13:11:24 RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf 13:11:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-tsdtf-irc 13:11:32 Zakim has joined #tsdtf 13:11:44 zakim, this will be tsdtf 13:11:44 ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 19 minutes 13:11:51 meeting: TSD TF 13:12:03 chair: CarlosV, Christophe 13:12:30 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Dec/0002.html 13:12:48 agenda+ Linking location and techniques in TCDL 2.0 13:13:03 agenda+ Final review of evaluation process 13:13:16 agenda+ Templates for TCDL metadata 13:13:28 agenda+ Uploading of test cases 13:15:33 scribe: Michael 13:16:28 Aihal has joined #tsdtf 13:22:51 Vangelis has joined #tsdtf 13:26:07 ChrisR has joined #tsdtf 13:30:16 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started 13:30:17 +Shadi 13:30:44 +Cooper 13:31:00 Christophe has joined #tsdtf 13:31:18 CarlosI has joined #tsdtf 13:31:44 +??P0 13:32:05 zakim, ??P0 is Christophe_Strobbe 13:32:05 +Christophe_Strobbe; got it 13:32:05 zakim, ? is really Christophe 13:32:06 sorry, shadi, I do not recognize a party named '?' 13:32:09 +Vangelis_Karkaletsis 13:32:19 scribe: Michael_Cooper 13:32:22 scribe_nick: Aihal 13:32:23 scribeNick: Aihal 13:32:32 +[IPcaller] 13:32:48 zakim, ipcaller is really Chris 13:32:48 +Chris; got it 13:33:02 +berrueta 13:33:35 CarlosV has joined #tsdtf 13:34:15 -Chris 13:34:18 agenda? 13:34:24 +??P4 13:34:38 zakim, ? is really CarlosV 13:34:38 +CarlosV; got it 13:34:40 +[IPcaller] 13:34:48 zakim, ipcaller is really Chris 13:34:48 +Chris; got it 13:35:08 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:35:08 On the phone I see Shadi, Cooper, Christophe_Strobbe, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, berrueta, CarlosV, Chris 13:36:00 regrets: Daniela 13:36:41 zakim, take up item 1 13:36:41 agendum 1. "Linking location and techniques in TCDL 2.0" taken up [from shadi] 13:37:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Nov/0044.html 13:37:59 cv: concerns expressed about mapping locations and techniques 13:38:06 ... proposal from Christophe 13:38:12 cs: prefer option A 13:38:40 ... most robust, minimal duplication 13:39:21 saz: question on A - is techref IDREF? 13:39:28 cs: is IDREFS 13:40:44 ... would like to be able to use space-separated refs 13:40:56 saz: was only one not liking it on list 13:41:18 -Chris 13:42:11 cv: problem with non-valid ID attribute on techinque 13:42:21 cs: schema updated, technique has ID 13:43:07 cv: Option A most error-prone, but cleaner 13:43:57 mc: validating processor can ensure avoidance of errors 13:45:14 cv: discussed with CS; scendario with techniques / locations wouldn't be caught 13:45:21 ... by validating processor 13:47:00 vk: A more processor-friendly; B more user-friendly; can live with A 13:47:17 cr: prefer A or B to C 13:49:19 ??1: agree with analysis; no preference between A & B, lean towards B, don't like C 13:49:46 s/??1/ci 13:50:12 saz: point of being more machine testable compelling 13:50:31 ... should be able to extract IDs out of WCAG source XML 13:50:43 ... may be able to do a bunch of stuff with that 13:51:18 ci: can live iwth A 13:51:27 s/iwth/with 13:51:50 chris, can you live with option A? 13:52:12 mc: prefer A 13:52:42 cr: can live with A 13:53:18 RESOLUTION: accept model A from Christophe's proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Nov/0044.html 13:53:32 zakim, next item 13:53:32 agendum 2. "Final review of evaluation process" taken up [from shadi] 13:54:06 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/process 13:54:11 saz: no feedback received 13:54:20 cv: were some issues raised last week 13:54:52 cs: Shadi clarified some issues on list 13:54:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Nov/0046.html 13:55:44 saz: 13:56:27 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2005/tools 13:57:46 cv: concern about how people contribute to lists 13:57:51 cs: suggest wiki 13:58:13 saz: wiki is available if we want 13:58:27 ... could also use CVS to edit a common document 13:59:07 mc: wiki easier for multiple contributions 13:59:23 saz: not concerned about concurrency but want it to be easy for people to track 13:59:30 + +1.202.789.aaaa 13:59:43 zakim, +1.202 is Tim_Boland 13:59:43 +Tim_Boland; got it 14:01:31 cv: where would wiki be hosted? 