15:48:01 RRSAgent has joined #sweo 15:48:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-sweo-irc 15:48:09 zakim, this will be sweo 15:48:09 ok, ivan; I see SW_SWEO()11:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes 15:48:21 rrsagent, set log public 15:48:40 Meeting: SWEO IG Weekly Telco 15:48:43 Chair: Susie 15:56:30 kidehen has joined #sweo 15:56:37 pasquale has joined #sweo 15:56:45 hi all 15:56:48 good morning 15:56:50 hello pasquale! 15:56:54 ciao 15:57:00 good evening for me:-( 15:57:12 also for me ;-) 15:57:39 good localtime()! 15:57:46 ahah 15:57:47 g'day, pasquale, kjetilk 15:57:59 hi LeeF 15:58:02 Ina has joined #sweo 15:58:09 zakim, code? 15:58:09 the conference code is 7936 (tel:+1.617.761.6200), LeeF 15:58:10 hi Leef 15:58:14 thanks, z. 15:58:26 wing has joined #sweo 15:58:54 SW_SWEO()11:00AM has now started 15:58:59 Susie has joined #sweo 15:59:01 + +1.925.842.aaaa 15:59:19 +[IBMCambridge] 15:59:20 zakim, dial ivan-617 15:59:20 ok, ivan; the call is being made 15:59:21 +Ivan 15:59:38 zakim, IBMCambridge holds LeeF and wing 15:59:38 +LeeF, wing; got it 15:59:50 paulmiller has joined #sweo 15:59:51 + +1.781.273.aabb 15:59:54 zakim, aaaa is frank 15:59:54 +frank; got it 15:59:55 +??P11 15:59:58 kidehen 16:00:00 uldis has joined #sweo 16:00:01 +??P15 16:00:12 zakim, ??P11 susie 16:00:12 I don't understand '??P11 susie', ivan 16:00:18 kidehen 16:00:23 zakim, ??P11 is susie 16:00:23 +susie; got it 16:00:33 zakim ??P15 is kingsley 16:00:34 +??P18 16:00:40 kingsley is kidehen 16:00:45 zakim, ??P15 is kingsley 16:00:47 +kingsley; got it 16:00:53 Hi folks. I'll be joining from Skype dial-in. It proved patchy quality yesterday, here's hoping for today. 16:01:06 781 is kidehen/kingsley 16:01:10 could be me 16:01:19 zakim, ??P15 is uldis 16:01:19 I already had ??P15 as kingsley, ivan 16:01:35 zakim, who do you see? 16:01:37 I don't understand your question, kjetilk. 16:01:40 +??P26 16:01:43 Frank has joined #SWEO 16:02:02 martind has joined #SWEO 16:02:12 +??P24 16:02:18 ina joined 16:02:23 zakim, ??P26 is ina 16:02:23 +ina; got it 16:02:26 how do I get Zakim to say which aren't identified? 16:02:32 zakim, ??P24 is martin 16:02:38 +martin; got it 16:02:48 thanks for giving me id ;-) 16:02:50 zakim, who's on the phone? 16:02:51 ScribeNick: uldis 16:03:00 On the phone I see frank, [IBMCambridge], Ivan, +1.781.273.aabb, susie, kingsley, ??P18, ina, martin 16:03:02 [IBMCambridge] has LeeF, wing 16:03:08 +Ian_Davis 16:03:23 zakim, Ian_Davis is paulmiller 16:03:32 +paulmiller; got it 16:04:25 zakim, ??P18 uldis 16:04:26 I don't understand '??P18 uldis', ivan 16:04:37 zakim, ??P18 is uldis 16:04:37 +uldis; got it 16:04:40 +Orri 16:05:24 davidr has joined #sweo 16:05:33 start off with ivan providing an overview of IRC 16:05:49 review actions items & discuss progress re. questionairs 16:05:59 talk re. web developers to contact 16:06:10 discuss how we should be targeting them 16:06:22 finish w. progress on resource gathering 16:06:59 http://www.w3.org/mid/457FCFDB.6080003@w3.org 16:07:22 q+ 16:07:41 q? 16:07:46 ack q 16:07:50 most important IRC command: queue mgmnt 16:07:55 ack ivan 16:08:10 +Karen 16:08:20 +??P2 16:08:32 zakim, ??P2 is dave 16:08:32 +dave; got it 16:09:30 wiki page for this conference call: 16:09:31 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/Meetings/2006-12-13_Conference_Call 16:10:10 ivan tells about the scribe script 16:10:53 please avoid using channel for parallel conversation because that clutters up the log 16:12:11 zakim, who is speaking 16:12:11 I don't understand 'who is speaking', ivan 16:12:14 +[IPcaller] 16:12:30 zakim, IPcaller is kjetilk 16:12:30 +kjetilk; got it 16:12:32 Zakim: IPcaller is KjetilK 16:13:16 who is introducing himself now? 16:13:19 kjetilk? 