13:57:44 RRSAgent has joined #ws-desc 13:57:44 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-ws-desc-irc 13:57:53 zakim, this will be wsdl 13:57:53 ok, TonyR, I see WS_DescWG(WSDL)10:00AM already started 13:58:04 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:58:04 On the phone I see ??P3 13:58:11 zakim, ??is me 13:58:11 I don't understand '??is me', TonyR 13:58:15 zakim, ?? is me 13:58:15 +TonyR; got it 14:04:54 sanjiva has joined #ws-desc 14:07:37 Arthur sent regrest 14:07:40 regrets 14:07:54 oh dear - that is bad 14:11:15 +Canon 14:12:38 plh has joined #ws-desc 14:13:28 +Plh 14:14:50 +Jonathan_Marsh 14:18:59 youenn has joined #ws-desc 14:22:33 (location: Rennes. 14-18 November) 14:26:23 confirmed for 14-17 14:26:32 18, waiting for Youenn 14:27:44 http://www.mont-saint-michel.net/ 14:27:44 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Michael%27s_Mount 14:28:33 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mont_Saint_Michel 14:33:01 -Plh 14:33:03 -Canon 14:33:04 -Jonathan_Marsh 14:33:06 -TonyR 14:33:08 WS_DescWG(WSDL)10:00AM has ended 14:33:09 Attendees were TonyR, Canon, Plh, Jonathan_Marsh 14:33:38 zakim, this will be ws-desc 14:33:38 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, TonyR 14:33:50 zakim, this will be wsdwg 14:33:50 ok, TonyR; I see WS_DescWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 27 minutes 14:50:47 alewis has joined #ws-desc 14:57:08 charlton has joined #ws-desc 14:57:09 charltonb has joined #ws-desc 14:58:39 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has now started 14:58:46 +[IPcaller] 14:58:53 charltonb has left #ws-desc 14:59:29 Zakim, [IPcaller] is charlton 14:59:29 +charlton; got it 14:59:31 Vivek has joined #ws-desc 15:00:07 +Jonathan_Marsh 15:00:10 -charlton 15:00:12 +charlton 15:00:14 +??P20 15:00:20 zakim, ?? is me 15:00:20 +TonyR; got it 15:00:28 +Vivek_Pandey 15:00:32 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:00:32 On the phone I see charlton, Jonathan_Marsh, TonyR, Vivek_Pandey 15:00:50 Allen has joined #ws-desc 15:01:34 +Tom_Jordahl 15:01:45 TomJ has joined #ws-desc 15:01:58 +Plh 15:02:13 +Amelia_Lewis 15:02:33 pauld has joined #ws-desc 15:02:55 +Gilbert_Pilz 15:02:59 +??P33 15:03:05 zakim, ??P33 is Allen 15:03:05 +Allen; got it 15:03:16 gpilz has joined #ws-desc 15:05:10 JacekK has joined #ws-desc 15:05:48 +JacekK 15:07:16 Scribe: Tom Jordahl 15:07:20 Scribe: TomJ 15:07:38 Topic: Approval of minutes 15:07:47 +GlenD 15:07:58 no comments or corrections to minutes of last week - APPROVED 15:08:05 Topic: Action Items 15:08:18 GlenD has joined #ws-desc 15:09:21 discussion about Glens action item 15:09:24 +Canon 15:09:57 Roberto has joined #ws-desc 15:10:32 +Roberto_Chinnici 15:10:45 +Paul_Downey 15:11:35 Jonathan completed his 15:11:46 Retiring MEP usage item for all 15:11:59 Topic: Administrivia 15:12:17 jjm has joined #ws-desc 15:12:36 Jonathan: Implementors meeting report - Renn for interop, Nov 14-18, 2006 15:13:26 Jonathan: 9-12 participants, possible problem with location on Sat the 18th 15:15:06 Jonathan: not as much progress as we want, so hope that interop will move things along 15:15:18 Topic: Future telcons 15:15:49 Agenda is getting short, next week - yes. But other weeks as "as needed" 15:15:58 Implementors calls will continue weekly 15:16:14 Topic: Features "at risk" 15:16:21 Continued from last week 15:16:37 Features and Properties 15:17:16 Jonathan: Where are we at? MTOM might be a user, any progress on that? 15:18:39 might be able to extend SOAP module to include MTOM 15:19:06 Glen: SOAP module without properties isn't very useful 15:20:49 Jonathan: should this be a seperate issue? 15:21:38 Glen: SOAP module today relies on F&P. So we need to either remove it, explain that config isn't in WSDL, or create a new config method 15:22:27 Glen: module syntax without properties isn't really worth keeping 15:22:42 Jonathan: SOAP module was marked at risk... 15:22:47 s/was/was NOT/ 15:23:39 Jonathan: What about original MTOM issue? 15:24:06 Youenn: could reuse the policy syntax 15:26:06 discussion about how we can enhance the MTOM syntax 15:27:18 ominous silence as we think about leaving F&P in or hacking up other parts of the spec 15:28:19 Jonathan: If we remove F&P, we will need a proposal on how to handle MTOM 15:31:22 http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-primer-20060327/#adv-MTOM 15:31:50 Jonathan: Does the removal of F&P depend on replacing the ability to engage MTOM 15:32:07 Glen: I would like to see that done 15:32:59 jjm: I would like to see a proposal first 15:33:20 Any voluteers for a creating a proposal? 15:33:38 {true|false} 15:35:02 Youenn: will try, but on vacation next week 15:35:42 ACTION: Youenn to propose an alternative syntax for MTOM if F&P is removed 15:36:21 Topic: Features "at risk" - URI replacement in HTTP 15:36:57 Jonathan: functionality of URI replace at risk, but no evidence that it will be any less implemented than the rest of the binding. 