IRC log of er on 2007-05-16

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:54:25 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #er

13:54:25 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/05/16-er-irc

13:54:29 [JohannesK]

Zakim, this will be ERT

13:54:29 [Zakim]

ok, JohannesK; I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes

13:54:53 [JohannesK]

Agenda+ HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments

13:55:08 [JohannesK]

Meeting: ERT WG

13:55:33 [JohannesK]

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0011

13:55:58 [JohannesK]

Chair: JK

14:00:09 [Zakim]

WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has now started

14:00:16 [Zakim]

+carlosV

14:00:23 [JohannesK]

Regrets: RR

14:00:40 [JohannesK]

zakim, carlosV is really JohannesK

14:00:40 [Zakim]

+JohannesK; got it

14:10:02 [CarlosI]

CarlosI has joined #er

14:11:06 [Zakim]

+ +34.98.429.aaaa - is perhaps CarlosI

14:13:52 [JohannesK]

Scribe: JohannesK

14:14:01 [JohannesK]

Zakim, take up agendum 1

14:14:01 [Zakim]

agendum 1. "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments" taken up [from JohannesK]

14:14:15 [JohannesK]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Apr/0014.html

14:21:03 [JohannesK]

JK: there are problems with data URI scheme

14:22:40 [JohannesK]

JK: for non-text/plain/US_ASCII stuff data URI must include mediaType; so data URI is not just a representation of the content, but content + media type, which is already in the Content-Type header

14:23:20 [JohannesK]

JK: proposal: "new" property for non-text stuff (base64Content); we already had this before we talked about data URI scheme

14:23:50 [JohannesK]

CI: Where there problems with the base64Content property? Why did we consider data URI?

14:23:57 [JohannesK]

JK: don't know

14:24:41 [JohannesK]

CI: base64Content property would be ok for me, let's ask others (who remember)

14:27:15 [JohannesK]

JK: ISSUE-011 editorial issue

14:28:57 [JohannesK]

CI: ISSUE-012/-013 maybe too much "noise" in the schema, but generally no problem

14:29:49 [JohannesK]

JK: ISSUE-014/-015

14:29:51 [JohannesK]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Mar/0108.html

14:34:54 [JohannesK]

JK: no solution for ISSUE-014

14:35:06 [JohannesK]

JK: Eric has a solution for 015

14:35:15 [JohannesK]

CI: i's sort of ugly, but it works

14:35:27 [JohannesK]

s/i's/it's/

14:36:55 [JohannesK]

JK: I could try to implement the proposal

14:38:40 [JohannesK]

JK: issues 016/018/019 about mixing OWL and RDFS -> discuss these in connection with EARL schema

14:43:23 [JohannesK]

JK: any new thoughts about inconsistency and complexity?

14:43:33 [JohannesK]

CI: I prefer current approach

14:47:16 [JohannesK]

JK: issue 007 is predefined value "accept" equivalent to literal "accept" or literal "Accept"?

14:47:49 [JohannesK]

JK: Should applications ignore literals when there is a predefined value? Should they treat the literal as equivalent?

14:55:59 [JohannesK]

CI: literals and predefined values (same name: "accept") are not equivalent

14:58:22 [JohannesK]

JK: issue 006

14:58:37 [JohannesK]

JK: e.g.: Accept: application/xhtml+xml, text/html

14:59:20 [JohannesK]

JK: literal field value "application/xhtml+xml, text/html"

15:00:03 [JohannesK]

JK: or you could split this into several HeaderElements

15:05:49 [JohannesK]

CI: always issues with upper-/lower-case, maybe we should say, both solutions are not equivalent

15:07:04 [JohannesK]

Zakim, close agendum 1

15:07:04 [Zakim]

agendum 1, HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments, closed

15:07:06 [Zakim]

I see nothing remaining on the agenda

15:07:26 [Zakim]

-CarlosI

15:07:33 [JohannesK]

RRSAgent, make minutes

15:07:33 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/16-er-minutes.html JohannesK

15:07:47 [JohannesK]

Zakim, bye

15:07:47 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #er

15:07:52 [Zakim]

leaving. As of this point the attendees were JohannesK, +34.98.429.aaaa

15:07:58 [JohannesK]

RRSAgent, bye