13:54:05 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #er
13:54:05 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/06/06-er-irc
13:54:12 <shadi> zakim, the will be ert
13:54:12 <Zakim> I don't understand 'the will be ert', shadi
13:54:21 <shadi> zakim, this will be ert
13:54:21 <Zakim> ok, shadi; I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
13:54:30 <shadi> meeting: ERT WG
13:54:34 <shadi> chair: Shadi
13:54:44 <shadi> regrets: CarlosI, CarlosV
13:55:25 <drooks> drooks has joined #er
13:57:01 <shadi> agenda+ Review of FOAF 0.9
13:57:11 <shadi> agenda+ Review of MobileOK Basic Tests 1.0
13:57:19 <shadi> agenda+ More documents for review
13:57:28 <shadi> agenda+ Meet at W3C Technical Plenary?
13:57:38 <shadi> agenda+ HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments
13:57:47 <shadi> agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema comments
14:00:53 <Zakim> WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has now started
14:00:54 <Zakim> +Shadi
14:01:24 <JohannesK> JohannesK has joined #er
14:01:52 <Zakim> +Johannes
14:02:49 <Reinhard> Reinhard has joined #er
14:05:29 <Zakim> +Reinhard_Ruemer
14:06:50 <Zakim> +??P39
14:07:07 <shadi> zakim, ??p39 is really David
14:07:07 <Zakim> +David; got it
14:08:13 <shadi> scribe: David
14:08:21 <shadi> scribenick: drooks
14:08:31 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 1
14:08:31 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Review of FOAF 0.9" taken up [from shadi]
14:08:52 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0000
14:10:24 <drooks> shadi: need to chase up dan bri for more info
14:11:00 <drooks> shadi: no need to drop earl:compound assertor for foaf:group class
14:11:10 <drooks> shadi: no changes in our current requirements
14:12:09 <drooks> reinhard: agrees with JK's email
14:12:26 <drooks> action: Shadi to write back to dan bri and cc the list
14:13:47 <drooks> johannes: has anyone checked out the classes referred to in foaf?
14:13:52 <JohannesK> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20070524.rdf>
14:17:44 <shadi> zakim, who is making noise?
14:17:46 <drooks> shadi: agrees that we need to have a closer look at this
14:17:54 <Zakim> shadi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: David (98%)
14:18:02 <shadi> zakim, mute david
14:18:02 <Zakim> David should now be muted
14:18:52 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#assertor
14:20:26 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 2
14:20:26 <Zakim> agendum 2. "Review of MobileOK Basic Tests 1.0" taken up [from shadi]
14:20:50 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0007
14:21:18 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0001
14:22:48 <drooks> shadi: has anyone reviewed johannes comments?
14:23:59 <drooks> shadi: are there any other points we need to discuss? nothing has really jumped out at me
14:26:46 <drooks> action: shadi to open a WBS form for responses to MOK doc
14:29:35 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 3
14:29:35 <Zakim> agendum 3. "More documents for review" taken up [from shadi]
14:30:06 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2007AprJun/0038
14:30:21 <drooks> shadi: we need to review WCAG2.0 before review period expires on june 29
14:30:54 <drooks> shadi: would be good to check the testability of criteria and how we can express it in EARL
14:33:52 <drooks> johannes: pseudo code is more for techies
14:35:15 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/Overview.html#G94
14:36:51 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/#test_auto_refresh
14:38:54 <drooks> reinhard: thinks MOK test cases are more specific
14:39:22 <drooks> drooks: also agrees, MOK easier to implement, its more concise
14:40:17 <drooks> johannes: perhaps thats because MOK Basic tests are all machine testable and can be expressed as an algorithm
14:40:51 <drooks> reinhard: looks like WCAG could also be written in pseudo code
14:41:52 <drooks> shadi: i'll take this back to the WCAG WG
14:42:18 <drooks> action: Shadi to open a WBS form for WCAG2.0 review comments
14:42:48 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0026
14:42:54 <drooks> shadi: we also need to review POWDER
14:43:11 <drooks> drooks: yes, im in the group
14:43:57 <drooks> shadi: please keep us informed on what is going on
14:44:06 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0023
14:44:14 <JohannesK> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20070525/#testresult>
14:44:48 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum $
14:44:48 <Zakim> '\$' does not match any agenda item, shadi
14:44:52 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 4
14:44:52 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Meet at W3C Technical Plenary?" taken up [from shadi]
14:46:21 <JohannesK> 5-10 November 2007
14:50:10 <drooks> shadi: we shoud look at another f2f at end of summer if possible
14:52:45 <drooks> shadi: can everyone please check timings and budget for f2f meetings
14:53:37 <drooks> shadi: i'll be going to boston and can represent ERT
14:55:22 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 5
14:55:22 <Zakim> agendum 5. "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments" taken up [from shadi]
14:57:37 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 6
14:57:39 <Zakim> agendum 6. "EARL 1.0 Schema comments" taken up [from shadi]
14:57:52 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0041
15:00:15 <drooks> RESOLUTION: accept response to issue 20
15:00:52 <Zakim> -Johannes
15:00:54 <Zakim> -Reinhard_Ruemer
15:00:57 <Zakim> -Shadi
15:00:58 <Zakim> -David
15:01:01 <Zakim> WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has ended
15:01:02 <Zakim> Attendees were Shadi, Johannes, Reinhard_Ruemer, David
15:01:06 <drooks> drooks has left #er