IRC log of grddl-wg on 2007-03-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:03:52 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #grddl-wg
- 15:03:53 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-grddl-wg-irc
- 15:03:59 [HarryH]
- zakim, this is grddl
- 15:03:59 [Zakim]
- HarryH, this was already SW_GRDDL()11:00AM
- 15:04:00 [Zakim]
- ok, HarryH; that matches SW_GRDDL()11:00AM
- 15:04:02 [jjc]
- jjc has joined #grddl-wg
- 15:04:07 [HarryH]
- Meeting: GRDDL Working Group
- 15:04:21 [HarryH]
- Chair: HarryH
- 15:04:26 [HarryH]
- Scribe: Chime
- 15:04:34 [HarryH]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda
- 15:04:41 [HarryH]
- zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda
- 15:04:41 [Zakim]
- working on it, HarryH
- 15:04:47 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:04:49 [briansuda]
- Zakim, +IPcaller is briansuda
- 15:04:49 [Zakim]
- sorry, briansuda, I do not recognize a party named '+IPcaller'
- 15:04:51 [Zakim]
- done reading agenda, HarryH
- 15:04:53 [Zakim]
- +??P21
- 15:04:59 [briansuda]
- Zakim, [IPcaller] is briansuda
- 15:04:59 [Zakim]
- +briansuda; got it
- 15:05:03 [jjc]
- Zakim, ??P21 is me
- 15:05:03 [Zakim]
- +jjc; got it
- 15:05:17 [HarryH]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:05:17 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see FabienG, john-l, rreck, HarryH, Chimezie_Ogbuji, briansuda, jjc
- 15:06:19 [HarryH]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:06:19 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see FabienG, john-l, rreck, HarryH, Chimezie_Ogbuji, briansuda, jjc
- 15:06:42 [HarryH]
- regets: Simone
- 15:06:56 [HarryH]
- PROPOSED: to approve GRDDL WG Weekly -- 7 March 2007 as a true record
- 15:07:05 [HarryH]
- http://www.w3.org/2007/02/28-grddl-wg-minutes.html
- 15:07:37 [HarryH]
- RESOLVED: GRDDL WG Weekly -- 7 March 2007 as a true record
- 15:07:44 [jjc]
- regrets: DanC
- 15:07:51 [HarryH]
- PROPOSED: to meet again Wed, 21 March 11:00-0500. scribe volunteer?
- 15:08:07 [HarryH]
- Scribe for next meeting: Fabien
- 15:08:13 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:08:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2007-03-07T11:00-0500" taken up
- 15:08:17 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:08:17 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 was just opened, HarryH
- 15:08:22 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:08:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 was just opened, HarryH
- 15:08:27 [HarryH]
- I know...
- 15:08:30 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:08:30 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 was just opened, HarryH
- 15:08:33 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 2
- 15:08:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Patent Policy" taken up
- 15:09:41 [HarryH]
- ACTION: HarryH contact AC Reps directly about form if not filled out by next Tuesday.
- 15:10:42 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 3
- 15:10:42 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Advocating" taken up
- 15:11:33 [HarryH]
- Why aren't there more comments on the spec?
- 15:11:49 [chimezie]
- It covers alot of ground
- 15:11:53 [chimezie]
- a *bit* intimidating..
- 15:11:58 [jjc]
- LC comments come on the last day!
- 15:12:00 [rreck]
- i concur
- 15:12:14 [HarryH]
- I assume we're getting lots of implementers..
- 15:12:25 [HarryH]
- Which is the audience of the spec.
- 15:12:33 [HarryH]
- And they have been following since working draft.
- 15:12:46 [HarryH]
- However, it would be good to do better outreach to the microformat community?
- 15:12:56 [chimezie]
- is everyone on irc on the phone?
- 15:13:06 [john-l]
- Zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:13:06 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see FabienG, john-l, rreck, HarryH, Chimezie_Ogbuji, briansuda, jjc
- 15:13:48 [chimezie]
- does the primer cover some of that advocacy?
- 15:14:08 [jjc]
- As long as we are happy that there are implementers, and that they are reading the spec
- 15:14:16 [jjc]
- then everything is OK for this one
- 15:14:22 [jjc]
- Primer audience may be wider
- 15:14:40 [jjc]
- Last Call comments are made by unhappy people
- 15:14:46 [Zakim]
- -HarryH
- 15:14:47 [chimezie]
- yes...
- 15:15:20 [HarryH]
- OK, then maybe save big push on GRDDL for deployment till we get primer a bit more well sorted...
- 15:15:22 [jjc]
- which WG have we asked to review?