16:13:22 yup 16:13:45 works at Opera, getting interested in SemWeb 16:13:55 also interested in outread and education 16:13:58 just joined the group 16:14:41 paul walsh also first time on the call 16:14:48 --- 16:14:50 Topic: Action items 16:15:25 Susie: may be a little early for [some of] these action items 16:16:03 working with Karen on questionaire 16:16:53 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CoreMessaging/Questionnaire 16:17:40 this is the latest version of the questionaire 16:18:17 decided to use a W3C web tool to do the questionaire 16:18:43 PaulW has joined #sweo 16:18:48 questions are in 4 main areas: 16:18:53 - general awareness 16:19:08 - implementations [that people may have done] 16:19:55 q+ 16:19:59 also: How do customers perceive your usage of Semantic Web technologies? (open dialogue) 16:20:45 q+ 16:20:50 - influencers [who makes decisions, ...] 16:21:34 - personal 16:21:42 danbri has joined #sweo 16:21:43 should take 10 minutes to fill it out 16:21:57 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CoreMessaging/Questionnaire 16:22:05 have prepared a cover letter to go with the questionaire 16:22:32 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CoreMessaging/Cover_Letter 16:22:47 please provide feedback by the end of the week 16:22:47 q? 16:22:54 q? 16:23:02 ack martind 16:23:38 q- 16:23:42 q+ to express fear that the survey might be too long 16:23:59 +??P8 16:24:04 martin: would be useful to compare familiarity with semweb with other technologies like WWW, web 2.0, ... 16:24:08 ??P8 is danbri 16:24:14 zakim, ??P8 is danbri 16:24:14 +danbri; got it 16:24:23 q? 16:24:59 is it karen? 16:25:03 yes 16:25:04 yes 16:25:05 yes 16:25:14 karen: a good question. 16:25:35 it'd help us to better understand why people are using other technologies and which 16:25:36 ack LeeF 16:25:38 LeeF, you wanted to express fear that the survey might be too long 16:25:42 danbri has changed the topic to: sweo 13dec agenda: http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/Meetings/2006-12-13_Conference_Call 16:25:54 lee: a bit surprised by length of q. 16:25:54 q+ 16:26:04 thinks it would take significantly longer than 10 minutes 16:26:13 especially the open dialogues 16:26:38 not convinced it is bad to have it longer 16:27:35 ack martind 16:27:48 Karen will check with Ian about the web questionaire and if we can test how long it takes to fill in 16:28:09 martind suggested a wiki page "semantic web me" (?) 16:28:22 myths... 16:28:36 +2 16:28:43 kidehen: convinced we should not do this - lead people on questioning path about the myths 16:28:57 that was Lee 16:28:58 s/kidehen/Lee/ 16:29:05 oh, sorry. thanks 16:29:05 :-) 16:29:41 Susie: action items re. questionaire 16:29:46 q+ 16:29:55 add question re technologies - incorporate it in 16:30:01 action: susie & karen to finalize the questions 16:30:09 action: ivan to create the wbs form 16:30:24 action: karen to see with ian wether a test can be set up 16:30:48 to finalise the questionaire by end of tomorrow (ivan and karen) 16:30:54 ack ivan 16:32:13 deadline for feedback on q. - end of tomorrow 16:32:32 ivan needs to set up dates of start and end of questionaire 16:32:39 what are these dates? 