ISSUE-70

Scope should be defined in terms of concepts, not in terms of use cases

State:
CLOSED
Product:
wsc-usecases
Raised by:
Stuart Schechter
Opened on:
2007-04-25
Description:
With regard to section 3.1 (Goals), I think it\'s very hard to make sense of
what\'s in scope and out of scope given that there are 20 use cases. It
sounds like consensus is that average user\'s everyday activities in are in
scope, and that exceptional cases and expert use cases are out of scope (so
long as they attacker can not cause and exploit exceptional cases.) Why
don\'t we just say something to that effect?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: ISSUE-70: Scope should be defined in terms of concepts, not in terms of use cases ( (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-06-15)
  2. Re: ISSUE-70: Scope should be defined in terms of concepts, not in terms of use cases (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-05-23)
  3. ISSUE-70: Scope should be defined in terms of concepts, not in terms of use cases (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-04-25)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>, Chair, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 70.html,v 1.1 2010/10/11 09:35:19 dom Exp $