13:53:22 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 13:53:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc 13:53:27 meeting: i18n ITS WG 13:53:29 chair: Yves 13:53:31 scribe: Felix 13:53:35 scribeNick: fsasaki 13:53:40 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0028.html 13:53:50 rrsagent, make log public 13:54:00 present+ Yves, Felix 13:54:08 regrets+ Jirka 14:00:10 I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started 14:00:14 sure. 14:00:17 +Yves_Savourel 14:00:39 -Yves_Savourel 14:00:40 +Yves_Savourel 14:00:41 +Felix 14:00:51 + +49.613.772.aaaa 14:01:12 present+ Andrzej 14:01:18 zakim, who is here? 14:01:18 On the phone I see Yves_Savourel, Felix, Andrzej 14:01:19 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, YvesS 14:01:43 AZ has joined #i18nits 14:01:51 topic: action items 14:02:10 action: Everybody to look at the DocBook section from Jirka (ONGOING) 14:02:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0019.html 14:03:42 Felix: wondered which version Jirka thinks about 14:03:48 Yves: version 5 14:03:59 Felix: what about previous versions? 14:04:07 Yves: question for Jirka 14:04:29 .. did not see an issue, only worried about the long list of non-translatable elements 14:04:57 .. losts of special tags are hard to know whether they are translatable or not 14:05:20 .. we need to make sure that these are only seen as examples 14:05:58 .. so next step: ask Jirka about the version, Felix will give him access to the editing directory 14:06:55 action: Felix to prepare access for Jirka for the BP directory 14:07:22 action: Everybody to think about the idea: consider to have all existing schemas "ITS+..." with only markup which is not already in the schema, e.g. "ITS+XHTML" without its:dir? And have a general guideline to do that for existing schemas. (ONGOING) 14:08:13 Yves: agree with the consideration, but we need also to describe the mapping between the format and the ITS data category 14:08:41 .. otherwise, people can just remove the corresponding attribute from the ITS schemas for their customization 14:08:54 chriLi has joined #i18nits 14:09:15 hi, sorry for being late. I currently don't have a phone. 14:10:16 Felix: we will need to modify the existing sections in the BP document if we agree on that 14:10:48 Yves: btw., I reworked the DITA example 14:11:04 +Christian 14:11:19 no I have a phone 14:12:02 action: editors of BP document to change the descriptions of ITS+existing schemas to say that there is no need to have ITS attributes for existing markup, and have association rules instead 14:12:11 action: Christian to send comment on EMMA (DONE) 14:13:03 action: Everybody to look at SPARQL and the SPARQL result format for potential ITS review (PENDING) 14:13:24 action: Everybody to look into XLIFF 1.2, TMX 2, SRX 2 (ONGOING) 14:13:33 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0029.html 14:13:50 (comments from Yves on TMX) 14:14:48 Andrzej: your comments look good to me 14:14:51 Felix: +1 14:15:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0029.html 14:15:14 Christian: have not looked at TMX so far 14:15:20 Yves: we will wait for another week 14:15:57 (nobody else looked at SRX or XLIFF 1.2 so far) 14:16:06 action: Yves to look on Atom and the bidi attribute and possibly ITS in general (PENDING) 14:16:27 topic: ISO and ITS 14:18:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0020.html 14:21:50 Yves: is there a requirement for implementations? 14:22:02 Felix: don't think so 14:22:16 Christian: got some feedback internally, there will be some effort required 14:22:25 .. like fill in forms, reform the spec 14:25:26 Yves: we will make a final decision at the f2f meeting 14:25:37 s/decision/decision about ITS as ISO/ 14:25:51 Yves: I know some ISO people and will contact them as well 14:26:11 action: Yves to contact some ISO people about the "ITS as ISO standard" topic 14:26:42 topic: Reviewing W3C Work for ITS 14:27:01 http://www.w3.org/TR/#last-call 14:29:29 (discussion on CC/PP, no review seems necessary) 14:30:03 topic: BP WD 14:30:38 Yves: no changes recently 14:31:41 Felix: how about some milestones for the document? 14:32:06 Yves: yes, a first milestones would be Wd publication with DocBook section 14:32:12 .. I'll add that to the agenda 14:32:15 topic: f2f meeting 14:32:20 agenda at http://www.w3.org/International/its/ftf-200705-Paris.html#Objective 14:33:00 ISO topic is already in agenda, "milestone" need to be added, Christian wanted also general organization of the WG 14:33:27 Christian: would suggest that as a generic topic at the beginning 14:34:22 .. maybe also a slot of briefing things related to ITS 14:35:13 .. do we need a bridge during the meeting? 14:36:21 Christian: in other (also not ITS f2f meetings), long calls where not productive 14:38:40 agreement to reserve a bridge from 4:30-5:30 for Monday and Tuesday 14:38:56 action: Felix to reserve a bridge from 4:30-5:30 for Monday and Tuesday 14:41:08 topic: AOB 14:41:25 Christian: submitted a draft for the OASIS day about ITS 14:41:49 Felix: submitted something to Unicode also about ITS, was accepted 14:42:04 -Christian 14:42:06 -Yves_Savourel 14:42:06 -Felix 14:42:15 -Andrzej 14:42:16 I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended 14:42:17 Attendees were Yves_Savourel, Felix, +49.613.772.aaaa, Andrzej, Christian 14:42:25 s/OASIS day about ITS/OASIS day about ITS, will take about a month to get feedback/ 14:42:30 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:42:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 14:45:33 rrsagent, bye 14:45:33 I see 10 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-actions.rdf : 14:45:33 ACTION: Everybody to look at the DocBook section from Jirka (ONGOING) [1] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-02-10 14:45:33 ACTION: Felix to prepare access for Jirka for the BP directory [2] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-06-55 14:45:33 ACTION: Everybody to think about the idea: consider to have all existing schemas "ITS+..." with only markup which is not already in the schema, e.g. "ITS+XHTML" without its:dir? And have a general guideline to do that for existing schemas. (ONGOING) [3] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-07-22 14:45:33 ACTION: editors of BP document to change the descriptions of ITS+existing schemas to say that there is no need to have ITS attributes for existing markup, and have association rules instead [4] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-12-02 14:45:33 ACTION: Christian to send comment on EMMA (DONE) [5] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-12-11 14:45:33 ACTION: Everybody to look at SPARQL and the SPARQL result format for potential ITS review (PENDING) [6] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-13-03 14:45:33 ACTION: Everybody to look into XLIFF 1.2, TMX 2, SRX 2 (ONGOING) [7] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-13-24 14:45:33 ACTION: Yves to look on Atom and the bidi attribute and possibly ITS in general (PENDING) [8] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-16-06 14:45:33 ACTION: Yves to contact some ISO people about the "ITS as ISO standard" topic [9] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-26-11 14:45:33 ACTION: Felix to reserve a bridge from 4:30-5:30 for Monday and Tuesday [10] 14:45:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/09-i18nits-irc#T14-38-56 14:45:37 zakim, bye 14:45:37 Zakim has left #i18nits 14:45:39 fsasaki has left #i18nits