IRC log of rdfa on 2007-03-26
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:51:09 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 12:51:09 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/26-rdfa-irc
- 12:51:34 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rdfa
- 12:51:46 [mhausenblas]
- zakim, list conferences
- 12:51:46 [Zakim]
- I see Team_SysWeb()8:00AM active
- 12:51:47 [Zakim]
- also scheduled at this time are MWI_DDWG()9:00AM, WS_Team()9:00AM, SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM
- 12:52:08 [mhausenblas]
- zakim, this will be SW_SWD(RDFa)
- 12:52:08 [Zakim]
- ok, mhausenblas; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
- 12:52:27 [mhausenblas]
- Meeting: W3C RDF-in-XHTML TF - Telecon 2007-03-26, 13:00 UTC
- 12:53:45 [mhausenblas]
- agenda+ RDFa Test Cases [mhausenblas]
- 12:53:59 [mhausenblas]
- agenda?
- 12:54:12 [RalphS]
- RalphS has joined #rdfa
- 12:56:14 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 12:57:13 [RalphS]
- did Elias post minutes of last week?
- 12:57:45 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2007/03/19-rdfa-minutes.html previous 2007-03-19
- 12:57:55 [RalphS]
- well, those are still raw/unedited
- 12:58:01 [RalphS]
- but I suppose they'll have to do
- 12:58:26 [RalphS]
- [checking inbox to be sure I didn't miss mail from Elias with an updated attachment ...]
- 12:58:53 [RalphS]
- [nope, don't see any update]
- 13:00:12 [Steven]
- Steven has joined #rdfa
- 13:00:22 [Steven]
- zakim, who is here?
- 13:00:22 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM has not yet started, Steven
- 13:00:26 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Steven, RalphS, Zakim, RRSAgent, mhausenblas
- 13:00:31 [wing]
- wing has joined #rdfa
- 13:00:52 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM has now started
- 13:01:00 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 13:01:15 [Zakim]
- + +043316876aaaa
- 13:01:15 [Zakim]
- +[IBMCambridge]
- 13:01:19 [wing]
- zakim, IBMCambridge is wing
- 13:01:19 [Zakim]
- +wing; got it
- 13:01:42 [RalphS]
- zakim, aaaa is mhausenblas
- 13:01:42 [Zakim]
- +mhausenblas; got it
- 13:01:57 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 13:01:57 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 13:01:59 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 13:04:50 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben start a list of RDF/XML features that are not supported by RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action01]
- 13:04:54 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:04:58 [RalphS]
- Topic: Action Review
- 13:04:59 [Zakim]
- + +44.442.076.89.aabb
- 13:05:08 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Ben to get back in touch with Ian about eRDF/RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/12-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 13:05:34 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben to include agenda item for approval of existing tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/12-rdfa-minutes.html#action02]
- 13:05:36 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:05:48 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben to look into Science Commons use case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/11-htmltf-minutes.html#action04]
- 13:05:49 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:06:04 [RalphS]
- zakim, aabb is Mark
- 13:06:04 [Zakim]
- +Mark; got it
- 13:06:04 [MarkB]
- MarkB has joined #rdfa
- 13:06:12 [RalphS]
- zakim, nick markb is mark
- 13:06:12 [Zakim]
- ok, RalphS, I now associate MarkB with Mark
- 13:06:28 [RalphS]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 13:06:28 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose mhausenblas
- 13:06:46 [RalphS]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 13:06:46 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Mark
- 13:06:59 [RalphS]
- Chair: Ralph
- 13:07:07 [RalphS]
- Scribe: mhausenblas
- 13:07:07 [mhausenblas]
- ScribeNick: mhausenblas
- 13:07:15 [RalphS]
- Scribe: Michael
- 13:07:37 [RalphS]
- ACTION: MarkB to ask Shane to make his document public [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/19-rdfa-minutes.html#action23]
- 13:07:39 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:07:45 [mhausenblas]
- Present: Ralph, Mark Birbeck, Steven, Wing Michael Hausenblas
- 13:07:59 [mhausenblas]
- Regrets: Ben
- 13:08:05 [mhausenblas]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 13:08:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/26-rdfa-minutes.html mhausenblas
- 13:08:13 [RalphS]
- ACTION: MarkB to work rdf:label back into RDFa syntax when using @content [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/19-rdfa-minutes.html#action25]
- 13:08:13 [mhausenblas]
- agenda?
