IRC log of i18nits on 2007-04-25

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:55:05 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #i18nits
13:55:05 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc
13:55:09 [fsasaki]
meeting: i18n ITS WG
13:55:11 [fsasaki]
chair: Yves
13:55:13 [fsasaki]
scribe: Felix
13:55:16 [fsasaki]
scribenick: fsasaki
13:55:37 [fsasaki]
agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0016.html
13:55:41 [fsasaki]
rrsagent, make log public
14:00:06 [Zakim]
I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started
14:00:13 [Zakim]
+Yves_Savourel
14:00:53 [Zakim]
+Felix
14:01:18 [Jirka]
Jirka has joined #i18nits
14:01:49 [YvesS]
zakim, who is here?
14:01:49 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Yves_Savourel, Felix
14:01:50 [Zakim]
On IRC I see Jirka, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, YvesS
14:02:05 [fsasaki]
present+ Yves, Jirka, Felix
14:02:06 [Zakim]
+??P12
14:02:11 [fsasaki]
regrets+ Sebastian
14:02:33 [Zakim]
+Christian
14:02:44 [fsasaki]
present+ Christian
14:02:49 [YvesS]
zakim, who is here?
14:02:49 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Yves_Savourel, Felix (muted), Jirka, Christian
14:02:50 [Zakim]
On IRC I see Jirka, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, YvesS
14:03:10 [fsasaki]
topic: action items
14:03:11 [chriLi]
chriLi has joined #i18nits
14:03:36 [fsasaki]
action: Felix to prepare the BP WD for publication (ONGOING)
14:03:51 [fsasaki]
Felix: document will be published on Friday
14:04:12 [Jirka]
zakim, mute me
14:04:12 [Zakim]
Jirka should now be muted
14:04:29 [Jirka]
ok
14:04:41 [fsasaki]
s/ONGOING/DONE/
14:04:55 [fsasaki]
action: Christian to try to look at EMMA (DONE)
14:04:57 [YvesS]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0007.html
14:05:20 [fsasaki]
Yves: Felix and me looked at the mail, I made a note about one example
14:05:41 [fsasaki]
Christian: your note was right, I'll change the example
14:06:44 [fsasaki]
Felix: example how to send a a comment:
14:07:01 [fsasaki]
to: public-some-wg , cc: public-i18n-its , public-i18n-core
14:07:31 [fsasaki]
Felix: i18n core would be in the loop, and it is our comment
14:07:56 [fsasaki]
Christian: I'll send the comment
14:08:09 [fsasaki]
action: Christian to send comment on EMMA
14:08:22 [fsasaki]
Felix: i18n core tracks comments like this: http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/
14:08:41 [fsasaki]
.. for a single review a separate HTML page like http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-xforms11/
14:09:53 [fsasaki]
.. it is some effort, but I wanted to bring the proposal to you
14:10:01 [fsasaki]
Yves: seems to be a lot of effort
14:10:25 [fsasaki]
.. we could have a simplified web page which lists the specs we commented on and point to the initial mails
14:10:43 [fsasaki]
.. the other way would be that the person who sends the comment to keep track of it
14:11:05 [fsasaki]
.. having a simplified page would be the best solution
14:11:36 [fsasaki]
Felix: agree
14:12:12 [fsasaki]
Christian: maintaining the overview page would not be too much effort
14:12:26 [fsasaki]
.. more worried about the individual review
14:13:12 [fsasaki]
Yves: I start a summary page of comments
14:13:40 [fsasaki]
action: Yves to start a summary page for comments we made on other drafts
14:14:14 [fsasaki]
action: Felix to follow up with issue found in the Rec document about "lro" vs "rlo" (DONE)
14:14:25 [fsasaki]
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/its-errata.html
14:15:16 [fsasaki]
Felix: I updated the errata page with the error
14:16:41 [fsasaki]
.. we can publish the updated REC later after we have more errors
14:17:14 [fsasaki]
action: Yves to do add rule for xml:lang='zxx' and translate in DITA integration (POSTPONED)
14:17:24 [fsasaki]
topic: ITS Recommendation
