IRC log of ua on 2007-03-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 18:49:45 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #ua
- 18:49:45 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/01-ua-irc
- 18:49:57 [AllanJ]
- rrsagent set logs public
- 18:50:07 [AllanJ]
- rrsagent, set logs public
- 18:50:25 [AllanJ]
- meeting: UAWG conference call
- 18:50:32 [AllanJ]
- chair: Jim Allan
- 18:50:41 [AllanJ]
- scribe: Jan Richards
- 18:50:48 [AllanJ]
- agenda:
- 18:51:51 [AllanJ]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007JanMar/0040.html
- 18:53:52 [JR]
- JR has joined #ua
- 18:55:52 [JR]
- scribe: JR
- 18:56:46 [Zakim]
- WAI_UAWG()2:00PM has now started
- 18:56:53 [Zakim]
- +Jim_Allan
- 19:00:23 [KFord]
- KFord has joined #ua
- 19:01:03 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 19:01:33 [AllanJ]
- zakim, ??P2 is KFord
- 19:01:33 [Zakim]
- +KFord; got it
- 19:02:02 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 19:02:18 [parente]
- parente has joined #ua
- 19:02:26 [cklaws]
- cklaws has joined #ua
- 19:02:33 [Zakim]
- +??P3
- 19:02:44 [AllanJ]
- zakim, [IBM] is cklaws
- 19:02:44 [Zakim]
- +cklaws; got it
- 19:02:49 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 19:03:04 [AllanJ]
- zakim, ??p3 is jr
- 19:03:04 [Zakim]
- +jr; got it
- 19:03:23 [AllanJ]
- zakim, [ibm] is parente
- 19:03:23 [Zakim]
- +parente; got it
- 19:04:32 [JR]
- Topic: 1. Review Acton items
- 19:04:43 [JR]
- JA: ACTION: KF to 3f DONE
- 19:04:52 [JR]
- JA: ACTION: JA to Will combine KF's 3f and 3d
- 19:04:55 [JR]
- DONE
- 19:05:09 [JR]
- JA: ACTION: KF to Send 1f text
- 19:05:29 [JR]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007JanMar/0042.html
- 19:05:39 [JR]
- JA: Do we need "more" in there
- 19:05:51 [JR]
- JA: or just "clarity"
- 19:06:38 [JR]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007JanMar/0035.html
- 19:06:59 [JR]
- JA: ACTION: JR to Add a sentence to 3e saying we'll keep an eye on emerging
- 19:06:59 [JR]
- protocols in this area
- 19:08:02 [JR]
- ACTION: JA to will do 1c
- 19:08:19 [JR]
- JA: ACTION: JA to will do 1c
- 19:08:52 [JR]
- JA: Discussing reviewing issue of wcag/uaag reponsibility split
- 19:09:00 [JR]
- JA: Would like some more eyes on this
- 19:09:49 [JR]
- JR: Also maybe want to look at principle of split
- 19:10:08 [JR]
- JA: Example: Checkpoint 2.1.1
- 19:10:25 [AllanJ]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/guidelines.html#keyboard-operation
- 19:10:39 [AllanJ]
- 2.1.1 All functionality of the content is operable in a non-time-dependent manner through a keyboard interface, except where the task requires analog, time-dependent input.
- 19:11:49 [JR]
- JA: Doesn't seem like it should be here - author has no control of plugin
- 19:12:06 [JR]
- CL: But this could be a web app - author does control
- 19:12:29 [JR]
- CL: But yes in the static web it's the browser or plugin who provides this
- 19:12:58 [JR]
- Action JR: Take a look at the wcag/uaag relationship - division of responsibility
- 19:13:21 [JR]
- JA: ACTION: JA to Will do 2c
- 19:13:51 [JR]
- JA: As thinking thought we needed to define core behaviour in browser before getting in to extnesions etc
- 19:14:08 [AllanJ]
- extensions (becomes native to the UA, may change UI and/or content or interaction with the content in viewport)
- 19:14:43 [JR]
- JA: Ex. can't get alt text from keyboard without screen reader - with mouse can hover to get tooltip
- 19:15:08 [JR]
- JA: We should always say mouse AND keyboard
- 19:16:14 [JR]
- CL: Right should be able to get tooltips from keyboard
- 19:16:27 [JR]
- JA: Right Doesn't know of any browser
- 19:16:39 [JR]
- CL: Author could do it
- 19:16:48 [JR]
- JA: I've tried
- 19:17:17 [JR]
- CL: In CL there is much bigger concept of tooltips - with controls etc
- 19:18:15 [JR]
- JA: OK there are two levels - plain HTML etc and ARIA level
- 19:18:45 [AllanJ]
- Assistive technology (external to the UA, have own UI, provide alternate views of content, provide alternate input/output interaction, may render conditional content)
- 19:19:18 [JR]
- JA: Will clean this up and send to the list
- 19:19:59 [cklaws]
- A plug-in is a program that runs as part of the user agent and that is not part of content. Users generally choose to include or exclude plug-ins from their user agent.