- 13:08:22 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:08:47 [RalphS]
- Mark: that came from IPTC work; element content becomes rdfs:label
- 13:08:51 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Wing add a property to the test case schema for tracking origin and approval of an individual test [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action11]
- 13:08:55 [mhausenblas]
- Topic: Action Items
- 13:09:09 [wing]
- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema#
- 13:09:11 [wing]
- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema#discussion
- 13:09:13 [wing]
- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema#issue
- 13:09:50 [RalphS]
- -- done
- 13:10:00 [RalphS]
- Wing: I'll add some examples into the existing test cases
- 13:10:11 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben to take a look at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0001.html to see if issue has been resolved [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/12-rdfa-minutes.html#action17]
- 13:10:15 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:10:27 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Mark produce more examples of applicability of n-ary relations from IPTC documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/23-htmltf-minutes.html#action08]
- 13:10:30 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:10:53 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Mark produce RDFa XHTML 1.1 module and spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/18-htmltf-minutes.html#action06]
- 13:10:55 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:11:19 [RalphS]
- Mark: still needs a public version, plus some questions from Shane to me to which he'd like answers
- 13:11:30 [RalphS]
- ... Shane may be holding public version awaiting my answers
- 13:11:54 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Mark produce RDFa XHTML 1.1 module using XML Schema [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/18-htmltf-minutes.html#action06]
- 13:11:57 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:12:04 [RalphS]
- Mark: that's part of discussion with Shane
- 13:12:19 [RalphS]
- [DONE ]ACTION: Michael continue work on the FAQ template that Elias started [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/08-htmltf-minutes.html#action10]
- 13:12:21 [mhausenblas]
- --> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0076.html FAQ Wiki update by Simone
- 13:12:44 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Michael to prepare RDF/XML - RDFa comparison wiki page [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action09]
- 13:12:48 [RalphS]
- Michael: Simone did that one
- 13:12:58 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Steven to put together sample XHTML2 doc with all mime type, etc. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-htmltf-minutes.html#action01]
- 13:13:00 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:13:09 [RalphS]
- zakim, is elias here?
- 13:13:09 [Zakim]
- RalphS, I do not see Elias anywhere
- 13:13:29 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Elias to send email to list with use case from IBM [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/04-htmltf-minutes.html#action10]
- 13:13:31 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:13:40 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Elias to look for cases where plain literal is more of a common use. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/19-rdfa-minutes.html#action24]
- 13:13:42 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:13:56 [RalphS]
- agenda?
- 13:14:18 [mhausenblas]
- agenda+ XMLLiteral [Steven]
- 13:14:34 [RalphS]
- zakim, move to next agendum
- 13:14:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "RDFa Test Cases" taken up [from mhausenblas]
- 13:14:42 [RalphS]
- scribenick: ralphs
- 13:14:54 [RalphS]
- Michael: Wing is working hard on adapting all the new test cases
- 13:15:19 [RalphS]
- ... I'm waiting for approval from the group to move 29 or 30 more in
- 13:15:27 [RalphS]
- ... does this approval need to come from TF or from the WG?
