51:51 Zakim, mute me 15:51:52 jjc, you wanted to represent someone else in HP 15:51:55 danja should now be muted 15:52:11 Murry: the proposal doesn't change how Xproc handles anything 15:53:17 Jeremy: many specs are moving tword ??? 15:53:17 (re jjc's point, noah M. (in the TAG) often brings up "synthetic infosets" ) 15:53:21 ack DanC 15:54:09 Harry: if we postpone this, then it delays the GRDDL spec 15:54:28 q+ to modify DanC's proposal, if the chair wishes us to consider it 15:54:53 DanC: proposed to respond to comment noting that we have postponed #faithful-infoset 15:55:09 Harry: anything between normative and tests? 15:57:30 Harry: the spec talks about passing the node-tree to transformation language 15:57:53 ack jjc 15:57:53 jjc, you wanted to modify DanC's proposal, if the chair wishes us to consider it 15:58:28 David: wants to hold till next week 15:58:33 Dan: wants to decide now 15:58:46 Jeremy: amendment to Dan's proposal 15:59:31 postponing faithful-info set was an important part of and referenced in our documents 15:59:44 q+ to suggest that links to open tag issues fit better in the status section 16:00:01 ack DanC 16:00:01 DanC, you wanted to suggest that links to open tag issues fit better in the status section 16:00:18 Dan: tag issues in the status section already, could add a link there 16:00:57 add a link to the status section about XML 16:01:28 David: jeremy's wordsmithing, be away to address teh comment 16:01:41 [[ 16:01:41 this specification anticipates that the 16:01:42 resolution of TAG issue 16:01:42 16:01:42 xmlFunctions-34 16:01:42 16:01:44 will provide further 16:01:46 clarification and guidance. 16:01:48 ]] 16:01:58 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0199.html #faithful-infoset wordsmithing JJC 19 Jun 16:02:17 change that text to something else 16:02:29 GRDDL is intended to contribute to addressing Web Architecture issues such as RDFinXHTML-35 and namespaceDocument-8 as well as issues postponed by the RDF Core working group such as rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf and faq-html-compliance. 16:02:59 Jeremy: add something near there, similar to my wordsmithing 16:03:19 David: jeremy's wording would certainly be an improvement 16:03:52 Jeremy: Would like Dan to add something in that section about XML 16:05:04 David: WG hold so folks can read, or move forward 16:05:37 Jeremy: has suggest words, but Dan is the editor, so he is over text - up to the editor 16:05:57 trusts dan to edit as he sees fit 16:06:49 specifically words to the effect that the "xmlFunctions-34 16:06:50 16:06:50 will provide further 16:06:50 clarification and guidance" 16:06:51 ACTION DanC: work xmlFunctions-34 ref, incl "guidance..." into status section 16:07:07 Note: Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:33:18 -0400 was when the comemnt was made 16:07:15 Zakim, who's on the phone? 16:07:15 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, Murray_Maloney, FabienG, jjc, danja (muted), Harry_Halpin 16:07:21 Zakim, unmute me 16:07:21 danja should no longer be muted 16:07:25 yes 16:07:42 john: yes 16:07:44 Dan: no 16:07:54 ronald: yes 16:07:56 murry: no 16:07:59 concur 16:08:04 murray: no 16:08:08 jeremy; no 16:08:14 concur 16:08:14 danny: concur 16:09:27 Harry: can't extend this more than next week 16:09:48 if we cannot reach formal consensus by next week, that is it 16:10:14 david: if one more week is given, then the WG has atiquatly addressed the comment 16:11:05 harry: one normative and test case, there is no actual text. these need to be thought through and flush out by next week 16:11:15 (it's always best when specific stuff is available as of when the agenda goes out) 16:12:00 (http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.271 has an attempt at the xmlFunctions stuff in the status section ) 16:12:05 Harry: without chairs hat, this is just a possible design pattern for GRDDL agents for langs that are not XSLT1 16:12:19 (that makes sense) 16:12:27 David: to use XProc instead of XSLT 16:12:43 Murry: XProc doesn't actually do what david intends 16:12:47 I only know what i have read in the XProc spec 16:13:22 Harry: informative text to the spec or a note, lang not XSLT1 have potential issues 16:13:33 (to DanC) 16:14:27 Zakim, who's on the phone? 16:14:27 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, Murray_Maloney, FabienG, jjc, danja, Harry_Halpin 16:14:31 abstain 16:15:04 david: part 2, subsetting problem 16:15:11 Zakim, mute jjc temporarily 16:15:11 jjc should now be muted 16:15:26 jjc should now be unmuted again 16:15:38 gets GRDDL results, partical results return, but there is no way to know if they got ALL the results intended 16:15:55 leave the door open to a WG note, ... 