16:33:24 in f2f was an action item when do we want to have input - end of january? 16:33:49 19th of jan 16:33:56 end date for q. 16:34:57 action karen & susie to test the questionnaire by the 19th 16:35:11 action: karen & susie to test the questionnaire by the 19th 16:35:18 topic: use case identification 16:35:54 danbri is here for the first time 16:36:04 does self-introduction 16:36:07 danbri: Hi... :-) 16:36:25 drawn in RDF world in 1997 16:37:17 mentions outreach in swad-et-shirts :) 16:37:37 was chairing semweb ig 16:37:57 best thing we ever did, was make those tshirts! 16:38:06 +100 :) 16:38:07 uldis: *is* chairing... 16:38:14 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Use_Cases?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=DSC00202.JPG 16:38:19 paulmiller: thanx 16:38:24 topic: Use cases 16:38:53 in f2f decided to focus use cases: 16:39:02 - in industries (one dimention) 16:39:13 - government (another dimension) 16:39:26 s/dimention/dimension/ 16:39:36 target messaging to particular roles in organisation 16:39:57 3 dimentions: industries, job function, technology usage 16:40:49 q? 16:40:56 think where inside of that "cube" (see photo) you'd be 16:41:05 kidehen: is there wiki space for it? 16:41:20 Use case Web site: http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Use_Cases 16:41:54 q+ 16:42:22 Susie posted background info and picture on the wiki 16:42:25 ack ivan 16:42:51 ivan: we should be careful to come up with real-world use cases 16:43:03 and not use cases we as techies like 16:43:13 q+ 16:43:25 need to look at them from the industry (e.g. oil) point of view 16:43:32 and come up with _real_ use cases 16:43:46 involving industry experts 16:44:28 ack Frank 16:44:29 Susie: need to targe at the right level 16:44:38 Frank: need to clarify use cases 16:44:40 kidehen: I have updated the heading in the Wiki 16:44:51 susie: note 16:44:54 ivan refers to business use cases 16:45:10 Frank is in energy sector and interested to develop these 16:45:32 paulmiller has joined #sweo 16:45:44 ivan gave a connection in Norway and Frank will develop some use cases 16:45:51 q+ karen 16:46:05 Not sure what happened there... all the other channels I'm on stayed connected... 16:46:18 Susie: could you give a date when we have some use cases? 16:46:20 (there is a former Asemantics guy in Norway doing RDF+oil work btw... David Norheim. Is that the connection?) 16:46:21 17th of jan 16:46:25 ack karen 16:46:43 deadline for [first?] use cases 16:46:55 Karen: make the cube an interactive tool 16:47:10 to allow you to choose slices to, e.g., look at use cases from CTO perspective 16:47:30 that would be a good way to present this info [in future] 16:47:53 LeeF: in Second Life :) 16:48:09 uldis, ooooooooooooo =) 16:48:11 q? 16:48:13 (y) 16:48:18 ivan: they do exist, i think 16:48:25 topic: web developer community 16:48:42 review list of influential web developers 16:48:49 ivan put up a secure wiki 16:48:59 we have a list 16:49:06 few people don't have email addresses 16:49:12 please add if you know their addresses 16:49:25 also add if you have personal contact with them 16:49:27 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/InfluentialPeople 16:49:34 (drankBeerWith? :) 16:50:01 This conference is scheduled to end in 10 minutes; 10 ports must be freed 16:50:29 Susie: not sure if web dev. community will respond as well to the web questionaire 16:50:43 q? 16:50:58 q+ 16:51:05 maybe someone has thoughts on that 16:51:13 Susie: maybe send a questionaire first 16:51:15 q+ 16:51:21 ack uldis 16:52:15 q+ 16:52:16 uldis: security concerns about the members-only wiki pages 16:52:46 PaulW: who is original questionaire targeted towards? 