IRC log of i18nits on 2007-04-25
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:55:05 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #i18nits
- 13:55:05 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc
- 13:55:09 [fsasaki]
- meeting: i18n ITS WG
- 13:55:11 [fsasaki]
- chair: Yves
- 13:55:13 [fsasaki]
- scribe: Felix
- 13:55:16 [fsasaki]
- scribenick: fsasaki
- 13:55:37 [fsasaki]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0016.html
- 13:55:41 [fsasaki]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 14:00:06 [Zakim]
- I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started
- 14:00:13 [Zakim]
- +Yves_Savourel
- 14:00:53 [Zakim]
- +Felix
- 14:01:18 [Jirka]
- Jirka has joined #i18nits
- 14:01:49 [YvesS]
- zakim, who is here?
- 14:01:49 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Yves_Savourel, Felix
- 14:01:50 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Jirka, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, YvesS
- 14:02:05 [fsasaki]
- present+ Yves, Jirka, Felix
- 14:02:06 [Zakim]
- +??P12
- 14:02:11 [fsasaki]
- regrets+ Sebastian
- 14:02:33 [Zakim]
- +Christian
- 14:02:44 [fsasaki]
- present+ Christian
- 14:02:49 [YvesS]
- zakim, who is here?
- 14:02:49 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Yves_Savourel, Felix (muted), Jirka, Christian
- 14:02:50 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Jirka, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, YvesS
- 14:03:10 [fsasaki]
- topic: action items
- 14:03:11 [chriLi]
- chriLi has joined #i18nits
- 14:03:36 [fsasaki]
- action: Felix to prepare the BP WD for publication (ONGOING)
- 14:03:51 [fsasaki]
- Felix: document will be published on Friday
- 14:04:12 [Jirka]
- zakim, mute me
- 14:04:12 [Zakim]
- Jirka should now be muted
- 14:04:29 [Jirka]
- ok
- 14:04:41 [fsasaki]
- s/ONGOING/DONE/
- 14:04:55 [fsasaki]
- action: Christian to try to look at EMMA (DONE)
- 14:04:57 [YvesS]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0007.html
- 14:05:20 [fsasaki]
- Yves: Felix and me looked at the mail, I made a note about one example
- 14:05:41 [fsasaki]
- Christian: your note was right, I'll change the example
- 14:06:44 [fsasaki]
- Felix: example how to send a a comment:
- 14:07:01 [fsasaki]
- to: public-some-wg , cc: public-i18n-its , public-i18n-core
- 14:07:31 [fsasaki]
- Felix: i18n core would be in the loop, and it is our comment
- 14:07:56 [fsasaki]
- Christian: I'll send the comment
- 14:08:09 [fsasaki]
- action: Christian to send comment on EMMA
- 14:08:22 [fsasaki]
- Felix: i18n core tracks comments like this: http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/
- 14:08:41 [fsasaki]
- .. for a single review a separate HTML page like http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-xforms11/
- 14:09:53 [fsasaki]
- .. it is some effort, but I wanted to bring the proposal to you
- 14:10:01 [fsasaki]
- Yves: seems to be a lot of effort
- 14:10:25 [fsasaki]
- .. we could have a simplified web page which lists the specs we commented on and point to the initial mails
- 14:10:43 [fsasaki]
- .. the other way would be that the person who sends the comment to keep track of it
- 14:11:05 [fsasaki]
- .. having a simplified page would be the best solution
- 14:11:36 [fsasaki]
- Felix: agree
- 14:12:12 [fsasaki]
- Christian: maintaining the overview page would not be too much effort
- 14:12:26 [fsasaki]
- .. more worried about the individual review
- 14:13:12 [fsasaki]
- Yves: I start a summary page of comments
- 14:13:40 [fsasaki]
- action: Yves to start a summary page for comments we made on other drafts
- 14:14:14 [fsasaki]
- action: Felix to follow up with issue found in the Rec document about "lro" vs "rlo" (DONE)
- 14:14:25 [fsasaki]
- http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/its-errata.html
- 14:15:16 [fsasaki]
- Felix: I updated the errata page with the error
- 14:16:41 [fsasaki]
- .. we can publish the updated REC later after we have more errors
- 14:17:14 [fsasaki]
- action: Yves to do add rule for xml:lang='zxx' and translate in DITA integration (POSTPONED)
