14:41:39 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 14:41:39 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/11/01-i18nits-irc 14:41:49 meeting: i18n ITS Working Group 14:42:12 chair: Felix 14:42:16 scribe: Felix 14:42:19 scribeNick: fsasaki 14:42:28 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0030.html 14:42:40 regrets: Andrzej, Christian, Yves 14:42:45 rrsagent, make log public 15:00:52 I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started 15:00:52 +Felix 15:02:33 +Sebastian_Rahtz 15:02:34 -Sebastian_Rahtz 15:02:35 +Sebastian_Rahtz 15:04:22 +Diane_Stoick 15:05:27 topic: namespace binding issue 15:05:51 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3319 15:05:54 rahtz has joined #i18nits 15:06:09 diane1 has joined #i18nits 15:06:32 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3319#c9 15:08:30 Felix: Michael proposed to copy all namespace nodes 15:08:43 Sebastian: does this preserve the prefix 15:09:00 .. I have no technical objection in using xmlns - how does it affect Felix? 15:09:05 Felix: not sure 15:09:18 Sebastian: if Michael is right 15:09:49 .. we can drop the element 15:10:24 Felix: I'm not sure about external rules 15:11:34 .. Michael will test this in an XSLT 1.0 implementation 15:11:40 .. especially using global rules 15:13:05 Sebastian: if he does not succeed, we will keep ? 15:13:36 Felix: yes. 15:13:55 http://www.w3.org/2006/10/its-draft/ 15:14:11 "The following parts of the specification are considered at risk:" 15:14:17 Felix: look at this paragraph 15:15:12 .. it says how we handle 15:16:01 Sebastian: if you tacke the rules element and put it through e.g. an identity transformation 15:16:11 .. it might decide to throw away the declarations 15:18:03 Felix: that would not happen with XSLT 15:18:11 Sebastian: might happen with DOM 15:18:56 .. is it part of the PSVI? 15:19:33 Felix: I'm sure it is part of the PSVI 15:20:19 .. I think it is possible in DOM 15:20:34 .. it is not possible in SAX 15:21:05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0029.html 15:21:49 Sebastian: three issues: 15:22:05 .. can you do it? Is it sufficient? Does it survive XML transformation? 15:22:22 Felix: with Michael, only "can you do it?" is important 15:23:17 topic: CR phase 15:23:24 Sebastian: how long does the CR phase last? 15:23:37 Felix: we planned at least until 10 December 15:23:46 .. CR has no "last day" date 15:24:39 .. Michael and I will work on the at the beginning of December 15:25:04 http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/ImpReport 15:25:44 http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/ 15:26:45 Felix: we have to fill the implementation table 15:27:55 Sebastian: Yves does not directionality and others 15:28:23 Felix: I do just "useless" stuff, but comparable 15:28:31 .. for all data categories 15:28:44 Sebastian: you don't have to do anything useful 15:29:37 .. is the output format mandated somewhere? 15:29:43 .. can whe change our minds about it? 15:29:56 Felix: we can 15:30:52 Sebastian: basic things like generating "output-type" is not necessary 15:32:50 Sebastian: can we resolve all this until the end of the month? 15:32:58 Felix: should be possible 15:33:34 topic: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0027.html 15:34:46 reply from Yves http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0028.html 15:34:59 reply from Felix http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0029.html 15:35:44 locNotePointer="../notes"/> 15:36:34 Sebastian: it still does not force you to have content in nodes 15:36:53 .. you could write a predicate "the node has to exist and has to string length > 0" 15:37:34 .. you might also ask "what happens if there are three ../notes"? 15:38:08 .. the pointer could point to the root of the document or somewhere else 15:38:49 Felix: the most you can do is to give an best practice advice 15:39:12 Sebastian: an implementor should be sensitive what comes back after ITS processing 15:39:22 Felix: no need to define error condititions? 15:39:40 Sebastian: we discussed that before and decided not to have them 15:39:44 Felix: I still agree 15:42:02 topic: CR and after 15:42:21 Felix: we might have promotion for ITS for PR 15:44:20 topic: BP document 15:46:15 Felix: will be a topic after CR and during the next phase 2007 15:47:32 .. we might need some editing work on that next year 15:47:49 topic: calls in November 15:49:12 Diane, Sebastian: available through the whole of November 15:49:17 Felix: out for next week 15:51:54 -Sebastian_Rahtz 15:51:56 -Diane_Stoick 15:51:56 -Felix 15:51:57 I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended 15:51:58 Attendees were Felix, Sebastian_Rahtz, Diane_Stoick 15:52:27 present: Diane, Felix, Sebastian 15:52:31 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:52:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/01-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 15:58:23 rrsagent, bye 15:58:23 I see no action items