16:52:57 q- 16:53:02 Susie: to commercial organisations and vendors (software companies) 16:53:15 then decided to extend it to people who were not using SW already 16:54:21 q+ 16:54:23 5 min remaining 16:54:35 could someone scribe this question 16:54:39 did not catch it 16:54:55 PaulW: can reach out to people in UK 16:55:02 This conference is scheduled to end in 5 minutes; 10 ports must be freed 16:55:23 PaulW: addressing the developers is important 16:55:32 q+ karen 16:55:36 ack PaulW 16:55:46 ack PaulW 16:56:00 Susie: we could identify w3c members but not clear how it will scale 16:56:30 how to reach out to people not familiar with SW 16:56:42 may be mistake to assume they know what is SW 16:57:01 we should be targetting the "long tail" 16:57:09 should we have a press release? 16:57:15 that there is SWEO initiative 16:57:42 Susie: could PaulW collect ideas how to reach out to different people and present during next call(s) 16:58:01 PaulW: happy to help you on that. 16:58:02 This conference is scheduled to end in 2 minutes; 10 ports must be freed 16:58:44 q? 16:58:49 cheers Paul 16:58:55 ack kjetilk 16:59:02 This conference is scheduled to end in 1 minute; 10 ports must be freed 16:59:22 kjetilk: don't think we should target the long tail 16:59:41 target people who [sound quality too low, did not catch] 16:59:45 q+ 16:59:49 PaulW: no prob. 16:59:56 kjetilk: target the people writing the code 17:00:01 This conference is scheduled to end now; 10 ports must be freed immediately 17:00:04 have running code which will impress a lot more people 17:00:07 The time reserved for this conference has been exceeded. 10 ports must be freed 17:00:27 kjetilk: write in IRC if scribe missed something 17:00:34 ack karen 17:00:48 +1 17:00:51 uldis: it's fine :-) 17:00:51 karen: q. was not targeted for dev. community 17:01:01 I second Karen's comment 17:01:04 does not suggest to send it to dev. community 17:01:11 need different set of questions 17:01:16 use different approach 17:01:18 --- 17:01:22 wrapping up the call 17:01:29 did not have time for resource gathering progress 17:01:35 action for next call 17:02:01 -kjetilk 17:02:01 Frank has left #SWEO 17:02:03 -susie 17:02:09 -Karen 17:02:11 -kingsley 17:02:12 wing has left #sweo 17:02:13 -Orri 17:02:17 - +1.781.273.aabb 17:02:19 -frank 17:02:20 bye all 17:02:21 -paulmiller 17:02:21 zakim, bye 17:02:23 -dave 17:02:23 PaulW has left #sweo 17:02:27 -[IBMCambridge] 17:02:29 -danbri 17:02:31 -Ivan 17:02:33 -uldis 17:02:37 -martin 17:02:41 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:02:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-sweo-minutes.html ivan 17:02:47 paulmiller has left #sweo 17:02:49 martind has left #SWEO 17:02:59 leaving. As of this point the attendees were +1.925.842.aaaa, Ivan, LeeF, wing, +1.781.273.aabb, frank, susie, kingsley, ina, martin, paulmiller, uldis, Orri, Karen, dave, 17:03:02 Zakim has left #sweo 17:03:04 ... kjetilk, danbri 17:03:11 ...pasquale 17:04:10 was nice to hear everyone again 17:04:20 uldis has left #sweo 17:04:33 hi all, bye 17:05:23 bye! 17:05:28 kjetilk has left #SWEO 17:11:20 davidr has left #sweo 17:23:34 kidehen has left #sweo