15:57:16 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #swd
15:57:16 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc
15:57:20 <RalphS> Meeting: SWD WG
15:57:32 <RalphS> Chair: Guus
15:57:39 <RalphS> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0125.html
15:57:44 <RalphS> -> http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html Previous 2007-02-13
15:57:49 <RalphS> zakim, who's on the call?
15:57:49 <Zakim> On the phone I see TomB
15:58:05 <RalphS> rrsagent, please make record public
15:58:21 <Zakim> +??P3
15:58:29 <Zakim> +Ralph
15:58:40 <dlrubin> dlrubin has joined #swd
15:58:49 <RalphS> zakim, ??p3 is Daniel
15:58:49 <Zakim> +Daniel; got it
15:59:03 <RalphS> Regrets: Diego, Michael, Elisa, Bernard
15:59:38 <Antoine> Antoine has joined #swd
16:00:35 <JonP> JonP has joined #swd
16:00:48 <Simone> Zakim, passcode?
16:00:48 <Zakim> the conference code is 79394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Simone
16:01:08 <Zakim> +[VrijeUni]
16:01:32 <Zakim> +Jon_Phipps
16:01:33 <RalphS> zakim, vrijeuni is Guus
16:01:34 <Zakim> +Guus; got it
16:01:46 <Zakim> +??P16
16:01:53 <Zakim> +Guus.a
16:02:06 <RalphS> zakim, guus.a is Antoine
16:02:06 <Zakim> +Antoine; got it
16:02:20 <Simone> Zakim who's online?
16:02:27 <Simone> Zakim, who's online?
16:02:27 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, Simone.
16:02:35 <RalphS> zakim, ??p16 is probably Simone
16:02:36 <Zakim> +Simone?; got it
16:02:42 <Guus> Guus has joined #swd
16:02:50 <JonP> zakim, Jon_Phipps is me
16:02:50 <Zakim> +JonP; got it
16:03:32 <Zakim> -Simone?
16:04:18 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
16:04:28 <Simone> Zakim, +[IPcaller] is Simone
16:04:28 <Zakim> sorry, Simone, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]'
16:04:47 <Simone> Zakim, [IPcaller] is Simone
16:04:47 <Zakim> +Simone; got it
16:05:46 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
16:05:46 <Zakim> On the phone I see TomB, Daniel, Ralph, Guus, JonP, Antoine, Simone
16:05:47 <Zakim> On IRC I see Guus, JonP, Antoine, RRSAgent, TomB, Simone, Zakim, RalphS
16:06:14 <aliman> aliman has joined #swd
16:06:42 <benadida> benadida has joined #SWD
16:06:53 <Zakim> +Ben_Adida
16:06:56 <Guus> ben, can you scribe?
16:07:40 <Zakim> +??P1
16:07:47 <RalphS> zakim, ??p1 is Alistair
16:07:47 <Zakim> +Alistair; got it
16:07:49 <Zakim> -TomB
16:07:52 <RalphS> Scribe: Ben
16:07:57 <benadida> scribenick: benadida
16:08:08 <TomB> TomB has joined #swd
16:08:32 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
16:09:02 <RalphS> -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ScribeDuty Scribe duty
16:09:44 <benadida> propose to accept minutes
16:10:00 <benadida> ACCEPTED
16:10:17 <benadida> topic: SKOS
16:10:23 <benadida> Topic: SKOS
16:10:44 <benadida> Guus: Antoine, you sent mail about capturing relationships between labels
16:11:25 <benadida> zakim, who is talking?
16:11:37 <Zakim> benadida, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds
16:11:49 <benadida> antoine: we have a basis for discussion now
16:11:54 <dlrubin> dlrubin has joined #swd
16:12:32 <benadida> ACTION: Guus to check that this issue of more specialization than broad/narrow is on the issues list [recorded in [54]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action03] 
16:12:32 <RalphS> [DONE] ACTION: Guus to check that this issue of more specialization than broad/narrow is on the issues list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:12:35 <benadida> --DONE
16:12:50 <Simone> Zakim, mute me
16:12:50 <Zakim> Simone should now be muted
16:14:02 <benadida> [scribe missed some comments by Antoine]
16:14:06 <RalphS> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0135.html ACTION SKOS specialization [Guus 2007-02-20]
16:14:21 <benadida> ACTION: Guus to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07]
16:14:24 <benadida> --DROPPED
16:14:29 <benadida> ACTION: Antoine to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07]
16:15:00 <benadida> ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal values, and how to represent that in skos [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09]
16:15:02 <benadida> --CONTINUES
16:15:10 <benadida> ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01]
16:15:12 <benadida> --CONTINUES
16:15:55 <RalphS> ACTION: Alistair to rephrase the old issue of skos/owl-dl coexistence and semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action08]
16:15:57 <RalphS> -- continues
16:16:13 <benadida> ACTION: guus to pick a SKOS issue and open it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-swd-minutes.html#action13]
16:16:16 <benadida> --DONE
16:16:52 <Guus> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox
16:16:58 <Guus> SKOS issues list
16:17:22 <benadida> Guus: let's take a look at the current set of issues
16:17:31 <benadida> Ralph: the sandbox is "pre-acceptance" stage.
