IRC log of grddl-wg on 2006-09-27
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:01:16 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #grddl-wg
- 15:01:16 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/09/27-grddl-wg-irc
- 15:01:28 [FabienGandon]
- FabienGandon has joined #grddl-wg
- 15:01:29 [DanC]
- Zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda
- 15:01:29 [Zakim]
- working on it, DanC
- 15:01:32 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-09-27T11:00-0400
- 15:01:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 added
- 15:01:44 [Zakim]
- agenda+ publication schedule
- 15:01:50 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 added
- 15:01:58 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Discussion of Primer Document
- 15:02:06 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 added
- 15:02:14 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Review of Use Cases document, reviewing actions from last meeting
- 15:02:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 added
- 15:02:28 [Zakim]
- agenda+ GRDDL Spec: [#issue-base-param]
- 15:02:32 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 added
- 15:02:34 [Zakim]
- agenda+ [#issue-output-formats] which output formats should GRDDL support?
- 15:02:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 added
- 15:02:42 [Zakim]
- agenda+ [#issue-mt-ns]
- 15:02:46 [Zakim]
- agendum 7 added
- 15:02:50 [Zakim]
- done reading agenda, DanC
- 15:03:13 [DanC]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:03:32 [Zakim]
- sorry, DanC, I don't know what conference this is
- 15:03:38 [HarryH]
- Zakim, this is grddl
- 15:03:42 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see FabienGandon, RRSAgent, Zakim, chimezie, HarryH, iand, DanC
- 15:03:46 [Zakim]
- ok, HarryH; that matches SW_GRDDL()11:00AM
- 15:04:02 [Zakim]
- +DanC
- 15:04:04 [FabienGandon]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 15:04:08 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ??P2, Murray_Maloney, ??P0, FabienGandon, Chimezie_Ogbuji, DanC
- 15:04:16 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see FabienGandon, RRSAgent, Zakim, chimezie, HarryH, iand, DanC
- 15:04:30 [DanC]
- Zakim, mute ??P0 temporarily
- 15:04:36 [Zakim]
- ??P0 should now be muted
- 15:04:36 [DanC]
- Zakim, ??P2 is HarryH
- 15:04:38 [Zakim]
- +HarryH; got it
- 15:04:38 [HarryH]
- Zakim, ??p2 is HarryH
- 15:04:40 [Zakim]
- I already had ??P2 as HarryH, HarryH
- 15:04:46 [Zakim]
- ??P0 should now be unmuted again
- 15:04:55 [DanC]
- Zakim, ??P0 is IanD
- 15:05:00 [DanC]
- Zakim, take up item 1
- 15:05:06 [Zakim]
- +IanD; got it
- 15:05:08 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-09-27T11:00-0400" taken up
- 15:05:17 [DanC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-grddl-wg-minutes minutes 20 Sep
- 15:05:23 [HarryH]
- Chair: HarryH
- 15:05:26 [HarryH]
- Scribe: Fabien
- 15:05:58 [ryager]
- ryager has joined #grddl-wg
- 15:05:59 [FabienGandon]
- Regrets : Rachel and Ben
- 15:06:38 [Zakim]
- +Rachel_Yager
- 15:07:18 [FabienGandon]
- SW coordination group is ok with drafts of primer and use case first and then the specs.
- 15:07:33 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:07:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "publication schedule" taken up
- 15:07:37 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:07:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 was just opened, HarryH
- 15:07:49 [HarryH]
- Zakim, close item 2
- 15:07:49 [Zakim]
- agendum 2, publication schedule, closed
- 15:07:50 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 15:07:51 [Zakim]
- 3. Discussion of Primer Document
- 15:07:52 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:07:52 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Discussion of Primer Document" taken up
- 15:08:35 [FabienGandon]
- Primer: Ian's access setup but to be tested.
- 15:09:38 [FabienGandon]
- Ian is happy with the comments and need some more time to integrate them.
- 15:10:04 [briansuda]
- briansuda has joined #grddl-wg
- 15:10:11 [FabienGandon]
- Harry is ok to go to draft without all the example as long as they are included in next version
- 15:11:49 [FabienGandon]
- Harry: At least simple sample files for input and output should be available on the web.
