14:51:35 RRSAgent has joined #er 14:51:36 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-er-irc 14:51:41 Zakim has joined #er 14:51:47 zakim, this will be ert 14:51:47 ok, shadi; I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 14:51:53 meeting: ERT WG 14:51:58 chair: Shadi 14:52:30 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0051.html 14:52:44 regrets: Shane, Daniela 14:52:55 agenda+ publishing HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 14:53:11 agenda+ addressing warnings in EARL 14:53:21 agenda+ pick up on new listed issues 14:53:35 agenda+ date for upcoming face-to-face 14:53:46 agenda+ winter break meeting schedule 14:56:49 ChrisR has joined #er 14:57:51 CarlosI has joined #er 15:00:14 WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has now started 15:00:17 +Shadi 15:00:48 JohannesK has joined #er 15:00:55 +berrueta 15:01:15 davidr has joined #er 15:01:35 +Klaus/Johannes/Thomas 15:01:37 +??P8 15:01:55 zakim, ??p8 is really David 15:01:55 +David; got it 15:02:13 zakim, berrueta is really CarlosI 15:02:13 +CarlosI; got it 15:02:19 zakim, klaus is really Johannes 15:02:19 +Johannes; got it 15:02:28 regrets: Shane, Daniela, Shane 15:02:34 regrets: Shane, Daniela, Charles 15:03:37 scribe: Johannes 15:03:43 scribenick: JohannesK 15:04:15 agenda? 15:04:54 zakim, take up agendum 1 15:04:54 agendum 1. "publishing HTTP Vocabulary in RDF" taken up [from shadi] 15:05:12 zakim, mute me 15:05:13 Shadi should now be muted 15:05:44 SAZ: let's postpone agenda item 2 (addressing warnings in EARL) 15:06:04 zakim, unmute me 15:06:04 Shadi should no longer be muted 15:06:36 SAZ: thanks for the response 15:07:19 RESOLUTION: publish 'HTTP vocabulary in RDF' as WD 15:07:21 +??P0 15:07:47 zakim, ??p0 is really Chris 15:07:47 +Chris; got it 15:07:52 JibberJim has joined #er 15:08:15 zakim, close agendum 1 15:08:15 agendum 1, publishing HTTP Vocabulary in RDF, closed 15:08:16 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:08:18 2. addressing warnings in EARL [from shadi] 15:08:23 zakim, take up agendum 3 15:08:23 agendum 3. "pick up on new listed issues" taken up [from shadi] 15:09:11 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues 15:09:47 SAZ: stability of foaf:Organization 15:10:02 zakim, mute me 15:10:02 Shadi should now be muted 15:10:39 CI: I'm in favour, incubator group think it's stable enough 15:10:48 zakim, unmute me 15:10:48 Shadi should no longer be muted 15:11:18 SAZ: any opposing ideas or concerns? 15:13:31 SAZ: adopt foaf:Organization to be used as an earl:SingleAssertor (recommended like foaf:Person) 15:14:08 RESOLUTION: adopt foaf:Organization to be used as an earl:SingleAssertor (recommended like foaf:Person) 15:14:34 SAZ: renaming of earl:validity 15:14:45 +??P1 15:14:59 zakim, ??p1 is really Jim 15:14:59 +Jim; got it 15:15:35 SAZ: was comment by Phil Archer 15:15:44 SAZ: could be earl:outcome instead 15:15:51 SAZ: any comments? 15:17:09 CI: Phil's comments make sense, validation is only one type of test; not sure about earl:outcome 15:18:37 ACTION: david to find a nice alternative for validity 15:19:25 s/nice alternative/couple of nice alternatives/ 15:19:46 SAZ: consider stand-alone pointer vocabulary 15:20:19 SAZ: create WG note from that 15:21:15 SAZ: Jim, would you like to? 15:21:27 Jim: yes 15:22:24 ACTION: Jim to create a WG note about pointer vocabulary 15:22:34 SAZ: consider WCL "groups of resources" 15:23:34 SAZ: was comment by Phil Archer 15:24:10 SAZ: web content labelling incubator group is planning to work on this 15:24:27 SAZ: it may take a while 15:26:53 Jim: let's wait and see 15:28:02 Jim: but publish before that 15:28:40 SAZ: this seems to be the only open issue for the next WD 15:29:19 RESOLUTION: we will not hold EARL publication, but will monitor development in WCL 15:30:00 ACTION: SAZ to update issues list 15:30:24 SAZ: everyone have a look at issues list 15:30:30 zakim, close agendum 3 15:30:30 agendum 3, pick up on new listed issues, closed 15:30:32 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:30:34 2. addressing warnings in EARL [from shadi] 15:30:38 zakim, take up agendum 4 15:30:38 agendum 4. "date for upcoming face-to-face" taken up [from shadi] 15:31:35 SAZ: Charles does not recommend Oslo because of low temperature 15:32:35 European W3C Symposium on eGovernment: http://www.w3c.es/Eventos/2007/eGov/ 15:32:42 SAZ: there's a symposion in Gijon at Feb 01/02 2007 15:33:36 CI: beer is cheaper in Spain 15:35:59 SAZ: sometime within Feb 19-23? 