14:53:30 RRSAgent has joined #swd 14:53:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc 14:53:35 rrsagent, bookmark 14:53:35 See http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T14-53-35 14:53:41 zakim, this will be swd 14:53:41 ok, TomB, I see SW_SWD()11:00AM already started 14:53:53 Meeting: SWD WG 14:53:56 Chair: Tom 14:54:28 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Apr/0021.html 14:54:56 RalphS has joined #swd 14:55:04 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html 14:55:44 Regrets: Elisa, Simone, Guus 14:55:58 rrsagent, please make record public 14:57:38 yes 14:57:41 + +0120682aaaa 14:57:47 just about to dial in thouggh.... 14:58:30 +??P35 14:59:26 Scribe: seanb 15:00:35 http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 15:00:42 +Ralph 15:01:46 Antoine has joined #swd 15:02:12 Bern has joined #swd 15:02:28 +Antoine_Isaac 15:04:09 zakim, who's on the call? 15:04:09 On the phone I see TomB, Bernard, SeanB, Ralph, Antoine_Isaac 15:04:39 JonP has joined #swd 15:06:01 Topic: Admin 15:06:23 berrueta has joined #swd 15:06:24 +Jon_Phipps 15:06:30 vit has joined #swd 15:06:30 aliman has joined #swd 15:07:28 +??P7 15:07:37 zakim, Jon_Phipps is me 15:07:37 + +49.842.9.aabb 15:07:38 +JonP; got it 15:07:46 zakim, ??P7 is me 15:07:46 I already had ??P7 as Aliman, berrueta 15:08:16 zakim, aliman is really Diego 15:08:16 +Diego; got it 15:08:28 PROPOSED to accept minutes of 3 April telecon: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html 15:08:55 RESOLVED: accepted minutes 15:08:58 zakim, vit is really Alistair 15:08:58 +Alistair; got it 15:09:00 Upcoming telecons: 15:09:08 April 24th, no problem 15:09:27 ehm, i'm not on the phone - sorry for possible confusion - i'm only following you on IRC 15:09:37 May 1st TomB has a problem 15:09:47 May 8th: WWW conflict 15:09:47 [ok, Vit; thanks, just confusion when Diego and Alistair joined] 15:09:56 Ralph: Regrets for May 8, I'll be in Banff 15:10:18 Spring face-to-face meeting. Proposed to hold it in Sept/Oct/Nov 15:10:33 RESOLVED: Next f2f in Sep/Oct/Nov 15:10:48 ACTION: TomB to start questionnaire on date for f2f 15:10:56 I can't make May 1st, can make May 8th telcon. 15:11:08 Bernard: W3C plenary in 1st week of Nov. Why not synchronise? 15:11:35 Ralph: Probably good idea, but potentail conflict wth ISWC 15:11:48 Ralph: In Cambridge (4-10 Nov) 15:12:08 Topic: SKOS 15:12:13 (dates definitely overlap ISWC; the question is whether that matters for SWD WG) 15:12:24 ACTION: Antoine, Jon, Daniel respond to the SKOS Use Case reviews, target a decision to publish on 17 April [http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action02] 15:12:47 --continues 15:13:11 Antoine: issues still to be resolved, hopefully in the next fw days. 15:13:13 +Ben_Adida 15:13:15 benadida has joined #SWD 15:13:23 ...requesting feedback from reviewers to comments addressed 15:13:47 ACTION: Alan to write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] 15:13:49 --continues 15:13:58 ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal values, and how to represent that in skos [http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] 15:14:00 --continues 15:14:14 Antoine: Is it possible to get some support (e.g. Ralph) w.r.t the 15:14:25 ... editorial aspects of putting documents into W3C and get processed 15:14:31 .. with proper stylesheets 15:14:47 Ralph: From WG homepage there are pointers to guides for editors 15:15:03 ... tech report editors materials (bottom of WG home paghe) 15:15:17 ...document is in wg space, so pubrules checker can be run over it. 15:15:35 Antoine: worried about technical difficulties. E.g. uses amaya but then 15:15:47 ...output is diofferent. character encoding? 15:15:52 Jon: Can help with this. 15:16:03 ACTION: Guus revise his ISSUE-26 proposal to account for other options [http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action07] 15:16:06 --continues 15:16:11 I just use http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/base as base stylesheet for editors drafts 15:16:18 ACTION: Alistair to write up two alternatives for representing Collections [http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action08] 15:16:22 --continues 15:16:37 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/#resources Editors' Resources 15:16:37 Topic: Recipes 15:16:46 ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] 15:16:49 --continues 15:17:23 Topic: Vocabulary Managament 15:17:31 ACTION: Elisa to provide outline of work to be done by Apr 17 [http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action01] 15:17:33 --continues 15:17:45 Topic: RDFa 15:17:56 ACTION: Ben to send mail to Semantic Web and HTML mailing lists publicizing and soliciting comments on RDFa Primer and RDFa Use Cases work [http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action14] 15:17:59 --done 15:18:10 Ben: Just did it 45 minutes ago! 15:18:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/1027.html 15:18:36 Ben: Report from yesterday's call 15:18:49 ...Have a solid Working draft for use cases/primer 15:18:54 ...hoping for more comments 15:18:55 -> http://www.w3.org/2007/04/16-rdfa-minutes record of 2007-04-16 RDFa telecon 15:19:02 ...working on synatx and diuscussing what to bring to last call 15:19:08 ...feedback from grdddl wg 15:19:21 ...grdddl taking sntax and test cases to last call. 15:19:34 ...use cases and primer kept as notes. 15:20:01 q+ 15:20:04 ...i.e. normative docs as last call, non-normative stuff as wg notes 15:20:42 Ralph: this is fine. Case by case decising by wg as to what should be rec and what should be 15:21:02 ...notes. Anything important for a reader to understand the technology (and us e it) should be part of 15:21:26 ...rec package. Auxiliarry stuff could be notes. Use cases fall into the second. Primer maybe not. 15:21:33 ...depends on how complete other documents are. 15:21:52 Ben: GRDDL wg says that their primer will go to last call if time permits. 