IRC log of er on 2007-06-06
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:54:05 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #er
- 13:54:05 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/06/06-er-irc
- 13:54:12 [shadi]
- zakim, the will be ert
- 13:54:12 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'the will be ert', shadi
- 13:54:21 [shadi]
- zakim, this will be ert
- 13:54:21 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
- 13:54:30 [shadi]
- meeting: ERT WG
- 13:54:34 [shadi]
- chair: Shadi
- 13:54:44 [shadi]
- regrets: CarlosI, CarlosV
- 13:55:25 [drooks]
- drooks has joined #er
- 13:57:01 [shadi]
- agenda+ Review of FOAF 0.9
- 13:57:11 [shadi]
- agenda+ Review of MobileOK Basic Tests 1.0
- 13:57:19 [shadi]
- agenda+ More documents for review
- 13:57:28 [shadi]
- agenda+ Meet at W3C Technical Plenary?
- 13:57:38 [shadi]
- agenda+ HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments
- 13:57:47 [shadi]
- agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema comments
- 14:00:53 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has now started
- 14:00:54 [Zakim]
- +Shadi
- 14:01:24 [JohannesK]
- JohannesK has joined #er
- 14:01:52 [Zakim]
- +Johannes
- 14:02:49 [Reinhard]
- Reinhard has joined #er
- 14:05:29 [Zakim]
- +Reinhard_Ruemer
- 14:06:50 [Zakim]
- +??P39
- 14:07:07 [shadi]
- zakim, ??p39 is really David
- 14:07:07 [Zakim]
- +David; got it
- 14:08:13 [shadi]
- scribe: David
- 14:08:21 [shadi]
- scribenick: drooks
- 14:08:31 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 14:08:31 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Review of FOAF 0.9" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:08:52 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0000
- 14:10:24 [drooks]
- shadi: need to chase up dan bri for more info
- 14:11:00 [drooks]
- shadi: no need to drop earl:compound assertor for foaf:group class
- 14:11:10 [drooks]
- shadi: no changes in our current requirements
- 14:12:09 [drooks]
- reinhard: agrees with JK's email
- 14:12:26 [drooks]
- action: Shadi to write back to dan bri and cc the list
- 14:13:47 [drooks]
- johannes: has anyone checked out the classes referred to in foaf?
- 14:13:52 [JohannesK]
- <http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20070524.rdf>
- 14:17:44 [shadi]
- zakim, who is making noise?
- 14:17:46 [drooks]
- shadi: agrees that we need to have a closer look at this
- 14:17:54 [Zakim]
- shadi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: David (98%)
- 14:18:02 [shadi]
- zakim, mute david
- 14:18:02 [Zakim]
- David should now be muted
- 14:18:52 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#assertor
- 14:20:26 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 2
- 14:20:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Review of MobileOK Basic Tests 1.0" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:20:50 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0007
- 14:21:18 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0001
- 14:22:48 [drooks]
- shadi: has anyone reviewed johannes comments?
- 14:23:59 [drooks]
- shadi: are there any other points we need to discuss? nothing has really jumped out at me
- 14:26:46 [drooks]
- action: shadi to open a WBS form for responses to MOK doc
- 14:29:35 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 14:29:35 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "More documents for review" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:30:06 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2007AprJun/0038
- 14:30:21 [drooks]
- shadi: we need to review WCAG2.0 before review period expires on june 29
- 14:30:54 [drooks]
- shadi: would be good to check the testability of criteria and how we can express it in EARL
- 14:33:52 [drooks]
- johannes: pseudo code is more for techies
- 14:35:15 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/Overview.html#G94
- 14:36:51 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/#test_auto_refresh
- 14:38:54 [drooks]
- reinhard: thinks MOK test cases are more specific
- 14:39:22 [drooks]
- drooks: also agrees, MOK easier to implement, its more concise
- 14:40:17 [drooks]
- johannes: perhaps thats because MOK Basic tests are all machine testable and can be expressed as an algorithm
- 14:40:51 [drooks]
- reinhard: looks like WCAG could also be written in pseudo code
- 14:41:52 [drooks]
- shadi: i'll take this back to the WCAG WG
- 14:42:18 [drooks]
- action: Shadi to open a WBS form for WCAG2.0 review comments
- 14:42:48 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0026
- 14:42:54 [drooks]
- shadi: we also need to review POWDER
- 14:43:11 [drooks]
- drooks: yes, im in the group
- 14:43:57 [drooks]
- shadi: please keep us informed on what is going on
- 14:44:06 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0023
- 14:44:14 [JohannesK]
- <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20070525/#testresult>
- 14:44:48 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum $
- 14:44:48 [Zakim]
- '\$' does not match any agenda item, shadi
- 14:44:52 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 4
- 14:44:52 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Meet at W3C Technical Plenary?" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:46:21 [JohannesK]
- 5-10 November 2007
- 14:50:10 [drooks]
- shadi: we shoud look at another f2f at end of summer if possible
- 14:52:45 [drooks]
- shadi: can everyone please check timings and budget for f2f meetings
- 14:53:37 [drooks]
- shadi: i'll be going to boston and can represent ERT
- 14:55:22 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 5
- 14:55:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:57:37 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 6
- 14:57:39 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "EARL 1.0 Schema comments" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:57:52 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0041
- 15:00:15 [drooks]
- RESOLUTION: accept response to issue 20
- 15:00:52 [Zakim]
- -Johannes
- 15:00:54 [Zakim]
- -Reinhard_Ruemer
- 15:00:57 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 15:00:58 [Zakim]
- -David
- 15:01:01 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has ended
- 15:01:02 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Shadi, Johannes, Reinhard_Ruemer, David
- 15:01:06 [drooks]
- drooks has left #er