12:29:15 RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf 12:29:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-irc 12:29:21 Zakim has joined #tsdtf 12:30:06 MichaelC has joined #tsdtf 12:30:15 zakim, this will be tsd 12:30:15 ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start now 12:30:57 Christophe has joined #tsdtf 12:31:07 zakim, code? 12:31:07 the conference code is 8783 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), shadi 12:31:28 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started 12:31:37 +Cooper 12:32:13 +Shadi 12:32:17 +Christophe_Strobbe 12:32:34 meeting: TSD TF 12:32:53 zakim, who is making noise? 12:33:04 chair: CarlosV, Christophe 12:33:09 scribe: Shadi 12:33:11 shadi, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: Christophe_Strobbe (68%), Shadi (5%) 12:33:29 CarlosI has joined #tsdtf 12:33:44 regrets: Tim 12:33:52 +Vangelis_Karkaletsis 12:34:06 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Jun/0007.html 12:34:23 agenda+ XPath 2.0 in TCDL 2.0 12:34:33 agenda+ Updating test samples to new WCAG 2.0 working draft 12:34:46 agenda+ Web form interface for submitting test samples 12:35:30 Reinhard has joined #tsdtf 12:35:51 +??P4 12:36:25 zakim, P4 is CarlosIglesias 12:36:25 sorry, Christophe, I do not recognize a party named 'P4' 12:36:31 zakim, ??P4 is CarlosIglesias 12:36:31 +CarlosIglesias; got it 12:36:41 +Reinhard 12:37:27 zakim, take up agendum 1 12:37:27 agendum 1. "XPath 2.0 in TCDL 2.0" taken up [from shadi] 12:38:11 CS: advise to jump to XPath 2.0 in TCDL 2.0, more powerfull than the current XPath 1.0 12:38:34 ...no compatibility issues that will impact the subset we are using 12:39:47 CI: we wanted to use EARL pointers, will this be incompatible? i don't see conflicts. 12:40:08 ...we can add XPath 2.0 as another type of pointers in the EARL pointers draft 12:40:18 ...once we do this, I don't see a problem 12:40:46 CS: does the current EARL draft refer to specific XPath version? 12:41:01 CI: don't think so, we just talked about XPath so far 12:41:09 ...may need to include version numbers 12:41:39 CS: we don't have a dependency on EARL pointers anyway 12:43:46 SAZ: concur with CI, but just a question to clarify 12:44:39 ...we are not losing anything when we jump from XPath 1.0 -> XPath 2.0 (in the metadata subset of TCDL 2.0) 12:45:04 ...but do we win anything? is there something that we can do now that we couldN't do before? 12:46:13 ...do we even need to specify the version of XPath if they are that compatible? 12:46:41 CS: if we want to use more complex querries then we have to use XPath 2.0 12:47:06 ...for example built-in datatypes or regular expressions 12:48:23 SAZ: so it is sufficient that the EARL pointer vocabulary identifies the version number? 12:48:30 CS: yes, I think so 12:49:23 ...we can find a convention for the time being until the EARL pointer vocabulary is updated 12:49:50 SAZ: yes, we can use XPath 2.0 for now, and update the EArL pointers at the same time 12:49:59 CS: any objections to this? 12:53:47 action: CI include the issue on XPath versions in the EARL pointers planning work 12:54:35 RESOLUTION: for now, XPath 2.0 is the default format for any XPath expressions in the metadata 12:56:00 action: CS add a clarification note in the metadata on the (temporary) XPath 2.0 convention 12:56:27 zakim, take up next 12:56:27 agendum 2. "Updating test samples to new WCAG 2.0 working draft" taken up [from shadi] 12:56:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Jun/0001.html 12:57:12 CS: we talked about that last time, had an action item to check the impact of this change 12:58:38 ...sent a mail, some need changes 12:58:44 ...who volunteers? 12:58:52 MC: i should do some 12:58:55 RR: me too 13:02:49 action: MC and RR choose 3 test samples and check if they need to be updated to the new WCAG 2.0 WD (send a mail to list to avoid duplicate work) 13:02:54 zakim, take up next 13:02:54 agendum 3. "Web form interface for submitting test samples" taken up [from shadi] 13:03:36 EV: no news right now, look for someone to work on the interface 13:04:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Jun/0003.html 13:05:26 SAZ: MWI are working on a new interface, we are coordinating internally 13:05:38 ...hopefully we can adopt some of this work from them 13:06:20 agenda+ Action Item review 13:06:26 zakim, take up next 13:06:26 agendum 4. "Action Item review" taken up [from shadi] 13:06:49 CS: SAZ you have an action item open 13:07:03 ...also you wanted to move some of the usage docs to the CVS repository 13:07:32 SAZ: sorry, didn't get to it. will try this week 13:07:54 action: SAZ update the review process document 13:08:15 action: SAZ move review process document to the CVS repository 13:09:00 agenda+ Structure Review script 13:09:05 zakim, take up next 13:09:05 agendum 5. "Structure Review script" taken up [from shadi] 13:09:15 CS: working on a structure review script 13:09:26 ...have some code but still finalizing it 13:09:31 ...will announce it soon 13:09:41 Schematron 13:10:23 SAZ: what technology? 13:10:42 CS: schematron, running XSLT 1.0 or XSLT 2.0 13:10:54 see also http://www.schematron.com/ 13:11:18 -Vangelis_Karkaletsis 13:11:21 -Reinhard 13:11:22 -Cooper 13:11:24 -Shadi 13:11:25 -Christophe_Strobbe 13:11:34 -CarlosIglesias 13:11:35 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended 13:11:36 Attendees were Cooper, Shadi, Christophe_Strobbe, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, CarlosIglesias, Reinhard 13:11:40 Vangelis has left #tsdtf 13:12:02 zakim, bye 13:12:02 Zakim has left #tsdtf 13:12:12 rrsagent, make logs world 13:12:16 rrsagent, make minutes 13:12:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi 13:12:18 rrsagent, make logs world 13:12:23 rrsagent, bye 13:12:23 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-actions.rdf : 13:12:23 ACTION: CI include the issue on XPath versions in the EARL pointers planning work [1] 13:12:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-irc#T12-53-47 13:12:23 ACTION: CS add a clarification note in the metadata on the (temporary) XPath 2.0 convention [2] 13:12:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-irc#T12-56-00 13:12:23 ACTION: MC and RR choose 3 test samples and check if they need to be updated to the new WCAG 2.0 WD (send a mail to list to avoid duplicate work) [3] 13:12:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-irc#T13-02-49 13:12:23 ACTION: SAZ update the review process document [4] 13:12:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-irc#T13-07-54 13:12:23 ACTION: SAZ move review process document to the CVS repository [5] 13:12:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-tsdtf-irc#T13-08-15