17:02:55 RRSAgent has joined #ws-desc 17:02:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/02/22-ws-desc-irc 17:03:31 Jonathan: we'll take this to the list 17:03:44 Jonathan: other issues? Youenn may have had one 17:04:05 youenn: it's about the query parameter separator value, which may be anything 17:04:26 Jonathan: yes, but what if it's something that interacts with the encoding algorithm? 17:04:43 Jonathan: so should we restrict the values to something more manageable, like {';', '&'} 17:05:46 youenn: maybe a SHOULD restriction to the two could be sufficient 17:06:35 Jonathan: e.g. # would not be a good query param separator 17:06:47 Jonathan: how much do we want to keep people from hanging themselves? 17:07:19 Jonathan: we can come up with a list of harmless characters, and even put it in schema 17:07:39 ACTION: Jonathan to figure out what characters can be used as query separators without causing harm 17:08:00 people happy with the direction 17:08:10 Jonathan: any other issues? 17:08:14 jkaputin: I had one 17:08:31 ... on the schema, about #any, #other, and it still has features and properties? 17:08:34 there is an issue 17:08:43 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xsd 17:08:45 q+ monica 17:08:59 ack monica 17:09:41 Jonathan: the editor's copy doesn't have f&p 17:09:49 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2007Feb/0006.html 17:09:56 youenn: still on the URI encoding, people are talking about it in the W3C URI list 17:10:07 Jonathan: do you think they say something that we could use? 17:10:33 youenn: it'd be good to have consensus with them 17:10:41 Jonathan: we can send a summary of our proposal to them 17:11:03 ACTION: Jonathan to send a summary of our URI templating text to the URI list 17:11:24 topic: implementation status summary 17:11:35 Jonathan: we're getting closer to completion 17:11:47 ... all green on interchange results 17:11:57 ... no results for LocationTemplate-2G 17:12:28 youenn: working on that 17:13:49 Jonathan: ... few reds expected to remain 17:14:41 Jonathan: all-green would assure us that no new issues should be coming 17:15:25 Jonathan: results for validation should probably be refreshed before director's call 17:16:05 youenn: some of the results may stay red in PR 17:16:54 Jonathan: director's call should come within 10 days after our vote to move to PR 17:17:01 jkaputin: we may have better results 17:17:42 Jonathan: msg-level tests are the main thing to focus on now 17:17:53 topic: publication status and plan 17:18:18 jjm: editorial items implemented 17:18:24 Roberto: have problems with CVS 17:19:15 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:19:15 On the phone I see alewis (muted), Gilbert_Pilz, JacekK, [Canon], TonyR, Plh, Jonathan_Marsh, Roberto, Roland_Merrick, asir, Monica_Martin 17:19:20 Jonathan: we should have everything done before we vote for PR next week 17:19:32 -[Canon] 17:20:00 +[Canon] 17:20:27 Jonathan: renumbering assertions? 17:20:56 JacekK: where do the assertion IDs show up? 17:21:17 Jonathan: in the summary, fragment-id's, and test suite in validation 17:22:20 Jonathan: two numbering schemes - token, then number or a coded number 17:22:50 gpilz: do we have a proposal for renumbering? 17:23:00 Jonathan: arthur came up with a new system 17:23:10 gpilz: consistency would be good 17:23:35 s/gpilz/jkaputin/ 17:23:58 Jonathan: the question is about who does it 17:24:14 JacekK: don't think they're prominent enough that they need to be changed 17:24:24 Jonathan: the question is whether we have somebody to do it 17:24:51 Jonathan: if we don't care, let's drop this 17:25:50 jkaputin: it'd be good to have the IDs identify a section in the spec 17:25:59 Jonathan: the assertion ID is a fragment ID, direct link 17:27:04 Jonathan: I'll send a mail to Arthur that we don't really care about the renumbering 17:27:50 jkaputin: if I send you a patch, would it be considered? 17:27:54 Jonathan: it would be accepted 17:28:19 Jonathan: let's talk with Arthur 17:28:37 ACTION: Jonathan to start renumbering discussion 17:29:11 Jonathan: any necessary changes to the SOAP 1.1 binding? 17:29:57 Jonathan: RDF mapping? 17:30:23 JacekK: it will be updated for the PR publication round 17:30:51 Jonathan: next week we'll ask about new WDs of SOAP 1.1 binding, additional MEPs, and RDF mapping 17:31:15 noted, jonathan. 17:31:39 Jonathan: the additional MEPs title should look more official 17:32:02 ... similar to the specs 17:32:55 jjm: CR136 implementing needs the regeneration of the component table 17:33:02 plh: I can do it 17:33:45 Jonathan: there's a - component which is weird 17:34:03 -alewis 17:34:04 Jonathan: see you next week 17:34:12 alewis has left #ws-desc 17:34:24 asir: not aware of any changes for SOAP 1.1 binding doc 17:34:55 -Gilbert_Pilz 17:34:56 -Plh 17:34:58 -Roland_Merrick 17:34:59 -TonyR 17:35:00 -JacekK 17:35:01 -Monica_Martin 17:35:03 -Jonathan_Marsh 17:35:04 -[Canon] 17:35:05 -Roberto 17:35:16 -asir 17:35:18 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has ended 17:35:19 Attendees were +1.919.742.aaaa, Gilbert_Pilz, [Canon], Plh, Jonathan_Marsh, TonyR, alewis, JacekK, Roberto, Roland_Merrick, Monica_Martin, asir, Paul_Downey 18:31:09 rrsagent, where am i? 18:31:09 See http://www.w3.org/2007/02/22-ws-desc-irc#T18-31-09 18:31:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:31:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/22-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 18:32:13 rrsagent, set log world 18:32:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:32:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/22-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 19:28:26 Zakim has left #ws-desc