- 19:19:59 [JR]
- JA: We don't have a defintion for "extension"
- 19:20:15 [AllanJ]
- plugins (external to the UA, are a UA, may be embedded within content viewport, have own UI)
- 19:21:01 [JR]
- JA: TEITAC wrestling with plugin issue...
- 19:21:16 [JR]
- JA: THey are a platform within a platform...
- 19:21:37 [AllanJ]
- Web applications (Flash?) author provide UI - content written appropriately, browser take content and sends to API
- 19:21:41 [JR]
- JA: Flash came up, sort of a plugin but author provide UI like a web application
- 19:22:23 [JR]
- CL:Wikipedia has some good definitions
- 19:22:43 [JR]
- JA: At one time, thought flash was a plugin...
- 19:23:29 [cklaws]
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0#Rich_Internet_applications
- 19:24:06 [JR]
- JA: Then...is SVG a plugin now that its in Firefox natively
- 19:24:58 [JR]
- JR: User agents don't need to be HTML only...
- 19:25:14 [JR]
- KF: Some technologies can be in both platforms
- 19:25:41 [JR]
- KK: Like acrobat vs reader
- 19:25:46 [JR]
- KK=KF
- 19:26:00 [JR]
- CL: Reader more accessible when not embedded
- 19:26:29 [JR]
- JA: Are charcterizations clear in extensions defn?
- 19:26:50 [cklaws]
- But Flash is currently only accessible as an ActiveX control in a Web page - in IE on Windows today
- 19:27:30 [AllanJ]
- >extensions (becomes native to the UA, may change UI and/or content or interaction with the content in viewport)
- 19:28:20 [JR]
- CL: I think of extensions on Firefox...
- 19:28:31 [JR]
- KF: IE has extensions as well...
- 19:28:50 [JR]
- KF: ...Something added to Chrome...may interact on content
- 19:29:56 [cklaws]
- The term extension in a computing context most commonly refers to a computer program that although not useful or functional in its own right, is designed to be incorporated into another piece of software in order to enhance, or extend, the functionality.
- 19:30:10 [AllanJ]
- JR: extensions are going to be added to a UA, included in the conformance profile...browser + extension x, y, z conform
- 19:30:46 [JR]
- JR: I like CL's wikipedia example
- 19:31:09 [JR]
- JA: Agreed that extensions become part of chrome...
- 19:32:05 [JR]
- KF: THere's a firefox extension that adds numbers to all links
- 19:32:21 [JR]
- JA: Also ad-blocker
- 19:32:54 [JR]
- JA: Have seen extensions loaded into status bar
- 19:33:18 [JR]
- JA: Think my defn is ok so far
- 19:34:06 [JR]
- CL: OK its fine
- 19:34:24 [AllanJ]
- plugins (external to the UA, are a UA, may be embedded within content viewport, have own UI)
- 19:35:01 [JR]
- CL: This had been in UAAG ...
- 19:35:13 [JR]
- CL: But often APPEARS to be in content - even though not in DOM
- 19:35:50 [JR]
- JA: OK current defn missing that
- 19:36:01 [JR]
- ...important piece.
- 19:36:39 [JR]
- JA: Was thinking specifically of media players...
- 19:36:53 [JR]
- JA: Have own user interface - stop, play volume slider...
- 19:37:10 [JR]
- JA: Outside of browser chrome, UA doesn't know about them...
- 19:37:25 [JR]
- CL: Once in, keyboard handled by that use interface
- 19:37:45 [JR]
- JA: Maybe need to be more clear than term "UI"
- 19:38:04 [JR]
- KF: Yes need to clarify a bit more - especially what we mean by own UI
- 19:38:40 [JR]
- CL: They have their own controls and their own keyboard nav...
