15:19:47 RRSAgent has joined #rif 15:19:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-rif-irc 15:19:58 Zakim, this will be rif 15:19:58 ok, MoZ; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 41 minutes 15:21:24 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Feb/0026.html 15:21:52 ChrisW has changed the topic to: 13 Feb RIF Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Feb/0026.html 15:22:15 Meeting: RIF Telecon 13 Feb 07 15:22:36 Chair: Chris Welty 15:23:27 Zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-rif-agenda.rdf 15:23:27 working on it, ChrisW 15:23:28 agenda+ Admin' [ChrisW] 15:23:29 agendum 1 added 15:23:30 agenda+ F2F [ChrisW] 15:23:31 agendum 2 added 15:23:32 agenda+ Liason [ChrisW] 15:23:34 agendum 3 added 15:23:36 agenda+ Technical Design [ChrisW] 15:23:37 agendum 4 added 15:23:38 agenda+ RIF-RAF [ChrisW] 15:23:39 agendum 5 added 15:23:40 agenda+ UCR [ChrisW] 15:23:42 agendum 6 added 15:23:44 agenda+ AOB [ChrisW] 15:23:46 agendum 7 added 15:23:49 done reading agenda, ChrisW 15:23:53 zakij, clear agenda 15:23:58 zakim, clear agenda 15:23:58 agenda cleared 15:24:06 agenda+ Admin 15:24:12 agenda+ F2F 15:24:17 agenda+ Liason 15:24:25 agenda+ Technical Design 15:24:32 agenda+ UCR 15:24:36 agenda+ RIFRAF 15:24:40 agenda+ AOB 15:24:55 rrsagent, make minutes 15:24:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 15:29:13 rrsagent, make logs public 15:31:34 hey moz, can you scribe today? 15:32:06 ChrisW, not I even won't be able to attend by phone, I fear 15:32:13 I will only be there on IRC 15:33:45 ok 15:34:47 The problem is even I would do I still will be a first-half-time-scribe 15:39:40 sandro has joined #rif 15:41:10 that's ok 15:52:04 agiurca has joined #rif 15:52:37 csma has joined #rif 15:54:52 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:55:02 + +39.022.399.aaaa 15:55:16 zakim, aaaa is me 15:55:16 +csma; got it 15:57:21 Harold has joined #rif 15:58:05 +[NRCC] 15:58:22 patranja has joined #rif 15:58:46 IgorMozetic has joined #rif 15:59:27 zakim, [NRCC] is me 15:59:27 +Harold; got it 15:59:56 +[IBM] 15:59:59 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 16:00:02 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 16:00:02 +ChrisW; got it 16:00:23 josb has joined #rif 16:00:42 +[IPcaller] 16:00:52 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 16:00:52 +IgorMozetic; got it 16:01:03 zakim, mute me 16:01:04 IgorMozetic should now be muted 16:01:36 +josb 16:01:42 Allen has joined #rif 16:02:04 Enterprise Architect is another UML tool: http://www.sparxsystems.com/ea.htm 16:02:05 +[LMU] 16:02:07 DavidHirtle has joined #rif 16:02:07 +[TU-Cottbus] 16:02:18 zakim, who is talking? 16:02:24 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 16:02:29 zakim, [TU-Cottbus] is agiurca 16:02:29 +agiurca; got it 16:02:30 +Allen_Ginsberg 16:02:33 ChrisW, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: csma (21%), ChrisW (19%), PaulaP (2%), [TU-Cottbus] (30%) 16:02:37 zakim, mute me 16:02:37 agiurca should now be muted 16:02:41 zakim, mute me 16:02:41 csma should now be muted 16:02:44 zakim, mute me 16:02:49 Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted 16:02:59 +Sandro 16:03:17 +??P35 16:03:17 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 16:03:22 +[IBM] 16:03:26 zakim, [ibm] is temporarily me 16:03:26 +StellaMitchell; got it 16:03:37 zakim, ack me 16:03:40 I see ??P35 on the speaker queue 16:03:45 cgi-irc has joined #rif 16:03:53 LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif 16:03:56 +??P38 16:04:06 +Dave_Reynolds (was ??P38) 16:04:15 ack ?? 