IRC log of swd on 2007-02-20

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:57:16 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #swd
15:57:16 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc
15:57:20 [RalphS]
Meeting: SWD WG
15:57:32 [RalphS]
Chair: Guus
15:57:39 [RalphS]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0125.html
15:57:44 [RalphS]
-> http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html Previous 2007-02-13
15:57:49 [RalphS]
zakim, who's on the call?
15:57:49 [Zakim]
On the phone I see TomB
15:58:05 [RalphS]
rrsagent, please make record public
15:58:21 [Zakim]
+??P3
15:58:29 [Zakim]
+Ralph
15:58:40 [dlrubin]
dlrubin has joined #swd
15:58:49 [RalphS]
zakim, ??p3 is Daniel
15:58:49 [Zakim]
+Daniel; got it
15:59:03 [RalphS]
Regrets: Diego, Michael, Elisa, Bernard
15:59:38 [Antoine]
Antoine has joined #swd
16:00:35 [JonP]
JonP has joined #swd
16:00:48 [Simone]
Zakim, passcode?
16:00:48 [Zakim]
the conference code is 79394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Simone
16:01:08 [Zakim]
+[VrijeUni]
16:01:32 [Zakim]
+Jon_Phipps
16:01:33 [RalphS]
zakim, vrijeuni is Guus
16:01:34 [Zakim]
+Guus; got it
16:01:46 [Zakim]
+??P16
16:01:53 [Zakim]
+Guus.a
16:02:06 [RalphS]
zakim, guus.a is Antoine
16:02:06 [Zakim]
+Antoine; got it
16:02:20 [Simone]
Zakim who's online?
16:02:27 [Simone]
Zakim, who's online?
16:02:27 [Zakim]
I don't understand your question, Simone.
16:02:35 [RalphS]
zakim, ??p16 is probably Simone
16:02:36 [Zakim]
+Simone?; got it
16:02:42 [Guus]
Guus has joined #swd
16:02:50 [JonP]
zakim, Jon_Phipps is me
16:02:50 [Zakim]
+JonP; got it
16:03:32 [Zakim]
-Simone?
16:04:18 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
16:04:28 [Simone]
Zakim, +[IPcaller] is Simone
16:04:28 [Zakim]
sorry, Simone, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]'
16:04:47 [Simone]
Zakim, [IPcaller] is Simone
16:04:47 [Zakim]
+Simone; got it
16:05:46 [Guus]
zakim, who is here?
16:05:46 [Zakim]
On the phone I see TomB, Daniel, Ralph, Guus, JonP, Antoine, Simone
16:05:47 [Zakim]
On IRC I see Guus, JonP, Antoine, RRSAgent, TomB, Simone, Zakim, RalphS
16:06:14 [aliman]
aliman has joined #swd
16:06:42 [benadida]
benadida has joined #SWD
16:06:53 [Zakim]
+Ben_Adida
16:06:56 [Guus]
ben, can you scribe?
16:07:40 [Zakim]
+??P1
16:07:47 [RalphS]
zakim, ??p1 is Alistair
16:07:47 [Zakim]
+Alistair; got it
16:07:49 [Zakim]
-TomB
16:07:52 [RalphS]
Scribe: Ben
16:07:57 [benadida]
scribenick: benadida
16:08:08 [TomB]
TomB has joined #swd
16:08:32 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
16:09:02 [RalphS]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ScribeDuty Scribe duty
16:09:44 [benadida]
propose to accept minutes
16:10:00 [benadida]
ACCEPTED
16:10:17 [benadida]
topic: SKOS
16:10:23 [benadida]
Topic: SKOS
16:10:44 [benadida]
Guus: Antoine, you sent mail about capturing relationships between labels
16:11:06 [RalphS]
[DONE] ACTION: Antoine to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04]
16:11:25 [benadida]
zakim, who is talking?