- 15:15:46 [chimezie]
- im not sure if we've asked any for review specifically
- 15:15:48 [HarryH]
- Quite a few informally, almost none formally.
- 15:15:57 [jjc]
- XSLT?
- 15:16:00 [Zakim]
- +HarryH
- 15:16:09 [chimezie]
- but we have liason with SADDLE & XProc
- 15:16:09 [HarryH]
- Actually, we haven't asked XSLT
- 15:16:15 [HarryH]
- We asked XProc and Xquery
- 15:17:42 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 3
- 15:17:42 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Advocating" taken up
- 15:17:47 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 4
- 15:17:47 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Primer Document: Last Call?" taken up
- 15:18:44 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 5
- 15:18:44 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Use-Case Document: Going To Last Call?" taken up
- 15:19:20 [chimezie]
- jjc: what was decition about Primer going to rec track
- 15:19:38 [chimezie]
- HarryH: there seemed to be more votes to take it rec track, but editor has been unavailable
- 15:20:50 [chimezie]
- jjc: release a LC WD to quickly cycle up to LC if thats what we have in mind for the Primer
- 15:21:44 [HarryH]
- good plan of action to myself
- 15:21:45 [chimezie]
- jjc: wouldn't expect substantial LC comments for the primer
- 15:22:05 [HarryH]
- we've had only syntactic comments before
- 15:22:29 [HarryH]
- Zakim, oen item 6
- 15:22:29 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'oen item 6', HarryH
- 15:22:36 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 6
- 15:22:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "Test Cases as Rec?" taken up
- 15:22:57 [chimezie]
- HarryH: usecase editor is more available but response to questionaire suggests it *shouldn't* be taken to REC
- 15:23:12 [chimezie]
- FabienG: posted a new version of the usecase document
- 15:23:37 [HarryH]
- New version
- 15:23:56 [FabienG]
- see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm
- 15:25:11 [chimezie]
- FabienG: doesn't believe it is in critical path
- 15:25:23 [chimezie]
- FabienG: probably will play a role again for outreach
- 15:25:51 [chimezie]
- jjc: one more round of WG review for a WG Note
- 15:25:53 [HarryH]
- Reviewer volunteers?
- 15:26:18 [HarryH]
- ACTION: Jeremy to review Use-case document
- 15:26:32 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 6
- 15:26:32 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "Test Cases as Rec?" taken up
- 15:26:42 [HarryH]
- Chime, you've posted a document?
- 15:27:12 [chimezie]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc50/grddl-tests.html
- 15:28:17 [chimezie]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Mar/0087.html
- 15:29:02 [chimezie]
- jjc: critical to publish WD
- 15:29:14 [chimezie]
- jjc: need to publish 2 copies to go to PR
- 15:29:39 [chimezie]
- jjc: first WD is a placeholder
- 15:30:04 [chimezie]
- jjc: bad manners to put out a single cycle WD -> PR
- 15:30:33 [HarryH]
- How about give one more week to clean it up and then release as Working Draft?
- 15:30:53 [Zakim]
- -HarryH
- 15:31:04 [HarryH]
- And since I believe it's in critical path perhaps get another co-editor.
- 15:31:22 [Zakim]
- +HarryH
- 15:31:49 [chimezie]
- jjc: suggests publishing WD with an ACTION on editor to address outstanding commentary
- 15:34:18 [chimezie]
- HarryH: RDF processors support turtle..
- 15:34:46 [chimezie]
- jjc: we can put it in informative text..
- 15:36:13 [chimezie]
- jjc: the main problem is where we make changes to normative sections of the specification..
- 15:37:27 [chimezie]
- will going forward with leaving the test document as is close the door on addressing #output-format LC commentary?
- 15:40:07 [HarryH]
- ACTION: Chime to address comments in test case doc and then release as WD
- 15:40:14 [chimezie]
- jjc: clean up broken text, links, etc..
- 15:40:44 [jjc]
- ^text^test
- 15:40:54 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 8
- 15:40:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 8. "tests for" taken up [from #issue-mt-ns]
- 15:41:07 [Zakim]
- -HarryH
- 15:41:37 [Zakim]
- +HarryH
- 15:42:00 [HarryH]
- Chime - did we get EARL output?
- 15:42:52 [chimezie]
- could the current test harness be used to get result Jena GRDDL reader impl?
- 15:43:48 [john-l]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Mar/0085.html
- 15:44:42 [HarryH]
- Do we have any volunteers to fix the tests?
- 15:44:45 [chimezie]
- jjc: need someone to fix broken tests..
- 15:45:12 [chimezie]
- john-l's email shows how it is broken..
