IRC log of tsdtf on 2006-10-31
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:09:00 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf
- 13:09:00 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-irc
- 13:09:07 [Christophe]
- zakim, calls?
- 13:09:07 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, Christophe.
- 13:10:11 [Christophe]
- Christophe has changed the topic to: WAI TSD TF telecon
- 13:11:02 [Christophe]
- zakim, what conferences?
- 13:11:02 [Zakim]
- I see ARCH_Team()8:00AM active and no others scheduled near this time
- 13:13:25 [Christophe]
- zakim, what conferences?
- 13:13:25 [Zakim]
- I see ARCH_Team()8:00AM active and no others scheduled near this time
- 13:15:32 [Christophe]
- Zakim, this will be WAI_TSDTF
- 13:15:32 [Zakim]
- ok, Christophe; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 15 minutes
- 13:16:34 [Christophe]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Oct/0067.html
- 13:16:44 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has joined #tsdtf
- 13:16:55 [Christophe]
- Meeting: WAI TSD TF
- 13:17:24 [Christophe]
- Chair: Christophe_Strobbe
- 13:17:40 [Christophe]
- Regrets: CarlosI, Tim
- 13:18:29 [Christophe]
- Agenda+ First review of test samples
- 13:18:41 [Christophe]
- Agenda+ Web view of the test samples
- 13:29:33 [Daniela]
- Daniela has joined #tsdtf
- 13:29:40 [Vangelis]
- \me technique.. i mean under "technique" element
- 13:30:13 [Daniela]
- Daniela has joined #tsdtf
- 13:31:19 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started
- 13:31:26 [Zakim]
- +Christophe_Strobbe
- 13:31:27 [Zakim]
- +Daniela
- 13:31:40 [Zakim]
- + +30210820aaaa
- 13:32:00 [Christophe]
- Zakim, +30210820aaaa is Shadi
- 13:32:00 [Zakim]
- +Shadi; got it
- 13:32:57 [Zakim]
- +Vangelis_Karkaletsis
- 13:33:05 [ChrisR]
- ChrisR has joined #tsdtf
- 13:33:47 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 13:34:37 [Christophe]
- zakim, [IP is ChrisR
- 13:34:40 [Zakim]
- +ChrisR; got it
- 13:36:20 [Christophe]
- Scribe: Vangelis
- 13:36:34 [Vangelis]
- Zakim, take up agendum 1
- 13:36:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "First review of test samples" taken up [from Christophe]
- 13:37:13 [Vangelis]
- CS: opportunity to look samples?
- 13:37:27 [Vangelis]
- DO: no, probs with CVS access
- 13:39:25 [Vangelis]
- CV: for eclipse you need only to locate private key home directory
- 13:40:39 [Vangelis]
- EV: for eclipse see preferences>Team>CVS>SSH2 Connection method
- 13:40:45 [Zakim]
- +Cooper
- 13:41:34 [Michael_Cooper]
- Michael_Cooper has joined #tsdtf
- 13:41:42 [Christophe]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/ctprocess.html
- 13:42:41 [Vangelis]
- CS: discuss the test process for test samples
- 13:44:07 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: need experience from previous task forces and bentoweb
- 13:44:36 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: what are the critical issues
- 13:44:57 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: WCAG good example
- 13:45:50 [Vangelis]
- CS: experience for bentoweb: test case developers when these are done-> evaluation team for review process in several stages-
- 13:46:44 [Vangelis]
- CS: if change needed go back to developer otherwise go to second reviewer-> accepted
- 13:47:20 [Michael_Cooper]
- q+ to ask about meaning of "accepting" a test case in our context
- 13:47:49 [Vangelis]
- CS: user testing : users review tests through html forms input
- 13:48:28 [Vangelis]
- CS: automated testing: not done so far.. for colour contrast with tool for instance
- 13:48:51 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: for task force this mean evaluating technique?