14:22:07 [fsasaki]
Felix: got some feedback from Japanese members that ITS should get more outreach, e.g. having it as an ISO standard, which makes it easier to appraoch governmental institutions
14:22:29 [fsasaki]
Yves: in localization industry, ISO is not so important. Tool vendors are more important
14:23:05 [fsasaki]
.. it is a big effort to go to ISO , maybe national standards would be easier, but maybe it is the same effort
14:24:01 [fsasaki]
Jirka: I'm in ISO WG for markup languages
14:24:29 [fsasaki]
.. it is possible to have existing specs in s.t. which is called fast track process
14:24:51 [fsasaki]
.. it means that existing specs from e.g. OASIS or W3C become ISO standards
14:25:06 [fsasaki]
.. problem is maintainance. Must be clear who maintains: ISO or original submitter
14:25:34 [fsasaki]
.. in some countries having ISO stamps makes them more attractive for governmental organizations
14:26:00 [fsasaki]
Yves: very helpful. Maybe we can add an item to the agenda of the f2f to discuss that
14:26:40 [fsasaki]
Jirka: I can send pointers about the fast track process
14:26:51 [fsasaki]
action: Jirka to send pointers about ISO fast track process
14:27:26 [fsasaki]
Christian: I also think we should try to relate ITS to upcoming technologies like W3C specs
14:27:39 [fsasaki]
.. and we should try to relate ITS to producers of multilingual content
14:27:54 [fsasaki]
.. however, we also need to see tool support for ITS
14:31:26 [Jirka]
Jirka doesn't think that it makes sense to have one standard released by two standard bodies, it makes further maintenance harder
14:31:35 [Jirka]
Jirka thinks that tool vendors are more important then ISO stamp
14:31:42 [Jirka]
Jirka thinks that we definitively push ITS in the new HTML WG, but this WG solves different problems at this time
14:32:40 [fsasaki]
Both Yves and Christian are talking to various tool vendors / tool creators about ITS adoption already
14:33:16 [fsasaki]
Jirka: I'm preparing a vote for openoffice XML format. I can integrate into the vote that ITS should be integrated into the format
14:33:46 [fsasaki]
s/openoffice/office open XML/
14:34:03 [fsasaki]
everybody likes the idea a lot
14:34:19 [fsasaki]
Yves: we will discuss outreach also at the f2f
14:34:32 [YvesS]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0013.html
14:34:34 [fsasaki]
topic: ITS in atom
14:34:45 [fsasaki]
yves: we have not followed up on this topic
14:35:35 [fsasaki]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2007AprJun/0017.html
14:37:03 [fsasaki]
Felix summarizes the mail http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0013.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2007AprJun/0017.html
14:38:04 [fsasaki]
Yves: do you know about Atom? Is ITS useful?
14:38:24 [fsasaki]
Felix: not sure
14:38:45 [fsasaki]
Yves: I'll follow up on the bidi attribute and also ITS in general
14:38:59 [fsasaki]
action: Yves to look on Atom and the bidi attribute and possibly ITS in general
14:39:12 [fsasaki]
topic: Reviewing W3C Work for ITS
14:39:40 [fsasaki]
Christian: looked at SPARQL
14:40:04 [fsasaki]
.. found similar issues as i18n core WG
14:40:29 [fsasaki]
.. the variable binding result format http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ might use ITS
14:42:49 [fsasaki]
Felix: not sure if it needs a review, maybe it is auto generated and needs no localization
14:43:23 [fsasaki]
Christian: should we take more time to look into this and see also the outcome of the Atom review?
14:43:25 [fsasaki]
Yves: sure
14:43:34 [fsasaki]
Felix: does SPARQL need ITS?
14:43:37 [fsasaki]
Christian: don't think so
14:44:03 [fsasaki]
action: everybody to look at SPARQL and the SPARQL result format for potential ITS review
14:45:11 [fsasaki]
Yves: no new drafts
14:45:31 [fsasaki]
Christian: what about non-ITS specs?
14:45:45 [fsasaki]
.. like TMX?
