IRC log of databinding on 2007-05-29

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:48:15 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #databinding
13:48:15 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-databinding-irc
13:48:17 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
13:48:17 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #databinding
13:48:19 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be DBWG
13:48:19 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see WS_DBWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes
13:48:20 [trackbot]
Meeting: Databinding WG Teleconference
13:48:20 [trackbot]
Date: 29 May 2007
13:59:55 [gcowe]
gcowe has joined #databinding
14:00:40 [pauld]
zakim, code?
14:00:40 [Zakim]
the conference code is 3294 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), pauld
14:00:48 [Zakim]
WS_DBWG()10:00AM has now started
14:00:58 [Zakim]
+Paul_Downey
14:01:04 [Zakim]
+??P19
14:01:34 [pauld]
agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2007May/0004.html
14:01:51 [pauld]
zakim, ??p19 is really me
14:01:51 [Zakim]
+pauld; got it
14:02:02 [pauld]
zakim, ??p19 is really gcowe
14:02:02 [Zakim]
+gcowe; got it
14:05:59 [Zakim]
+ +0173235aaaa
14:06:17 [pauld]
zakim, aaaa is JonC
14:06:17 [Zakim]
+JonC; got it
14:11:09 [pauld]
Topic: Administrivia
14:11:26 [pauld]
minutes from 1 may approved
14:12:08 [pauld]
pauld: plan to dedicate next week to the WG, will rerun report by the end, have issues list ready to discuss at next telcon
14:12:34 [pauld]
pauld: mainly working on report of patterns use in the wild
14:14:33 [pauld]
.. as discussed informally, I presented the report to the W3C AC in Banff
14:15:33 [pauld]
some positive feedback, but again it's a challenge to translate interest into participation
14:16:46 [pauld]
discussion on participation.
14:20:10 [pauld]
XMLBeans holding a DOM does well in our tests, need to think again about +1 test
14:20:49 [pauld]
gcowe: have assistance for testing Web Sphere
14:21:02 [pauld]
.. possibly in two weeks
14:22:24 [pauld]
pauld: ok, be ready to start work on issues next telcon and get Basic to PR
14:26:43 [pauld]
JonC: worried about the XPath expressions being overly complex. There are some we can process using XPath 1.0 style. Do we want to mix and match styles? Doesn't that add more confusion?
14:28:41 [pauld]
pauld: I think we resolved this by saying we'd write an introduction / guide on how the patterns work
14:29:40 [pauld]
JonC: consistency seems better over simplifying some of the patterns
14:29:50 [pauld]
ADJOURNED
14:30:11 [Zakim]
-Paul_Downey
14:30:12 [Zakim]
-JonC
14:30:15 [Zakim]
-gcowe
14:30:16 [Zakim]
WS_DBWG()10:00AM has ended
14:30:17 [Zakim]
Attendees were Paul_Downey, gcowe, +0173235aaaa, JonC
14:30:20 [pauld]
rrsagent, generate minutes
14:30:20 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-databinding-minutes.html pauld
14:30:48 [pauld]
rrsagent, make logs public
14:32:58 [pauld]
Topic: lc-jmarsh-1: XPath Expressions Too Complex?
14:33:02 [pauld]
rrsagent, generate minutes
14:33:02 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-databinding-minutes.html pauld
16:29:24 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #databinding