- 15:12:16 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:12:52 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie wouldn't say the primer is ready to ship.
- 15:13:32 [FabienGandon]
- A diagram would help explain the foaf part
- 15:13:33 [DanC]
- (I'm torn... you never get a 2nd chance to make a 1st impression... but I really want to ship something in September. hmm.)
- 15:14:22 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie : need to explain the role of XFN in the example too.
- 15:14:41 [chimezie]
- The main parts that weren't clear to me was the use of XFN and the role of 'spidering'
- 15:16:20 [FabienGandon]
- Murray: Can we have the use case first then the primer then the spec this would give us some time and let people absorb the different docs
- 15:17:06 [FabienGandon]
- Ian: I agree the primer could you some additional time.
- 15:17:25 [FabienGandon]
- Harry: could we setup a comment list?
- 15:18:04 [DanC]
- ideas: grddl-talk, public-grddl-comments
- 15:18:23 [iand]
- it needs more time, but i think we should publish primer sooner not later and get more public feedback
- 15:18:49 [DanC]
- perhaps public-grddl-talk
- 15:19:04 [DanC]
- perhaps public-grddl-forum
- 15:19:46 [HarryH]
- perhaps public-grddl-comments
- 15:19:53 [DanC]
- ACTION DanC: set up public-grddl-comments
- 15:19:54 [FabienGandon]
- ACTION: DanC to create the mailing list public-grddl-comments
- 15:20:06 [DanC]
- action -1
- 15:20:30 [HarryH]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:20:30 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Review of Use Cases document, reviewing actions from last meeting" taken up
- 15:21:13 [FabienGandon]
- Murray: sent a review on the vocabulary.
- 15:21:33 [DanC]
- 1.33 glossary http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm
- 15:23:42 [FabienGandon]
- Murray: the introduction I wrote for the specs could be used in other docs.
- 15:23:55 [chimezie]
- both primer and usecase documents have different audiences so abstracts/intros would expected to be different in what they are tryin to communicate
- 15:25:49 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: you need both teh abstract and an introduction.
- 15:26:36 [FabienGandon]
- FG: for the time being I only maintain the abstract, if we need an intro we could get it from the last version of the abstract.
- 15:26:53 [DanC]
- (abstract I just wrote is in 1.94 http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec )
- 15:28:07 [FabienGandon]
- Murray: the introduction I wrote plus the one of the primer plus a simple example would be a good introduction far whome three docs.
- 15:28:32 [FabienGandon]
- s/far whome/ for all
- 15:29:03 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie: the audience matters in the introduction
- 15:29:47 [DanC]
- yes, "A number of documents contain data that could be valuable if they were automatically accessible." is good.
- 15:30:16 [FabienGandon]
- Harry: I like Murray's intro; I don't want knowledge representation to appear in the intro
- 15:30:52 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: want to get it out in September but seems we still some more discussions
- 15:33:18 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie: a common abstract could have an added value but the current versions are not too far from the quality to be shipped
- 15:34:36 [chimezie]
- My problem with not using knowledge representation (or something similar) is that metadata doesn't really say anything.
- 15:35:05 [HarryH]
- I believe I avoided both the words 'metadata' and 'knowledge represetnation' in my revised wording :)
- 15:36:02 [DanC]
- . ACTION DanC: coordinate edits on the abstracts and intros thru Friday noon chicago/boston time
- 15:36:33 [FabienGandon]
- ACTION: DanC to coordinate edits on the abstracts and intros thru Friday noon chicago/boston time
- 15:37:02 [FabienGandon]
- Harry: uses cases should be published ASAP.
- 15:37:29 [DanC]
- PROPOSED: to publish use cases http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm 1.33 + edits as agreed by 2 of DanC, Ian, Fabien, Murray by Friday noon chicago time
- 15:38:27 [HarryH]
- my take on use-case intro in this e-mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/0164.html
- 15:38:48 [DanC]
- so RESOLVED.
- 15:39:57 [FabienGandon]
- Ryager: I missed the date for the review.
- 15:40:35 [FabienGandon]
- Ryager: I read the version of saturday and I approved it. I will re-read the next version.
