IRC log of swd on 2006-11-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:54:29 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swd
- 15:54:29 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc
- 15:54:40 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, please make this record public
- 15:54:46 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #swd
- 15:54:52 [TomB]
- TomB has joined #swd
- 15:54:53 [RalphS]
- zakim, this will be swd
- 15:54:53 [Zakim]
- ok, RalphS; I see SW_SWD()11:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
- 15:55:45 [TomB]
- RalphS, Guus, I'm chairing today?
- 15:55:50 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started
- 15:55:58 [Zakim]
- + +31.70.314.aaaa
- 15:56:33 [Antoine]
- zakim, aaaa is me
- 15:56:33 [Zakim]
- +Antoine; got it
- 15:56:55 [Zakim]
- + +1.617.395.aabb
- 15:56:59 [Zakim]
- -Antoine
- 15:57:01 [Zakim]
- +Antoine
- 15:57:13 [RalphS]
- zakim, aabb is me
- 15:57:13 [Zakim]
- +RalphS; got it
- 15:58:20 [RalphS]
- RalphS has changed the topic to: SWD WG 14 Nov agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0025.html
- 15:58:22 [berrueta]
- berrueta has joined #swd
- 15:58:30 [Zakim]
- +??P21
- 15:58:53 [Bern]
- Bern has joined #swd
- 15:59:14 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p21 is Tom
- 15:59:14 [Zakim]
- +Tom; got it
- 15:59:45 [Zakim]
- -RalphS
- 15:59:54 [Zakim]
- +??P34
- 16:00:04 [Bern]
- zakim, ??p34 is me
- 16:00:04 [Zakim]
- +Bern; got it
- 16:00:15 [JonP]
- JonP has joined #swd
- 16:00:16 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 16:00:27 [aliman]
- aliman has joined #swd
- 16:00:54 [Zakim]
- +JonP
- 16:01:15 [Zakim]
- +Antoine.a
- 16:01:26 [RalphS]
- zakim, antoine.a is really Guus
- 16:01:26 [Zakim]
- +Guus; got it
- 16:01:48 [Zakim]
- +??P42
- 16:01:59 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p42 is Alistair
- 16:01:59 [Zakim]
- +Alistair; got it
- 16:02:01 [Zakim]
- +CarlosI
- 16:02:38 [RalphS]
- zakim, Carlos is really Diego
- 16:02:39 [Zakim]
- +Diego; got it
- 16:02:49 [Guus]
- zakim, wo is here?
- 16:02:49 [Zakim]
- sorry, Guus, I do not understand your question
- 16:03:08 [RalphS]
- Meeting: SWD WG
- 16:03:16 [RalphS]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0025.html
- 16:03:44 [RalphS]
- Regrets: Sean, Daniel
- 16:05:53 [RalphS]
- Scribe: Bernard
- 16:05:58 [RalphS]
- scribenick: bern
- 16:06:06 [RalphS]
- Previous: 2006-11-07 http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html
- 16:06:23 [Bern]
- Guus: ignore action items at top of agenda are spurious
- 16:07:07 [Bern]
- Guus: minures are accepted, seconded by TomB
- 16:07:26 [TomB]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Scribing.html
- 16:07:43 [Bern]
- Ralph: question tutorial for IRC, zakim, etc
- 16:08:17 [Bern]
- ...working with Tom
- 16:08:29 [Bern]
- TomB: propose that tutorial is in agenda header
- 16:08:50 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Ralph consider a tutorial on scribe conventions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action01]
- 16:09:39 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Scribing.html Notes on scribing
- 16:10:03 [Bern]
- RalphS: this on on the table of "nearby" links
- 16:10:12 [Bern]
- ... on the WG home page
- 16:10:35 [Bern]
- Topic: tlecon times
- 16:11:01 [Bern]
- Guus: this time is convenient for many people including chairs
- 16:11:07 [Bern]
- ...despite ovelap with RIF
- 16:11:30 [Bern]
- ...so proposes to stay with this time
- 16:12:12 [Bern]
- [DONE] ACTION: Tom to discuss with Guus [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action08]
- 16:12:41 [RalphS]
- s/discuss/discuss telecon time/
- 16:13:07 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0014.html example SKOS use case
- 16:13:20 [aliman]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0019.html email suggesting format for skos use cases
- 16:13:44 [TomB]
- ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179
- 16:13:46 [TomB]
- compatibility issue evolves [recorded in
- 16:13:48 [TomB]
- [36]w3c:/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action07]