16:11:37 [Zakim]
benadida, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds
16:11:49 [benadida]
antoine: we have a basis for discussion now
16:11:54 [dlrubin]
dlrubin has joined #swd
16:12:32 [benadida]
ACTION: Guus to check that this issue of more specialization than broad/narrow is on the issues list [recorded in [54]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:12:32 [RalphS]
[DONE] ACTION: Guus to check that this issue of more specialization than broad/narrow is on the issues list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:12:35 [benadida]
--DONE
16:12:50 [Simone]
Zakim, mute me
16:12:50 [Zakim]
Simone should now be muted
16:14:02 [benadida]
[scribe missed some comments by Antoine]
16:14:06 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0135.html ACTION SKOS specialization [Guus 2007-02-20]
16:14:21 [benadida]
ACTION: Guus to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07]
16:14:24 [benadida]
--DROPPED
16:14:29 [benadida]
ACTION: Antoine to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07]
16:15:00 [benadida]
ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal values, and how to represent that in skos [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09]
16:15:02 [benadida]
--CONTINUES
16:15:10 [benadida]
ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01]
16:15:12 [benadida]
--CONTINUES
16:15:55 [RalphS]
ACTION: Alistair to rephrase the old issue of skos/owl-dl coexistence and semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action08]
16:15:57 [RalphS]
-- continues
16:16:13 [benadida]
ACTION: guus to pick a SKOS issue and open it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-swd-minutes.html#action13]
16:16:16 [benadida]
--DONE
16:16:52 [Guus]
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox
16:16:58 [Guus]
SKOS issues list
16:17:22 [benadida]
Guus: let's take a look at the current set of issues
16:17:31 [benadida]
Ralph: the sandbox is "pre-acceptance" stage.
16:17:41 [benadida]
... we should change the title of the sandbox page.
16:18:17 [benadida]
Guus: let's take issues from the sandbox list as an example of the issue process.
16:18:35 [benadida]
Antoine: should we have the official list in the issue tracker?
16:18:46 [benadida]
Ralph: not what I heard.
16:19:22 [benadida]
... I'm confused as to which of these two pages are which.
16:19:25 [TomB]
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues
16:19:26 [benadida]
Alistair: confused too
16:20:24 [RalphS]
[I've just retitled http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox
16:20:51 [benadida]
[scribe is still confused about the status]
16:21:10 [benadida]
Guus: under the impression that we would move this to a real issues page and remove the link
16:21:26 [benadida]
Alistair: did we agree to use the wiki for SKOS issues, or tracker?
16:21:37 [benadida]
... i was under impression that it would be the wiki
16:22:01 [benadida]
Ralph: Jon had an action?
16:22:06 [benadida]
Jon: yes, regarding recipes, they are on tracker
16:22:30 [benadida]
... I preferred the tracker, esp. regarding internal linking and references
16:22:35 [TomB]
q+ to point out the overlap between http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues
16:22:48 [benadida]
Guus: someone has to take the action to move the sandbox issues to tracker
16:22:55 [benadida]
Ralph: in the meantime, let's use the sandbox, where the content is
16:23:11 [Zakim]
TomB, you wanted to point out the overlap between http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues
16:23:29 [benadida]
TomB: another doc on the wiki called IssuesProcess, overlap with SkosIssues
16:23:52 [benadida]
... one way to proceed is to compare those two
16:24:08 [benadida]
... if they're the same, move sandbox to SkosIssues
16:24:30 [benadida]
... overlap is confusing, we should consolidate
16:24:38 [benadida]
... one process doc, one issues doc
16:25:24 [benadida]
Guus: let's take an issue, open it, and propose a solution
16:25:34 [benadida]
... http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-89dba8974eaba1e2a1253cee178d3f4b6cf5edea
16:26:53 [benadida]
... also http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-0e457cb9f0b2bf56983b8e4c8ffaa8c08936be46
16:27:24 [benadida]
... happy to take over this action from you and propose a resolution
16:27:28 [benadida]
s/you/Antoine/
16:27:51 [benadida]
Guus: propose to own this issue (from 1.3.4) and propose a resolution
16:28:03 [benadida]
ACTION: antoine to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04]
16:28:08 [benadida]
--DROPPED
16:28:13 [benadida]
ACTION: Guus to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04]
16:28:49 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0124.html [SKOS] relationships between labels [Antoine 2007-02-19]
16:29:48 [benadida]
ACTION: Guus to propose a resolution to relationships between labels by next week
16:30:23 [RalphS]
[I think we previously recorded Antoine's action as DONE. Guus has a new action to propose a resolution to issue SKOS-I-RelationshipsBetweenLabels ]
16:30:36 [benadida]
[oh, whoops]
16:30:54 [RalphS]
action -9
16:31:32 [benadida]
[scribe is lost... if someone can fill in]
16:31:54 [Guus]
q?
16:32:17 [benadida]
Antoine: introduce a new annotation class, "link annotation", instances of this class related to literals that stand for labels we want to link
16:33:13 [aliman]
First solution: Term-as-class
16:33:13 [RalphS]
q+ to ask for a link to a Use Case for SKOS-I-AnnotationOnLabel
16:33:20 [aliman]
Second solution: link as annotation based on n-ary relation pattern
16:33:25 [benadida]
... other solution is to create a new term class, that would represent the current concept labels as resources
16:33:47 [Zakim]
RalphS, you wanted to ask for a link to a Use Case for SKOS-I-AnnotationOnLabel
16:34:00 [aliman]
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels use cases referenced within
16:34:57 [benadida]
Guus: maybe we should move to the issue tracker
16:35:11 [benadida]
Ralph: Antoine has been updating the issues sandbox page
16:35:43 [benadida]
... the wiki record suggests that Antoine is the primary updater for the issues sandbox
16:35:49 [benadida]
... model in mind for tracking the issues?
