14:27:42 RRSAgent has joined #ws-desc 14:27:42 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-irc 14:27:49 Zakim has joined #ws-desc 14:27:54 RRSAgent, set log world 14:28:01 Zakim, this will be WSDesc 14:28:01 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, Jonathan 14:28:09 Zakim, list conferences 14:28:09 I see Team_(fttf)13:59Z, UW_UWA()10:00AM, Team_(wai)13:02Z, Math_IG()10:00AM, MWI_BPWG()10:00AM active 14:28:11 also scheduled at this time are Team_Global(review)8:00AM, VB_VBWG()10:00AM 14:28:20 Zakim this will be WS_Desc 14:28:29 Zakim, this will be WS_Desc 14:28:29 ok, Jonathan; I see WS_DescWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 32 minutes 14:55:13 Allen has joined #ws-desc 14:56:53 pauld has joined #ws-desc 15:00:38 TonyR has joined #ws-desc 15:00:49 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has now started 15:00:52 +Plh 15:01:26 +??P19 15:01:34 zakim, ??P19 is Allen 15:01:34 +Allen; got it 15:02:11 +Tom_Jordahl 15:02:16 +Jonathan_Marsh 15:02:20 JacekK has joined #ws-desc 15:02:21 TomJ has joined #ws-desc 15:02:31 + +00000aaaa 15:02:49 zakim, the zeroes is me 15:02:49 I don't understand 'the zeroes is me', JacekK 15:02:53 zakim, aaaa is me 15:02:53 +JacekK; got it 15:03:01 +Roberto 15:03:23 +??P12 15:03:32 zakim, ??p12 is me 15:03:32 +TonyR; got it 15:04:31 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:04:31 On the phone I see Plh, Allen, Tom_Jordahl, Jonathan_Marsh, JacekK, Roberto, TonyR 15:05:24 scribe: plh 15:05:31 Arthur has joined #ws-desc 15:05:33 Topic: Approval of minutes 15:05:35 -Roberto 15:05:42 Resolved: minutes approve 15:05:47 s/approve/approved/ 15:05:51 Topic: Action items 15:05:54 +Roberto 15:06:08 Jonathan: added some bugzilla links on the homepage 15:06:17 -JacekK 15:06:40 i'll call in a couple of minutes 15:07:31 Topic: Administrivia 15:07:44 +JacekK 15:07:49 Jonathan: still working on WSDL 2.0 descriptions for existing HTTP 15:08:00 ... Arthur and I checked those into the test suite 15:08:17 ... last week we had the WSDL 2.0 in URIs item. 15:08:29 +??P24 15:08:56 charlton has joined #ws-desc 15:09:19 charlton has changed the topic to: 15:10:12 Philippe: I need to double check for this 15:10:22 ACTION: Philippe to double check http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Mar/0072.html 15:10:51 Zakim, ??P24 is Charlton 15:10:51 +Charlton; got it 15:11:14 Topic: issue 4427 15:12:55 Philippe: [summarizes the proposal] 15:13:27 "A WSDL 2.0 15:13:27 Infoset contains representations for a collection of WSDL 2.0 components that 15:13:27 share a common target namespace and zero or more wsdl:import element 15:13:27 information items 4.2 Importing Descriptions that corresponds to a collection 15:13:27 with components drawn from multiple target namespaces." 15:14:05 Jonathan: s/corresponds/correspond/ 15:14:05 +Arthur 15:14:45 -Roberto 15:16:21 Jonathan: s/drawn// 15:16:56 New text: "A WSDL 2.0 15:16:56 Infoset contains representations for a collection of WSDL 2.0 components that 15:16:56 share a common target namespace and zero or more wsdl:import element 15:16:56 information items 4.2 Importing Descriptions that correspond to a collection 15:16:56 with components from multiple target namespaces." 15:17:09 Jonathan: objection to adopt the new text? 15:17:15 Resolved: proposal adopted. 15:20:01 Jonathan: we should mark the bug as resolved, once the editors integrated the proposal 15:20:04 +Gilbert_Pilz 15:20:20 gpilz has joined #ws-desc 15:20:28 Roberto has joined #ws-desc 15:20:29 Topic: Issue 4429 15:20:59 + +1.415.268.aabb 15:21:20 Jonathan: redundancy of asssertions. 15:21:34 ... we resolved 4381 and those seem duplicate 15:22:39 Resolved: 4429 is a duplicate of 4381 15:22:55 Issue: 4431 15:23:01 Topic: Issue 4431 15:23:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Apr/0027.html 15:24:29 Proposed text: "Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property of the first component, there is an equivalent property on the second component, and vice versa. 15:24:29 Instances of properties are considered equivalent if they have the same type and their values are equivalent." 15:26:52 Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for 15:26:53 each 15:26:53 property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an 15:26:53 equivalent value, 15:27:01 on the second 15:27:01 component, and vice versa. 15:27:25 +[Microsoft] 15:27:39 Jacek: "for each property value" ? 15:27:40 "for each property" -> "for each property value" 15:28:05 Ram has joined #ws-desc 15:28:42 Proposed text: "Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for property value of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value, on the secondcomponent, and vice versa." 15:29:07 Resolved: proposed text adopted 15:29:43 Topic: Issue 4430 15:31:25 +[Canon] 15:32:05 jjm has joined #ws-desc 15:32:33 Philippe: [summarizes the proposal] 15:33:19 rrsagent, where am i? 15:33:19 See http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-irc#T15-33-19 15:35:45 Jacek: it talks about characters and looks like it can conflict, but the binding use replacement mechanism. 