14:59:03 RRSAgent has joined #grddl-wg 14:59:03 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-grddl-wg-irc 14:59:23 in the presence of RRSAgent and all god's creation, I hereby authorize john-l to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results 14:59:44 ACTION: john-l to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results based on recent GRDDL.py changes. 14:59:44 1/2 ;-) 15:00:02 ? 15:00:09 only half a smiley. 15:00:22 i.e. I meant it seriously, but I said it humorously 15:00:42 how about updating it now? can you do `make test_results_auto.html` ? 15:01:11 Nope, my ssh key is on my computer at home. At work we have stupid 'd0z3 boxen. 15:02:00 ah. boring. 15:02:07 Zakim, this is grddl 15:02:29 grddl matches both SW_GRDDL()11:00AM and SW_GRDDL()11:00AM, DanC 15:02:41 danja has joined #grddl-wg 15:03:58 Zakim, this is SW_GRDDL 15:03:58 SW_GRDDL matches both SW_GRDDL()11:00AM and SW_GRDDL()11:00AM, DanC 15:04:14 Zakim, this is SW_GRDDL()11:00AM 15:04:14 SW_GRDDL()11:00AM matches both SW_GRDDL()11:00AM and SW_GRDDL()11:00AM, DanC 15:04:33 zakim, who's here? 15:04:33 has not yet started, FabienG 15:04:34 On IRC I see danja, RRSAgent, FabienG, Zakim, john-l, briansuda, DanC 15:06:20 Zakim, take up item 1 15:06:20 agendum 1. "Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2007-05-23T11:00-0400" taken up 15:07:53 Zakim, bye 15:07:53 Zakim has left #grddl-wg 15:07:55 Zakim has joined #grddl-wg 15:07:59 Zakim, this is GRDDL 15:07:59 GRDDL matches both SW_GRDDL()11:00AM and SW_GRDDL()11:00AM, DanC 15:10:02 Simone has joined #grddl-wg 15:10:09 Zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda 15:10:09 working on it, DanC 15:10:10 agenda+ Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2007-05-23T11:00-0400 15:10:11 agendum 1 added 15:10:12 agenda+ GRDDL Vocabulary 15:10:14 agendum 2 added 15:10:16 agenda+ Error handling 15:10:17 agendum 3 added 15:10:18 agenda+ #issue-base-param, follow-up 15:10:20 agendum 4 added 15:10:21 agenda+ Implementation Report, toward PR request 15:10:22 agendum 5 added 15:10:24 agenda+ Primer 15:10:26 agendum 6 added 15:10:28 agenda+ Advocating 15:10:30 agendum 7 added 15:10:32 agenda+ Pending GRDDL spec edits 15:10:34 agendum 8 added 15:10:36 agenda+ public-grddl-comments auditing 15:10:38 agendum 9 added 15:10:40 done reading agenda, DanC 15:10:45 Zakim, take up item 1 15:10:45 agendum 1. "Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2007-05-23T11:00-0400" taken up 15:11:15 Zakim, pick a victim 15:11:15 sorry, DanC, I don't know what conference this is 15:11:22 Zakim, pick a scribe 15:11:22 sorry, DanC, I don't know what conference this is 15:12:57 briansuda_ has joined #grddl-wg 15:13:35 Scribe: danja 15:14:01 Regrets: RReck 15:14:09 I note john-l, FabienG, DanC, danja, jjc, Simone, HarryH on the phone. Am I missing anyone? 15:14:23 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/att-0038/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html minutes 16 May 15:14:45 RESOLVED: to approve minutes 16 May 15:15:10 regrets danc 30 May 15:15:26 HH travelling, but should be available 30 may 15:16:46 PROPOSED: to meet again 30 May, HH/JJC to chair, ... 15:16:54 pick me 15:17:15 RESOLVED: to meet again 30 May, HH/JJC to chair, FabienG to scribe. 15:17:58 Zakim, next item 15:17:58 agendum 2. "GRDDL Vocabulary" taken up 15:18:23 jeremy: apologies, no caught up with actions 15:18:35 ACTION: jjc to look at namespace document closely. [CONTINUES] 15:19:02 chair doesn't see any reason for apology. 