15:57:55 RRSAgent has joined #grddl-wg 15:57:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/12/06-grddl-wg-irc 15:58:17 DanC has changed the topic to: GRDDL WG 6 Dec http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda 15:58:20 Zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda 15:58:20 working on it, DanC 15:58:21 agenda+ Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-12-06T11:00-0500 15:58:22 agendum 1 added 15:58:23 agenda+ Test cases for GRDDL with XML documents 15:58:25 agendum 2 added 15:58:26 agenda+ [#issue-output-formats] [DONE?] whether GRDDL transformations may produce RDF in a format other than RDF/XML 15:58:29 agendum 3 added 15:58:30 agenda+ GRDDL and (non-XML) HTML 15:58:31 agendum 4 added 15:58:33 agenda+ Cross-document Introduction 15:58:34 agendum 5 added 15:58:35 agenda+ [#issue-mt-ns] 15:58:36 agendum 6 added 15:58:38 agenda+ [#issue-base-param] 15:58:40 agendum 7 added 15:58:42 agenda+ Primer Document 15:58:44 agendum 8 added 15:58:46 agenda+ GRDDL Spec: General issues 15:58:48 agendum 9 added 15:58:50 done reading agenda, DanC 15:59:04 FabienG has joined #grddl-wg 16:00:28 bwm has joined #grddl-wg 16:01:06 SW_GRDDL()11:00AM has now started 16:01:08 +DanC 16:01:25 +[Sophia] 16:01:29 -[Sophia] 16:01:31 +[Sophia] 16:01:38 Zakim, take up item 1 16:01:41 zakim, [Sophia] is FabienG 16:01:45 agendum 1. "Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-12-06T11:00-0500" taken up 16:01:49 +FabienG; got it 16:01:50 +??P17 16:01:59 Zakim, ??p17 16:01:59 I don't understand '??p17', bwm 16:02:03 Zakim, ??p17 is bwm 16:02:03 +bwm; got it 16:02:16 Regrets: Chime, danja 16:03:12 Zakim, take up item 4 16:03:12 agendum 4. "GRDDL and (non-XML) HTML" taken up 16:03:48 + +1.919.457.aaaa 16:04:22 Zakim, aaaa is HarryH 16:04:22 +HarryH; got it 16:07:19 ACTION: Fabien to add a sentence about non-XML HTML in the Use Case document [DONE] 16:07:40 DanC: I'd like to actually have a tidy use case, with caveats 16:07:56 ACTION: Fabien to add a tidy/tag-soup use case/paragraph, with caveats 16:09:19 FG: how to say it? 16:09:29 DanC: we don't have to write a formal spec; just a story... 16:09:49 ... one guy forgot a / in his
; it worked; for another guy, it didn't work 16:10:02 Zakim, who's on the phone? 16:10:02 On the phone I see DanC, FabienG, bwm, HarryH 16:10:19 Regrets: Chime, danja, Murray 16:10:45 Zakim, take up item 1 16:10:45 agendum 1. "Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-12-06T11:00-0500" taken up 16:11:05 RESOLVED: to approve minutes 22 Nov http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Nov/att-0096/22-grddl-wg-minutes.html 16:11:22 DanC: regrets 13 Dec due to TAG meeting 16:12:00 RESOLVED: to meet again 13 Dec; Brian M to scribe 16:12:15 Zakim, close item 1 16:12:15 agendum 1, Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-12-06T11:00-0500, closed 16:12:16 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:12:17 2. Test cases for GRDDL with XML documents 16:12:20 Zakim, next item 16:12:20 agendum 2. "Test cases for GRDDL with XML documents" taken up 16:12:49 ACTION Chime: to verify http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1#projectsSpreadsheet 16:12:51 -- done 16:12:54 DanC: see http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2006-11-30.html#T03-25-10 16:15:07 DanC: I suggest discussion of title_author isn't done 16:15:13 Zakim, next agendum 16:15:13 agendum 3. "[#issue-output-formats] [DONE?] whether GRDDL transformations may produce RDF in a format other than RDF/XML" taken up 16:15:48 Zakim, take up item 2 16:15:48 agendum 2. "Test cases for GRDDL with XML documents" taken up 16:16:55 PROPOSED: to approve http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1#rdfa1 (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/rdf_sem.html http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/rdf_sem-output.rdf ) 16:17:43 lack of critical mass. 16:18:09 ACTION bwm: review testlist1#rdfa1 16:18:50 Chime http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Dec/0005.html 16:19:34 iand has joined #grddl-wg 16:19:54 ACTION HH: respond to Chime, clarifying song/album and discussing bNode vs URI 16:20:03 q+ to ask aboout a teste case with SAWSDL 16:20:07 ack FabienG 16:20:07 FabienG, you wanted to ask aboout a teste case with SAWSDL 16:21:17 DanC: a SAWSDL test case sounds great; then we can look at whether it merits screenspace as a use case 16:21:25 HH: status of SAWSDL? 