16:04:26 ChrisW has left #rif 16:04:36 ChrisW has joined #rif 16:04:43 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:04:43 On the phone I see csma (muted), Harold, ChrisW, IgorMozetic (muted), josb (muted), PaulaP (muted), agiurca (muted), Allen_Ginsberg (muted), Sandro (muted), DavidHirtle, 16:04:46 ... StellaMitchell (muted), Dave_Reynolds 16:04:51 +Leora_Morgenstern 16:04:53 +??P5 16:04:56 pfps has joined #rif 16:05:06 zakim, please mute me 16:05:06 Leora_Morgenstern should now be muted 16:05:28 +??P14 16:05:37 zakim, P14 is me 16:05:37 sorry, pfps, I do not recognize a party named 'P14' 16:05:54 zakim, ??P14 is me 16:05:54 +pfps; got it 16:06:18 +Michael_Kifer 16:06:45 I will do it 16:06:48 scribenick: csma 16:07:23 next agendum 16:07:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Feb/0013.html 16:07:42 zakim, mute me 16:07:42 Michael_Kifer should now be muted 16:07:43 proposed: approve minutes of 13 Feb 16:07:56 RESOLVED: minutes from 13 Feb approved 16:08:00 s/13/6/ 16:08:02 zakim, unmute me 16:08:04 next agendum 16:08:05 Allen_Ginsberg should no longer be muted 16:08:28 Zakum, next agendum 16:09:14 Allen: If you did not fill the questionaire, please do it before next Friday 16:09:53 ...extra room booked for BO sessions 16:09:59 I'm ready to scribe. 16:10:08 scribenick: pfps 16:10:44 zakim, unmute me 16:10:44 Leora_Morgenstern should no longer be muted 16:10:45 Chris: If you think you might come, sign up on the Wiki and provide nationality so that the appropriate paperwork can be done. 16:10:53 Yes, sandro, because I forgot to sign up 16:11:02 Sandro: I'll reopen the questionnaire to support this. 16:11:10 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F5 16:11:28 Chris: 16 have signed up, so expect 20 16:12:46 Chris: agenda is up for meeting 16:13:17 Chris: If we can't approve drafts, then we want to at least try to get concrete actions for editors that will result in a working draft 16:13:37 Chris: Documents will be frozen one week before F2F 16:13:47 Is there news about wiki-tr (reading on the plane)? 16:14:16 Chris: Day 2 devoted to UCR draft 16:14:36 Chris: Day 3 devoted to architecture and to complete actions from previous days 16:14:54 Chris: WIKI page has more details, comments wanted 16:15:09 Chris: Hotels still have room, but do often fill 16:15:50 zakim, next item 16:15:50 agendum 2. "F2F" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:15:53 Allen: Two demos are available. 16:16:04 Harold: What about remote participation? 16:16:41 Allen: Each room has a speakerphone 16:17:06 Chris: Use regular code, if second bridge is needed then one will be set up 16:17:33 zakim, next item 16:17:33 agendum 3. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:17:34 Sandro: Will send out email asking who wants to phone in (and when?) 16:17:53 ACTION: to Sandro to send email to ask who plans to attend by phone 16:17:53 Sorry, couldn't find user - to 16:18:08 PRR - no news 16:18:11 zakim, next item 16:18:11 agendum 3 was just opened, ChrisW 16:18:19 zakim, close item 3 16:18:19 agendum 3, Liason, closed 16:18:21 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:18:22 4. Technical Design [from ChrisW] 16:18:33 Chris: Action review 16:19:10 Chris: Harold actions 216 done, 217 done, 16:19:17 +Gary_Hallmark 