- 13:15:35 [RalphS]
- ... these 29 or 30 will be the initial set
- 13:15:44 [RalphS]
- ... can then make more from Primer or from the mailing list
- 13:15:59 [RalphS]
- ... hope to have inital ones done this week
- 13:16:08 [RalphS]
- ... can think about using test suite for REC-track
- 13:16:20 [Steven]
- s/inital/initial/
- 13:16:50 [RalphS]
- ... please look at what's there and comment
- 13:17:19 [mhausenblas]
- --> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/ RDFa Test Suite
- 13:17:49 [RalphS]
- Ralph: regarding 'approval', I suggest that Task Force approval is sufficient and we'll get review from the two WGs when we propose to publish a document
- 13:18:43 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/26-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 13:19:03 [RalphS]
- Mark: I've been using the data but most of my work is client-side so I haven't been trying to use the test suite directly
- 13:19:35 [Steven]
- s/-->/->/
- 13:19:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/26-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 13:20:02 [RalphS]
- Mark: ... I have a client-side RDFa parser that supports plug-ins
- 13:20:28 [RalphS]
- ... xforms processor allows 'selenium' plug-ins too
- 13:20:37 [MarkB]
- It's called Selenium...
- 13:20:47 [MarkB]
- ...and it's by OpenQA.
- 13:20:55 [Steven]
- http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2007/03/formsplayer-provides-support-for.html
- 13:21:22 [Steven]
- http://www.openqa.org/selenium/
- 13:22:31 [mhausenblas]
- next agendum
- 13:22:37 [RalphS]
- zakim, move to next agendum
- 13:22:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 was just opened, RalphS
- 13:22:43 [RalphS]
- zakim, move to agendum 2
- 13:22:43 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "XMLLiteral" taken up [from Steven via mhausenblas]
- 13:23:49 [mhausenblas]
- Ralph: Who wants to sum up?
- 13:24:05 [mhausenblas]
- Steven: Looks like we are converging
- 13:24:12 [RalphS]
- scribenick: mhausenblas
- 13:24:39 [mhausenblas]
- Ralph: Anybody implemented current proposal?
- 13:24:58 [mhausenblas]
- Mark: I did
- 13:26:20 [Steven]
- Steven: It looks like we are converging on a consensus position of "If there is markup it is a literal, if not, it is plain text, and values of @datatype are available to override the default"
- 13:26:56 [mhausenblas]
- Mark: Regarding lookahead (SAX) ... some worries from Elias
- 13:27:20 [mhausenblas]
- ... though possible to do
- 13:27:42 [mhausenblas]
- ... One thing not commented on the list is (from Ivan)
- 13:28:10 [mhausenblas]
- ... does author know what to do with the markup?
- 13:28:42 [mhausenblas]
- ... lots of UC that are applicable
- 13:29:27 [mhausenblas]
- ... two issues: what is the default from a RDF store
- 13:30:00 [mhausenblas]
- ... second issue (separate): should there be a kind of lossless markup
- 13:30:33 [mhausenblas]
- ... example: table with person props from FOAF
- 13:30:50 [RalphS]
- q+
- 13:30:59 [mhausenblas]
- ... here, the markup is not expected in the output
- 13:31:51 [mhausenblas]
- ... put aside XMLLiteral, start with markup
- 13:31:53 [mhausenblas]
- ack Ralph
- 13:32:45 [mhausenblas]
- q+ to as how uf handle this
- 13:33:38 [mhausenblas]
- Mark: Is the mode of detection correct?
- 13:33:53 [mhausenblas]
- ... imposing plain literal thing
- 13:34:09 [mhausenblas]
- ... other way round: found markup - now let's use it
- 13:34:18 [mhausenblas]
- Ralph: Find out via UC
- 13:34:39 [mhausenblas]
- Mark: Should we take this to the HTML WG?
- 13:35:05 [mhausenblas]
- q?
- 13:35:43 [Steven]
- +1 to Ralph
- 13:35:45 [Zakim]
- mhausenblas, you wanted to as how uf handle this
- 13:36:01 [RalphS]
- Michael: the microformat community has somehow been dealing with this question
- 13:36:10 [RalphS]
- ... do we know what they've done?
- 13:36:23 [RalphS]
- ... could we invite someone from microformats to chat with us?