14:01:46 saz: service from W3C, need to explore details 14:02:24 zakim, mute Tim 14:02:24 Tim_Boland should now be muted 14:03:02 cs: weren't there ease of use issues with W3C wiki? 14:04:11 mc: some of the issues may be resolved because it's now supported, but not familiar with the specific software 14:05:30 action: Shadi to explore wiki option 14:07:25 saz: question about reviews at steps 2 and 3 14:08:07 cv: perhaps steps are same 14:08:22 saz: might do things asynchronously, better not to combine 14:08:47 cv: prefer same person to do the steps 14:09:05 saz: we could prefer same user, but not combine 14:09:55 cv: need way to store results 14:10:04 saz: results need to be publicly visible; wiki option 14:10:20 ... WBS form can be publicly viewable, but it doesn't keep history like wiki does 14:11:38 ... 14:11:51 ... appropriate for straw poll (step 4) but recording evaluation results better in wiki 14:11:54 cs: agree 14:13:59 ci: discussed bug-tracking system earlier 14:14:32 ... but not user-friendly 14:14:40 saz: Bugzilla is an option 14:15:06 ci: could store history and store who's working on what, more consistenly than wiki 14:15:41 ci: use instead of Bugzilla 14:15:53 JIRA: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/ 14:15:58 s//JIRA 14:16:40 saz: wouldn't be supported by W3C systems team, so we'd be on our own 14:17:42 ci: if Bugzlilla supported by W3C, why WCAG use external? 14:17:54 mc: may not have been supported at time, and needed to customize 14:18:04 saz: issues with externally-hosted tools 14:18:16 ... prefer to go with internally-supported, low-rent tools 14:18:34 ci: can ask to support JIRA? 14:18:48 saz: asked a while ago, no plans to support anything else 14:19:09 ... there is effort to analyze WG needs, but won't be complete for a while 14:19:59 ci: prefer Bugzilla stil, but may be better to use just one tool e.g. wiki 14:20:28 ... issue tracking in bug tracker more flexible than wiki 14:20:36 s/stil/still 14:21:53 ... author can get automatic feedback from system about changes in status in bug tracker 14:23:49 saz: issue of who configures 14:27:17 mc: bug tracker still has its limitations 14:27:27 saz: will use WBS in step 4 anyway 14:27:44 ... we have discomfort either with configuring bug tracker, or sending emails to each author 14:28:28 s/ci: prefer/cv: prefer 14:28:54 cv: prefer bug tracker 14:30:07 ci: any bug tracker will have difficulties, but should choose what meets our needs, as simply as possible 14:30:22 ... that may be wiki 14:30:37 ... if that doesn't meet needs, than Bugzilla best next option 14:31:14 saz: hear support for bug tracking, but usability an issue 14:31:26 -Christophe_Strobbe 14:32:01 cv: JIRA runs in Tomcat 14:32:30 action: Carlos V to send question to list about software 14:32:48 KUL did not pay phone bills 14:32:50 saz: request people review his responses to see if other open questions 14:33:06 -Tim_Boland 14:33:08 -Vangelis_Karkaletsis 14:33:11 -Shadi 14:33:12 ChrisR has left #tsdtf 14:33:13 -CarlosV 14:33:17 -Cooper 14:33:20 -berrueta 14:33:21 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended 14:33:22 Attendees were Shadi, Cooper, Christophe_Strobbe, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, Chris, berrueta, CarlosV, +1.202.789.aaaa, Tim_Boland 14:33:33 zakim, bye 14:33:33 Zakim has left #tsdtf 14:33:42 rrsagent, make logs world 14:33:46 rrsagent, make minutes 14:33:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi 14:33:48 rrsagent, make logs world 14:33:52 rrsagent, bye 14:33:52 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-tsdtf-actions.rdf : 14:33:52 ACTION: Shadi to explore wiki option [1] 14:33:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-tsdtf-irc#T14-05-30 14:33:52 ACTION: Carlos V to send question to list about software [2] 14:33:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-tsdtf-irc#T14-32-30