15:28:28 RRSAgent has joined #ws-desc 15:28:28 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/11/30-ws-desc-irc 15:28:41 rrsagent, make logs public 15:28:46 ACTION: John Kaputin to create a test case with "required=false" 15:41:29 ACTION: Jonathan to allow different extensions per implementation. 15:49:22 ACTION: Jonathan Echo-2G into bad bucket. 15:49:54 -David_Illsley 15:49:56 -Canon 15:50:04 This conference is scheduled to end in 10 minutes; all ports must be freed 15:50:21 -Arthur_Ryman 15:50:27 -Jonathan_Marsh 15:50:29 -TonyR 15:50:30 WS_DescWG(WSDL)10:00AM has ended 15:50:31 Attendees were Arthur_Ryman, Jonathan_Marsh, TonyR, David_Illsley, Canon 15:52:00 zakim, this will be WSDWG 15:52:00 ok, TonyR; I see WS_DescWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 15:56:34 TomJ has joined #ws-desc 15:57:36 Allen has joined #ws-desc 15:58:46 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has now started 15:58:53 +??P15 15:59:00 zakim, ??p15 is me 15:59:01 +TonyR; got it 15:59:16 +??P20 15:59:21 pauld has joined #ws-desc 15:59:39 zakim, ??p20 is pauld 15:59:39 +pauld; got it 16:00:41 +Tom_Jordahl 16:02:07 +??P38 16:02:47 +Jonathan_Marsh 16:02:48 +Arthur_Ryman 16:02:55 Zakim, who's on the phone? 16:02:55 On the phone I see TonyR, pauld, Tom_Jordahl, ??P38, Arthur_Ryman, Jonathan_Marsh 16:03:00 Roberto has joined #ws-desc 16:03:19 zakim, ??P38 is Allen 16:03:19 +Allen; got it 16:03:20 JacekK has joined #ws-desc 16:03:43 +Roberto 16:04:04 +JacekK 16:04:25 +Asir_Vedamuthu 16:04:35 gpilz has joined #ws-desc 16:04:37 asir has joined #ws-desc 16:04:56 +[IPcaller] 16:05:13 +Gilbert_Pilz 16:07:05 Zakim, +[IPcaller] is charlton 16:07:05 sorry, Jonathan, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 16:07:15 Zakim, [IPcaller] is charlton 16:07:15 +charlton; got it 16:07:23 charlton has joined #ws-desc 16:07:40 zakim, who is on the call? 16:07:45 On the phone I see TonyR, pauld, Tom_Jordahl, Allen, Arthur_Ryman, Jonathan_Marsh, Roberto, JacekK, Asir_Vedamuthu, charlton, Gilbert_Pilz 16:10:49 + +329987aaaa 16:13:06 +m2 16:13:19 SCRIBE: Allen 16:14:03 TOPIC: previous minutes 16:14:31 Minutes from Oct 26 approved 16:14:35 monica has joined #ws-desc 16:18:54 Dashboard looks awesome! 16:20:15 TOPIC: Interop event 16:20:46 Jonathan reports on progress at interop event 16:24:29 ACTION: Jonathan will propose a plan for publishing component model interchange format as a note. 16:24:52 pauld has joined #ws-desc 16:25:01 Arthur: note can happen after we finish the spec 16:25:14 TOPIC: Republication schedule 16:25:33 RRSAgent, where am i? 16:25:33 See http://www.w3.org/2006/11/30-ws-desc-irc#T16-25-33 16:25:50 Jonathan: Do we want to publish as soon as possible? 16:26:51 Arthur: In part 1 the only changes should be tweaks to the assertions so it should be ready. 16:27:24 Jonathan: Want to let people know of changes as soon as possible: removal of f&p, http binding at risk. 16:27:49 Jacek: Do you think we can be done by early January? 16:28:09 Jonathan: We have many issues but they are simple so yes. 16:28:19 Jacek: Do we have heartbeat issues? 16:28:38 Jonathan: We may but we have violated them already if we do. 16:28:49 Jacek: I think we can wait 16:29:11 good one :-) 16:29:26 youenn has joined #ws-desc 16:29:39 Jonathan: I don't hear objections so we will wait till January 16:30:39 TOPIC: LC Reviews 16:31:45 Jonathan: Do we have any objection to Policy WG publishing WSDL 1.1 Component Designators? 16:32:34 Arthur: We should ask Phillipe since he was against us doing anything with 1.1. 16:32:45 +Amelia_Lewis 16:33:41 Arthur: We can ask David O to contribute spec here if we think that is a better place for it. 16:34:00 Jonathan: I think it belongs here but don't want it to get in the way of our other deliverables. 16:34:39 -charlton 16:35:12 alewis has joined #ws-desc 16:35:45 Jonathan: Can take it to coordination group and say we can do it if our charter is extended. 16:36:09 ACTION: Jonathan to take the proposal to the CG that we can take the work, as long as our charter is extended and as long as we can get our primary deliverables done first. 16:36:55 Paul: Invite members to look at databinding document 16:37:07 +Charlton_Barreto 16:37:29 Paul: Audience - within W3C, schema WG, outside, WS-I Basic Profile WG 16:38:40 charltonb has joined #ws-desc 16:38:46 Paul: need contributions of test cases, WG doesn't need to review, individuals can send comments. 16:39:07 Jonathan: Policy is in LC, we have been asked to review. 16:39:51 Arthur: I reviewed it, main comment, need to provide definition of equivalence, comment accepted. 16:40:54 Charlton: I volunteer to look at it. 16:40:55 ACTION: Charlton to review WS-Policy LC 16:41:17 s/main comment/made comment/ 16:41:17 jkaputin has joined #ws-desc 16:42:14 TOPIC: MTOM Description 16:42:47 proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0029.html 16:43:00 Jonathan: Paul made a proposal for new attribute. 