- 15:40:45 [HarryH]
- Zakim, who's on the phone
- 15:40:45 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'who's on the phone', HarryH
- 15:41:29 [HarryH]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 15:41:29 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see HarryH, Murray_Maloney, IanD, FabienGandon, Chimezie_Ogbuji, DanC, Rachel_Yager, [IPcaller]
- 15:41:31 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see briansuda, ryager, FabienGandon, RRSAgent, Zakim, chimezie, HarryH, iand, DanC
- 15:41:50 [DanC]
- the PROPOSED/RESOLVED above is not quite right.
- 15:41:55 [FabienGandon]
- Murray: discuss the vocabulary choice
- 15:42:35 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie: no strong feeling on this
- 15:43:04 [FabienGandon]
- Ryager: the intro reads strange.
- 15:43:15 [chimezie]
- my argument for terminology as is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/0178.html
- 15:43:16 [FabienGandon]
- Danc: we are changing the intro.
- 15:44:40 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: possible candidates: GRDDL-candidate doc, GRDDL source document, others? What are the preferences?
- 15:45:10 [FabienGandon]
- Harry let's go arround the table.
- 15:45:45 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: Processor ok, GRDDL(aware) agent, source document
- 15:45:46 [DanC]
- I prefer GRDDL-aware agent/client, source document, GRDDL transformation
- 15:45:59 [FabienGandon]
- Ian: like source document
- 15:46:02 [DanC]
- I meant to say I *don't* like processor.
- 15:46:25 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie: like the doc as it is
- 15:46:48 [HarryH]
- Harry: client rather than agent
- 15:47:31 [FabienGandon]
- Harry: source doc ok, processor fine, transformation ok
- 15:48:00 [DanC]
- FG: I hear "GRDDL client"...
- 15:48:07 [DanC]
- MM: well, add "aware".
- 15:48:31 [DanC]
- FG: and "source document" seems ok to me
- 15:48:34 [chimezie]
- Agent has a specific connotation, client is so open-ended that is says nothing
- 15:48:39 [chimezie]
- other than it operates over a network
- 15:49:25 [DanC]
- MM: how about [missed] and "result document"?
- 15:49:40 [DanC]
- CHI: I don't like "agent"... [missed some]
- 15:50:03 [DanC]
- MM: "user agent" is the neutral term in place of "browser"
- 15:51:18 [DanC]
- FG: source document, GRDDL transformation seem clear...
- 15:51:52 [DanC]
- HH: I don't hear consensus around GRDDL processor/agent/client... "aware"...
- 15:52:06 [DanC]
- DC: whereas it doesn't affect running code, I'm happy to delegate to the editor, i.e. have FG pick
- 15:54:12 [DanC]
- HH: or maybe "agent" is the preference?
- 15:54:27 [FabienGandon]
- My opinion: "source document", "GRDDL transformation", "GRDDL agent"
- 15:54:56 [FabienGandon]
- Consensus: "source document", "GRDDL transformation", "GRDDL-aware agent"
- 15:55:01 [DanC]
- HH: so "grddl aware agent", "source document", "GRDDL transformation"?
- 15:55:12 [HarryH]
- result document?
- 15:56:04 [DanC]
- (no objection to "grddl aware agent", "source document", "GRDDL transformation")
- 15:56:14 [DanC]
- MM: and "result document"?
- 15:57:32 [DanC]
- HH: any objection to s/GRDDL result document/result document/?
- 15:57:55 [DanC]
- RY: I don't like "GRDDL result document"
- 15:58:03 [HarryH]
- RESOLVED: vocabulary is "grddl-aware agent" "source document" "GRDDL transformation" "result document"
- 15:58:06 [FabienGandon]
- ACTION: Fabien to use "source document", "result document", "GRDDL transformation", "GRDDL-aware agent"
- 15:58:41 [FabienGandon]
- Harry: consensus about the rest of the doc?
- 15:58:51 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: pictures.
- 15:59:10 [DanC]
- MM: I just meant that the edits should include the pictures as well as the text.
- 16:00:10 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie: objections from Danny on wiki pictures and xform picture.