16:19:19 Chris: Jos action #? done 16:19:45 Chris: actions 218, 219, 220 done 16:19:56 johnhall has joined #rif 16:20:07 Chris: action 223 done 16:20:18 +Sandro.a 16:20:26 Chris: action (Sandro) not done 16:20:30 -Sandro 16:20:41 sandro has joined #rif 16:20:49 s/(sandro)/224/ 16:20:55 Harold: draft incorporates all changes from Allen's initial review 16:21:00 +[IPcaller] 16:21:15 zakim, ipcaller is me 16:21:15 +johnhall; got it 16:21:22 Harold: still discussing later review from Allen and other reviews (appendix) 16:21:23 zakim,mute me 16:21:23 johnhall should now be muted 16:21:40 q+ 16:21:43 Harold: overview section has initial content 16:22:01 zakim, unmute me 16:22:01 Michael_Kifer should no longer be muted 16:22:11 sandro has joined #rif 16:22:11 Harold: Mike and Jos are discussing comments 16:22:18 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:22:18 On the phone I see csma (muted), Harold, ChrisW, IgorMozetic (muted), josb (muted), PaulaP (muted), agiurca (muted), Allen_Ginsberg, DavidHirtle, StellaMitchell (muted), 16:22:22 ... Dave_Reynolds, Leora_Morgenstern, PaulVincent, pfps, Michael_Kifer, Gary_Hallmark, Sandro.a, johnhall (muted) 16:22:52 Michael: current document has motivation - where should they go? they might end up quite long 16:23:14 Chris: leave motivation, etc., in for initial draft, later move to another document 16:23:30 There is a consensus about the Section "Multisorted Extension?" Why is this an extension? I propose to drop out this section by moving the content to the Syntax and Semantics sections. 16:23:41 sandro has joined #rif 16:24:11 Michael: how to address criticism then? 16:24:22 q+ 16:24:47 Harold: comments are against technical sections - mixture of intro and formal stuff 16:24:47 GaryHallmark has joined #rif 16:24:55 sandro has joined #rif 16:25:06 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:25:06 On the phone I see csma (muted), Harold, ChrisW, IgorMozetic (muted), josb (muted), PaulaP (muted), agiurca (muted), Allen_Ginsberg, DavidHirtle, StellaMitchell (muted), 16:25:09 ... Dave_Reynolds, Leora_Morgenstern, PaulVincent, pfps, Michael_Kifer, Gary_Hallmark, Sandro.a, johnhall (muted) 16:25:37 Harold: maybe a reorganization of the section is the best way to go 16:25:44 q? 16:25:55 ack michaelk 16:26:26 Chris: how much work to rewrite 16:26:51 q? 16:27:17 Michael/Harold: more than a week, can't just take it out, need to reorganize 16:27:27 zakim, unmute me 16:27:27 josb should no longer be muted 16:27:41 Chris: Jos - what is the biggest problem 16:28:12 Jos: mixture of intro/motivation and technical stuff, which degrades readability 16:28:35 Jos: would be better to have informal intro to language with motivation 16:28:40 I agree with Jos; we should clearly separate what is the spec and what are additional explanations 16:28:52 Jos: separate section/document for technical stuff 16:28:59 Jos, later perhaps we'll need a 'walk-through' like the one for OWL? Just not in one week? 16:29:25 Michael: other problems are small, this is the only one that is big 16:29:47 Jos: also question on end point (which documents?) so scope of this document is unclear 16:29:54 q? 16:30:05 Chris: this doc is description of RIF core - it will be the guts of the standard 16:30:35 Chris: some stuff will move to another document, which is not ready yet, they need to exist now, so that this document can be read 16:31:35 Michael: the current situation is problematic for non-experts, there needs to be an introductory section or document 16:31:37 Michael, but it's also a good didactic principle to do it "informal-formal-informal-formal-...". 