20:57:02 RRSAgent has joined #ws-addr 20:57:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-irc 20:57:16 zakim, this will be ws_addrwg 20:57:16 ok, bob; I see WS_AddrWG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 20:57:35 Meeting Web Services Addressing WG Teleconference 20:57:44 Chair: Bob Freund 20:58:06 gpilz has joined #ws-addr 20:58:42 WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has now started 20:58:49 +Gilbert_Pilz 20:59:52 +Bob_Freund 21:00:10 +David_Illsley 21:01:15 cferris has joined #ws-addr 21:01:19 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Mar/0027.html 21:01:33 plh has joined #ws-addr 21:01:41 +Plh 21:01:44 +Chris_Ferris 21:01:59 +Dave_Hull 21:02:09 MrGoodner has joined #ws-addr 21:02:28 dhull has joined #ws-addr 21:02:33 +??P7 21:02:37 +??P8 21:03:38 zakim, mute ??P8 21:03:38 ??P8 should now be muted 21:03:44 Katy has joined #ws-addr 21:04:00 zakim, ??P7 is katy 21:04:00 +katy; got it 21:04:11 that would help :-) 21:04:16 zakim, ??P8 is MrGoodner 21:04:16 +MrGoodner; got it 21:04:20 zakim, unmute ?p8 21:04:20 sorry, plh, I do not know which phone connection belongs to ?p8 21:04:26 zakim, unmute mrgoodner 21:04:26 MrGoodner should no longer be muted 21:05:06 +Tom_Rutt 21:05:40 Regrets: Tony, Anish 21:05:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-minutes.html plh 21:06:42 Meeting: WS-Addressing 21:07:01 Topic: Last Call issue 21:07:10 scribe: bob 21:07:16 Present: Gilbert_Pilz, Bob_Freund, David_Illsley, Plh, Chris_Ferris, Dave_Hull, katy, MrGoodner, Tom Rutt 21:07:33 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Mar/0026.html Consolodated list of Alternatives A thru D to resolved WS ADDR LC comment 21:08:30 TomR: Major point is to make all of the assertions requirements 21:08:48 ... The first two are probably non-starters 21:09:17 ... I do not want to spend time on alternative a since it has problems 21:10:04 ... Alternative b is just like a and has similiar problems. 21:11:15 ... Alternative c can be made to work, but I think that its use-case is fairly small. 21:12:33 ... Alternative d is my preference. 21:12:45 q+ 21:13:38 +??P1 21:14:06 ... These proposals pertain to the response message and can handle mixed alternatives since it pertains to a single exchange 21:14:23 zakim, ??P1 is paco 21:14:23 +paco; got it 21:14:42 Paco has joined #ws-addr 21:15:12 Katy: I think that we have been over this ground before, I think that we established a need. 21:16:12 TomR: I think that you need to come up with a use case when a server needs to specify a delayed response. 21:16:30 Katy: The case is a server behind a firewall 21:16:52 TomR: How would it get the request in the first case? 21:17:28 q+ 21:17:30 q+ 21:17:55 TomR: Is that use case strong enough to support this alternative? 21:18:34 MarcG: We have not talked about informational items expressed as parameters. 21:18:39 q- 21:18:56 zakim, who is making noise? 21:19:07 bob, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gilbert_Pilz (34%), Bob_Freund (28%), Chris_Ferris (31%) 21:19:18 ack katy 21:19:26 ack gpilz 21:19:28 TRutt_ has joined #ws-addr 21:19:42 TomR: I guess parameters can be alternative e 21:20:29 q+ 21:20:40 Gil: Features should be weighed against their usefulness and necessity 21:20:45 ack david 21:21:10 -katy 21:21:17 David: In terms of use cases, Anish mentioned one where a service might take a long time to develop a response. 21:21:56 q+ 21:22:03 q+ 21:22:10 ack tru 21:22:12 PaulKnight has joined #ws-addr 21:22:20 q+ 21:22:45 ack gpi 21:22:49 +Paul_Knight 21:23:20 Gil: Parameters are low cost, but the default intersection algorithm will not deal with them. 21:23:37 TomR: Parameters will be passed to you. 21:23:49 +[IPcaller] 21:24:21 ack cfer 21:24:36 q+ 21:24:46 q+ 21:24:56 Cfer: Although I am in favor of E, one must be aware of the cost. 21:25:04 q- 21:25:36 ... The cost is the need to understand the interpretation of the parameters. 21:26:14 ... on the other hand, dealing with all of the combinatorial mechanics, one might end up with a rediculously comples think 21:26:25 ack mrg 21:26:54 s/redic/ridic/ 21:27:02 q+ 21:27:04 s/comples/complex/ 21:27:21 MarcG: I do not think that we need to define the logic, it might be good enough to convey the information 21:27:41 ack gpilz 21:28:40 q+ 21:28:44 q+ 21:28:55 Gil: I support alternative e and to break down the parameters to fine granularity 21:29:03 ack tru 21:30:46 TomR: Do we need the complexity, isn't it enough to express what the server supports, after all, the client picks. 21:31:04 ack katy 21:31:08 q+ 21:31:23 ack dhu 21:32:28 q+ 21:32:50 q+ 21:33:10 ack tru 21:33:37 ack david 21:34:02 Bob: Are there any objections to alternative e? 21:35:57 q+ - to ask a question 21:36:06 q- - 21:36:18 q+ gil to ask a question 21:37:11 Gil: if it just says "addressing" and there are no parameters, what does it mean? 21:37:19 ack gil 21:37:19 gil, you wanted to ask a question 21:39:12 action: TomR to craft some new language utilizing policy parameters by tomorrow 21:39:25 Topic: WS-Naming 21:40:50 plh: WS-Naming claims to profile ws-addressing, but violates ws-addressing 21:44:03 action: distribute "key points" in ws-naming 21:45:00 -Gilbert_Pilz 21:45:01 -Plh 21:45:03 -MrGoodner 21:45:04 -Tom_Rutt 21:45:06 -Chris_Ferris 21:45:06 Next meeting to be March 19 21:45:07 -David_Illsley 21:45:09 -paco 21:45:10 -Bob_Freund 21:45:18 -[IPcaller] 21:45:22 -Dave_Hull 21:45:47 rrsagent, make logs public 21:45:58 rrsagent, generate minutes 21:45:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-minutes.html bob 21:47:00 TRutt_ has left #ws-addr 21:47:18 -Paul_Knight 21:47:19 WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has ended 21:47:20 Attendees were Gilbert_Pilz, Bob_Freund, David_Illsley, Plh, Chris_Ferris, Dave_Hull, katy, MrGoodner, Tom_Rutt, paco, Paul_Knight, [IPcaller] 22:00:26 dhull has joined #ws-addr 23:11:04 bob has left #ws-addr