16:16:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0199.html 16:16:14 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0201.html 16:16:28 ignore the first URL 16:16:31 (not sure I see the subsetting problem as a problem) 16:16:51 Zakim, mute me 16:16:51 danja should now be muted 16:17:07 david: involves adding a sentance and add mention about the WG note 16:17:15 abstain 16:17:17 abstain 16:17:20 Zakim, who's on the phone? 16:17:20 On the phone I see dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, Murray_Maloney, FabienG, jjc, danja (muted), Harry_Halpin 16:17:26 john: yes 16:17:32 what is the proposal? 16:17:57 Zakim, unmute me 16:17:59 danja should no longer be muted 16:18:00 discussion about WG Note about complete GRDDL result? 16:18:08 dan: interesting, but as team contact no cycles to do admin work 16:19:30 (a) mentioning the WG in the body of the spec isn't something I like to do as editor 16:19:36 jeremy: is this actually on the agenda. 16:19:55 (b) the suggestion under faithful infoset is a testable assertion 16:20:17 HP submission 16:20:28 Harry: this could be an HP submission rather than a Note 16:20:34 -Murray_Maloney 16:20:58 (b) the suggestion under faithful infoset is a testable assertion; to add that at this (post-CR) stage suggests adding test cases. 16:20:58 David: is happy to do this as a submission rather than a WG note 16:22:17 Jermey: happy with it to be a note, but does not like the content, against the sentance 16:22:48 ACTION dbooth Send "just that sentence to be added to faithful infoset" over the listserv 16:23:01 Zakim, next item 16:23:01 agendum 5. "Standard Transformation Library" taken up 16:23:09 Zakim, open item 7 16:23:09 agendum 7. "#issue-base-param" taken up 16:23:26 Dan: no movement on that action 16:23:34 ACTION: dbooth to Send "just that sentence to be added to faithful infoset" over the listserv 16:23:51 Dan: will get around to it eventually 16:23:58 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0171.html 16:24:51 Note this was informative not substantive - it is a fair bit of text ... 16:25:03 John: confident that changes are in, would like a review if possible 16:25:26 Zakim, open item 8 16:25:26 agendum 8. "GRDDL vocabulary and misc spec edits" taken up 16:25:34 Jeremy: Dave Beckett has mentioned it. 16:26:06 ACTION: DanC to incorporate 0054 comments into namespace doc.(consider notifying Dave Beckett) 16:26:12 Harry: comments from Dave Booth... 16:26:23 s/Booth/Beckett 16:26:39 Dan: has made changes, found and issue 16:26:44 ACTION: jjc to ask DaveBeckett to look at Base appendix, in response to appropriate comment 16:27:08 ACTION: DanC to incorporate 0054 comments into namespace doc.(consider notifying Dave Beckett) [CONTINUES] 16:27:15 Zakim, open item 9 16:27:15 agendum 9. "Implementation Report, toward PR request" taken up 16:27:45 as to how I'm not done on namespace doc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0174.html 16:27:51 Harry: getting close 16:28:05 ACTION: DanC to incorporate 0054 comments into namespace doc.(consider notifying Dave Beckett) 16:28:21 Do we want to include raptor in our PR request? 16:28:29 Dan: yes 16:29:04 Jeremy: we have more tests to approve next week, so abit of a moving target 16:29:35 Dan: w3c online service and ??? are two implementations 16:29:49 Jeremy, are you planning on pushing out some new EARL results soon? 16:29:52 Harry: W3C should be kept correct, even if they use other people's code 16:30:03 should do before I go on holiday - EARL 16:30:13 Excellent. 16:30:17 dan: kingsly and co. open link vertuoso? is second implementation 16:30:32 ACTION: HarryH to ping Dom to encourage him to move code. 16:30:50 ACTION: Danja to contact Kingsley and try to get GRDDL EARL results 16:30:52 ACTION: john-l to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results based on new EARL results as they come in. 16:30:56 danja, if you could wish into your blog about an openlink column in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results , that might do it 16:31:27 Harry: don't want to keep contacting people for EARL for tests we keep adding 16:31:33 'k, nice leverage :-) 16:31:36 ACTION: john-l to generate new EARL for GRDDL.py. 16:32:13 Jeremy: wants to keep contacting Dave about back and forth about test lib updates 16:32:13 (DanC is happy to add tests as they mature) 16:32:46 Dan: approve them today, contigent on John or wait 16:33:06 Harry: can we ask EARL on un-approved tests 16:33:13 q+ 16:33:22 ack DanC 16:33:35 Dan: edit the master list of tests, when you thiink it is resonable 16:34:08 Harry: this will get us EARL results 16:34:45 ACTION: john-l and chime to update test document to reflect new tests (but not one in response dbooth) asap in order for those results to be in EARL. 16:35:01 Harry: PR request needs EARL inorder... 