15:22:13 q+ 15:22:13 ...If primer is particularly useful then it could be part of the rec. Documents are 15:22:30 ...useful, but pushing them all to rec status may not be feasible in the time. 15:22:49 Ralph: Used to be that could decide later. New W3 patent policy requires us to say whether or not 15:23:00 ... a document is rec track when first drafts are published. 15:23:12 Ben: Have already made statements about the documents. 15:23:45 Ralph: In case of RDFa rec has moved from being part of XHTML to standalone document 15:23:59 ...can potentially change our minds later 15:24:16 Ben: Safe to say that use cases and other auxiliaries are ok as notes. 15:24:22 ...Primre should be part of rec package 15:24:36 Ralph: I don't see a particular reason to break that trend 15:24:59 Ben: RDFa overview document. Points to other documents. May be auxiliary 15:25:10 ...Just an umbrella 15:25:38 ...Proposed: syntax rec track test cases last call. primer to last call. Others notes 15:25:50 ...Will send summary to group cc swd. ANy comments please shout 15:26:16 ACTION: Ben to send a summary of status of components of specifications will be handled 15:26:24 Topic: AOB 15:26:36 TomB: Request for comments on GRDDL last call 15:26:55 ...volunteer to read grddl spec and report back to next week's call 15:27:11 ...can then send a note to grddl. Purpose of review is to flag issues that we see 15:27:36 ...w.r.t. SWD deliverables. Anything that raises issues re. SKOS or RDFa should be flagged 15:27:57 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Apr/0020.html Request for Comments from SWD Group on GRDDL Last Call [TomB] 15:28:00 ...also soliciting feedback on test cases and primer (but GRDDDL spec more important) 15:28:39 Ben: was involved in GRDDL. What's the timeline? 15:29:14 Bern has joined #swd 15:29:15 TomB: By middle of next week. Not a complete review, but before April 24th. 15:29:24 Ben: Can't do it (is moving) 15:29:42 TomB: Looking for some kind of collective response 15:29:55 "Comments are due by 30 March 2007" -- http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/ 15:30:01 Ben: Some mild concerns that they haven't taken RDFa into account. Not killer concerns, 15:30:05 ...but worth noting 15:30:24 ...Can email them and say I need more time before feeding back 15:31:05 ...whatever happens, Ben should send comment 15:31:29 ...This is a good document. Someone else shoudlt ake a look as Ben's been involved 15:31:56 zakim, who's on the call? 15:31:56 On the phone I see TomB, Bernard, SeanB, Ralph, Antoine_Isaac, JonP, Diego, Alistair, Ben_Adida 15:32:03 ACTION: Ben to provide feedback on GRDDL Last Call Doc 15:32:16 Diego: I'll do it 15:32:51 ACTION: Diego to review GRDDL Last Call Doc. Discuss briefly at next week's call 15:33:26 TomB: next meeting April 24th for sure. 15:33:31 -Ben_Adida 15:33:33 -Bernard 15:33:34 -Diego 15:33:35 -Alistair 15:33:37 -JonP 15:33:56 benadida has left #SWD 15:34:00 -Antoine_Isaac 15:34:04 zakim, list participants 15:34:04 As of this point the attendees have been +0120682aaaa, Bernard, SeanB, TomB, Ralph, Antoine_Isaac, +49.842.9.aabb, JonP, Diego, Alistair, Ben_Adida 15:34:57 -Ralph 15:35:02 -SeanB 15:35:13 rrsagent, please draft minutes 15:35:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html seanb 15:35:34 -TomB 15:35:35 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 15:35:39 Attendees were +0120682aaaa, Bernard, SeanB, TomB, Ralph, Antoine_Isaac, +49.842.9.aabb, JonP, Diego, Alistair, Ben_Adida 15:40:12 Antoine has left #swd 15:43:33 ralph -- one question. Who is/was +0120682aaaa?? 15:48:07 that was Bernard 15:50:51 zakim, bye 15:50:51 Zakim has left #swd 15:50:54 rrsagent, bye 15:50:54 I see 12 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-actions.rdf : 15:50:54 ACTION: TomB to start questionnaire on date for f2f [1] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-10-48 15:50:54 ACTION: Antoine, Jon, Daniel respond to the SKOS Use Case reviews, target a decision to publish on 17 April [http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action02] [2] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-12-24 15:50:54 ACTION: Alan to write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] [3] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-13-47 15:50:54 ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal values, and how to represent that in skos [http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] [4] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-13-58 15:50:54 ACTION: Guus revise his ISSUE-26 proposal to account for other options [http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action07] [5] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-16-03 15:50:54 ACTION: Alistair to write up two alternatives for representing Collections [http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action08] [6] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-16-18 15:50:54 ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [7] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-16-46 15:50:54 ACTION: Elisa to provide outline of work to be done by Apr 17 [http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action01] [8] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-17-31 15:50:54 ACTION: Ben to send mail to Semantic Web and HTML mailing lists publicizing and soliciting comments on RDFa Primer and RDFa Use Cases work [http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action14] [9] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-17-56 15:50:54 ACTION: Ben to send a summary of status of components of specifications will be handled [10] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-26-16 15:50:54 ACTION: Ben to provide feedback on GRDDL Last Call Doc [11] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-32-03 15:50:54 ACTION: Diego to review GRDDL Last Call Doc. Discuss briefly at next week's call [12] 15:50:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-irc#T15-32-51