15:19:17 holidays considered helpful 15:19:36 ns doc action not urgent 15:19:43 jjc: we told a commentor that we'd do it[?] before PR 15:19:46 on schedule for pr sometime in June 15:19:49 Zakim, next item 15:19:49 agendum 3. "Error handling" taken up 15:20:06 ^ was HarryH 15:20:25 ACTION: jjc to write an normative test case showing that if the transform is broken, you should not get a partial result, you should get no results. [CONTINUES] 15:21:20 DanC: error codes common in spec 15:21:25 no, not common 15:21:32 jjc: lot of work 15:21:37 but there's large catalog of errors in XQuery 15:21:46 not rare..? 15:22:06 HarryH concerned about blocks to PR 15:23:13 DanC less concerned 15:23:19 Zakim, next item 15:23:19 agendum 4. "#issue-base-param, follow-up" taken up 15:23:49 ACTION: jjc to write text about base-uri, which may become normative. [CONTINUES] 15:24:50 ACTION: john-l to implement htmlbase1 [DONE] 15:25:23 htmlbase1 is already approved 15:25:51 jjc on beckett on base http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/0014.html 15:26:06 Zakim, mute me 15:26:06 sorry, danja, I don't know what conference this is 15:26:10 grr 15:27:04 jjc has joined #grddl-wg 15:27:54 beckett 4 May http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0051.html 15:29:27 HarryH suggests update of xslt 15:29:55 fabien: last time we talked about base, should be taken from source 15:30:01 jjc: correct for htmll 15:30:26 fabian: if param not set...with h for local refs...? 15:30:37 Danc: suggests no use for params 15:30:55 fabian: useful if saved to local disk 15:31:10 loses ref to source uri 15:31:22 otherwise should be ok 15:31:32 jjc: why not test without param 15:32:02 jjc: if so add comment (giving fabiens exception) & reply to dajobe 15:32:20 kept in primer material space 15:32:42 ACTION Fabien: clarify purpose of uri param in RDFa2RDFXML.xsl 15:34:25 *60 15:34:29 heh 15:34:37 (wrong place) 15:35:13 part of charter to define interop with RDFa 15:36:05 ACTION HH: remove or clarify base param in eRDF transformation 15:36:28 DanC: online grddl service uses base params? 15:36:39 ACTION DanC: remove base param from online GRDDL service and home2rss.xsl 15:36:43 HarryH: would be good to get it compliant with spec 15:36:58 DanC: independent implementation, with bugs 15:37:37 suggestion - ask Dom 15:37:52 ACTION HH: ask Dom to check his XSLT against current GRDDL tests 15:38:05 Zakim, next item 15:38:06 agendum 5. "Implementation Report, toward PR request" taken up 15:38:52 current version 1.13 15:38:58 ACTION: chimezie to start an index of tests by normative assertion (proxy for feature) [CONTINUES] 15:39:12 (chime at conferences) 15:39:14 ACTION: HarryH to start an index of tests by issue (not urgent; due 30 May) [CONTINUES] 15:39:37 ACTION: john-l to turn "fails" into passes on GRDDL.py and rebuild test-results [DONE] 15:40:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/att-0048/GRDDL-testing-summary_2007-05-22.html 15:40:18 john-l , passed everything but eRDF 4 (not approved test) 15:40:33 (not yet checked in summary) 15:40:34 aha... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/att-0048/GRDDL-testing-summary_2007-05-22.html 15:40:54 jjc: base URI issues in that case 15:41:04 embedded-rdf4 pass fail 15:41:13 john-l: will take another look 15:41:36 ACTION: john-l to try to implement #embedded-rdf4 15:41:42 jjc: monitoring approved cases 15:42:54 "anyone remember why this test was unethical?" it sounded like... 15:43:05 ^unethical^not applicable^ 15:43:11 ah, ta 15:44:21 "The precise relationship between the features of GRDDL and the approved tests, as well as the removal of unapproved tests, will happen before GRDDL Test Cases becomes a Proposed Recommendation." -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results 15:44:26 DanC: got a todo to clarify "not applicable" 15:45:04 Doesn't http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests#multiple-output explain the not applicable situation? 