16:32:01 ack csma 16:32:05 Rather than informal-informal-...informal-formal-formal-...-formal. 16:32:06 Michael: A completely formal document will need to point to the motivation 16:32:24 CSMA: not clear what is spec and what is non-spec 16:32:58 q+ 16:33:02 CSMA: fix by visually indicating spec and non-spec? 16:33:21 q- 16:33:22 Chris: can this be done? 16:33:33 I agree with Christian 16:34:04 May be the RIF MOF/UML metamodel is better to be inside of the Positive Conditions section and not in the RIF overview. 16:34:09 Harold: probably, but how to do in WIKI style 16:34:26 Michael: how to do quickly? 16:34:26 Christian, special fonts (or boxes) for "informal" and for "formal" would be doable. 16:34:55 CSMA: how about highlighting / italics (just for frozen version) and something better later? 16:35:43 Harold: how about colours? 16:36:17 Sandro: WIKI vs TR - have editors pick something for WIKI, I can map into TR 16:36:33 E.g. in the help system: ||<#FF8080> red ||<#80FF80> green ||<#8080FF> blue || 16:37:08 there is a tag which is not closed 16:37:26 zakim, mute csma 16:37:26 csma should now be muted 16:37:26 AxelPolleres has joined #rif 16:37:31 Michael: Need some fixes for WIKI-TR - can't use entities 16:37:47 zakim, mute me 16:37:48 csma was already muted, csma 16:37:57 q+ 16:38:17 + +3592976aabb 16:38:22 Which colour do we use for "formal"? red? 16:38:27 Sandro: will try to fix (somehow) 16:39:09 Michael: OK 16:39:25 q? 16:40:05 Chris: temporary solution is to distinguish via colour 16:40:16 Or, following Christian, mark "informal" by green? 16:41:18 q? 16:41:18 ack me 16:41:18 zakim, unmute me 16:41:22 csma should no longer be muted 16:41:46 zakim, mute me 16:41:46 Michael_Kifer should now be muted 16:41:54 CSMA: what goes into the overview? Why is the metamodel not in the spec? 16:41:57 q- 16:42:55 From the metamodel cannot be obtained the actual BNF. What is the mapping which was used? 16:42:58 Harold: problem with mixing motivation with metamodel 16:43:44 CSMA: XML part should be separated, later 16:44:27 Harold: may not need strict separation, just mark 16:44:45 XML syntax can be generated fro the MOF abstract syntax 16:45:31 Harold: perhaps physically separate, and have links 16:45:52 CSMA: for this WD just mark, discuss end state later 16:45:59 zakim, mute me 16:45:59 csma should now be muted 16:46:20 Chris: move where? 16:46:46 I removed the remark about moving XML into a different section 16:46:56 Harold: need two diagrams 16:47:08 I keep the remark about moving the meta-model along with the corresponding BNF 16:48:00 +1 16:48:10 Chris: do minimal change 16:48:10 The mapping from the MOF abstract syntax to BNF must be described. 16:48:26 Who is recording actions? 16:48:37 Ok 16:49:02 Action to Harold to move the MOF diagram to the relevant syntax subsection 16:49:43 zakim, unmute me 16:49:43 Michael_Kifer should no longer be muted 16:50:01 Harold: problems with concurrent editing in WIKI 16:50:11 zakim, unmute me 16:50:11 agiurca should no longer be muted 16:50:42 ACTION: Harold to move the MOF diagrams to the relevant syntax subsections 16:50:43 Created ACTION-225 - Move the MOF diagrams to the relevant syntax subsections [on Harold Boley - due 2007-02-20]. 