15:37:19 Jonathan: Going to remove this from the agenda for now. 15:37:44 Still begs the question if we will get any HTTP biding implemented 15:37:58 Topic: Features "at risk" - "extra" MEPS 15:38:21 Jonathan; We talked about this last week, any further thoughts on removing them? 15:38:50 concesus seems to still be to remove them 15:39:16 Jonathan: Any objection to letting the editors factor out a Note with the MEPS? 15:39:30 Amy volunteers to do the work 15:39:49 Topic: RDS last call issues 15:40:13 zakim, who is making noise? 15:40:23 TonyR, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 14 (67%), Jonathan_Marsh (76%), JacekK (4%), GlenD (4%) 15:40:35 ACTION: Editors to factor the "extra" MEPS out of the specification (Part 2) and make a new NOTE 15:41:40 s/RDS/RDF/ 15:42:12 Issue 289 - what kind of documents do we want to publish? 15:43:18 Jack: handle that last 15:43:35 Issue 291 - Connicalized (C14n) should be used. 15:43:42 Jack: Yes 15:44:06 Issue 292 - more c14n 15:44:16 Jack: Yes, example in email. 15:44:20 s/Connicalized/Canonicalized/ 15:45:27 Issue 293 - clarify the normitive text 15:45:53 issue 294 - Class of products 15:46:09 Jack: well will add some more info to the text 15:46:29 issue 295 - RFC 2119 keywords 15:46:52 s/normitive/normative 15:47:28 Jack: will soften or capitalize the text as appropriate 15:48:17 Issue 296 - no conformance section 15:48:57 Jack: doesn't seem necessary for a conformance section, we will add text to calrify 15:49:25 Jonathan: wouldn't someone say they conform to the RDF spec? 15:49:42 Jack: well, maybe. We can add something 15:50:12 ACTION: Marsh to suggest some generic conformance text 15:50:59 Issue 297 - Generic Extension Mechanism 15:51:27 Jack: Not sure what the issue is, will contact to get clarification 15:51:52 ACTION: Jack to follow up with Karl Dubost to get info about RDF issue 297 15:52:30 Issue 298 - Editorial 15:52:45 Jack: will take them under advisement 15:53:43 RESOLUTION: Close RDF issues 291-298 with actions as discussed 15:53:56 RESOLVED: Close RDF issues 291-298 with actions as discussed 15:54:22 Jonathan: When so you expect to have these edits done? 15:54:45 Jack: End of October seems like a good target for next draft (or LC) 15:56:03 Topic: CR64 - WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments 15:56:53 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR064 15:57:27 Editorial comments - refer them to the editors 15:58:38 RESOLVED: CR64 is sent to the editors 16:00:14 Topic: CR65 - More WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments 16:00:30 RESOLVED: Close and send to the editors as CR64 16:01:04 Topic: Issue CR078 - XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to 16:01:14 s/to/to XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to 16:01:16 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR078 16:02:43 Amy: Not convinced we need to do anything to advance this use case. 16:03:18 Amy: don't see an easily portable way to deal with one particular Schema language 16:06:48 Jonathan: Proposal to close with now action 16:06:52 s/now/no/ 16:06:59 Any objections? 16:07:21 No objections 16:07:50 RESOLVED: Close CR78 with no action, Jonathan to compose a reply with details 16:08:16 Skip CR80 16:08:41 Topic: Issue CR21 - WSDL operation safety 16:09:02 Issue from the TAG, take a look at it once we are much closer to interop. 16:09:10 No other business? 16:09:11 lets adjourn :-) 16:09:23 Adjourned 16:09:30 -Gilbert_Pilz 16:09:32 -Jonathan_Marsh 16:09:33 -Plh 16:09:34 -Canon 16:09:36 -JacekK 16:09:37 -GlenD 16:09:38 regrets for next week, at a F2F 16:09:38 -Allen 16:09:39 -Amelia_Lewis 16:09:40 -Roberto 16:09:42 -TonyR 16:09:43 -Vivek_Pandey 16:09:45 -Tom_Jordahl 16:09:47 -Paul_Downey 16:09:58 -charlton 16:09:59 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has ended 16:10:00 pauld has left #ws-desc 16:10:01 Attendees were charlton, Jonathan_Marsh, TonyR, Vivek_Pandey, Tom_Jordahl, Plh, Amelia_Lewis, Gilbert_Pilz, Allen, JacekK, GlenD, Canon, Roberto, Paul_Downey 16:11:23 alewis has left #ws-desc 16:12:08 TomJ has left #ws-desc 16:16:04 TonyR has left #ws-desc 16:53:32 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:53:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 16:53:51 RRSAgent, set log world 16:53:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:53:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 16:54:31 Meeting: WS Description WG telcon 16:54:36 Chair: Jonathan 16:55:37 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:55:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 17:01:27 plh has left #ws-desc 17:56:07 Zakim has left #ws-desc