14:46:06 [fsasaki]
Yves: we should gather the comments and send them out officially
14:46:28 [fsasaki]
action: Yves to look into TMX and SRX for ITS related comments
14:46:39 [fsasaki]
s/and SRX //
14:46:47 [fsasaki]
Yves: don't think there is s.t. in SRX
14:47:07 [fsasaki]
Christian: relationship between segmentation rules and our "Within Text" rules?
14:47:46 [fsasaki]
Yves: theoretically yes, practically not. SRX deals only with regex in text. ITS "Within Text" deals with element structure
14:47:59 [fsasaki]
.. you can implement both without knowing each other
14:49:00 [fsasaki]
.. "Within Text" has to do with s.t. which is sent to a tool. After that , another tool might use that information to do text segmentation
14:49:25 [fsasaki]
Christian: SRX is a standard for segmentation rules, so isn't it related to "Within Text"?
14:49:38 [fsasaki]
Yves: it is related, but at different stages of the process
14:49:50 [fsasaki]
Christian: we could make a joint comment to make the relationship to ITS clear
14:49:57 [fsasaki]
Yves: good point
14:51:16 [fsasaki]
Felix: we could make such relations also clear in the BP document
14:51:29 [fsasaki]
Yves: other formats: XLIFF: has no directionality aspect in it
14:51:40 [fsasaki]
Christian: yes.
14:51:56 [fsasaki]
action: Everybody to look into XLIFF 1.2, TMX 2. and SRX 2
14:52:25 [fsasaki]
action: Yves to add non-w3c specs to the comment overview page
14:52:36 [fsasaki]
topic: Best Practices Working Draft
14:52:55 [fsasaki]
Yves: made no change, waited for publication
14:53:05 [fsasaki]
.. at the f2f, mabye we could try some online editing
14:53:27 [fsasaki]
s/f2f/next call or f2f/
14:54:15 [fsasaki]
.. I have web ex and could set up a meeting
14:54:55 [fsasaki]
(some concerns about OS useability, for people who don't have windows)
14:55:13 [fsasaki]
topic: Face-to-face meeting at SAP Paris
14:55:18 [fsasaki]
Yves: as a reminder
14:55:38 [fsasaki]
.. one more topic: outreach discussion
14:56:09 [fsasaki]
topic: AOB
14:56:23 [fsasaki]
Yves: will not be at next call, Felix will chair
14:56:43 [Zakim]
-Christian
14:56:44 [Zakim]
-Jirka
14:56:44 [Zakim]
-Yves_Savourel
14:56:45 [Jirka]
Jirka has left #i18nits
14:56:46 [Zakim]
-Felix
14:56:47 [Zakim]
I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended
14:56:48 [Zakim]
Attendees were Yves_Savourel, Felix, Jirka, Christian
14:56:50 [fsasaki]
rrsagent, draft minutes
14:56:50 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki
15:02:44 [fsasaki]
rrsagent, bye
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
I see 12 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-actions.rdf :
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Felix to prepare the BP WD for publication (ONGOING) [1]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-03-36
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Christian to try to look at EMMA (DONE) [2]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-04-55
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Christian to send comment on EMMA [3]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-08-09
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Yves to start a summary page for comments we made on other drafts [4]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-13-40
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Felix to follow up with issue found in the Rec document about "lro" vs "rlo" (DONE) [5]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-14-14
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Yves to do add rule for xml:lang='zxx' and translate in DITA integration (POSTPONED) [6]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-17-14
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Jirka to send pointers about ISO fast track process [7]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-26-51
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Yves to look on Atom and the bidi attribute and possibly ITS in general [8]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-38-59
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: everybody to look at SPARQL and the SPARQL result format for potential ITS review [9]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-44-03
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Yves to look into TMX and SRX for ITS related comments [10]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-46-28
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Everybody to look into XLIFF 1.2, TMX 2. and SRX 2 [11]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-51-56
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Yves to add non-w3c specs to the comment overview page [12]
15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-52-25
15:02:46 [fsasaki]
zakim, bye
15:02:58 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #i18nits
15:02:59 [fsasaki]
zakim, bye
15:03:06 [fsasaki]
zakim, bye
15:03:10 [fsasaki]
fsasaki has left #i18nits