- 19:39:44 [JR]
- KF: Isn't this kind of plugin a user agent...
- 19:39:57 [JR]
- CL: Sometimes its a "player"...
- 19:40:33 [AllanJ]
- KF: browser is a player of html
- 19:40:40 [AllanJ]
- ...player is a UA
- 19:41:11 [JR]
- AJ: I've always though of plugins as players of different formats
- 19:41:17 [JR]
- AJ=JA
- 19:42:26 [AllanJ]
- CL: flash in a webpage, don't know that its not part of the content. doesn't have its own ui
- 19:43:09 [JR]
- KF: "DocHosted"
- 19:43:42 [AllanJ]
- ...other types of players, word & pdf are hosted applications with own controls and interface embeded in the browser
- 19:43:49 [JR]
- JR: Seems like between plugin and extension
- 19:45:33 [cklaws]
- Plugins are slightly different from extensions, which modify or add to existing functionality. The main difference is that plugins generally rely on the main application's user interface and have a well-defined boundary to their possible set of actions. Extensions generally have fewer restrictions on their actions, and may provide their own user interfaces.
- 19:46:09 [JR]
- KF: Plugin and extensions cover the field including DocHosting
- 19:47:19 [JR]
- CL: Plugins trying to use same chrome for diff content
- 19:47:45 [AllanJ]
- jr: plugins work with different types of content, may provide their own chrome
- 19:47:58 [JR]
- CL: Extensions opertating on same content
- 19:48:15 [JR]
- CL: Plugins working on new kind of content
- 19:48:35 [JR]
- KF: Has to leave early
- 19:48:48 [Zakim]
- -KFord
- 19:48:54 [JR]
- JA: Let's just finish AT, we'll do the use cases next time
- 19:49:24 [JR]
- JA: Hypothetical...we have SVG native in browser...
- 19:49:47 [JR]
- ...then not a plugin anymore...just has to follow UA guidelines.
- 19:50:43 [AllanJ]
- Assistive technology (external to the UA, have own UI, provide alternate views of content, provide alternate input/output interaction, may render conditional content)
- 19:51:15 [JR]
- CL: OK we may want ot change AT defn...
- 19:51:38 [JR]
- CL: In UAAG 1. went back and forth on whether it is a user agent
- 19:52:18 [JR]
- CL: Further confused by integrated browsers...PWwebspeak, HPR...
- 19:52:32 [JR]
- CL: But some ATs might be extensions
- 19:52:57 [AllanJ]
- ...- firevox, webadapt2me
- 19:53:04 [JR]
- CL: SOme might not be out of process
- 19:53:33 [JR]
- CL: Inprocess - go to DOM to do nav etc., Out of process use accessibility API
- 19:54:18 [Zakim]
- -cklaws
- 19:54:20 [Zakim]
- -Jim_Allan
- 19:54:21 [JR]
- JA: Good point separate core tools from assistive tech functionality
- 19:54:30 [cklaws]
- my phone just died
- 19:54:33 [parente]
- mine too
- 19:54:44 [AllanJ]
- me too
- 19:54:48 [parente]
- must be IBM
- 19:54:57 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 19:55:11 [AllanJ]
- its almost end of time. lets just cal it quits
- 19:55:20 [Zakim]
- +Jim_Allan
- 19:55:32 [JR]
- zakim, [IBM] is really cklaws
- 19:55:32 [Zakim]
- +cklaws; got it
- 19:56:14 [JR]
- JA: Let's continue this next time
- 19:56:25 [JR]
- JA: "Base" user agent
- 19:57:08 [Zakim]
- -cklaws
- 19:57:09 [Zakim]
- -parente
- 19:57:09 [Zakim]
- -Jim_Allan
- 20:10:50 [JR]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 20:10:50 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/01-ua-minutes.html JR
- 20:10:56 [JR]
- RRSAgent, set logs public
- 20:12:28 [JR]
- Zakim, bye
- 20:12:28 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were Jim_Allan, KFord, cklaws, jr, parente
- 20:12:28 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #ua
- 20:12:36 [JR]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 20:12:36 [RRSAgent]
- I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/01-ua-actions.rdf :
- 20:12:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JA to will do 1c [1]
- 20:12:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/01-ua-irc#T19-08-02
- 20:12:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JR to Take a look at the wcag/uaag relationship - division of responsibility [2]
- 20:12:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/01-ua-irc#T19-12-58