- 13:49:14 [Vangelis]
- CS: yes, other purpose between bentoweb and TF
- 13:50:00 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: for this task force focus on test samples and not techniques
- 13:53:06 [Michael_Cooper]
- ack m
- 13:53:06 [Zakim]
- Michael_Cooper, you wanted to ask about meaning of "accepting" a test case in our context
- 13:53:53 [Vangelis]
- MC: need to have some criteria how to accept
- 13:55:00 [Vangelis]
- CR: the WCAG group would need to have a look at them
- 13:55:21 [Vangelis]
- MC: problem would be dependency
- 13:57:32 [Vangelis]
- CR: maybe couple of tests in WCAG need review to make sure are correct
- 13:59:13 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: what we need to produce accepted test samples ok by WCAG WG
- 14:00:23 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: before formally accepted maybe both WCAg and ERT group have chance to look and send any comments
- 14:00:43 [Vangelis]
- MC: ok, set a timeline
- 14:03:19 [Vangelis]
- MC: WCAG pooling to surveys to accept or reject and moves on
- 14:04:19 [Vangelis]
- MC: this tf needs a procedure
- 14:05:50 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: what the acceptance really means? accepted for the draft technique?
- 14:06:53 [Vangelis]
- CS: technique might change and a test could be accepted
- 14:07:52 [Vangelis]
- MC: aggree mapping with url is the approach we need
- 14:09:40 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: clarify that test samples cannot be more stable that techniques
- 14:10:29 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: need specify procedures when ex a new test sample is uploaded
- 14:13:14 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: write a proposal for criteria procedures (ex validate, check metadata...)
- 14:14:02 [Vangelis]
- CS: I could have a try
- 14:15:22 [Vangelis]
- ACTION: CS proposal for internal test case review process
- 14:17:40 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: important to look procedure before looking actual test samples
- 14:19:01 [Vangelis]
- Zakim, take up agendum 2
- 14:19:02 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Web view of the test samples" taken up [from Christophe]
- 14:21:09 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: discuss the overall requirements and then with chris help could do that
- 14:21:42 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: one audience public: maybe download test samples
- 14:22:05 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: other: us for see what we have what do we develop...
- 14:22:36 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: somebody want to test an evaluation tool
- 14:23:45 [Vangelis]
- MC: every way.. by technology/ by tech feature
- 14:24:43 [Vangelis]
- CR: dont think find organisation of WCAG script not so helpful
- 14:26:34 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: wcag widget select certain things like level, technologies and give a view technique (wcag quick reference)
- 14:26:50 [Christophe]
- WCAG 2.0 Quick Reference: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/
- 14:28:29 [Vangelis]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/complete
- 14:29:06 [Vangelis]
- SAZ: List of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools : might look like this
- 14:33:07 [Vangelis]
- ACTION: SAZ and CR first prototype implementation and send to list
- 14:34:39 [Zakim]
- -ChrisR
- 14:34:40 [Zakim]
- -Daniela
- 14:34:40 [Zakim]
- -Cooper
- 14:34:41 [ChrisR]
- ChrisR has left #tsdtf
- 14:34:42 [Zakim]
- -Vangelis_Karkaletsis
- 14:34:43 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 14:34:46 [Zakim]
- -Christophe_Strobbe
- 14:34:47 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended
- 14:34:48 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Christophe_Strobbe, Daniela, Shadi, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, [IPcaller], ChrisR, Cooper
- 14:36:12 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has left #tsdtf
- 14:36:15 [Christophe]
- zakim, bye
- 14:36:15 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tsdtf
- 14:36:25 [Christophe]
- rrsagent, make log world
- 14:36:45 [Christophe]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:36:45 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-minutes.html Christophe
- 14:39:11 [Christophe]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:39:11 [RRSAgent]
- I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-actions.rdf :
- 14:39:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: CS proposal for internal test case review process [1]
- 14:39:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-irc#T14-15-22
- 14:39:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: SAZ and CR first prototype implementation and send to list [2]
- 14:39:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-irc#T14-33-07