16:17:41 <benadida> ... we should change the title of the sandbox page.
16:18:17 <benadida> Guus: let's take issues from the sandbox list as an example of the issue process.
16:18:35 <benadida> Antoine: should we have the official list in the issue tracker?
16:18:46 <benadida> Ralph: not what I heard.
16:19:22 <benadida> ... I'm confused as to which of these two pages are which.
16:19:25 <TomB> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues
16:19:26 <benadida> Alistair: confused too
16:20:24 <RalphS> [I've just retitled http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox
16:20:51 <benadida> [scribe is still confused about the status]
16:21:10 <benadida> Guus: under the impression that we would move this to a real issues page and remove the link
16:21:26 <benadida> Alistair: did we agree to use the wiki for SKOS issues, or tracker?
16:21:37 <benadida> ... i was under impression that it would be the wiki
16:22:01 <benadida> Ralph: Jon had an action?
16:22:06 <benadida> Jon: yes, regarding recipes, they are on tracker
16:22:30 <benadida> ... I preferred the tracker, esp. regarding internal linking and references
16:22:35 <TomB> q+ to point out the overlap between http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues
16:22:48 <benadida> Guus: someone has to take the action to move the sandbox issues to tracker
16:22:55 <benadida> Ralph: in the meantime, let's use the sandbox, where the content is
16:23:11 <Zakim> TomB, you wanted to point out the overlap between http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues
16:23:29 <benadida> TomB: another doc on the wiki called IssuesProcess, overlap with SkosIssues
16:23:52 <benadida> ... one way to proceed is to compare those two
16:24:08 <benadida> ... if they're the same, move sandbox to SkosIssues
16:24:30 <benadida> ... overlap is confusing, we should consolidate
16:24:38 <benadida> ... one process doc, one issues doc
16:25:24 <benadida> Guus: let's take an issue, open it, and propose a solution
16:25:34 <benadida> ... http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-89dba8974eaba1e2a1253cee178d3f4b6cf5edea
16:26:53 <benadida> ... also http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-0e457cb9f0b2bf56983b8e4c8ffaa8c08936be46
16:27:24 <benadida> ... happy to take over this action from you and propose a resolution
16:27:28 <benadida> s/you/Antoine/
16:27:51 <benadida> Guus: propose to own this issue (from 1.3.4) and propose a resolution
16:28:03 <benadida> ACTION: antoine to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04]
16:28:08 <benadida> --DROPPED
16:28:13 <benadida> ACTION: Guus to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04]
16:28:49 <RalphS> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0124.html [SKOS] relationships between labels [Antoine 2007-02-19]
16:29:48 <benadida> ACTION: Guus to propose a resolution to relationships between labels by next week
16:30:23 <RalphS> [I think we previously recorded Antoine's action as DONE.  Guus has a new action to propose a resolution to issue SKOS-I-RelationshipsBetweenLabels ]
16:30:36 <benadida> [oh, whoops]
16:30:54 <RalphS> action -9
16:31:32 <benadida> [scribe is lost... if someone can fill in]
16:31:54 <Guus> q?
16:32:17 <benadida> Antoine: introduce a new annotation class, "link annotation", instances of this class related to literals that stand for labels we want to link
16:33:13 <aliman> First solution: Term-as-class
16:33:13 <RalphS> q+ to ask for a link to a Use Case for SKOS-I-AnnotationOnLabel
16:33:20 <aliman> Second solution: link as annotation based on n-ary relation pattern
16:33:25 <benadida> ... other solution is to create a new term class, that would represent the current concept labels as resources
16:33:47 <Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask for a link to a Use Case for SKOS-I-AnnotationOnLabel
16:34:00 <aliman> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels use cases referenced within
16:34:57 <benadida> Guus: maybe we should move to the issue tracker
16:35:11 <benadida> Ralph: Antoine has been updating the issues sandbox page
16:35:43 <benadida> ... the wiki record suggests that Antoine is the primary updater for the issues sandbox
16:35:49 <benadida> ... model in mind for tracking the issues?