16:35:09 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/lc-spec 16:36:52 ACTION: HarryH and DanC to write XML Activity Lead and Chair of XSL/XQuery cc SemWeb CG re quotes 16:37:40 jeremy: need to close the loop on these comments... are you satisfied, yes/no ... 16:37:50 on beckett in particular 16:38:03 ACTION: jjc close loop with DaveB on 0102 16:38:10 ACTION: jjc review appendix A of test editors draft [DO 16:38:23 i.e. [DONE] 16:38:25 ACTION: jjc review appendix A of test editors draft [DONE] 16:38:39 ACTION: DanC to review test coverage results via tabulator [WITHDRAWN] 16:38:43 HArry: results from Tablulator? 16:38:59 Harry: do people feel we are ready for PR? 16:39:19 WBS Survey? 16:39:36 ACTION: HarryH to write draft PR request 16:39:54 David: other editoray things he has run across - not major issues 16:40:21 (thanks, briansuda , for staying late to scribe.) 16:40:26 Meeting adjourned. 16:40:29 -rreck 16:40:37 -dbooth 16:40:39 -danja 16:40:41 AJOURNED 16:40:48 ADJOURNED 16:41:20 -DanC 16:41:34 rrsagent draft minutes 16:42:11 RRSAgent draft minutes 16:42:25 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:42:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-minutes.html briansuda 16:42:59 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 16:43:11 \http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/medicalquery.rq 16:43:24 rrsagent, make logs world-visible 16:43:28 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/hl7-sample.rdf 16:43:33 produced from 16:43:38 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/hl7-sample.xml 16:43:45 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:43:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-minutes.html briansuda 16:44:19 Chair: HarryH 16:44:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/hl7-sample-grddl.xml 16:44:32 produced from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/hl7-sample-grddl.xml 16:44:32 did we have any regrets today? 16:44:36 Simone 16:44:39 Chime 16:44:46 Regrets: Simone,Chime 16:44:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:44:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-minutes.html briansuda 16:45:08 16:46:04 rrsagent, make logs world-visible 16:46:10 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:46:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-minutes.html briansuda 16:46:26 16:46:27 Harry, you're still going to press onward with testing the spreadsheet example, right? 16:46:28 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 16:46:40 line 67 of the version of transform in doc29 16:46:47 Yep, will double-check spreadsheet example. 16:46:59 Cool; do you need anything else from me? 16:47:05 Nope 16:47:16 -john-l 16:47:39 grddl:transformation="../td/hl7-rim-to-pomr.xslt" 16:48:18 Zakim, what confernce? 16:48:19 I don't understand your question, briansuda. 16:48:25 grddl:transformation="hl7-rim-to-pomr.xslt" 16:48:58 -FabienG 16:49:28 FabienG has left #grddl-wg 16:49:55 -briansuda 16:50:01 -Harry_Halpin 16:50:08 jjc - sorry gotta catch an airplane! 16:50:16 Zakim, list attendees 16:50:16 As of this point the attendees have been dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, danja_, Harry_Halpin, Murray_Maloney, jjc, FabienG, danja 16:50:34 But if there's a mismatch between primer and test directory we should straighten it out and they should both produce the correct RDF, i.e. no rdfs:Description. 16:50:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:50:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-minutes.html briansuda 16:51:14 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 16:51:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:51:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-minutes.html briansuda 16:51:20 Tell me if you grok what's going on. I'll be busy for the next 3 days but will give everything a good lookover this weekend. 16:51:22 Thanks! 16:51:32 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 16:51:35 rrsagent, make logs world-visible 16:51:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:51:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-grddl-wg-minutes.html briansuda 16:55:02 disconnecting the lone participant, jjc, in SW_GRDDL()11:00AM 16:55:03 SW_GRDDL()11:00AM has ended 16:55:05 Attendees were dbooth, briansuda, john-l, DanC, rreck, danja_, Harry_Halpin, Murray_Maloney, jjc, FabienG, danja 17:02:01 jjc has joined #grddl-wg