16:50:57 Sandro: email WIKI bugs to sysreq 16:51:03 sysreq@w3.org 16:51:12 q+ 16:51:14 to report the wiki being down or seriously malfunctioning. 16:51:43 Chris: how to fix problem with WIKI-TR? 16:52:09 q? 16:52:11 zakim, mute me 16:52:11 Michael_Kifer should now be muted 16:52:29 Chris: Sandro - run WIKI-TR and see if there are real problems 16:52:37 q? 16:53:05 Harold: Can WIKI-TR handle appendices? 16:53:23 Can we move that discussion off line? 16:53:34 Sandro: can handle by using single numbering 16:54:17 q? 16:54:29 q? 16:54:35 ack agiurca 16:55:20 Adrian: need to explain mapping from BNF to abstract syntax 16:56:03 Harold: something needs to be done 16:56:44 Adrian: why do we need new syntax? 16:56:58 zakim, unmute me 16:56:58 Michael_Kifer should no longer be muted 16:57:02 Adrian: what about sorts? are they core or not? 16:57:07 Michael: in core 16:57:14 zakim, unmute me 16:57:14 csma should no longer be muted 16:57:24 "Multisorted extension" is a 'Core-internal' extension. 16:57:24 Adrian: then don't call this multi-sorted extensions 16:58:22 Adrian: what is status of "type" 16:58:30 Harold: missing - needs to be added 16:58:43 Chris: put this into an email 16:59:01 Harold, do you want a action to add some text to explain the mapping between BNF and MOF diagram? 16:59:22 zakim, mute me 16:59:22 csma should now be muted 16:59:31 Adrian, attributes in BNF syntax are not wide-spread, but we could invent something. 16:59:37 q- 16:59:45 Christian, yes. 16:59:47 zakim, mute me 16:59:47 agiurca should now be muted 17:00:09 Chris: other comments 17:00:17 zakim, next item 17:00:17 agendum 4. "Technical Design" taken up [from ChrisW] 17:00:20 Chris: next item - UCR 17:00:38 Allen: no recent changes - reviews have been assigned 17:00:39 action: harold to add some text in the syntax subsections to explain the mapping between BNF and MOF diagrams 17:00:40 Created ACTION-226 - Add some text in the syntax subsections to explain the mapping between BNF and MOF diagrams [on Harold Boley - due 2007-02-20]. 17:00:55 zakim, mute me 17:00:55 Michael_Kifer should now be muted 17:00:59 Chris: what needs to be done for final version - there are outstanding issues 17:01:25 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/open 17:02:12 Chris: e.g. RIF must cover OWL 17:02:34 Chris: F2F should cover all outstanding issues with UCR 17:03:03 Chris: each open UCR issue should have a plan 17:03:17 Alllen: OK, I'll look at them 17:03:31 Chris: some of them are old - and should have already been closed 17:04:28 Chris: we want a success - need to think about extensions as well 17:04:44 Chris: this WILL come up at the F2F - be prepared 17:05:01 -Leora_Morgenstern 17:05:14 zakim, unmute me 17:05:15 Chris: action conclusion and summary - 215 - open 17:05:16 csma should no longer be muted 17:05:42 Allen: deferred to final version, work on phase 2 first 17:05:49 I do 17:06:07 Chris: opinions either way? 17:06:09 we should have a conclusion in the next WD 17:06:30 CSMA: we should have conclusion and summary now 17:07:00 Chris: OK, Allen can you do that 17:07:06 Allen: I'll try 17:07:13 zakim, ùute me 17:07:13 I don't understand 'ùute me', csma 17:07:18 zakim, mute csma 17:07:18 csma should now be muted 17:07:20 zakim, mute me 17:07:20 csma was already muted, csma 17:07:24 q+ 17:07:33 m7 zakim, unmute me 17:07:45 ack paulap 17:08:16 Paula: how should Phase 2 requirements be gathered? 17:08:26 Chris: good question - Allen? 