- 16:13:56 [TomB]
- -- continues
- 16:14:40 [Bern]
- Guus: progress on http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action10
- 16:15:00 [Bern]
- Alistair: waiting for concensus on use case format
- 16:16:23 [Bern]
- Guus: taken action on http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action09
- 16:16:32 [Bern]
- ...waiting for message to appear on mailing list
- 16:17:25 [Bern]
- Jon: questions on Guus' example use cases
- 16:18:07 [Bern]
- Guus: cannot be directly used for SKOS, different use but similar
- 16:18:26 [Bern]
- ... also look at GoF Patterns book
- 16:19:06 [Bern]
- Guus: action on http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action07
- 16:19:24 [Bern]
- Antione: looking for more insight on use case format and how to divide workload
- 16:19:56 [aliman]
- q+ to ask everybody to say what they think about the suggested use case
- 16:19:59 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0015.html W3C Tech Report editor's materials
- 16:20:50 [Bern]
- Guus: talking to Chris Welty at ISWC about use of Wiki
- 16:21:05 [Bern]
- ... doesn't require document editors to have CVS access
- 16:21:14 [Bern]
- ...Chris has good experience with it
- 16:21:26 [Bern]
- ...suggest as a way of capturing documentation for the WG
- 16:21:42 [Bern]
- RalphS: Wiki might encourage more contributions
- 16:22:01 [Bern]
- ... to find out more information about state of Wiki scripts
- 16:22:24 [Bern]
- ...concen about ease of editing wiki pages
- 16:22:30 [Bern]
- ...expressed from Tom
- 16:22:44 [Bern]
- ...but could use Wiki to collect notes
- 16:23:14 [Bern]
- Jon: which wiki?
- 16:23:21 [aliman]
- it's moin moin
- 16:23:27 [aliman]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ RIF wiki
- 16:23:32 [Bern]
- Guus: on the RIF WG home page
- 16:23:44 [TomB]
- 1+ Good experience with moinmoin
- 16:23:52 [Guus]
- RIF wiki http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/
- 16:24:29 [Bern]
- Guus: suggest we consider it. but try it out first
- 16:24:57 [Bern]
- ACTION: Ralph to find out more about the Wiki tools
- 16:25:13 [RalphS]
- s/the/the RIF/
- 16:25:28 [Bern]
- Guus: looking for tools to make collaboration for the group easier
- 16:26:10 [RalphS]
- Ralph: I personally find it very awkward to edit Wiki page
- 16:26:12 [JonP]
- +1 to using a wiki for document production if scripts exist to convert to doc format
- 16:26:19 [Bern]
- Guus: look at use cases
- 16:26:46 [Bern]
- ...and a format to describe them
- 16:26:58 [Bern]
- ...referrring to Alistair's posting
- 16:27:17 [Bern]
- ...clarification of use of Alistair's term "fucntionality"
- 16:27:41 [Bern]
- Alistair: functionality, for example, is search and browse (a description of how people can search and browse)
- 16:28:21 [Bern]
- Guus: on vocabularies, expect examples for expressiveness
- 16:29:07 [Bern]
- Alistair: expect to describe vocabulary, including their structural characteristics and provide concrrete examples to illustrate all features mentioned
- 16:29:19 [TomB]
- q+ Alistair is cutting in and out acoustically - just my phone?
- 16:29:28 [Bern]
- Guus: I would be more explicit (e.g. broader, narrower, related)
- 16:29:44 [Bern]
- ...and anything outside ISO format should be specified
- 16:30:22 [Bern]
- RalphS: assume we should subsume ISO standards
- 16:30:26 [aliman]
- iso 2788 and iso 5964
- 16:30:32 [Bern]
- ... is this a requirement?
- 16:30:51 [Guus]
- [i have to leave]
- 16:30:56 [Bern]
- ...state this as a requirement
- 16:31:19 [aliman]
- q+ on iso format
- 16:31:32 [Zakim]
- -Guus
- 16:31:44 [Bern]
- RalphS: needs discussion on ISO format assumption
- 16:32:27 [Bern]
- TomB: we're not going to be able to resolve this on this call
- 16:32:43 [Bern]
- ...propose an addition to requirements template from Alistair
- 16:33:01 [aliman]
- q+ to say on use case format
- 16:33:09 [Bern]
- RalphS: suggest editors put forward a list of requriemetns that are proposed and accepted
- 16:33:33 [Bern]
- TomB: so, simply, they have an action to start getting requiremetns from the email list?
