15:49:28 RRSAgent has joined #swd 15:49:28 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc 15:53:53 TomB has joined #swd 15:54:34 SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started 15:54:42 +Tom_Baker 15:54:55 +Ralph 15:59:01 cgi-irc has joined #swd 16:00:37 RalphS, I lost my phone connection! Re-dialing... 16:01:46 + +1.781.442.aaaa 16:01:57 +Tom_Baker.a 16:02:01 berrueta has joined #swd 16:02:09 seanb has joined #swd 16:02:18 zakim, aaaa is Bernard 16:02:18 +Bernard; got it 16:02:36 Elisa has joined #swd 16:03:12 zakim, drop tom_baker 16:03:25 +??P36 16:03:33 zakim, P36 is me 16:03:34 Tom_Baker is being disconnected 16:03:36 -Tom_Baker 16:03:45 sorry, berrueta, I do not recognize a party named 'P36' 16:03:47 +??P37 16:04:12 zakim, ??p37 is SeanB 16:04:12 +SeanB; got it 16:04:26 Meeting: SWD WG 16:04:26 +Elisa_Kendall 16:04:28 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Oct/0054.html 16:04:33 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html 16:05:06 dlrubin has joined #swd 16:05:29 could someone point me to the link where the dialin instructions live for this tcon? 16:05:47 zakim, ??p36 is Diego 16:05:49 +Diego; got it 16:05:58 thanks, RalphS 16:06:00 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Oct/0054.html 16:06:09 agenda contains dialing instructions, Daniel 16:06:12 fgandon has joined #swd 16:07:33 If Alistair Miles hasn't yet emailed to the list, he sends his apologies. He's been in Manchester for a meeting and will be travelling back now. 16:07:47 +??P39 16:07:54 Regrets: Guus Schreiber, Antoine Isaac, Alistair 16:08:06 zakim, ??p39 is DanielR 16:08:06 +DanielR; got it 16:08:16 Thanks very much. It would be nice if you put a link to the tcon details on the SWD web page (at least, I don't see it there) 16:08:34 noted, Daniel 16:09:15 +Rachel_Yager 16:10:31 ryager has joined #swd 16:11:00 Scribe: Daniel 16:11:07 scribenick: dlrubin 16:11:32 dlrubin: can you illustrate that please? 16:11:36 Tom: explaining how to scribe 16:11:44 ...this is an example. 16:12:07 ...continuing to explain 16:12:29 RalphS: need to say who scribenick is 16:13:06 Topic: Admin 16:13:15 TomB: roll call. encourage people to do self-intros 16:13:20 [Topic: introduces each agenda item] 16:13:22 ...write a paragraph and post to list 16:13:36 ...Motion to accept minutes from oct 24 16:13:48 ...Seconded by Ralphs 16:13:59 ...motion passed 16:14:12 I added Rachel to the list of attendees 16:14:21 ...two pending actions. 16:14:31 ...next tcon will be 11/7 16:15:04 Elisa: As of Monday, the OMG announced ontology definition metamodel is adopted spec 16:15:24 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2006-10-11 - ODM Specification 16:15:25 [we should continue the incomplete actions explicitly; ala ... 16:15:33 ACTION: Ralph consider a tutorial on scribe 16:15:33 conventions [recorded in 16:15:33 http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] 16:15:38 RalphS: pls add to list 16:15:42 drop action 1 16:15:45 rrsagent, drop action 1 16:16:01 action: Elisa to post announcement to SWD list 16:16:04 ACTION: Ralph consider a tutorial on scribe conventions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] 16:16:07 -- continues 16:16:14 Topic: cost requirements 16:16:15 [DONE] ACTION: Ralph to link to chris' telecon notes from SWD homepage [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action02] 16:16:24 s/cost/SKOS/ 16:17:09 ACTION: Alistair give pointers to deployed SKOS systems. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action06] 16:17:12 -- continues 16:17:21 ACTION: Daniel to link his use case to SKOS draft [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html#action01] 16:17:26 scribenick: RalphS 16:17:36 Daniel: I've talked with a couple of the groups I mentioned last meeting 16:18:02 ... it's a good opportunity; there interest in contributing to the development of a standard they can use to distribute their terminologies on the Web 16:18:11 ... they'd use SKOS if it meets all their needs 16:18:20 ... they're currently using OWL 16:18:50 ... how should we proceed to develop this use case? 16:19:16 ... the WG could give them a strawman and ask for feedback 16:19:26 Tom: what is the current state of their terminology? 