15:36:26 SAZ: we'll probably have a Last Call by then 15:37:10 SAZ: have a new editors' draft of schema document in January, then publish a WDLC 15:38:45 SAZ: Carlos, how to fly to Gijon? 15:39:01 CI: via Madrid or Barcelona 15:39:44 CI: I could provide some logistics information 15:40:42 SAZ: proposal Feb 22/23 2007 at CTIC in Gijon 15:41:17 zakim, close agendum 4 15:41:17 agendum 4, date for upcoming face-to-face, closed 15:41:18 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:41:19 zakim, take up agendum 5 15:41:19 2. addressing warnings in EARL [from shadi] 15:41:20 agendum 5. "winter break meeting schedule" taken up [from shadi] 15:42:11 SAZ: last call this year next week, Dec 20? 15:42:45 SAZ: first in 2007 will be Jan 17 15:43:23 SAZ: anybody wants to meet at Dec 27? 15:43:27 David: no 15:44:14 Jim: short time between first call in 2007 and F2F (one month) 15:44:50 In case you want to start looking for flights The closer airport is the Asturias Airport (IATA code: OVD), placed at 15 Km. from Avilés, 38 Km. from Gijón. 15:45:38 zakim, close agendum 5 15:45:38 agendum 5, winter break meeting schedule, closed 15:45:39 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:45:40 2. addressing warnings in EARL [from shadi] 15:45:41 zakim, take up agendum 2 15:45:41 agendum 2. "addressing warnings in EARL" taken up [from shadi] 15:46:22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0003 15:46:30 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0049 15:47:20 SAZ: first option is not to have warning at all 15:47:41 SAZ: second option is to have a Literal warning property 15:47:57 SAZ: third option is to have more complex warnings 15:50:22 JK: second option is to have warning properties together with a PASS test result? 15:50:29 SAZ: yes 15:51:10 SAZ: warning property of TestResult 15:53:08 CI: there won't be instances in second option 15:57:04 JK: no need for a complex even for CSS validator warnings 15:57:23 JK: TestResult with validity PASS, instance, and warning property 15:58:14 SAZ: is a warning a property of the test result or of the test case? 15:59:33 -Chris 15:59:35 ChrisR has left #er 16:02:03 CI: should be in test result, not in test case description 16:07:31 SAZ: send your opinions about warnings to the list 16:07:42 SAZ: we should close this next week 16:07:43 -David 16:07:44 davidr has left #er 16:07:46 -Jim 16:07:48 -Johannes 16:07:52 -Shadi 16:07:53 -CarlosI 16:07:56 WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has ended 16:07:59 Attendees were Shadi, Klaus/Johannes/Thomas, David, CarlosI, Johannes, Chris, Jim 16:11:07 Zakim, bye 16:11:07 Zakim has left #er 16:11:16 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:11:21 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:11:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-er-minutes.html shadi 16:11:26 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:11:31 RRSAgent, bye 16:11:31 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-er-actions.rdf : 16:11:31 ACTION: david to find a nice alternative for validity [1] 16:11:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-er-irc#T15-18-37 16:11:31 ACTION: Jim to create a WG note about pointer vocabulary [2] 16:11:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-er-irc#T15-22-24 16:11:31 ACTION: SAZ to update issues list [3] 16:11:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-er-irc#T15-30-00