- 16:33:56 [Bern]
- RalphS: sugest Jon & Antione to keep this list
- 16:34:44 [Bern]
- Alistair: I think Guus said I should have another crack at the format
- 16:35:14 [Bern]
- ...but we may be able to be more precise and more specific
- 16:35:31 [Bern]
- ...Guus seems to want us to talk about ISO formats
- 16:36:24 [Bern]
- RalphS: is the decision about accepting ISO as base requirements necessary before Alistair re-does the format
- 16:36:52 [Bern]
- ...but these are really separate, So these need to be discussed separately.
- 16:37:33 [Bern]
- Alistair: I heard Guus say we should use the ISO format as a way of laying out use cases
- 16:37:52 [Bern]
- ...but I tried to be as neutral as possible
- 16:38:08 [Bern]
- ...and not tied to any classification schemata
- 16:38:18 [Bern]
- ...and presented in a human readable form
- 16:38:36 [Bern]
- RalphS: I strongly endorse that
- 16:39:09 [Bern]
- TomB: I also thought Guus was suggesting that use case describe more about the vocabulary
- 16:39:22 [Bern]
- ...suggest we discuss for one more week, then come to a decision next week
- 16:41:03 [Bern]
- RalphS: everyone encouraged to provide feedback to Alistair
- 16:41:17 [Bern]
- Alistair: does everyone understand what I've written?
- 16:41:44 [Bern]
- RalphS: clarification of ISO format
- 16:42:39 [RalphS]
- Bernard: my understanding of Guus' point was that we use the GangOfFour patterns and only describe use cases that go beyond those narrower, broader, related-to
- 16:42:47 [TomB]
- +1 on Bernard's understanding
- 16:43:26 [Bern]
- Alistair: doesn't believe we should take ISO as a starting point
- 16:43:37 [RalphS]
- Alistair: taking 2788 as a style would lead to other things that are beyond our scope
- 16:44:04 [Bern]
- ...there's an awful lot of flexibility in ISO, not sufficiently well-defined
- 16:44:39 [Bern]
- q+ to ask about initial documents
- 16:44:56 [aliman]
- q-
- 16:44:57 [Bern]
- ACTION: all to respond to Alistair's proposal
- 16:45:44 [RalphS]
- Bernard: do the existing Working Drafts need some careful review by the WG?
- 16:46:14 [RalphS]
- ... I suggest that everyone send comments on the existing drafts in mail
- 16:46:31 [RalphS]
- Alistair: we could use the issues list to track these comments
- 16:47:49 [RalphS]
- ... I have been maintaining a public SKOS issues list; I use this to track comments
- 16:47:51 [TomB]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0019.html
- 16:48:02 [TomB]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0019.html
- 16:48:08 [TomB]
- http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals
- 16:48:45 [Bern]
- RalphS: important that this WG pays attention to these issues
- 16:49:09 [Bern]
- ...if Alistair can continue to track the issues
- 16:49:17 [Zakim]
- Bern, you wanted to ask about initial documents
- 16:49:41 [Bern]
- Alistair: been putting more energy into looking into requiremetns
- 16:50:03 [Bern]
- TomB: like to propose an action on Alistair to continue maintaining that list
- 16:50:27 [Bern]
- RalphS: priority is to capture use cases
- 16:50:47 [Bern]
- Alistair: important to make a connection from issues to requirements
- 16:50:49 [RalphS]
- Ralph: we can't close issues without knowing what our use cases are
- 16:50:57 [Bern]
- ...and make requirements explicit
- 16:51:20 [Bern]
- ...and I will continue to maintain that list of issues
- 16:54:04 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Daniel to send mail describing his use cases for SKOS draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html#action01]
- 16:54:10 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 16:54:38 [Bern]
- ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 compatibility issue evolves [recorded in [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action07] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action03]
- 16:54:45 [Bern]
- -- continues
- 16:55:16 [Bern]
- topic: RDF in XHTML
- 16:55:27 [Bern]
- TOMB: no one on call to discuss
- 16:55:48 [aliman]
- q+ to mention current thread on semantic-web@w3.org
- 16:56:05 [Bern]
- Topic: Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies
- 16:56:15 [Bern]
- RalphS: no time to participate
- 16:56:24 [Bern]
- TomB: no one to participate
- 16:56:52 [RalphS]
- Ralph: I will have to miss the Nov 28 and Dec 5 telecons due to W3C meetings; will be back in the office on December 11
- 16:57:01 [Bern]
- Alistair: also no time. However, there's a discussion on the semantic-web@w3.org thread
- 16:57:16 [Bern]
- JonP: useful discussion on the thread
- 16:57:37 [Bern]
- Alistair: a lot of the discussion seems to be igoring the recipes
- 16:57:49 [Bern]
- ...so perhaps our work is not widely known
- 16:58:09 [Bern]
- ...need to get more input and involvement
- 16:58:20 [Zakim]
- -Tom
- 16:58:29 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Nov/0055.html "Hash URIs" and content negotiation (start of thread)
- 16:58:34 [Bern]
- ...so have requested comments
- 16:58:52 [Zakim]
- +??P6
- 16:59:09 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Nov/thread.html#msg55 "Hash URIs" and content negotiation thread