15:45:12 john-l: the remaining case covered by previous action 15:45:53 Zakim, next item 15:45:53 agendum 6. "Primer" taken up 15:46:05 ACTION: john-l to add link from report to spec explaining multiple results and not applicable relationship 15:46:40 ACTION: HarryH to check any primer fixes in, Murray and Jeremy to review once finished. [DONE] 15:46:47 HarryH: primer near enough for reviewing 15:47:26 jjc: waiting for go-ahead for review, you only get one decent review per reviewer 15:47:58 HarryH: tempted to leave review actions until after PR (accurate..?) 15:48:22 jjc: can't see getting to PR without primer 15:48:53 DanC: looking at editors draft 15:48:57 ACTION jjc: review primer http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html v 1.71 2007/05/06 15:49:35 ACTION danja: review primer http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html v 1.71 2007/05/06 15:50:48 HarryH: got Gnumeric format xslt only 15:51:20 HarryH: wondering if healthcare example too complex, can swap in spreadsheet example 15:51:49 jjc: probably about time to call it a day on primer (barring big errors) 15:52:37 spreadsheet/healthcare different from use case pov 15:52:56 DanC: have a look at mnot's Excel xslt 15:53:16 ACTION john-l : draft an excel spreadsheet primer section 15:53:23 reviews - run examples, see if they break 15:53:54 ACTION: john-l to draft an Excel spreadsheet primer section 15:54:10 jjc: doesn't expect primer to be rec track any more 15:54:18 (audio breaking up) 15:54:50 yes 15:55:10 PROPOSED: to take the primer to WG Note status in 1 week to 1 month 15:55:12 poll 15:55:26 (currently I would abstain) 15:55:29 re. rec/note - I'll go with majority 15:55:47 that's called a 'concur' 15:55:57 jjc: Why would you abstain? 15:56:10 I've not looked at the text ever! 15:56:16 Ah. Good reason. :) 15:57:18 suda's xslt 15:57:39 "do you have specific issues" directed at wrong person 15:57:40 jjc's msg re suda's xslt http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/0115.html 15:57:46 briansuda_: ping 15:58:26 yes 15:58:41 Can you give some more feedback on the invalid RDF question? 15:58:43 jjc: nothing to add to that message at this stage 15:58:44 We're discussing it now. 15:58:51 briansuda_, the xmlns="" 's look bogus 15:59:04 For example, 15:59:16 i'm more than happy to fix things, just let me know how 15:59:29 er... we can only tell you what the symptoms are 15:59:41 it was hard to say, because the transform is complex 15:59:55 examples from primer 15:59:56 http://suda.co.uk/projects/microformats/mf-templates.xsl 16:00:04 seemed to be the problem when I looked in detail 16:00:43 HarryH: (plaintively) the transform runs... 16:01:01 some RDF tools are fussier than others 16:01:42 reviews.rdf ... 16:01:44 review.rdf has no xmlns="" 's 16:02:36 (jjc indistinct) 16:02:48 may be taking advantage of a bug 16:02:54 a RDF version of the hotel reviews http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/review.rdf ? 16:03:00 jjc: I think it is plausible that na XSLT iomplementation forgets the xmlns="" 16:03:01 yes, john-l 16:03:13 jjc and hence gets legal RDF output for the wrong reasons 16:03:32 That RDF file looks fine. 16:04:26 ]some of briansuda's code is linked from primer - could do with freezing 16:04:27 briansuda_: Can you produce a frozen stable version for the primer? 