17:08:33 Allen: no opinion 17:08:50 Chris: start new WIKI page - as before 17:08:57 Paula: I will help if needed 17:09:03 action paula to start phase 2 wiki page 17:09:07 Chris: ACTION Paula set up new WIKI page 17:09:13 ACTION: PaulaP to start a new wiki page for phase 2 reqs 17:09:13 Sorry, couldn't find user - PaulaP 17:09:28 action: paula to start phase 2 wiki page 17:09:28 Chris: 17:09:28 Sorry, couldn't find user - paula 17:09:41 q+ 17:09:43 zakim, rifraf 17:09:43 I don't understand 'rifraf', ChrisW 17:09:48 zakim, next item 17:09:49 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, ChrisW 17:09:50 Chris: next item - RIFRAF 17:09:56 ack axel 17:09:58 zakim, next item 17:09:58 agendum 5. "UCR" taken up [from ChrisW] 17:10:47 Axel: problems with aligning different stuff with UML diagrams 17:10:55 Axel: would like to go higher-level 17:11:22 Axel: no feedback so far 17:11:43 Chris: Leora will be at F2F, but not other RIFRAFers 17:11:58 Chris: what to discuss at meeting? 17:12:09 Axel: I will try to attend by phone. 17:13:06 Chris: Metamodel discussion is scheduled, RIFRAF also, these are the important ones 17:13:23 Chris: how much time to allot? 17:13:31 Axel: depends on other people! 17:13:56 Chris: will put email on list of to-be-read 17:14:02 Axel: should I prepare slides? 17:14:07 Chris: YES!!!!!!!!!!! 17:14:27 Axel: will produce something by Monday 17:14:36 action: axel to send slides on proposed rifraf ontology 17:14:36 Created ACTION-227 - Send slides on proposed rifraf ontology [on Axel Polleres - due 2007-02-20]. 17:15:06 zakim, next item 17:15:06 agendum 6. "RIFRAF" taken up [from ChrisW] 17:15:15 Chris: other business - going once, going twice, gone 17:15:20 +1 17:15:21 +1 17:15:22 -IgorMozetic 17:15:26 -PaulVincent 17:15:27 bye 17:15:30 -AxelPolleres 17:15:31 -StellaMitchell 17:15:31 -Gary_Hallmark 17:15:32 bye 17:15:32 -DavidHirtle 17:15:33 -Dave_Reynolds 17:15:34 -Harold 17:15:34 Bye 17:15:34 Chris: DONE 17:15:35 -PaulaP 17:15:35 rrsagent, make mintues 17:15:35 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make mintues', ChrisW. Try /msg RRSAgent help 17:15:36 -josb 17:15:37 -Allen_Ginsberg 17:15:38 AxelPolleres has left #rif 17:15:45 -Sandro 17:15:48 -johnhall 17:15:50 -Michael_Kifer 17:16:12 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:16:12 On the phone I see csma (muted), ChrisW, agiurca (muted), pfps 17:16:20 rrsagent, make minutes 17:16:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:17:29 -pfps 17:17:36 zakim, unmute me 17:17:36 csma should no longer be muted 17:17:38 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:17:39 On the phone I see csma, ChrisW, agiurca (muted) 17:17:46 -agiurca 17:17:51 -agiurca 17:18:10 csma has left #rif 17:21:08 -ChrisW 17:21:12 -csma 17:21:14 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 17:21:16 Attendees were +39.022.399.aaaa, csma, Harold, ChrisW, IgorMozetic, josb, PaulaP, agiurca, Allen_Ginsberg, Sandro, StellaMitchell, DavidHirtle, Dave_Reynolds, Leora_Morgenstern, 17:21:18 ... pfps, PaulVincent, Michael_Kifer, Gary_Hallmark, johnhall, AxelPolleres 17:21:20 rrsagent, make minutes 17:21:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:21:27 oops 17:21:56 Regrets: FrançoisBry DeborahNichols MarkusKrötzsch MohamedZergaoui (IRC only) IgorMozetic 17:22:05 Scribe: Peter Patel-Schneider 17:22:10 rrsagent, make minutes 17:22:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:23:07 ok, give it a sec - that should be it