16:19:43 Daniel: they are currently expressing their relationships in OWL 16:20:01 ... one group is using Protege frames but are planning to convert this to OWL 16:20:34 Elisa: I have another similar opportunity; I have been asked by a group working on ISO 11179 to help them put this into OWL 16:20:51 ... they already have a lot of it in UML 16:21:02 ... and I have some tools to convert UML to OWL 16:21:26 ... because their work is evolving we may have the opportunity to impact it 16:21:32 ... Bruce Bargmeyer is my contact 16:22:32 Tom: ISO 11179 is pretty big; it has 6 parts 16:22:45 Elisa: parts 2 and 3 are relevant, part 3 is what I think is the focus 16:23:01 Tom: this is a very interesting opportunity 16:23:35 Daniel: this is connected to National Cancer Institute work and is a huge opportunity 16:24:18 Elisa: see XMDR www.xmdr.org and look at latest UML and OWL versions 16:24:21 cgi-irc has joined #swd 16:24:39 ... though a bit out of sync with the document text 16:24:46 ... they've recently sent me XMI stuff 16:25:04 http://hpcrd.lbl.gov/SDM/XMDR/overview.html 16:25:10 -> http://www.xmdr.org/ eXtended MetaData Registry Project 16:25:25 Daniel: how much technical expertise is needed? 16:25:39 Elisa: XMI is an XML serialiaztion of MOF, a subset of UML 16:26:05 ... they've sent me both OWL and XMI; the OWL is OWL-lite 16:26:58 ... also, Frank Olken is now at NSF; he was also involved in 11179 16:27:13 zakim, ack RalphS 16:27:13 I see no one on the speaker queue 16:27:32 Link to ISO/IEC 11179: http://metadata-standards.org/11179/ 16:29:08 RalphS: concern we might set too-high expectations re: SWD working group and 11179 16:30:26 Daniel: We use the use cases to drive evolution of SKOS - make sure it supports needs of other communities. Interest in 11179: is there stuff in there that should influence the evolution of SKOS? 16:30:36 scribenick: tomB 16:31:20 ...CABig - NCI Cancer Bioinformatics Grid - metadata for clinical trials uses 11179 for terminologies for data-capture purposes. Interoperability with SKOS would be great. 16:31:36 ...Have ISO 11179 map to SKOS - make sure SKOS is compatible. 16:31:41 scribnick: Daniel 16:32:02 Elisa: Any review on SKOS compatibility would be very helpful - even informal. 16:32:13 Elisa: any help in making skos compatible with iso 11179 would be good 16:32:44 action: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 compatibility issue evolves 16:32:56 Ralph: there is already a working draft of skos 16:33:16 RalphS: Looking for Alistair informal presentation earlier this year... 16:33:23 ...we should consider that to be the strawman 16:33:25 ...our task is to finish the SKOS WD... 16:33:32 ...based on feedback from 11179 and others... 16:34:27 ...the reason to to skos work in this WG, it's important to have OWL expertise involved 16:34:41 ...it could appear that OWL and SKOS are trying to represent similar types of relationships 16:35:10 ...we want to make sure there is enough expertise to understand what OWL subclassing and SKOS broader/narrower is doing 16:35:29 ...people familar with OWL would be good to be involved in setting skos reqirements 16:35:53 Elisa: we are still a smal group. Will there be more OWL best practices people 16:36:04 Ralph: not necessarily. We have 15 people in the WG 16:36:28 ...Mike is interested 16:36:35 ...we may persuade him to stay involved 16:36:46 Elisa: Deb has been travelling a lot... 16:37:01 ...conf call conflict with rif call 16:37:28 ...there are many people in Best Practices in the rif group 16:38:29 Ralph: probably can't move the call later 16:38:38 Elisa: Conflict with RIF call - SWD could potentially have more participants involved in RIF. 16:38:55 Action: Tom to discuss with Juus 16:39:02 scribenick: dlrubin 16:39:20 Elisa: any day of the week at this time. Or move up one hour. 16:39:21 Elisa: any day of the week is fine, preferably after 7am. 16:39:44 Daniel: any day except Tues, preferably after 7am Pacific 16:39:59 (elisa:7am == 7am US Pacific Time == 1500 UTC now) 16:40:00 I prefer to stay with the current time. 16:40:04 Daniel: same - any other day of the week. No earlier than 7am. 16:40:14 Seanb: likes this current time 16:40:17 Sean: likes this time. Could potentially change. 