Structure Review for Test Sample: content-structure-separation-programmatic_039
- Editor
- editor@mail
- Status
- unconfirmed/new/assigned/pending/holding/rejected/accepted
Contact Information
Review Criteria |
Review Result |
Comment |
Name and e-mail address of the submitter are available. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
Organization on whose behalf the test sample was submitted. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
General Checks
Review Criteria |
Review Result |
Comment |
All the submitted files follow the naming convention and directory structure. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All the files include correct links unless otherwise required by the test. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All the files include correct spelling unless otherwise required by the test. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
Checks for Test Files
Review Criteria |
Review Result |
Comment |
All the files that are necessary to execute the test procedure have been submitted. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All the files include valid markup unless otherwise required by the test. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
Checks for Metadata
Review Criteria |
Review Result |
Comment |
The metadata files are valid TCDL 2.0. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
The metadata files use only elements and attributes specified in the Metadata Vocabulary. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All the dates and other integer or literal values have the correct format. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All static values (especially copyright notices) are included and accurate. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All titles, descriptions, and other required fields are included and accurate. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All identifiers (especially ID for techniques and rules) are used correctly. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
All structures such as rules, techniques, or pointers are used correctly. |
pass/fail |
no comment |
For more help see WCAG 2.0 Test Samples Development Task Force (TSD TF) Review Process