14:52:16 RRSAgent has joined #i18ncore 14:52:16 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-i18ncore-irc 14:52:20 meeting: i18n core WG 14:52:24 chair: Francois 14:52:31 scribe: Felix 14:52:35 scribeNick: fsasaki 14:53:17 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Feb/0000.html 14:53:24 rrsagent, make log public 14:57:39 fyergeau has joined #i18ncore 14:59:24 Mick has joined #i18ncore 14:59:46 I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM has now started 14:59:53 +Michael_Monaghan 15:00:09 +[IPcaller] 15:00:12 zakim, [ is fyergeau 15:00:12 +fyergeau; got it 15:00:14 -Michael_Monaghan 15:00:18 +Michael_Monaghan 15:00:30 +Felix 15:01:25 regrets: Ienup 15:02:36 topic: last minutes 15:02:40 minutes approved 15:02:43 topic: action items 15:02:50 ACTION: Felix to add mobileOK to LC radar (DONE) 15:02:57 ACTION: Richard to send the "IDN does it work?" document to GEO (DONE) 15:03:06 ACTION: all to give feedback on LTLI update (PENDING) 15:03:22 ACTION: Felix to write a mail about possibility for SVG tiny specific IRI tests to Chris and the i18n core list (PENDING) 15:03:31 ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (PENDING) 15:03:38 ACTION: Francois to draft s.t. for a note about C064 / C065 (DONE) 15:05:09 ACTION: Francois to have a look at issue 3698 and gather information on options for diacritics in collations (DROPPED) 15:05:21 Francois: there is no standard for that 15:05:29 Felix: there will be a last call soon I think 15:05:44 action: Francois to reread Martins mail on xml:base and to write a reply to him (PENDING 15:05:59 ACTION: Ienup to go to the Unicode UTC and check the stability of the "latest version" URI for referencing Unicode (DONE) 15:06:10 r12a has joined #i18ncore 15:06:16 zakim, dial richard 15:06:16 ok, r12a; the call is being made 15:06:18 +Richard 15:06:20 Francois: relevant for the note on C0 64/65, I used that information 15:06:27 topic: "IDNs, do they work" document 15:06:45 see mail from Richard at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JanMar/0040.html 15:07:21 Michael: got some feedback on IDN document 15:07:37 .. Mark Davis sent some feedback on the document, I can forward it to Richard 15:07:45 .. he saw some different behavior in IE 7 15:07:57 Richard: What is the different behavior? 15:08:33 Michael describes the mail from Mark at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JanMar/0028.html 15:09:05 latest draft from Michael at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JanMar/0032.html 15:09:51 Michael: I tested myself and saw that Mark is right 15:09:57 Francois: what was the difference? 15:10:09 Richard: if you have in language preference box "only English" 15:10:33 .. they seemed to have worked out "English users use only ASCII, no umlaut" 15:11:03 .. so if you go to "baecker.com" with AUMLAUT, you will get punycode 15:11:25 .. I have en-GB as my setting, you can't have en (only as "user defined") in IE 15:11:32 s/IE/IE 7/ 15:11:48 Francois: so they define ASCII as a new script for "English only"? 15:12:15 Richard: there are many languages which use latin scripts, I wonder how they figured that out 15:12:28 .. I get punycode for en and en-GB 15:12:47 Michael: it associates ASCII with any English language preference 15:12:58 .. and latin-1 for any western European languages 15:14:51 Richard: what test did you do, Michael? 15:15:20 Michael: I understand that it is technically correct what Mark says 15:16:05 .. but it might be misleading since IE 7 will work if you have a European language in your preference, even if the character is not from that language 15:17:22 action: Richard to contact Russ and others to figure out how IE 7 handles display of Punycode and language preference settigs 15:17:26 s/settigs/settings/ 15:18:55 Michael: on the links: some render fine on the screen, but you get a percent escaped URL 15:19:11 Richard: I can remove the links from the table header 15:19:16 Michael: ok 15:19:59 Richard: anther comment from Thomas Roessler 15:20:12 .. he said that this is not about fishing 15:20:39 .. I wanted to say that this is a gray area 15:21:52 .. if we would say "homograph attack" people would not understand what we mean 15:22:17 Francois: how about "fishing using a homograph attack"? 15:22:59 Richard: I'll have a look and see what I can come up with 15:23:14 Francois: all very good 15:23:29 Richard: the subsection after the table "other fishing concerns" after the table 15:23:40 .. I tried to summarize a lot of information 15:24:43 s/fishing/pishing/ 15:25:06 topic: Charmod C064 considered unclear 15:25:44 proposal from Francois at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JanMar/0042.html 15:26:12 Francois: proposal is to have this note as an erratum 15:26:45 Francois describes the note 15:27:24 Felix: looks good to me 15:27:54 Richard: different wording proposal using "tight"? 15:28:13 Francois: sometimes Unicode is referenced not normatively, so "tight" would not fit 15:28:15 s/tight/tied to/ 15:28:19 Richard: ok 15:28:53 .. how do we manage errrata? 15:29:01 Francois: you edit the errata page 15:29:37 Richard: do we have to go through a process? 15:30:10 Francois: for a normative change, you have to publish a new version of the spec 15:30:24 .. for the non-normative note, we just publish the erratum, that is it 15:31:07 http://www.w3.org/2005/02/charmod-fundamentals-errata.html 15:31:49 http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-charmod-20050215 15:33:23 Francois: we can have an group internal countdown for two weeks, if nobody protests, we put it on the errata page 15:34:02 RESOLUTION: WG agrees with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JanMar/0042.html as an erratum for charmod norm. We will have an group internal countdown for two weeks, if nobody protests, we put it on the errata page 15:34:18 topic: xml:base 15:34:51 Francois: too late to do s.t., let's drop this 15:35:05 topic: XQuery review update 15:35:40 Felix: there will be a last call of full text soon, so we can make a review at last call 15:35:47 topic: Work on Japanese layout 15:43:07 Felix gives a summary 15:43:24 Felix: I'll write a mail later about the task force, just a heads up for the moment 15:43:55 topic: LTLI update, see http://www.w3.org/International/core/langtags/ and normative statements at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006OctDec/0048.html . 15:44:07 Michael: there is a dublicate in sec. 3.1 15:44:24 .. there is a typo in sec. 4 first sentence 15:45:53 .. in Example 1: the extendend langugae range , why do two hyphens de-*-DE match e.g. de-DE? 15:46:16 Francois: this is not like pur ereg 15:46:26 s/pur ereg/pure regex/ 15:47:01 .. the de-*-DE is "two sub tags with any sub tag inbetween" 15:47:05 Michael: ok 15:47:44 Felix: the examples are from the matching spec 15:47:52 .. will be fine 15:48:23 action: Felix to make updates of LTLI taking Michaels feedback into account 15:48:30 topic: i18n charter review 15:48:55 Richard: review period finishes tomorrow, 25 respones so far 15:49:05 (Richard describes some responses) 15:49:43 (Richard describes the following process) 15:50:29 Richard: if you have ideas on a recruitement plan, please contact me 15:51:00 .. after rechartering we have to think how we will organize the work with the GEO folks 15:51:20 Francois: what is the time line? 15:51:28 Richard: a couple of weeks I think 15:51:39 topic: AOB 15:51:52 -fyergeau 15:51:54 -Michael_Monaghan 15:51:54 -Richard 15:51:55 -Felix 15:51:55 I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM has ended 15:51:56 Attendees were Michael_Monaghan, [IPcaller], fyergeau, Felix, Richard 15:52:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:52:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki 17:16:29 Zakim has left #i18ncore 17:27:49 r12a has left #i18ncore