- 16:00:56 [DanC]
- FG: I'm working on integrating a figure suggestion from chime
- 16:01:20 [DanC]
- PROPOSED: to publish use cases http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm 1.33 + edits as agreed by 2 of DanC, Ian, Fabien, Murray by Friday noon chicago time
- 16:01:29 [FabienGandon]
- ACTION: Fabien to integrate Chimezie's picture about XForms
- 16:02:55 [DanC]
- PROPOSED: to publish use cases http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm 1.33 + edits to introduction, glossary, and XForms diagram as agreed by 2 of DanC, Ian, Fabien, Murray by Friday noon chicago time
- 16:02:57 [FabienGandon]
- HarryH: try to avoid changing everything before releasing
- 16:03:53 [FabienGandon]
- Murray: I second the proposal
- 16:04:02 [FabienGandon]
- No objection.
- 16:04:06 [DanC]
- so RESOLVED.
- 16:06:14 [FabienGandon]
- HarryH: do we release the primer on friday?
- 16:07:43 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: if we are happy with the inro and abstract? can we ship the primer too? I would like to ship both the primer and uses case docs at the same time.
- 16:10:03 [FabienGandon]
- ACTION: Fabien to try to get a diagram on the XFN part of the primer before friday.
- 16:12:12 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie: we need more details to understand the XFN and make the diagram.
- 16:12:21 [DanC]
- noodling on proposal: PROPOSED: to release GRDDL Primer as a W3C WD, contingent on OK from Harry and Chime on XFN-related edits.
- 16:14:49 [DanC]
- MM: the signposting [?] is misleading. I'd really like the section headings changed as I suggested.
- 16:15:21 [FabienGandon]
- IanD: I don't understand what is misleading.
- 16:17:11 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: may be we are asking the reader to store too much before getting to the punch line.
- 16:19:45 [FabienGandon]
- MM: it is not a big pb i.e. we shouldn't stop publishing because of that.
- 16:19:54 [DanC]
- 6180 2006-09-27 13:29:57Z
- 16:20:37 [DanC]
- PROPOSED: to release GRDDL Primer v 6180 + edits to abstract, intro agreed by IanD+DanC as a W3C WD, contingent on OK from Harry and Chime on XFN-related edits.
- 16:21:21 [FabienGandon]
- Chimezie: I second.
- 16:21:31 [DanC]
- so RESOLVED.
- 16:23:15 [FabienGandon]
- DanC: people on critical path are DanC, Chimezie, Ian, Harry, Murray, Fabien
- 16:24:08 [ryager]
- I've to run. See you!
- 16:24:21 [Zakim]
- -Rachel_Yager
- 16:24:35 [FabienGandon]
- HarryH: could we check with the coordination group.
- 16:24:56 [DanC]
- target timing: request to webmaster Fri, title page date Mon 2 Oct, publication on 2, 3, 4, or 5 Oct.
- 16:24:58 [Zakim]
- -Murray_Maloney
- 16:25:08 [Zakim]
- -Chimezie_Ogbuji
- 16:25:10 [Zakim]
- -IanD
- 16:25:14 [Zakim]
- -DanC
- 16:25:16 [Zakim]
- -HarryH
- 16:25:20 [HarryH]
- Gotta run!
- 16:25:20 [Zakim]
- -briansuda
- 16:25:25 [Zakim]
- -FabienGandon
- 16:25:26 [Zakim]
- SW_GRDDL()11:00AM has ended
- 16:25:27 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Murray_Maloney, FabienGandon, Chimezie_Ogbuji, DanC, HarryH, IanD, Rachel_Yager, briansuda
- 16:26:25 [DanC]
- * chimezie gives regrets for next week
- 16:26:31 [DanC]
- me too. I'm at a TAG meeting.
- 16:26:38 [FabienGandon]
- rrsagent, please set these logs public
- 16:28:19 [FabienGandon]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 16:28:19 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/09/27-grddl-wg-minutes.html FabienGandon
- 16:29:57 [FabienGandon]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 16:29:57 [Zakim]
- sorry, FabienGandon, I don't know what conference this is
- 17:14:08 [briansuda]
- briansuda has joined #grddl-wg
- 18:40:07 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #grddl-wg