14:53:00 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #er
14:53:00 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-er-irc
14:53:07 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #er
14:53:14 <shadi> zakim, this will be ERT
14:53:14 <Zakim> ok, shadi; I see WAI_ERTWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes
14:53:22 <shadi> meeting: ERT WG
14:53:26 <shadi> chair: Shadi
14:53:40 <shadi> regrets: CarlosV, Johannes, Daniela
14:54:04 <shadi> agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Mar/0046.html
14:54:25 <shadi> agenda+ Comments on EARL 1.0 Schema Editor's Draft
14:54:39 <shadi> agenda+ Decide on EARL 1.0 Schema LC and HTTP-in-RDF WD publications
14:57:12 <shadi> regrets: CarlosV, Johannes, Daniela, David
14:58:45 <shadi> scribe: Shadi
14:59:18 <Zakim> WAI_ERTWG()11:00AM has now started
14:59:20 <Zakim> +Shadi
15:03:43 <CarlosI> CarlosI has joined #er
15:05:04 <Zakim> +berrueta
15:05:12 <Zakim> +ReinhardR
15:05:28 <CarlosI> zakim, berrueta is really CarlosI
15:05:28 <Zakim> +CarlosI; got it
15:08:15 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 1
15:08:15 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Comments on EARL 1.0 Schema Editor's Draft" taken up [from shadi]
15:08:19 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Mar/0045.html
15:10:19 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20070226
15:12:57 <shadi> RESOLUTION: issue #1 accepted
15:14:30 <CarlosI> SAZ: any comments about issue #2?
15:14:41 <shadi> RESOLUTION: issue #2 accepted
15:15:43 <shadi> RESOLUTION: issue #3-#7 accepted
15:19:57 <shadi> RESOLUTION: in issue #8 use TestCriterion
15:20:29 <shadi> action: SAZ ask for feedback on issue #8
15:23:45 <shadi> RESOLUTION: put issue #9 on hold for after Last Call
15:25:50 <shadi> RESOLUTION: in issue #10 add some indication in the assertor class
15:30:32 <shadi> [discussion on "mixed" vs "unknown" as values for testing mode]
15:30:37 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/27-er-minutes#item04
15:37:16 <shadi> RR: "mixed" is misleading, i expect to find more information about the combination used in the mixed
15:38:59 <shadi> CI: agree that "unkown" is imprecise because it *is* known to someone, prefer "notAvailable" or "undisclosed"
15:39:56 <shadi> RESOLUTION: change value name "mixed" not "notAvailable"
15:40:14 <shadi> action: SAZ ask for feedback on "notAvailbale"
15:41:04 <shadi> zakim, close agendum 1
15:41:04 <Zakim> agendum 1, Comments on EARL 1.0 Schema Editor's Draft, closed
15:41:05 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
15:41:06 <Zakim> 2. Decide on EARL 1.0 Schema LC and HTTP-in-RDF WD publications [from shadi]
15:41:11 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 2
15:41:11 <Zakim> agendum 2. "Decide on EARL 1.0 Schema LC and HTTP-in-RDF WD publications" taken up [from shadi]
15:43:13 <shadi> SAZ: given the changes above and the recent discussion, any objections to publishing EARL 1.0 Schema as Last Call?
15:43:51 <shadi> CI: somewhar concerned about changing names of classes, people expect stable specs at LC stage
15:44:14 <shadi> ...but think we should go to LC, seems stable enough for now
15:44:35 <CarlosI> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Requirements/
15:47:13 <shadi> CI: not sure we meet requirement F04. do we support aggregation
15:48:09 <shadi> ...we do not support "compacting" test results, we decided it is out of scope
15:48:21 <shadi> ...is this what is meant by aggregation?
15:49:55 <shadi> SAZ: it says "suppor" as opposed to "provide"
15:50:26 <shadi> CI: but that is a given since D01 says EARL will be an RDF Schema
15:51:29 <shadi> CI: also in F01, what is the framework?
15:52:40 <shadi> SAZ: seems that the issue is repitition of defining EARL as RDF
15:53:07 <shadi> CI: not providing anything particular beyond RDF, so doesn't make sense to state it
15:55:24 <shadi> SAZ: seems that the issue is more in the poorly defined requirements, rather than not meeting specific requirements that people are requesting
15:57:28 <shadi> RESOLUTION: publish EARL 1.0 Schema as a Last Call Working Draft
15:57:53 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20070301
15:59:39 <shadi> SAZ: did not receive any comments on it during the last week, on the other hand it is only a Working Draft and does not need the same level of stability
15:59:47 <shadi> ...only to show the world where we are at
16:00:31 <shadi> CI: was focusing on EARL Schema, did not get to HTTP
16:00:48 <shadi> ...am OK with publishing it now and reviewing later, it is only a WD
16:01:12 <shadi> CI: may be good to add a contributions section, got quite some feedback on it from different folks
16:01:19 <shadi> ...maybe more comments later
16:02:14 <shadi> action: add an acknowledgments section
16:02:31 <shadi> CI: the sooner we publish it, the sooner we get feedback on it
16:03:03 <shadi> RESOLUTION: publish HTTP Vocbulary in RDF and an updated Working Draft
16:05:15 <shadi> Topic: Next meeting
16:05:30 <Zakim> -ReinhardR
16:05:35 <shadi> SAZ: no meeting next week (CSUN)
16:05:36 <Zakim> -Shadi
16:05:37 <Zakim> -CarlosI
16:05:39 <Zakim> WAI_ERTWG()11:00AM has ended
16:05:41 <Zakim> Attendees were Shadi, ReinhardR, CarlosI
16:05:46 <shadi> ..anticipate publication next week
16:05:55 <shadi> ...please keep the comments coming!
16:09:51 <shadi> rrsagent, make logs world
16:09:55 <shadi> rrsagent, make minutes
16:09:55 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-er-minutes.html shadi
16:09:56 <shadi> rrsagent, make logs world
16:10:04 <shadi> rrsagent, bye
16:10:04 <RRSAgent> I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-er-actions.rdf :
16:10:04 <RRSAgent> ACTION: SAZ ask for feedback on issue #8 [1]
16:10:04 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-er-irc#T15-20-29
16:10:04 <RRSAgent> ACTION: SAZ ask for feedback on "notAvailbale" [2]
16:10:04 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-er-irc#T15-40-14
16:10:04 <RRSAgent> ACTION: add an acknowledgments section [3]
16:10:04 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-er-irc#T16-02-14