- 15:45:15 [HarryH]
- ACTION: jeremy to fix broken tests
- 15:46:26 [chimezie]
- jjc: clarify which tests were approved
- 15:48:11 [chimezie]
- jjc: EARL output reports will steamline the process
- 15:49:33 [Zakim]
- -HarryH
- 15:49:58 [HarryH]
- This sounds like we can skip the rest of the test-related issues on the agenda.
- 15:50:20 [Zakim]
- +HarryH
- 15:50:23 [chimezie]
- jjc: suggesting we decide how we specify multiple test outputs *after* a first WD publication
- 15:51:19 [HarryH]
- Zakim, open item 11
- 15:51:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 11. "GRDDL Spec: Last Call" taken up
- 15:51:51 [HarryH]
- ACTION: to send out Jeremy's message in response to Eliotte Rusty Harold
- 15:52:45 [HarryH]
- Chime: Suggestions for informative text and informative rules to address Stefano.
- 15:53:46 [HarryH]
- If DanC disappears, we're not going to have co-editor for the spec?
- 15:54:48 [HarryH]
- ACTION: HarryH to ask DanC for permission to check edits in that get WG consensus if DanC is unavailable.
- 15:55:08 [HarryH]
- Any final comments before adjourning meeting?
- 15:56:04 [HarryH]
- Can we just put library transforms in test doc or primer?
- 15:56:52 [HarryH]
- ACTION: Chime to put library transforms in Test Doc
- 15:57:04 [HarryH]
- ACTION: HarryH to make sure library transforms are linked from Primer.
- 15:58:00 [chimezie]
- jjc: transformation libraries are both inefficient and (broken?) in some case..
- 15:59:44 [jjc]
- jeremy to create library page
- 15:59:52 [jjc]
- jeremy to suggest changes to library transforms
- 16:00:25 [HarryH]
- ACTION: Jeremy tocreate a standalone library transform page and suggest changes to library transform
- 16:01:12 [Zakim]
- -HarryH
- 16:01:29 [HarryH]
- Are n3 rules helpful enough to put right next to normative text?
- 16:01:36 [chimezie]
- I think so
- 16:01:39 [jjc]
- no the
- 16:01:43 [jjc]
- i don't think
- 16:01:55 [Zakim]
- +HarryH
- 16:02:17 [HarryH]
- I thought it might trip implementers up but it is informative.
- 16:02:39 [HarryH]
- The decision in editor's hands.
- 16:02:40 [chimezie]
- jjc: thinks they should have been moved to an appendix
- 16:03:07 [HarryH]
- Meeting adjourned
- 16:03:16 [Zakim]
- -john-l
- 16:03:17 [Zakim]
- -briansuda
- 16:03:17 [Zakim]
- -jjc
- 16:03:23 [Zakim]
- -rreck
- 16:03:24 [Zakim]
- -FabienG
- 16:03:38 [HarryH]
- Chime?
- 16:03:52 [HarryH]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:03:52 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-grddl-wg-minutes.html HarryH
- 16:04:04 [chimezie]
- #
- 16:04:11 [chimezie]
- rssagent, make logs public
- 16:04:41 [chimezie]
- rssagent, make logs world-visible
- 16:05:22 [chimezie]
- rssagent, published minutes
- 16:06:08 [chimezie]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 16:06:30 [chimezie]
- rrsagent, make logs world-visible
- 16:07:03 [chimezie]
- rrsagent, publish minutes
- 16:07:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-grddl-wg-minutes.html chimezie
- 16:07:09 [HarryH]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html#hl7
- 16:07:59 [HarryH]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/CDA-sample.xml
- 16:08:04 [chimezie]
- breaking up again
- 16:09:07 [HarryH]
- i can add in xml transform to sample doc
- 16:10:02 [HarryH]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/problem-oriented-medical-record.owl
- 16:13:17 [HarryH]
- http://purl.org/cpr/doc
- 16:15:19 [Zakim]
- -HarryH
- 16:15:20 [Zakim]
- SW_GRDDL()11:00AM has ended
- 16:15:21 [Zakim]
- Attendees were FabienG, john-l, +1.703.956.aabb, HarryH, rreck, Chimezie_Ogbuji, briansuda, jjc
- 16:16:27 [chimezie]
- rrsagent make logs world-visible
- 16:18:21 [chimezie]
- rrsagent publish minutes
- 16:21:27 [chimezie]
- rrsagent generate minutes
- 16:21:46 [chimezie]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 16:21:46 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-grddl-wg-minutes.html chimezie
- 16:21:49 [jjc]
- jjc has joined #grddl-wg