- 16:59:16 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p6 is Tom
- 16:59:16 [Zakim]
- +Tom; got it
- 16:59:20 [Bern]
- ...TomB: no editor currently
- 16:59:34 [Bern]
- ...close meeting for today
- 16:59:53 [RalphS]
- zakim, list attendees
- 16:59:53 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been +31.70.314.aaaa, Antoine, +1.617.395.aabb, RalphS, Tom, Bern, Ralph, JonP, Guus, Alistair, CarlosI, Diego
- 16:59:57 [Zakim]
- -Alistair
- 16:59:58 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:59:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-minutes.html RalphS
- 17:00:11 [Zakim]
- -Bern
- 17:00:18 [Zakim]
- -JonP
- 17:00:21 [Zakim]
- -Diego
- 17:00:24 [Zakim]
- -Tom
- 17:00:27 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 17:02:20 [RalphS]
- hmm. there are several actions that did not get carried forward
- 17:02:33 [RalphS]
- (or closed)
- 17:02:37 [Antoine]
- Antoine has left #swd
- 17:02:54 [Zakim]
- -Antoine
- 17:02:55 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
- 17:02:56 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +31.70.314.aaaa, Antoine, +1.617.395.aabb, RalphS, Tom, Bern, Ralph, JonP, Guus, Alistair, CarlosI, Diego
- 17:03:32 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Alistair propose a format for presenting use cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action11]
- 17:03:50 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Alistair work with the UCR editors to draft questions to invite the esw-thes mailing list to contribute to the use cases and requirements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action10]
- 17:03:52 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 17:04:23 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Guus cite some examples of other Requirements documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action09]
- 17:04:44 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0028.html ACTION: Guus cite some examples of other Requirements docs [Guus Schreiber]
- 17:05:09 [TomB]
- TomB has joined #swd
- 17:05:10 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Jon, Daniel, Antoine figure out their individual roles as SKOS Requirements editors [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action07]
- 17:05:13 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 17:05:24 [TomB]
- RalphS, can you chat on phone?
- 17:05:30 [RalphS]
- sure
- 17:05:34 [TomB]
- #?
- 17:05:55 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Ralph point Jon, Daniel, Antoine at the W3C tech report editors materials [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action08]
- 17:06:15 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Alistair give pointers to deployed SKOS systems. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action06]
- 17:06:18 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 17:06:37 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 17:06:37 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-minutes.html RalphS
- 17:07:44 [RalphS]
- Bernard, you'll want to start with the later version of the -minutes.html file as it has the full list of actions now
- 19:20:48 [RalphS]
- zakim, bye
- 19:20:48 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #swd
- 19:20:50 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, bye
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-actions.rdf :
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 [1]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-13-44
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to find out more about the Wiki tools [2]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-24-57
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: all to respond to Alistair's proposal [3]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-44-57
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Daniel to send mail describing his use cases for SKOS draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html#action01] [4]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-54-04
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 compatibility issue evolves [recorded in [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action07] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action03] [5]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-54-38
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Alistair work with the UCR editors to draft questions to invite the esw-thes mailing list to contribute to the use cases and requirements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action10] [6]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T17-03-50
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jon, Daniel, Antoine figure out their individual roles as SKOS Requirements editors [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action07] [7]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T17-05-10
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Alistair give pointers to deployed SKOS systems. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action06] [8]
- 19:20:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T17-06-15