IRC log of au on 2007-01-29
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 20:58:21 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #au
- 20:58:22 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-irc
- 20:58:29 [JR]
- Zakim, this will be AUWG
- 20:58:29 [Zakim]
- ok, JR; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 58 minutes ago
- 20:58:46 [JR]
- Meeting: WAI AU
- 20:59:18 [JR]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0038.html
- 21:00:23 [Zakim]
- WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started
- 21:00:29 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 21:00:53 [JR]
- Zakim, ??P2 is really JR
- 21:00:53 [Zakim]
- +JR; got it
- 21:03:01 [Zakim]
- +Tim_Boland
- 21:03:55 [Tim]
- Tim has joined #au
- 21:05:05 [Zakim]
- +Greg_Pisocky
- 21:05:07 [JR]
- Regrets: Roberto Scano
- 21:06:58 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 21:07:27 [Greg]
- Greg has joined #au
- 21:07:31 [Greg]
- Hello
- 21:08:39 [Greg]
- Greg will minute
- 21:09:25 [JR]
- Scribe: Greg
- 21:09:40 [JR]
- Topic: 1. F2F Planning
- 21:09:48 [Greg]
- JR 1st agenda item Face to Face Planning
- 21:11:21 [JR]
- Action TB: Investigate hosting F2F
- 21:11:28 [Greg]
- Action TB to investigate NIST hosting ATAG Face to Face
- 21:14:03 [JR]
- JR: Clarify: Week of April 23rd 2007
- 21:14:35 [Greg]
- Potential date week of April 23rd in Wasington DC
- 21:14:38 [JR]
- Greg: If problem at NIST, Adobe could be a fall back
- 21:14:59 [Greg]
- JR: Report from the
- 21:15:09 [JR]
- Topic: 2. Report from Joint testing meeting attended by Tim and Jan.
- 21:15:09 [Greg]
- JR: Report from the joint meeting
- 21:15:58 [Greg]
- TB: WAI Testing Meeting as part of multi group meetings held last Wednesday. To ID ways for WGs to work together and avoid duplication of effort.
- 21:20:02 [Greg]
- JR: Was at User Agent Meetings engaged in same role for UAG as he serves for ATAG
- 21:21:14 [Greg]
- TB: Also attended Protocols and Formats where Authoring Tools were also discussed including for Rich Interactive Applications
- 21:22:13 [Greg]
- TB: Also discussion to form a possible content labelling working group "Powder"
- 21:23:14 [JR]
- Topic: 3. Comments on Public Working Draft
- 21:23:15 [Zakim]
- -Tim_Boland
- 21:23:52 [Greg]
- JR: We received numerous comments this round focused in particular areas
- 21:24:07 [Greg]
- JR: Organized by where they apply and entered into draft comment responses file
- 21:24:51 [Greg]
- JR: We need to address these efficiently since the face to face is so far away.
- 21:26:45 [Greg]
- Action: Jan to provide a legend of people's names
- 21:27:13 [Greg]
- JR: Schedule dealing with the comments section by section for upcoming meetings
- 21:28:03 [Greg]
- JR: 1) Clarify Relative Priorities, 2) Ideas around Partial Conformance, and 3) Clarify Content Specific Benchmarks
- 21:28:55 [Greg]
- Action: Jan initial statement for each
- 21:29:17 [Greg]
- BF: I would like to begin with Partial Credit issues first
- 21:30:09 [Greg]
- JR: The techniques reviews still need to occur though they will certainly be bumped.
- 21:32:19 [Greg]
- BF: Add a fourth discussion item regarding references to WCAG
- 21:33:46 [Zakim]
- +Treviranus
- 21:34:03 [JR]
- Action JR, BF: Put into email idea of "pick favourite content accessibility guideline"
- 21:34:34 [Greg]
- Action: JR, BF put into email idea of "pick preferred content accessibility guideline."
- 21:35:45 [Greg]
- BF: A preference has been expressed for the latter part of the week of April 23, 2007.
- 21:36:01 [JR]
- JT: Can make it
- 21:37:41 [Greg]
- The dates being discussed are April 25 - 27 in Washington DC for the next Face to Face.
- 21:39:56 [JR]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0013.html
- 21:42:20 [Greg]
- BF: Both aspects are important, what you generate and how you author.
- 21:46:11 [Greg]
- JT: And it would be clear that it would not be full compliance, but only partial compliance if you stressed one over the other.
- 21:46:35 [Greg]
- JT: This provides support to make that partial declaration.
- 21:50:52 [Greg]
- BF: The next question is what is the next step for partial conformance?
- 21:54:22 [Greg]
- JT: Is this document something we can work with?
- 21:54:47 [Greg]
- GP: Last comment was actually JR not JT
- 21:55:00 [JR]
- action JR: Flesh out "partial Conformance" wording in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0016.html
- 21:55:47 [Greg]
- JT: We also should explain what is meant by each.
- 21:56:10 [Zakim]
- -[IBM]
- 21:56:14 [Zakim]
- -Treviranus
- 21:56:15 [Zakim]
- -JR
- 21:56:16 [Greg]
- Adjourn:
- 21:56:27 [JR]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 21:56:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-minutes.html JR
- 21:56:33 [JR]
- RRSAgent, set logs public
- 21:58:28 [JR]
- Zakim, bye
- 21:58:28 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were JR, Tim_Boland, Greg_Pisocky, [IBM], Treviranus
- 21:58:28 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #au
- 21:58:40 [JR]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-actions.rdf :
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: TB to Investigate hosting F2F [1]
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-irc#T21-11-21
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jan to provide a legend of people's names [2]
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-irc#T21-26-45
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jan initial statement for each [3]
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-irc#T21-28-55
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JR, BF put into email idea of "pick preferred content accessibility guideline." [4]
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-irc#T21-34-34
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JR to Flesh out "partial Conformance" wording in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0016.html [5]
- 21:58:40 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/29-au-irc#T21-55-00