15:36:11 Jonathan: the main purpose of this is to refer to the appropriate section 15:36:56 Note that the presence in this property of the characters 15:36:56 "?" and "#" can conflict with those potentially added by the query string 15:36:56 serialization mechanism, section 6.8.2, Serialization as 15:36:56 "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts]. 15:37:54 looks good to me 15:38:02 Resolved: proposed text adopted. No action on interaction with CR157. 15:38:14 Topic: Issue 4434 15:38:20 youenn has joined #ws-desc 15:38:50 Jonathan: the suggestion is to move the example before the last paragraph 15:39:05 Resolved: no objection to change the order 15:39:13 Topic: Issue 4435 15:40:09 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#RPCStyle 15:42:08 Jonathan: agreed. better move it with the first or fifth paragraph 15:42:43 ... would rather have it lower in 4.1. 15:42:59 Jean-Jacques: switching 3rd and 4th paragraphs? 15:44:14 Resolved: we'll switch 3rd and 4th paragraphs in section 4.1 RPC Style 15:45:02 Topic: Issue 4436 15:46:29 Philippe: duplicate of "An Interface Operation component conforming to the RPC style MUST obey the constraints listed further below." ? 15:46:40 Jonathan: we need to keep the fact that RPC only works with XML Schema language 15:49:26 ... we could strike the early part of the sentence: "Furthermore, the associate messages MUST conform to the rules below, ..." and turns pagagraph 2 and 3 into a single paragraph." 15:50:41 Tom: do we need to change that anyway? 15:50:54 Philippe&Jean-Jacques: ok with proposal 15:51:03 Resolved: Jonathan's proposal is adopted. 15:52:10 Topic: Issue 4457 15:53:25 ACTIOn: Philippe to fix the references 15:53:36 Topic: Issue 4458 15:54:23 Jonathan: could be a bug or a feature request 15:55:01 ... would like to know how to support both application/x-www-form-urlencoded and application/sparql-query in the query operation 15:58:11 Philippe: you can't have more than on whttp:inputSerialization within the same binding operation 16:00:44 Jonathan: nope. you can put multiple media type in it, and it's up to the client to pick one 16:01:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Sep/0007 16:02:58 ACTION: Philippe to look into issue 4458 16:03:26 Topic: Issue 4468 16:04:08 Proposed: s/is set/is not set/ 16:04:18 Resolved: adopted 16:04:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2007Mar/0010.html 16:06:42 Topic: Issue 4458 16:10:47 Jonathan: they'll have to invent an extension to indicate some other kind of serialization for application/sparql-query in the case when they use #element or #any 16:11:00 ... since the default is application/xml 16:11:13 ... we could close the issue against our spec 16:11:22 ... and I'll follow-up with them 16:11:56 Resolved: close issue 4458 with no action, Jonathan will follow-up with them 16:12:08 rrsagent, drop action 3 16:13:16 Topic: Next steps 16:13:30 Jonathan: no more issues and last call ended on Sunday 16:14:54 Jonathan: I was able to write a description of flickr, but it has limitations 16:15:13 ... but authorization would need a policy 16:15:46 ... atom publication protocol, google publishing protocol 16:16:05 ... we have Arthur bugzilla one 16:16:10 ... I'll play with that 16:19:27 ... add the keyword "resolved" in the issues list 16:20:51 Topic: Interchange format note 16:20:58 Jonathan: ok to retire it? 16:21:00 Arthur: ok 16:21:20 [adjourned] 16:21:22 -Tom_Jordahl 16:21:23 -[Microsoft] 16:21:23 -Plh 16:21:25 -JacekK 16:21:26 -Allen 16:21:26 -Jonathan_Marsh 16:21:29 -Charlton 16:21:31 -Roberto 16:21:32 TonyR has left #ws-desc 16:21:32 -[Canon] 16:21:33 -Arthur 16:21:37 -Gilbert_Pilz 16:21:39 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has ended 16:21:41 Attendees were Plh, Allen, Tom_Jordahl, Jonathan_Marsh, +00000aaaa, JacekK, Roberto, TonyR, Charlton, Arthur, Gilbert_Pilz, +1.415.268.aabb, [Microsoft], [Canon] 16:25:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:25:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 16:25:41 rrsagent, set log world 16:25:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:25:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 16:26:03 Meeting: WS Description WG telcon 16:26:06 Chair: Jonathan 16:27:01 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:27:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 16:33:18 monica has joined #ws-desc 16:33:25 good morning 16:39:37 zakim, bye 16:39:38 Zakim has left #ws-desc 16:39:45 rrsagent, bye 16:39:45 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-actions.rdf : 16:39:45 ACTION: Philippe to double check http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Mar/0072.html [1] 16:39:45 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-irc#T15-10-22 16:39:45 ACTION: Philippe to fix the references [2] 16:39:45 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/19-ws-desc-irc#T15-53-25