- 14:17:24 [fsasaki]
- topic: ITS Recommendation
- 14:22:07 [fsasaki]
- Felix: got some feedback from Japanese members that ITS should get more outreach, e.g. having it as an ISO standard, which makes it easier to appraoch governmental institutions
- 14:22:29 [fsasaki]
- Yves: in localization industry, ISO is not so important. Tool vendors are more important
- 14:23:05 [fsasaki]
- .. it is a big effort to go to ISO , maybe national standards would be easier, but maybe it is the same effort
- 14:24:01 [fsasaki]
- Jirka: I'm in ISO WG for markup languages
- 14:24:29 [fsasaki]
- .. it is possible to have existing specs in s.t. which is called fast track process
- 14:24:51 [fsasaki]
- .. it means that existing specs from e.g. OASIS or W3C become ISO standards
- 14:25:06 [fsasaki]
- .. problem is maintainance. Must be clear who maintains: ISO or original submitter
- 14:25:34 [fsasaki]
- .. in some countries having ISO stamps makes them more attractive for governmental organizations
- 14:26:00 [fsasaki]
- Yves: very helpful. Maybe we can add an item to the agenda of the f2f to discuss that
- 14:26:40 [fsasaki]
- Jirka: I can send pointers about the fast track process
- 14:26:51 [fsasaki]
- action: Jirka to send pointers about ISO fast track process
- 14:27:26 [fsasaki]
- Christian: I also think we should try to relate ITS to upcoming technologies like W3C specs
- 14:27:39 [fsasaki]
- .. and we should try to relate ITS to producers of multilingual content
- 14:27:54 [fsasaki]
- .. however, we also need to see tool support for ITS
- 14:31:26 [Jirka]
- Jirka doesn't think that it makes sense to have one standard released by two standard bodies, it makes further maintenance harder
- 14:31:35 [Jirka]
- Jirka thinks that tool vendors are more important then ISO stamp
- 14:31:42 [Jirka]
- Jirka thinks that we definitively push ITS in the new HTML WG, but this WG solves different problems at this time
- 14:32:40 [fsasaki]
- Both Yves and Christian are talking to various tool vendors / tool creators about ITS adoption already
- 14:33:16 [fsasaki]
- Jirka: I'm preparing a vote for openoffice XML format. I can integrate into the vote that ITS should be integrated into the format
- 14:33:46 [fsasaki]
- s/openoffice/office open XML/
- 14:34:03 [fsasaki]
- everybody likes the idea a lot
- 14:34:19 [fsasaki]
- Yves: we will discuss outreach also at the f2f
- 14:34:32 [YvesS]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0013.html
- 14:34:34 [fsasaki]
- topic: ITS in atom
- 14:34:45 [fsasaki]
- yves: we have not followed up on this topic
- 14:35:35 [fsasaki]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2007AprJun/0017.html
- 14:37:03 [fsasaki]
- Felix summarizes the mail http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0013.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2007AprJun/0017.html
- 14:38:04 [fsasaki]
- Yves: do you know about Atom? Is ITS useful?
- 14:38:24 [fsasaki]
- Felix: not sure
- 14:38:45 [fsasaki]
- Yves: I'll follow up on the bidi attribute and also ITS in general
- 14:38:59 [fsasaki]
- action: Yves to look on Atom and the bidi attribute and possibly ITS in general
- 14:39:12 [fsasaki]
- topic: Reviewing W3C Work for ITS
- 14:39:40 [fsasaki]
- Christian: looked at SPARQL
- 14:40:04 [fsasaki]
- .. found similar issues as i18n core WG
- 14:40:29 [fsasaki]
- .. the variable binding result format http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ might use ITS
- 14:42:49 [fsasaki]
- Felix: not sure if it needs a review, maybe it is auto generated and needs no localization
- 14:43:23 [fsasaki]
- Christian: should we take more time to look into this and see also the outcome of the Atom review?
- 14:43:25 [fsasaki]
- Yves: sure
- 14:43:34 [fsasaki]
- Felix: does SPARQL need ITS?
- 14:43:37 [fsasaki]
- Christian: don't think so
- 14:44:03 [fsasaki]
- action: everybody to look at SPARQL and the SPARQL result format for potential ITS review
- 14:45:11 [fsasaki]
- Yves: no new drafts
- 14:45:31 [fsasaki]
- Christian: what about non-ITS specs?
- 14:45:45 [fsasaki]
- .. like TMX?