16:44:26 Youenn: Haven't had a chance to look at this yet 16:44:54 Arthur: Opposed to adding as part of the spec, open to adding as additional document 16:45:27 Asir: Why is WG focussing on this? 16:45:59 Jonathan: Cannon has requirement for this, long discussion of whether this should be done by this WG or XMLP. 16:48:54 Asir: Don't need additional attribute. Can already do it with Policy. 16:49:12 Jonathan: We'll continue on this next week. 16:49:38 TOPIC: CR82 - Header blocks in wrpc:signature 16:50:08 Jonathan: Jacek responded. If we don't hear back we can consider it done. 16:50:31 TOPIC: CR84 16:50:49 Jonathan: Resolved to fix as editorial 16:51:13 TOPIC: CR85 F&P Primer work 16:51:41 Jonathan: Resolved to close and track as editorial 16:52:58 Jacek: on issue 82 there was a response but it didn't make it to the list. 16:53:12 TOPIC: CR86 16:55:08 jjm has joined #ws-desc 16:56:36 Jonathan: Need to move sentence to include all http properties, not just cookies. That's the way its being implemented now. 16:57:40 Arthur: also add that properties MUST NOT be used when protocol is not HTTP. 16:58:22 Jonathan: Resolved with moving sentence and adding assertion. 16:58:44 TOPC: CR87 - Turning off http transfer coding 17:00:16 Jonathan: Does it make sense to turn off transfer coding to original state? Is empty string an ok syntax for that? 17:00:29 Arthur: What does this do to the component model? 17:00:52 Jonathan: Puts in a transfer coding without a value. 17:01:48 Jonathan: Can empty string be the same as on transfer coding at all? 17:02:49 Arther: Another way to do this is not provide a default. 17:03:12 Jonathan: Nice to have explicit way to do anything that can be done implicitly 17:04:03 RESOLUTION: Add text stating that {http transfer coding} = "" means no assertion as to the transfer coding. 17:05:00 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0003.html 17:05:17 TOPIC: CR88 & CR90 17:06:46 RESOLUION: use Amy's proposal in above link to resolve ambiguity 17:07:05 TOPIC: CR89 17:12:26 ACTION: Arthur will fix this editorially 17:12:47 RESOLUION: close with fix to be provided by Arthur 17:13:16 TOPIC: CR91 - WSDL 2.0 fault binding 17:14:45 ACTION: Editors will add to soap binding to implement spirit of issue. 17:14:59 RESOLVED: fix with editorial change 17:15:22 TOPIC: CR92 17:18:19 ACTION: Jonathan will check to see if WS-I specifies single detail item. 17:18:20 ACTION: Jonathan to look at whether WS-I BP profiles Detail children (to only one) 17:18:43 TOPIC: CR93 17:24:39 Arthur: we require global element definitions have a namespace 17:25:17 Arthur: We have element declarations and type definitons and we require that they have value uri as namespace. 17:25:44 Jonathan: We don't allow this today. Is it worth changing? 17:26:06 Arthur: This is inline with other things we don't support. 17:26:56 Jonathan: If we aren't going to change this should we have a section that talks about what we don't support? 17:28:28 -Charlton_Barreto 17:29:07 BP lists this as an extensibility point: Fault details - the contents of a Fault's detail element are not prescribed by SOAP 1.1. 17:29:41 Jacek: Spec only says that name is a QName, it says nothing about valid uri. 17:30:29 Arthur: We should make this more explicit 17:31:26 ACTION: Jonathan will add a paragraph to talk about what parts of SOAP we don't support. 17:33:01 +1 17:33:13 -pauld 17:34:15 -m2 17:34:17 Jonathan: Next week we start 1/2 hour early and go for 2 hours. 17:34:26 -Tom_Jordahl 17:34:28 TomJ has left #ws-desc 17:34:29 Adjourn 17:34:30 -Amelia_Lewis 17:34:32 -Arthur_Ryman 17:34:33 -TonyR 17:34:34 -Roberto 17:34:34 -JacekK 17:34:36 -Asir_Vedamuthu 17:34:37 -Jonathan_Marsh 17:34:38 - +329987aaaa 17:34:41 -Allen 17:35:14 -Gilbert_Pilz 17:35:15 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has ended 17:35:16 Attendees were TonyR, pauld, Tom_Jordahl, Jonathan_Marsh, Arthur_Ryman, Allen, Roberto, JacekK, Asir_Vedamuthu, Gilbert_Pilz, charlton, +329987aaaa, m2, Amelia_Lewis, 17:35:19 ... Charlton_Barreto 17:35:23 TonyR has left #ws-desc 17:35:33 alewis has left #ws-desc 17:36:32 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:36:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/30-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 17:36:46 RRSAgent, set log world 17:36:49 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:36:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/30-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 17:45:17 Chair: Jonathan 17:45:22 Meeting: WS Description WG telcon 17:45:59 s/RESOLUION/RESOLUTION/g 17:46:01 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:46:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/30-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 18:35:22 JacekK has joined #ws-desc 19:00:52 Zakim has left #ws-desc