16:04:45 sure 16:04:56 That would be useful; I think that stuff needs to get to Harry. 16:05:17 party! 16:05:23 The review.rdf differs from my msg of Apr 16:05:38 bratwurst & weissbeir please... 16:05:49 jjc: Did you generate the RDF from that msg? 16:05:59 I don't remember 16:06:20 Zakim, next item 16:06:20 agendum 7. "Advocating" taken up 16:06:43 ACTION: Chime to contact SemWebCG (CC IvanH) about who might be at STC '07 - mention session [DONE] 16:07:27 logo competition in susie s's hands 16:07:56 ACTION: HH to e-mail GRDDL Logo contest announcement - semantic web at w3.org (pending Susie/SWEO). [CONTINUES] 16:08:21 I see b/w at http://www.siatec.net/grddl/grddl_01.png ; is that by design? 16:08:23 the machine I'm skyping through just shutdown... 16:08:35 noted, danja 16:08:45 I'll continue making scribe notes for now 16:08:47 I'm inclined to adjourn. 16:08:48 thanks 16:08:49 All the logos I looked at were b/w 16:08:54 That continue to be largely beer orders etc 16:09:04 re. Danja to pick LeeF over Spreadsheet to RDF examples, does he have XSLT? 16:09:12 short answer: no 16:09:28 mnot might 16:09:36 long answer in comments at http://dannyayers.com/2007/05/20/spreadsheets-triples 16:09:37 PROPOSED: to adjourn 16:09:41 can I get a 2nd? 16:09:48 I second 16:09:49 any reason not to? 16:09:54 ADJOURN. 16:10:00 bye 16:10:01 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:10:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html DanC 16:10:04 bye 16:10:26 FabienG has left #grddl-wg 16:10:27 danja, hang on a sec while I chat with RRSAgent about the minutes, OK? 16:10:33 RRSAgent, make logs world-access 16:10:33 ok 16:10:42 thanks - I did get a 403 16:11:03 the world-access request has a latency of ~30seconds 16:11:23 ok, so I take that, tidy it up & mail list within 2 days..? 16:11:35 right; lemme tidy it just a bit by IRC here 1st... 16:11:43 Meeting: GRDDL WG Weekly 16:11:50 Chair: DanC 16:12:08 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:12:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html DanC 16:12:43 Simone, the logos seemed bigger than what I expected, too 16:13:11 Present: johnl-l, jjc, DanC, HarryH, danja, Simone 16:13:27 Present: johnl-l, jjc, DanC, HarryH, danja, Simone, FabienG 16:13:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:13:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html DanC 16:14:19 simone, any chance you could put them all on one page? (or are they already - I could only see individual pngs) 16:14:19 there, danja . the version of 2007/05/23 16:13:47 has the standard stuff. 16:14:26 great, thanks DanC 16:14:45 danja: yes 16:15:06 thanks Simone 16:15:10 danja, and also too small? 16:15:35 the ones I looked at seemed ok... 16:16:08 danja, what is the number do You prefer? 16:16:22 jjc preferes #1 the second one 16:17:18 like Fabien's concept 16:17:37 the cogs? 16:18:05 industrial seems somehow appropriate 16:18:49 yes 16:19:14 other logos is a combination of cogs and balls 16:19:29 with the cogs that "create" the connection 16:21:33 the small print will probably disappear when reduced, but I'm not sure there's a way around that without messing up the layout 16:25:57 the minimum size is 16x16 but i can try to have a good quality also on smaller icons, so I'll post a page with all logos and size reduced, or I can use the wiki if it's prefered 17:02:02 Levogiro has joined #grddl-wg 18:14:19 danja has joined #grddl-wg 19:40:31 danja has left #grddl-wg 21:19:39 'restarting to clear state' 21:20:06 restarting in 1 minute