16:40:31 berrueta: likes this time 16:40:35 Bernard: rearranged this week around this time. 16:40:47 Rachel: prefer the current time 16:40:50 Rachel: prefer to stay with current. 16:41:26 Topic: short-term deliverables 16:41:42 TomB: anyone else able to report on RDF and XHTML tcon? 16:41:51 Ralph: Ben is traveling 16:42:00 ...Nothing new to report since last week 16:42:42 tomb: We have finished the agenda 16:42:53 ..propose we close early today 16:43:25 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0021.html rough minutes from Mandelieu informal meeting 16:43:43 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/03/03-swbp-minutes.html#item07 Alistair on SKOS, RDFS, & OWL 16:44:16 TomB: meeting adjourned 16:44:17 -Bernard 16:44:18 -Rachel_Yager 16:44:19 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/03/03-swbp-minutes.html#item04 SKOS discusssion 16:44:24 -Elisa_Kendall 16:44:25 -SeanB 16:44:35 -Diego 16:44:39 zakim, list attendees 16:44:39 As of this point the attendees have been Tom_Baker, Ralph, +1.781.442.aaaa, Bernard, SeanB, Elisa_Kendall, Diego, DanielR, Rachel_Yager 16:45:23 rrsagent, list attendees 16:45:23 I'm logging. I don't understand 'list attendees', dlrubin. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:46:30 rrsagent, please draft minutes 16:46:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html dlrubin 16:46:30 rrsagent, please draft minutes 16:46:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html dlrubin 16:46:30 rrsagent, please draft minutes 16:46:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html dlrubin 16:47:06 seanb has left #swd 16:47:08 rrsagent, make record public 16:49:34 swick@w3.org 16:50:19 Chair: Tom 16:56:02 http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html 16:58:08 http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc#T16-16-04 17:08:23 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/ 17:08:24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Oct/0054.html 17:09:02 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/ 17:09:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/ 17:14:15 rrsagent, please draft minutes 17:14:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html dlrubin 17:16:45 -DanielR 17:17:33 Is there a problem that the minutes still have not appeared? 17:17:47 what do you mean? 17:17:50 ?? we've been looking at http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html 17:18:13 I meant the new minutes that should be re-generated to show Tom as chair 17:18:35 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/TeleconEtiquette 17:20:05 http://esw.w3.org/topic/FrontPage 17:25:19 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg 17:28:30 -Ralph 17:28:31 -Tom_Baker.a 17:28:32 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 17:28:34 Attendees were Tom_Baker, Ralph, +1.781.442.aaaa, Bernard, SeanB, Elisa_Kendall, Diego, DanielR, Rachel_Yager 17:28:39 zakim, bye 17:28:39 Zakim has left #swd 17:28:41 rrsagent, bye 17:28:41 I see 6 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-actions.rdf : 17:28:41 ACTION: Elisa to post announcement to SWD list [2] 17:28:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc#T16-16-01 17:28:41 ACTION: Ralph consider a tutorial on scribe conventions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] [3] 17:28:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc#T16-16-04 17:28:41 ACTION: Alistair give pointers to deployed SKOS systems. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action06] [4] 17:28:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc#T16-17-09 17:28:41 ACTION: Daniel to link his use case to SKOS draft [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html#action01] [5] 17:28:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc#T16-17-21 17:28:41 ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 compatibility issue evolves [6] 17:28:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc#T16-32-44 17:28:41 ACTION: Tom to discuss with Juus [7] 17:28:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-irc#T16-38-55