16:35:54 [benadida]
Antoine: not really, just a sandbox
16:36:08 [benadida]
Guus: any objections to tracker?
16:36:33 [benadida]
Ralph: Antoine did a lot of work for the sandbox page
16:36:54 [benadida]
Guus: can be done over next month
16:37:07 [benadida]
Alistair: we can split the work between Jon, Antoine, and me
16:37:20 [benadida]
Ralph: at what point do issues go into the tracker
16:37:39 [benadida]
... several things in the sandbox marked "raised"
16:37:50 [benadida]
Guus: for now, only open issues in tracker. Raised one later.
16:38:06 [benadida]
Ralph: so there is a purpose for the sandbox
16:39:02 [aliman]
where is the issue tracker stuff?
16:39:15 [benadida]
Guus: yes, raised issues in sandbox, then moved to tracker for "open issues"
16:40:10 [RalphS]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/open Tracker
16:41:13 [aliman]
q+ to ask about working of tracker
16:41:43 [benadida]
Ralph: intent is owner of the issue takes an action on the issue
16:42:06 [JonP]
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26
16:43:23 [benadida]
Guus: use case document?
16:43:29 [aliman]
q-
16:43:37 [aliman]
q+ to ask about new use cases
16:43:42 [benadida]
Antoine: Some discussion between Daniel (?) Jon and me about restricting use cases.
16:44:01 [benadida]
... agreed to limit to core use cases that fulfill requirements listed
16:44:25 [benadida]
... in the document, pointer to wiki and one-liner mentioning existence of use case
16:44:56 [benadida]
... 8 or 9 summaries in the use cases, matches what Guus said two weeks ago
16:45:37 [benadida]
Guus: check schedule feasibility next week
16:45:45 [Zakim]
aliman, you wanted to ask about new use cases
16:45:58 [benadida]
Alistair: will mention it later
16:46:00 [benadida]
Topic: Recipes
16:46:14 [benadida]
ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per dropping of 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action11]
16:46:15 [benadida]
--DONE
16:46:25 [benadida]
ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per resolution of issue 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action10]
16:46:27 [benadida]
--DONE
16:46:41 [benadida]
ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
16:46:43 [benadida]
--CONTINUES
16:49:04 [benadida]
Guus: as Jon did his actions, assuming there was a resolution, but apparently not. Sorry, misinterpreted.
16:49:29 [benadida]
Jon: there was an action on me to mark this as resolved and make changes to doc.
16:49:46 [benadida]
... issue resolved but not closed. Marked it as closed, but noted an action to change doc.
16:49:53 [benadida]
... when action is complete, work is complete.
16:50:13 [benadida]
... lack of additional status in tracker is a limitation
16:50:46 [benadida]
[note I have to run at noon sharp, as I'm traveling in a few hours]
16:52:11 [benadida]
(discussion of tracker features and status of issues)
16:52:27 [aliman]
q+ to ask about issue process
16:52:40 [Zakim]
aliman, you wanted to ask about issue process
16:52:50 [benadida]
Alistair: we've got this issues process page on the wiki
16:53:16 [benadida]
... nice if someone could take an action to reconcile the issues process page with the tool and actual process
16:53:50 [RalphS]
ACTION: Ralph write a proposal for bringing http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and Tracker into alignment
16:54:20 [benadida]
Topic: vocabulary management
16:54:31 [benadida]
ACTION: Elisa to summarize state of Vocabulary Management draft, add comments, and coordinate work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action06]
16:54:33 [benadida]
-- CONTINUES
16:54:59 [benadida]
ACTION: Guus to contact persons working on versioning in Knowledge Web for Vocabulary Management draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action05]
16:55:00 [benadida]
--DONE
16:55:04 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0137.html Vocabulary maintenance: WP 2.3 and W3C Semantic Web Deployment [Guus 2007-02-20]
16:55:17 [RalphS]
scribenick: Ralphs
16:55:19 [RalphS]
Topic: RDFa
16:55:30 [RalphS]
[DONE] ACTION: Ralph to ask Ben to request a review for RDFa primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action20]
16:55:55 [RalphS]
Ben: I think I already requested that review and the reviews were done before the face-to-face
16:56:08 [RalphS]
... I can ask for another set of reviews if the WG wants, but I'd like to publish soon
16:56:18 [RalphS]
Guus: there were a number of comments on the Use Case document
16:56:36 [RalphS]
Ben: yes, Use Cases will wait -- I'm focussing on Primer for now
16:56:57 [RalphS]
Guus: I'd like to see mail saying how you've responded to the review comments
16:57:11 [RalphS]
... and propose a decision to publish
16:57:21 [RalphS]
... same for Use Case document when it's ready
16:57:47 [RalphS]
... if there are significant changes you may wish to ask for additional comments from the reviewers before proposing to publish
16:58:10 [RalphS]
Ben: the request for additional comments on Use Cases may happen this week as there have been significant changes
16:58:24 [Zakim]
-Daniel
16:58:24 [RalphS]
... we're moving quickly on test cases; Michael and Wing are making good progress
16:58:35 [RalphS]
... we're also very close to having a first draft of XHTML 1.1 module
16:58:44 [RalphS]
... which means we'll soon have a path to validating RDFa in XHTML1.1
16:59:06 [RalphS]
ACTION: Guus to flag the issue of RDFa REC track on the coordination group [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:59:08 [RalphS]
-- continues
16:59:13 [TomB]
face-to-face?