- 14:46:06 [fsasaki]
- Yves: we should gather the comments and send them out officially
- 14:46:28 [fsasaki]
- action: Yves to look into TMX and SRX for ITS related comments
- 14:46:39 [fsasaki]
- s/and SRX //
- 14:46:47 [fsasaki]
- Yves: don't think there is s.t. in SRX
- 14:47:07 [fsasaki]
- Christian: relationship between segmentation rules and our "Within Text" rules?
- 14:47:46 [fsasaki]
- Yves: theoretically yes, practically not. SRX deals only with regex in text. ITS "Within Text" deals with element structure
- 14:47:59 [fsasaki]
- .. you can implement both without knowing each other
- 14:49:00 [fsasaki]
- .. "Within Text" has to do with s.t. which is sent to a tool. After that , another tool might use that information to do text segmentation
- 14:49:25 [fsasaki]
- Christian: SRX is a standard for segmentation rules, so isn't it related to "Within Text"?
- 14:49:38 [fsasaki]
- Yves: it is related, but at different stages of the process
- 14:49:50 [fsasaki]
- Christian: we could make a joint comment to make the relationship to ITS clear
- 14:49:57 [fsasaki]
- Yves: good point
- 14:51:16 [fsasaki]
- Felix: we could make such relations also clear in the BP document
- 14:51:29 [fsasaki]
- Yves: other formats: XLIFF: has no directionality aspect in it
- 14:51:40 [fsasaki]
- Christian: yes.
- 14:51:56 [fsasaki]
- action: Everybody to look into XLIFF 1.2, TMX 2. and SRX 2
- 14:52:25 [fsasaki]
- action: Yves to add non-w3c specs to the comment overview page
- 14:52:36 [fsasaki]
- topic: Best Practices Working Draft
- 14:52:55 [fsasaki]
- Yves: made no change, waited for publication
- 14:53:05 [fsasaki]
- .. at the f2f, mabye we could try some online editing
- 14:53:27 [fsasaki]
- s/f2f/next call or f2f/
- 14:54:15 [fsasaki]
- .. I have web ex and could set up a meeting
- 14:54:55 [fsasaki]
- (some concerns about OS useability, for people who don't have windows)
- 14:55:13 [fsasaki]
- topic: Face-to-face meeting at SAP Paris
- 14:55:18 [fsasaki]
- Yves: as a reminder
- 14:55:38 [fsasaki]
- .. one more topic: outreach discussion
- 14:56:09 [fsasaki]
- topic: AOB
- 14:56:23 [fsasaki]
- Yves: will not be at next call, Felix will chair
- 14:56:43 [Zakim]
- -Christian
- 14:56:44 [Zakim]
- -Jirka
- 14:56:44 [Zakim]
- -Yves_Savourel
- 14:56:45 [Jirka]
- Jirka has left #i18nits
- 14:56:46 [Zakim]
- -Felix
- 14:56:47 [Zakim]
- I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended
- 14:56:48 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Yves_Savourel, Felix, Jirka, Christian
- 14:56:50 [fsasaki]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:56:50 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki
- 15:02:44 [fsasaki]
- rrsagent, bye
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- I see 12 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-actions.rdf :
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Felix to prepare the BP WD for publication (ONGOING) [1]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-03-36
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Christian to try to look at EMMA (DONE) [2]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-04-55
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Christian to send comment on EMMA [3]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-08-09
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Yves to start a summary page for comments we made on other drafts [4]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-13-40
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Felix to follow up with issue found in the Rec document about "lro" vs "rlo" (DONE) [5]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-14-14
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Yves to do add rule for xml:lang='zxx' and translate in DITA integration (POSTPONED) [6]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-17-14
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jirka to send pointers about ISO fast track process [7]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-26-51
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Yves to look on Atom and the bidi attribute and possibly ITS in general [8]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-38-59
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: everybody to look at SPARQL and the SPARQL result format for potential ITS review [9]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-44-03
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Yves to look into TMX and SRX for ITS related comments [10]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-46-28
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Everybody to look into XLIFF 1.2, TMX 2. and SRX 2 [11]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-51-56
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Yves to add non-w3c specs to the comment overview page [12]
- 15:02:44 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-i18nits-irc#T14-52-25
- 15:02:46 [fsasaki]
- zakim, bye
- 15:02:58 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #i18nits
- 15:02:59 [fsasaki]
- zakim, bye
- 15:03:06 [fsasaki]
- zakim, bye
- 15:03:10 [fsasaki]
- fsasaki has left #i18nits