- 13:36:24 [Steven]
- q+
- 13:36:35 [RalphS]
- Mark: microformats gets around this problem by writing very specific examples
- 13:36:50 [RalphS]
- ... they've mostly not worried about generalizing
- 13:37:26 [mhausenblas]
- Steven: UC RSS
- 13:37:40 [RalphS]
- Steven: one of my major use cases is to be able to embed RSS in my documents, so I absolutely would want XMLliteral as the default
- 13:38:16 [MarkB]
- zakim, q+
- 13:38:16 [Zakim]
- I see Mark on the speaker queue
- 13:38:18 [mhausenblas]
- q+ to propose another solution
- 13:39:55 [Steven]
- Steven has joined #rdfa
- 13:40:03 [mhausenblas]
- q?
- 13:41:36 [mhausenblas]
- Mark: Agree with Steven, need input from Elias - maybe generate both
- 13:41:43 [Zakim]
- mhausenblas, you wanted to propose another solution
- 13:42:01 [RalphS]
- Mark: we could consider generating both plain literal and XML literal
- 13:42:10 [RalphS]
- ... there's already a way to use bnodes
- 13:42:22 [RalphS]
- Michael: perhaps let the author specify a per-document default
- 13:43:10 [RalphS]
- Mark: something like xml:space='preserve'; the author can specify which way the parser should work
- 13:43:27 [RalphS]
- ... or maybe SPAN has one behaviour and TABLE has another
- 13:43:29 [mhausenblas]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Nov/0024.html something like this
- 13:44:03 [RalphS]
- Mark: maybe specify the default processing on a per-element basis
- 13:44:17 [RalphS]
- Steven: doesn't appeal to me; I prefer that the markup be generic
- 13:44:31 [RalphS]
- Michael: the only one who knows what is meant to happen with his/her triples is the page author
- 13:45:16 [RalphS]
- Mark: if we acknowledge that triple stores do have a problem [I disgree], don't we have to insure that things come out consistently?
- 13:45:34 [RalphS]
- ... if we agree there's an issue then it needs to be solved in the markup
- 13:45:54 [RalphS]
- ... an author not familiar with these issues would not think to turn off XMLLiteral processing
- 13:46:02 [RalphS]
- ... we have to decide our fundamental assumptions
- 13:46:35 [RalphS]
- ... when I was testing Ivan's examples ages ago, I rewrote his queries using functions that extracted literal lexical values and they worked fine
- 13:46:46 [RalphS]
- ... but people now seem to be saying this isn't the right way to do it
- 13:48:43 [mhausenblas]
- agenda?
- 13:49:55 [mhausenblas]
- Ralph: Basis should be implementations, evaluations, and research
- 13:50:35 [mhausenblas]
- ... also relevant for TC
- 13:53:27 [mhausenblas]
- Mark: We first need to understand more from the RDF triple store issue from Elias before we can proceed
- 13:54:23 [mhausenblas]
- Ralph: Right. Process is first to identify how presence of markup means
- 13:54:35 [mhausenblas]
- ... then agree on how to flag that
- 13:55:24 [mhausenblas]
- Mark: Might not be sufficient; we might not be able to tell from markup presence
- 13:57:29 [mhausenblas]
- ... when RDF store can handle this downstream, we are able to keepo everything
- 13:57:54 [RalphS]
- "keep everything" means use XMLliteral
- 13:57:59 [mhausenblas]
- ,,, that is preserve all the markup (Elias will bring in results)
- 13:58:08 [RalphS]
- and "handle this" may be at the SPARQL query level
- 13:58:16 [mhausenblas]
- s/,,,/...
- 13:58:27 [mhausenblas]
- s/keepo/keep
- 13:58:58 [RalphS]
- next meeting: April 2
- 13:59:09 [Zakim]
- -Mark
- 13:59:10 [MarkB]
- for example, by using a query that compares on lexical values
- 13:59:11 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 13:59:12 [RalphS]
- Steven: April 9 is Easter holidy
- 13:59:21 [Zakim]
- -wing
- 13:59:25 [wing]
- wing has left #rdfa
- 13:59:27 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 13:59:29 [Zakim]
- -mhausenblas
- 13:59:30 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM has ended
- 13:59:32 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Ralph, +043316876aaaa, wing, mhausenblas, Steven, +44.442.076.89.aabb, Mark
- 13:59:55 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 13:59:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/26-rdfa-minutes.html RalphS