16:35:54 <benadida> Antoine: not really, just a sandbox
16:36:08 <benadida> Guus: any objections to tracker?
16:36:33 <benadida> Ralph: Antoine did a lot of work for the sandbox page
16:36:54 <benadida> Guus: can be done over next month
16:37:07 <benadida> Alistair: we can split the work between Jon, Antoine, and me
16:37:20 <benadida> Ralph: at what point do issues go into the tracker
16:37:39 <benadida> ... several things in the sandbox marked "raised"
16:37:50 <benadida> Guus: for now, only open issues in tracker. Raised one later.
16:38:06 <benadida> Ralph: so there is a purpose for the sandbox
16:39:02 <aliman> where is the issue tracker stuff?
16:39:15 <benadida> Guus: yes, raised issues in sandbox, then moved to tracker for "open issues"
16:40:10 <RalphS> -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/open Tracker
16:41:13 <aliman> q+ to ask about working of tracker
16:41:43 <benadida> Ralph: intent is owner of the issue takes an action on the issue
16:42:06 <JonP> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26
16:43:23 <benadida> Guus: use case document?
16:43:29 <aliman> q-
16:43:37 <aliman> q+ to ask about new use cases
16:43:42 <benadida> Antoine: Some discussion between Daniel (?) Jon and me about restricting use cases.
16:44:01 <benadida> ... agreed to limit to core use cases that fulfill requirements listed
16:44:25 <benadida> ... in the document, pointer to wiki and one-liner mentioning existence of use case
16:44:56 <benadida> ... 8 or 9 summaries in the use cases, matches what Guus said two weeks ago
16:45:37 <benadida> Guus: check schedule feasibility next week
16:45:45 <Zakim> aliman, you wanted to ask about new use cases
16:45:58 <benadida> Alistair: will mention it later
16:46:00 <benadida> Topic: Recipes
16:46:14 <benadida> ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per dropping of 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action11]
16:46:15 <benadida> --DONE
16:46:25 <benadida> ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per resolution of issue 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action10]
16:46:27 <benadida> --DONE
16:46:41 <benadida> ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
16:46:43 <benadida> --CONTINUES
16:49:04 <benadida> Guus: as Jon did his actions, assuming there was a resolution, but apparently not. Sorry, misinterpreted.
16:49:29 <benadida> Jon: there was an action on me to mark this as resolved and make changes to doc.
16:49:46 <benadida> ... issue resolved but not closed. Marked it as closed, but noted an action to change doc.
16:49:53 <benadida> ... when action is complete, work is complete.
16:50:13 <benadida> ... lack of additional status in tracker is a limitation
16:50:46 <benadida> [note I have to run at noon sharp, as I'm traveling in a few hours]
16:52:11 <benadida> (discussion of tracker features and status of issues)
16:52:27 <aliman> q+ to ask about issue process
16:52:40 <Zakim> aliman, you wanted to ask about issue process
16:52:50 <benadida> Alistair: we've got this issues process page on the wiki
16:53:16 <benadida> ... nice if someone could take an action to reconcile the issues process page with the tool and actual process
16:53:50 <RalphS> ACTION: Ralph write a proposal for bringing http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and Tracker into alignment
16:54:20 <benadida> Topic: vocabulary management
16:54:31 <benadida> ACTION: Elisa to summarize state of Vocabulary Management draft, add comments, and coordinate work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action06]
16:54:33 <benadida> -- CONTINUES
16:54:59 <benadida> ACTION: Guus to contact persons working on versioning in Knowledge Web for Vocabulary Management draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action05]
16:55:00 <benadida> --DONE
16:55:04 <RalphS> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0137.html Vocabulary maintenance: WP 2.3 and W3C Semantic Web Deployment [Guus 2007-02-20]
16:55:17 <RalphS> scribenick: Ralphs
16:55:19 <RalphS> Topic: RDFa
16:55:30 <RalphS> [DONE] ACTION: Ralph to ask Ben to request a review for RDFa primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action20]
16:55:55 <RalphS> Ben: I think I already requested that review and the reviews were done before the face-to-face
16:56:08 <RalphS> ... I can ask for another set of reviews if the WG wants, but I'd like to publish soon
16:56:18 <RalphS> Guus: there were a number of comments on the Use Case document
16:56:36 <RalphS> Ben: yes, Use Cases will wait -- I'm focussing on Primer for now
16:56:57 <RalphS> Guus: I'd like to see mail saying how you've responded to the review comments
16:57:11 <RalphS> ... and propose a decision to publish
16:57:21 <RalphS> ... same for Use Case document when it's ready
16:57:47 <RalphS> ... if there are significant changes you may wish to ask for additional comments from the reviewers before proposing to publish
16:58:10 <RalphS> Ben: the request for additional comments on Use Cases may happen this week as there have been significant changes
16:58:24 <Zakim> -Daniel
16:58:24 <RalphS> ... we're moving quickly on test cases; Michael and Wing are making good progress
16:58:35 <RalphS> ... we're also very close to having a first draft of XHTML 1.1 module
16:58:44 <RalphS> ... which means we'll soon have a path to validating RDFa in XHTML1.1
16:59:06 <RalphS> ACTION: Guus to flag the issue of RDFa REC track on the coordination group [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:59:08 <RalphS> -- continues
16:59:13 <TomB> face-to-face?
