ISSUE-202
Conformance model section makes outdated assumption about spec content
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-xit
- Raised by:
- Thomas Roessler
- Opened on:
- 2008-05-13
- Description:
The content of section 3.1 (to be section 3) is making an assumption about the structure of other material in the specification (sufficient, necessary, ...) that isn't generally true any more. I propose to rewrite it to say briefly that we're using RFC 2119 language, and list what sections are relevant to user agents (including, possibly, plugins), and which are relevant to Web content (section 9[?]).
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-446 on Thomas Roessler to Draft uncontroversial text to update section 3.1 and insert it - due 2008-06-10, closed- Related emails:
- wsc-xit issues clean-up (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-08-21)
- Meeting record: 2008-05-14 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-06-06)
- Meeting record: 2008-05-13 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-06-06)
- ISSUE-202: Conformance model section makes outdated assumption about spec content [wsc-xit] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-05-13)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Changelog:
2008-05-13 13:45:58: Created issue 'Conformance model section makes outdated assumption about spec content' nickname owned by Thomas Roessler on product wsc-xit, description 'The content of section 3.1 (to be section 3) is making an assumption about the structure of other material in the specification (sufficient, necessary, ...) that isn't generally true any more. I propose to rewrite it to say briefly that we're using RFC 2119 language, and list what sections are relevant to user agents (including, possibly, plugins), and which are relevant to Web content (section 9[?]). ' non-public [Thomas Roessler]
2008-08-21 10:31:23: Status changed to 'closed' [Thomas Roessler]