16:21:28 FG: last call WD 16:21:32 ... since 28 Sep 16:21:56 ACTION FG: make a SAWSDL test sketch 16:22:21 Zakim, next item 16:22:21 agendum 3. "[#issue-output-formats] [DONE?] whether GRDDL transformations may produce RDF in a format other than RDF/XML" taken up 16:22:59 danc: there is an atomOwl testcase 16:23:14 ... it requires taking text and inferring its n3 16:23:20 ... would be cleaner to use a mime type 16:23:23 ... but there isn't one 16:23:39 ... tim is encouraging us to use the mime type on the assumption it will be registered 16:23:50 ... that may be a good idea 16:23:56 ... not sure we can approve the test case 16:24:07 ... issue of whether the xslt case is suffciently well specified 16:25:41 brian: what about other scripting languages 16:26:32 +Ian_Davis 16:27:07 FabienG is excused 16:27:09 ... we could output a wrapper 16:27:15 danc: that doesn't help with the motivating use cases 16:27:17 -FabienG 16:27:19 brian: ok 16:36:54 PROPOSED: to resolve issue-output-formats by (1) adding formal rules to cover the case of of the XSLT 1.0 and RDF/XML (2) to allow other output formats as exemplified by the Atom/turtle test case 16:41:05 RESOLVED. 16:42:14 ACTION DanC: add N3/turtle mime type to Atom/turtle test case. 16:42:41 ... noting the unregistered status 16:43:43 Ian: anybody know of N3 registration status? 16:43:57 DanC: it's been discussed recently in a W3C/IETF telcon; tim sorta has the ball 16:44:02 HH: we could push that in the CG 16:44:19 ACTION HH: poke semweb cg re N3 media type registration 16:44:22 Zakim, next item 16:44:22 agendum 4. "GRDDL and (non-XML) HTML" taken up 16:44:33 Zakim, close item 4 16:44:33 agendum 4, GRDDL and (non-XML) HTML, closed 16:44:34 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:44:35 5. Cross-document Introduction 16:44:35 Zakim, next item 16:44:35 agendum 5. "Cross-document Introduction" taken up 16:44:51 ACTION: bwm to have a closer look at the Stephen King Example in the spec. [DONE] 16:45:15 HH: Happy with the new MusicBrainz example? 16:45:52 BWM: Hendrix the person vs the experience? 16:45:58 DanC: it's a group with 3 people 16:48:07 ACTION: Danja to suggest wording changes in light of recent comment on cross-document introduction 16:48:09 -- withdrawn 16:48:20 ACTION Ian: reconsider comments on cross-document introduction 16:48:25 Zakim, next item 16:48:25 agendum 6. "[#issue-mt-ns]" taken up 16:48:33 ACTION: Murray to write up the pros and cons of different approaches: [DONE] 16:48:40 ... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Nov/0127.html 16:52:30 ACTION HH: integrate Murray's XInclude test case sketch into the test collection 16:53:15 BWM: imagine d.xml -> t.xslt ; t.xslt produes { a b c. d e f. } regardless of input... 16:53:30 ... is { a b c } a grddl result? 16:53:45 DanC: no, not per current editor's draft 16:54:30 Zakim, next item 16:54:30 agendum 7. "[#issue-base-param]" taken up 16:55:43 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Nov/0137.html Issue-base-param: do we need the parameter? McBride, Brian (Thursday, 30 November) 16:55:48 BWM: is this approach OK? 16:55:52 HH: sounds good 16:56:08 ACTION BWM: produce ~3 test cases for #issue-base-param 16:56:13 Zakim, next item 16:56:14 agendum 8. "Primer Document" taken up 16:56:46 ACTION: Harry and Brian to rewrite second part of primer to use Brian and Dan's instance data. [CONTINUES] 16:56:55 HH: I have done all but check the stuff in 16:57:03 HH: I need to double-check the SPARQL queries 16:57:40 DanC: I've thought about taking the primer examples and putting them in the test suite... 16:57:50 ACTION IanD: integrate primer examples into test suite 16:58:13 Zakim, next item 16:58:13 agendum 9. "GRDDL Spec: General issues" taken up 16:59:00 -HarryH 16:59:40 ACTION: DanC to create a "normative only" view of the GRDDL spec. 16:59:43 -- done 16:59:48 see http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec_lean 17:00:09 ACTION: DanC to add a sample implementation appendix to the GRDDL spec. 17:00:26 http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#implExp 17:04:01 DanC: RDFa timing is tricky 17:04:22 ... http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-html-nsdoc is new 17:05:17 ACTION DanC: write rules about XSLT 1.0 processing context 17:05:45 Zakim, who's on the phone? 17:05:45 On the phone I see DanC, bwm, Ian_Davis 17:06:14 Topic: Schedule Pondering 17:09:16 IanD: a month slip is comfortable-ish, but let's not slip into "spring" 17:10:19 Brian: GRDDL is important, so I can probably stick around for a while... 17:10:28 ... yeah... sending some "done" signal at WWW2007 in May 17:13:51 -bwm 17:13:52 -DanC 17:13:54 -Ian_Davis 17:13:56 SW_GRDDL()11:00AM has ended 17:13:57 Attendees were DanC, FabienG, bwm, +1.919.457.aaaa, HarryH, Ian_Davis 17:14:35 DanC: [post-script-ish] so last call in Dec/Jan, and PR before May sounds about right. 17:14:50 ... if the 1st last call wins, we could even get REC before May. 19:31:53 Zakim has left #grddl-wg