16:59:21 <RalphS> Topic: Semantic Integration Note
16:59:23 <benadida> ACTION: Elisa to contact Daniel for participating in Semantic Integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action18]
16:59:26 <benadida> -- CONTINUES
16:59:30 <RalphS> ACTION: Elisa to contact Daniel for participating in Semantic Integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action18]
16:59:35 <RalphS> action -19
17:00:01 <RalphS> Topic: Face-to-face
17:00:02 <benadida> [thanks!]
17:00:14 <RalphS> Tom: if we're going to have another face-to-face in June we should start now looking at dates
17:00:37 <RalphS> ACTION: Tom propose some dates for next face-to-face, looking at June
17:00:49 <RalphS> Guus: I may be able to host in Amsterdam
17:00:54 <RalphS> [adjourned]
17:00:58 <Zakim> -Ben_Adida
17:00:59 <Zakim> -Guus
17:01:09 <Zakim> -TomB
17:01:14 <Zakim> -Alistair
17:01:15 <Zakim> -JonP
17:01:19 <Zakim> -Antoine
17:01:20 <Zakim> -Ralph
17:01:33 <Zakim> -Simone
17:01:34 <Zakim> SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
17:01:35 <Zakim> Attendees were TomB, Ralph, Daniel, Guus, Antoine, Simone?, JonP, Simone, Ben_Adida, Alistair
17:03:00 <RalphS> rrsagent, please draft minutes
17:03:00 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-minutes.html RalphS
17:03:13 <RalphS> zakim, bye
17:03:13 <Zakim> Zakim has left #swd
17:04:51 <RalphS> [DONE] ACTION: Antoine to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04]
17:05:33 <dlrubin> dlrubin has left #swd
17:06:38 <RalphS> rrsagent, please draft minutes
17:06:38 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-minutes.html RalphS
17:07:20 <Antoine> Antoine has left #swd
17:07:22 <RalphS> rrsagent, bye
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> I see 18 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-actions.rdf :
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to check that this issue of more specialization than broad/narrow is on the issues list [recorded in [54]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action03]  [1]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-12-32
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07] [2]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-14-21
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Antoine to check with Veronique on the terms being outside the iso standard [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action07] [3]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-14-29
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal values, and how to represent that in skos [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] [4]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-15-00
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] [5]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-15-10
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alistair to rephrase the old issue of skos/owl-dl coexistence and semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action08] [6]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-15-55
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: guus to pick a SKOS issue and open it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-swd-minutes.html#action13] [7]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-16-13
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: antoine to capture the issue on capturing relationships between labels [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action04] [8]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-28-03
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to propose a resolution to relationships between labels by next week [10]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-29-48
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per dropping of 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action11] [11]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-46-14
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jon to update Recipe issue list as per resolution of issue 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action10] [12]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-46-25
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [13]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-46-41
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph write a proposal for bringing http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and Tracker into alignment [14]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-53-50
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Elisa to summarize state of Vocabulary Management draft, add comments, and coordinate work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action06] [15]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-54-31
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to contact persons working on versioning in Knowledge Web for Vocabulary Management draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action05] [16]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-54-59
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to flag the issue of RDFa REC track on the coordination group [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/23-swd-minutes.html#action03] [17]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-59-06
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Elisa to contact Daniel for participating in Semantic Integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-swd-minutes.html#action18] [18]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T16-59-23
17:07:22 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Tom propose some dates for next face-to-face, looking at June [20]
17:07:22 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-irc#T17-00-37