16:59:21 [RalphS]
Topic: Semantic Integration Note
16:59:23 [benadida]
ACTION: Elisa to contact Daniel for participating in Semantic Integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action18]
16:59:26 [benadida]
-- CONTINUES
16:59:30 [RalphS]
ACTION: Elisa to contact Daniel for participating in Semantic Integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action18]
16:59:35 [RalphS]
action -19
17:00:01 [RalphS]
Topic: Face-to-face
17:00:02 [benadida]
[thanks!]
17:00:14 [RalphS]
Tom: if we're going to have another face-to-face in June we should start now looking at dates
17:00:37 [RalphS]
ACTION: Tom propose some dates for next face-to-face, looking at June
17:00:49 [RalphS]
Guus: I may be able to host in Amsterdam
17:00:54 [RalphS]
[adjourned]
17:00:58 [Zakim]
-Ben_Adida
17:00:59 [Zakim]
-Guus
17:01:09 [Zakim]
-TomB
17:01:14 [Zakim]
-Alistair
17:01:15 [Zakim]
-JonP
17:01:19 [Zakim]
-Antoine
17:01:20 [Zakim]
-Ralph
17:01:33 [Zakim]
-Simone
17:01:34 [Zakim]
SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
17:01:35 [Zakim]
Attendees were TomB, Ralph, Daniel, Guus, Antoine, Simone?, JonP, Simone, Ben_Adida, Alistair
17:03:00 [RalphS]
rrsagent, please draft minutes
17:03:00 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-minutes.html RalphS
17:03:13 [RalphS]
zakim, bye
17:03:13 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #swd
17:04:51 [RalphS]
[DONE] ACTION: Antoine to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04]
17:05:33 [dlrubin]
dlrubin has left #swd
17:06:38 [RalphS]
rrsagent, please draft minutes
17:06:38 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-minutes.html RalphS
17:07:20 [Antoine]
Antoine has left #swd
17:07:22 [RalphS]
rrsagent, bye
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
I see 18 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-actions.rdf :
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Guus to check that this issue of more specialization than broad/narrow is on the issues list [recorded in [54]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action03] [1]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-12-32
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Guus to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07] [2]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-14-21
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Antoine to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07] [3]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-14-29
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal values, and how to represent that in skos [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] [4]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-15-00
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] [5]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-15-10
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Alistair to rephrase the old issue of skos/owl-dl coexistence and semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action08] [6]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-15-55
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: guus to pick a SKOS issue and open it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-swd-minutes.html#action13] [7]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-16-13
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: antoine to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04] [8]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-28-03
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Guus to propose a resolution to relationships between labels by next week [10]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-29-48
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per dropping of 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action11] [11]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-46-14
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per resolution of issue 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action10] [12]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-46-25
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [13]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-46-41
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Ralph write a proposal for bringing http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and Tracker into alignment [14]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-53-50
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Elisa to summarize state of Vocabulary Management draft, add comments, and coordinate work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action06] [15]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-54-31
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Guus to contact persons working on versioning in Knowledge Web for Vocabulary Management draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action05] [16]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-54-59
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Guus to flag the issue of RDFa REC track on the coordination group [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action03] [17]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-59-06
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Elisa to contact Daniel for participating in Semantic Integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action18] [18]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-59-23
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Tom propose some dates for next face-to-face, looking at June [20]
17:07:22 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T17-00-37